Digest for rec.sport.pro-wrestling@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 11 topics

Friday, May 31, 2019

"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <Chadweasel@zoho.com>: Jun 01 01:06AM

]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> wrote in
>> he can find an account to mooch. I'm sure the asskicking he put on
>> people the last time hasn't been forgotten.
 
> Wow. You predicted the return of Lou Proctor to within 6 hours.
 
Lou was overdue. I'm waiting for my role model "Scott Oof" to reappear.
 
> You've got the 'Weasel eating out of the palm of your hand...
 
I consider that quite an accomplishment considering I have to get through
multiple layers of fakefiling, cowardice and denial.

 
> Chad has never been to Vermont in his life. I know this since
> Greyhound do not even offer a direct Salt Lake City to Vermont
> route...
 
Shucks and drat. I had counted on a Vermont Rasslin' and Spinkicking
promotion headed by Chad. You know, just like the one in Idaho he claims
to have sold. Without Chad, the Idaho promotion seems to have disappeared
like it never existed at all. Funny, eh?
Phil Dercucci <phildercucci@zoho.com>: Jun 01 02:31AM

]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> wrote in
 
> Welcome back Lou. Where have you been for the past year? What
> brings you back? And how long have you been using Phil Notchad
> Dercucci's PC and anti-virus software?
 
AVG has a 10.1% worldwide market share.
 
Vous êtes un menteur connu, sociopathe.
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Phil Dercucci <phildercucci@zoho.com>: Jun 01 02:28AM

]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> wrote in news:mn.0a567e36d9ff7327.136487
 
> diagnosed sociopath
 
La première étape consiste à admettre que vous avez un problème, pédé.
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Phil Dercucci <phildercucci@zoho.com>: Jun 01 02:26AM

]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> wrote in
 
>>> Come on Philip - we all know a $99 PC when we see one!
 
>> How did you get anywhere in life when you know so little?
 
> Just lucky I guess. People like me for some reason.
 
You obviously have no family or friends. You wouldn't be here so
often if you did.
Bl0atGermsL0bstr <newl0bstr@aol.com>: May 31 05:43PM -0700

how wuz hat putato plaed? did bil kulin tos a putato at the kuntestintz? tat wuld b a funi.
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 05:46PM -0700

On 2019-05-31 5:43 p.m., Bl0atGermsL0bstr wrote:
> how wuz hat putato plaed? did bil kulin tos a putato at the kuntestintz? tat wuld b a funi.
 
yes
Bl0atGermsL0bstr <newl0bstr@aol.com>: May 31 06:51PM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 8:46:37 PM UTC-4, % wrote:
> On 2019-05-31 5:43 p.m., Bl0atGermsL0bstr wrote:
> > how wuz hat putato plaed? did bil kulin tos a putato at the kuntestintz? tat wuld b a funi.
 
> yes
 
i thot so. fank yu. wen evin sumwun hu izint a fan uv gaim showz sez it wuz, tat pruvez it.
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 07:15PM -0700

On 2019-05-31 6:51 p.m., Bl0atGermsL0bstr wrote:
>>> how wuz hat putato plaed? did bil kulin tos a putato at the kuntestintz? tat wuld b a funi.
 
>> yes
 
> i thot so. fank yu. wen evin sumwun hu izint a fan uv gaim showz sez it wuz, tat pruvez it.
 
right
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 06:42PM -0700

That's wonderful news
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 07:15PM -0700

On 2019-05-31 6:42 p.m., robert stickler wrote:
> That's wonderful news
 
he's in an induced coma now
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 06:42PM -0700

What's for supper?
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 07:14PM -0700

On 2019-05-31 6:42 p.m., robert stickler wrote:
> What's for supper?
 
french fries and shrimp
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 06:43PM -0700

He does what % says
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 07:14PM -0700

On 2019-05-31 6:43 p.m., robert stickler wrote:
> He does what % says
 
when you're the me you need guidance
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 06:43PM -0700

9;45 pm
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 07:13PM -0700

On 2019-05-31 6:43 p.m., robert stickler wrote:
> 9;45 pm
 
7:13:pm
madeforzyngagames@yahoo.com: May 31 05:59PM -0700

another possibility that % owns a gun
]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con>: Jun 01 11:02AM +1000

> another possibility that % owns a gun
 
Please Alex, I beg of you.
 
Leave the entertainment to the flair players...
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 06:35PM -0700

> another possibility that % owns a gun
 
3 of them
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 06:36PM -0700

>> another possibility that % owns a gun
 
> Please Alex, I beg of you.
 
> Leave the entertainment to the flair players...
 
 
let him ramble it just shows ,
his desire for my heat seeking love missile
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 06:41PM -0700

The shooter was a liberal
madeforzyngagames@yahoo.com: May 31 06:27PM -0700

that % is an illegal immigrant
% <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 06:35PM -0700

> that % is an illegal immigrant
 
it's true i don't hide it
]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con>: Jun 01 10:58AM +1000

What are the odds that Chadwick completed that Law Degree he started
nine years ago?
 
P.S. By "period of abstinence", I am referring to Chadwick's three
month psychologist-enforced absence from Usenet, not his ongoing two
decade long expulsion from consentual contact with all things
vaginal...
"Scott Oaf - (I'm really Chudnozzle)" <Chadweasel@zoho.com>: Jun 01 01:16AM

]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> wrote in news:mn.0a927e36f8f2298f.136487
> month psychologist-enforced absence from Usenet, not his ongoing two
> decade long expulsion from consentual contact with all things
> vaginal...
 
I believe he was working on his VaporStrats, pay stubs and spin kicking
skills. No time for lawskool, Zimmerman.
 
Chadweasel's theme song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZDl_R8Zp2E&feature=youtu.be&t=59
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.pro-wrestling+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Sažetak za hr.rec.sport.nogomet@googlegroups.com - 1 ažuriranje u 1 tema

branko 10 <branko@ck.t-com.hr>: May 31 06:09PM +0200

Omiš - Hrvatska 0-5
Golovi (NovaTV, HD)
https://dai.ly/x79xg4n
Primili ste ovaj sažetak jer ste se pretplatili na ažuriranja te grupe. Postavke možete promijeniti na stranici članstva u grupi.
Da biste odjavili pretplatu na ovu grupu i prestali primati njezine e-poruke, pošaljite e-poruku na adresu hr.rec.sport.nogomet+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 7 topics

bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 02:26PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 10:48:08 -0700 (PDT), kaennorsing
>> back to BOAT vs GOAT - all over again.
 
>> bob
 
>Total numbers are what matter most.
 
to you. but i'm not disagreeing. others with agendas may.
 
> We can give bones points for concentrated dominance. Eg. Fed's 5 year fast court dominance at W/USO, Djoker's 4 slams in a row (2x?), Rafa's FO/clay streaks etc...
>But that's also double counting. Besides, who decides what dominance measures count for what? Not objective at all.
 
well, the objective measurement is fairly simple, slam winning %. by
that i mean how many slams won out of how many slams entered.
 
>Indeed extreme dominance argument work both ways: as true dominance or true clown field. We'll never agree.
>In the end you just add everything up and that's that.
 
i tend to agree.
 
bob
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 31 09:03PM +0200

>>But that's also double counting. Besides, who decides what dominance measures count for what? Not objective at all.
 
> well, the objective measurement is fairly simple, slam winning %. by
> that i mean how many slams won out of how many slams entered.
 
 
So you enter 1, you win it and we should praise your 100%?
 
 
I don't mind it as that's just a stat.
But then we use other stats too to get a fuller picture.
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
MBDunc <michaelb@dnainternet.net>: May 31 01:37PM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 9:26:08 PM UTC+3, bob wrote:
> well, the objective measurement is fairly simple, slam winning %. by
> that i mean how many slams won out of how many slams entered.
 
Open era Borg tops this stat with 11/27.
 
Then there is Budge who won his last 6 slams he played and won smt. like 99 of his last played 100 matches until turning pro.
 
.mikko
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 02:26PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 09:43:40 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
>> of the party!
 
>> bob
 
>Well I am not a Democrat.
 
lol
 
>And I have never been PC. You got this completely wrong, boobs. But I do think most of the Republicunts are indeed cunts.
 
which makes you a democrat.
 
bob
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 12:15PM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-5, bob wrote:
 
> >And I have never been PC. You got this completely wrong, boobs. But I do think most of the Republicunts are indeed cunts.
 
> which makes you a democrat.
 
> bob
 
Not really, I am especially adept in identifying cunts. You are a big cunt for example. Fat, old, greedy rich bastards who want to avoid taxes tend to go Republicunt. It is a fact. You can chose to deny it. But that is the truth. Democrats are no saints though. They chose to exploit minority like black and Hispanics to get few more votes. They are sneaky but not openly cunty like the Republicans.
 
There is a concept called being an independent. I am one of them. You know many Americans are independents? It may be news to you. But it is indeed, true.
Calimero <calimero377@gmx.de>: May 31 01:36PM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 9:15:44 PM UTC+2, soccerfan777 wrote:
 
> > which makes you a democrat.
 
> > bob
 
> Not really, I am especially adept in identifying cunts. You are a big cunt for example. Fat, old, greedy rich bastards who want to avoid taxes tend to go Republicunt. It is a fact. ...
 
It is a fact that rich people vote DemocRat. Plus blacks, at least those who have never left the DemocRat plantation.
 
 
Max
 
 

"Democrats fear Barr, you can smell it."
(Washington Post, May 2nd, 2019)
Manco <musefan2009@gmail.com>: May 31 01:10PM -0700

Casper Ruud trains at Rafael Nadal Academy, that's why. Uncle Toni scouting report on Federer to Rafa - hit big spin to his backhand, repeat 1000x. Same as the previous 30 scouting reports.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 01:15PM -0700

> hit big spin to his backhand, repeat 1000x. Same as the previous 30 scouting reports.
 
It didn't work in the last 4-5 times they played. Federer is hitting more topspin on his backhand than he did with smaller racquet.
I think Federer may surprise Nadal with the power on both wings. Still early, but we will see.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 11:25AM -0700

Lol good point.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 31 08:25PM +0200


>> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
>> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
> Pretty lame to be playing 5 setters though. Look at Federer. At his age, he is still winning in straights on his worst surface.
 
Sure.
 
But regarding Federer, it's probably misleading to use the term
"his worst surface" for him, when he's the guy with highest
minimum mpoat score. (shares it with Djokovic).
 
You could perhaps claim he's second to Djokovic in this category,
but only because Djokovic record on other surfaces is inferior to
Federer's thus making his more balanced.
 
 
Mpoat
 
Federer - Djokovic - Nadal - Sampras
 
AO: 41 - 38 - 24 - 18
FO: 25 - 25 - 55 - 5
W: 49 - 31 - 21 - 38
US: 38 - 36 - 25 - 37
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 12:17PM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 1:25:22 PM UTC-5, *skriptis wrote:
 
> Sure.
 
> But regarding Federer, it's probably misleading to use the term
> "his worst surface" for him,
 
 
It is still his worst surface, dumbass. Steffi's worst surface was clay and she won 6 FO. Everyone has a worst surface. Its the surface you are least comfortable with. For example, you are least comfortable with sanity.
 
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 12:20PM -0700

> It is still his worst surface, dumbass. Steffi's worst surface was clay and she won 6 FO. Everyone has a worst surface. Its the surface you are least comfortable with. For example, you are least comfortable with sanity.
 
Federer was in 4 or 5 FO finals, losing to the grinding goat of all time.
Manco <musefan2009@gmail.com>: May 31 01:09PM -0700

All that unnecessary 5th sets against journeymen because of his non-threat serve. This stat is one of the most deceptive in tennis history! Remember, all that matters in the end is GS titles. So even though Federer's 5 set record is cited as being 'mediocre', all that matters in the end is 20 GS titles.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 01:13PM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 2:20:43 PM UTC-5, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> > It is still his worst surface, dumbass. Steffi's worst surface was clay and she won 6 FO. Everyone has a worst surface. Its the surface you are least comfortable with. For example, you are least comfortable with sanity.
 
> Federer was in 4 or 5 FO finals, losing to the grinding goat of all time.
 
Did you read my response and see my comment on Steffi?
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 02:27PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 12:45:17 -0400 (EDT), PeteWasLucky
>if they think Biden will do any better than Hillary.i don't think biden has a chance. i think he had a chance in 2016.we'll see.bob
 
>You don't think he has a chance or you think he doesn't have a
> chance? :)
 
i wrote it in english waleed.
 
bob
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 11:32AM -0700

> i wrote it in english waleed.
 
I did write it in English too.
 
Which one do you prefer? You can answer the question. You are an engineer, correct?
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 31 11:38AM -0700

On Friday, 31 May 2019 19:32:29 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> > i wrote it in english waleed.
 
> I did write it in English too.
 
> Which one do you prefer? You can answer the question. You are an engineer, correct?
 
know you're a bit slow, but bob really did say it quite clearly.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 11:45AM -0700

> know you're a bit slow, but bob really did say it quite clearly
 
Does Bob pay you to clean his ass?
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 31 12:05PM -0700

On Friday, 31 May 2019 19:45:56 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> > know you're a bit slow, but bob really did say it quite clearly
 
> Does Bob pay you to clean his ass?
 
is a kind of torture thing people do in your country?
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 31 12:06PM -0700

On Friday, 31 May 2019 20:05:39 UTC+1, The Iceberg wrote:
> > > know you're a bit slow, but bob really did say it quite clearly
 
> > Does Bob pay you to clean his ass?
 
> is a kind of torture thing people do in your country?
 
that is sicko!
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 12:11PM -0700

> is a kind of torture thing people do in your country?
 
Looks like it if you make living cleaning Bob's and others' asses.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 12:12PM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 2:05:39 PM UTC-5, The Iceberg wrote:
> > > know you're a bit slow, but bob really did say it quite clearly
 
> > Does Bob pay you to clean his ass?
 
> is a kind of torture thing people do in your country?
 
Definitely the kind of torture that happens in Istanbul where you hail from. Are you still pissed that Obama sent troops to kill some of your Muslim brothers?
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 02:29PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 11:01:08 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>> >I like them in all shapes... except fat.
 
>> ?
 
>Talking about women... you tube light.
 
except fat ??
 
bob
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 12:10PM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 1:29:16 PM UTC-5, bob wrote:
 
> >Talking about women... you tube light.
 
> except fat ??
 
> bob
 
Are you stupid? No one can be this stupid.
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 02:28PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 10:30:32 -0700 (PDT), Calimero
 
>> last yr's USO will be remembered for decades!
 
>> bob
 
>Serena's third meltdown?
 
of course!
 
>No people tend to forget crimes and other misdemeanors.
 
nah
 
bob
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 11 topics

*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 31 08:00PM +0200

Nishikori already owns best 5th set record in the open era, with
today's win he further improves it.
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 11:07AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 1:00:22 PM UTC-5, *skriptis wrote:
> --
 
> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
Pretty lame to be playing 5 setters though. Look at Federer. At his age, he is still winning in straights on his worst surface.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 11:21AM -0700

> Nishikori already owns best 5th set record in the open era, with
today's win he further improves it.
 
He is the master of 5 sets because he plays them in first rounds against players he should beat in str8.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 09:30AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:24:04 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
 
> steffi had some chest, and halep was huge.
 
> totally flat=not for me.
 
> maybe a gay man likes it?
 
I like them in all shapes... except fat.
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:54PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 09:30:56 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>> totally flat=not for me.
 
>> maybe a gay man likes it?
 
>I like them in all shapes... except fat.
 
?
 
bob
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 11:01AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:54:55 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
 
> >> maybe a gay man likes it?
 
> >I like them in all shapes... except fat.
 
> ?
 
Talking about women... you tube light.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 31 06:29PM +0200

> think so.
 
> If you can keep winning a slam like eg Rafa at FO, then yes he did it
> for an insanely long period over the cream of the best players.
 
 
But that's different.
 
Rafa winning it year in year out is not longevity. It's excellence
as he's winning more than anyone else.
 
 
What's better? Winning two consecutive USO titles or winning two
but 10 years apart?
 
That's the real question.
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 09:30AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:27:08 AM UTC-5, *skriptis wrote:
 
> > I go with dominance. It makes more sense. I would rather go for a champion who was great day in day out (Graf) than someone who randomly popped in times and took advantage of a clown field (Serena).
 
> > That's why averaging the 7 best years of win-loss is the best measure for evaluating dominance. Anything less than a 7 is too less and anything more than 7 is too much IMO. Besides Borg, McEnroe and Wilander had 7 great years and then there is a huge drop off for McEnroe and Wilander and nothing for Borg (since he retired so young).
 
> Dumb post.
 
Quit describing yourself.
 
 
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:31PM -0400

On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 02:18:50 +1000, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>
wrote:
 
>think so.
 
>If you can keep winning a slam like eg Rafa at FO, then yes he did it
>for an insanely long period over the cream of the best players.
 
i agree about the field - if we want to go the "clown era" route, we
can for both men & women.
 
i was just saying, statistically, dominance VS achievement is what
we're talking about with % vs titles.
 
so who is "better" depends on if you prefer dominance or achievement.
 
 
for ex: who was the most dominant physicist? who achieved the most?
 
bob
kaennorsing <ljubitsis@hotmail.com>: May 31 10:48AM -0700

Op vrijdag 31 mei 2019 18:06:29 UTC+2 schreef bob:
> total slam count (or 7543 if you prefer) measures achievement. we're
> back to BOAT vs GOAT - all over again.
 
> bob
 
Total numbers are what matter most. We can give bones points for concentrated dominance. Eg. Fed's 5 year fast court dominance at W/USO, Djoker's 4 slams in a row (2x?), Rafa's FO/clay streaks etc...
 
But that's also double counting. Besides, who decides what dominance measures count for what? Not objective at all.
 
Indeed extreme dominance argument work both ways: as true dominance or true clown field. We'll never agree.
 
In the end you just add everything up and that's that.
undecided <costasz@gmail.com>: May 31 10:58AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 12:06:29 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
> total slam count (or 7543 if you prefer) measures achievement. we're
> back to BOAT vs GOAT - all over again.
 
> bob
 
I think they are equal. In most cases the outcomes depend on the opponents faced. Like in Fed's case, he was superior to the field until Nadal/Djoker showed and his winning profile changed.
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:10PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 12:50:16 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>> > Yes, to idiots.
 
>> Finally he admits he's WACIST!
 
>George Carlin was wacist too? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AckrIIZzYwI
 
maybe he was. you surely are, as you admit.
 
bob
Calimero <calimero377@gmx.de>: May 31 10:30AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 5:59:55 PM UTC+2, bob wrote:
> >Right, not even ONE.
 
> last yr's USO will be remembered for decades!
 
> bob
 
 
Serena's third meltdown?
No people tend to forget crimes and other misdemeanors.
 
 
Max
Calimero <calimero377@gmx.de>: May 31 10:27AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 9:46:08 AM UTC+2, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
> become President of the USA and we can engineer it. I will get all of
> Putin's team to buy in on this".
> -- Felix Sater
 
 
Pants down! Pants down!
Yes, that's the image I needed!!
Fits perfectly to the DemocRats and their media handmaidens at those glorious moments when Hillary lost in November 2016 or when the Mueller report came out with no Russia conspiracy or coordination!
Pants down for Clinton, Obama, the bad cops at DOJ/FBI and for CCN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo and other enemies of the people!!
 
 
Max
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 09:32AM -0700

Maybe a bagel for Gofin in the 4th.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 09:46AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:32:40 AM UTC-5, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> Maybe a bagel for Gofin in the 4th.
 
George is getting upset!
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:32PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>> trump had this little grin on his face. lol
 
>> bob
 
>Feel sad for the democrats. They have been had. I think Trump will completely whoop Biden in 2020. They are seriously deluded if they think Biden will do any better than Hillary.
 
i don't think biden has a chance. i think he had a chance in 2016.
we'll see.
 
bob
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 09:44AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:32:49 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
 
> i don't think biden has a chance. i think he had a chance in 2016.
> we'll see.
 
> bob
 
Nothing to see. Biden will get nominated. And it will be a landslide win for Trump. You can take it to the bank.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 12:45PM -0400

> On Fri, 31 May 2019 09:22:01 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777<zepfloyes@gmail.com> wrote:>On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 10:39:37 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:>> On Fri, 31 May 2019 04:49:48 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg>> <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> wrote:>> >> >This just too funny, the little demmies are literally flailing around about how the Mueller report is all finished and was a total NOTHING BURGER!>> >>> >https://www.westernjournal.com/nancy-pelosi-trump-crying-impeached/>> >House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California claimed Thursday that President Donald Trump ended a meeting with her the previous day because he was upset the House Democratic Caucus is not moving toward impeachment.>> >>> >HAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAAHHAAHA! LOL>> >> yes, this happened a few days ago - she said trump is literally>> "taunting us to impeach." >> >> trump had this little grin on his face. lol>> >> bob>>Feel sad for the democrats. They have been had. I think Trump will completely whoop Biden in 2020. They are seriously deluded if they think Biden will do any better than Hillary.i don't think biden has a chance. i think he had a chance in 2016.we'll see.bob
 
You don't think he has a chance or you think he doesn't have a
chance? :)
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
royberto99@gmail.com: May 31 09:44AM -0700

I hate watching tennis when hes on.....he drones on and laughs at himself. Never shuts up talking stupid trash. Im glad loads of others agree. Get him off. Hes worse than irritating.
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:32PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 08:32:49 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
>> as well as racist raj? :-)
 
>> bob
 
>How is that sexist? Have you grown a vagina these days?
 
you're not very PC for a democrat raj. AOC would have you thrown out
of the party!
 
bob
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 09:43AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:32:04 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
 
> you're not very PC for a democrat raj. AOC would have you thrown out
> of the party!
 
> bob
Well I am not a Democrat. And I have never been PC. You got this completely wrong, boobs. But I do think most of the Republicunts are indeed cunts.
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:34PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 18:03:32 +0200 (CEST), *skriptis
 
>Good question, but I think it increases prestige?
 
>Maybe in people's mind you stamp your authority much more if you
> win 8/8 than 8/16?
 
yes, but i'm not talking about 8/8. maybe 8/20, but you defended 3
times?
 
makes no difference to me.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:35PM -0400

On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 02:11:15 +1000, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> bob
 
>Me neither. If anything you could argue it's taking advantage of a
>competition lull.
 
most certainly. easy to defend roddick; rafa, not so much.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:37PM -0400

On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 02:11:15 +1000, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> bob
 
>Me neither. If anything you could argue it's taking advantage of a
>competition lull.
 
 
the strongest proponents we have on "defense of title" are liang and
raja. that alone should tell us it's not worth a turd.
 
bob
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 10 topics

bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:06PM -0400

the bottom line of the measurement we're looking for is dominance. who
was the better player. who dominated more. who achieved more.
 
i brought it up a decade ago related to the men: was there a "sweet
spot" for how much you won VS a given time period? is 10 slams in 10
yrs better than 12 slams in 20 yrs?
 
i know everybody relevant to this discussion replied. it can be
googled. :-)
 
so total trophies VS better slam trophy %. do we want to measure
*dominance* or *achievement*.
 
the answer is obvious. a far higher slam win % measure dominance.
total slam count (or 7543 if you prefer) measures achievement. we're
back to BOAT vs GOAT - all over again.
 
bob
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 09:16AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 11:06:29 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
> the bottom line of the measurement we're looking for is dominance. who
> was the better player. who dominated more. who achieved more.
 
I go with dominance. It makes more sense. I would rather go for a champion who was great day in day out (Graf) than someone who randomly popped in times and took advantage of a clown field (Serena).
 
That's why averaging the 7 best years of win-loss is the best measure for evaluating dominance. Anything less than a 7 is too less and anything more than 7 is too much IMO. Besides Borg, McEnroe and Wilander had 7 great years and then there is a huge drop off for McEnroe and Wilander and nothing for Borg (since he retired so young).
 
 
 
 
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: Jun 01 02:18AM +1000

On 1/06/2019 2:06 am, bob wrote:
> total slam count (or 7543 if you prefer) measures achievement. we're
> back to BOAT vs GOAT - all over again.
 
> bob
 
It gets murkier when a great player can defend multiple slams in a
softer era like eg Fed 2003-2009. After that Rafa & Djoker started
coming on & Fed barely defended a slam after that. In this example does
it really show 'dominance' in absolute terms? Dominance over a weaker
field to be sure, but in goat/boat level terms? Personally I don't
think so.
 
If you can keep winning a slam like eg Rafa at FO, then yes he did it
for an insanely long period over the cream of the best players.
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 31 06:27PM +0200

>> was the better player. who dominated more. who achieved more.
 
> I go with dominance. It makes more sense. I would rather go for a champion who was great day in day out (Graf) than someone who randomly popped in times and took advantage of a clown field (Serena).
 
> That's why averaging the 7 best years of win-loss is the best measure for evaluating dominance. Anything less than a 7 is too less and anything more than 7 is too much IMO. Besides Borg, McEnroe and Wilander had 7 great years and then there is a huge drop off for McEnroe and Wilander and nothing for Borg (since he retired so young).
 
 
Dumb post.
 
You're not even making an argument for 7 consecutive years, not to
mention the fact that the number itself is purely random or that
nobody cares about percentages.
 
 
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:24PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 10:00:56 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>> that's fine, i didn't ask for perfect. i asked for some chest.
 
>> bob
 
>Steffi Graf didnt have a big chest either... nor does Maria Sharapova... they are tennis players not bimbo cheerleaders. There is also a story that Peter Graf ask Steffi to do exercises to reduce the size. Also you know about Halep...
 
steffi had some chest, and halep was huge.
 
totally flat=not for me.
 
maybe a gay man likes it?
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:25PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 16:02:41 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg
 
>> > yeah Halep looked amazing!
 
>> She looks way better now. You want giant boobies, go fuck a cow.
 
>is that regular practice round your way, sicko?!! :Of
 
 
raj seems attracted to young boys.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:22PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 12:08:45 -0700 (PDT), PeteWasLucky
 
>> yes, it looks awful
 
>Then you shouldn't be looking on x-rays :)
 
is a toe supposed to look like that? lol
 
bob
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 31 06:03PM +0200

> used this daily about rafa, never defends non clay, etc. defending is
> nice, but say you play 16 yrs and win every other yr. never a defense,
> yet 8 titles? i'll take it. why defending is so important, not sure.
 
 
 
Good question, but I think it increases prestige?
 
Maybe in people's mind you stamp your authority much more if you
win 8/8 than 8/16?
 
 
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 31 06:06PM +0200


> Good question, but I think it increases prestige?
 
> Maybe in people's mind you stamp your authority much more if you
> win 8/8 than 8/16?
 
 
By 8/16 we mean of course winning very other year for 16 years.
 
Because if you win 8 consecutives that's 8/8 just as much it's
8/16 or 8/100.
 
:)
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: Jun 01 02:11AM +1000

On 1/06/2019 1:50 am, bob wrote:
> nice, but say you play 16 yrs and win every other yr. never a defense,
> yet 8 titles? i'll take it. why defending is so important, not sure.
 
> bob
 
Me neither. If anything you could argue it's taking advantage of a
competition lull.
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: Jun 01 02:22AM +1000

On 1/06/2019 2:06 am, *skriptis wrote:
 
> Because if you win 8 consecutives that's 8/8 just as much it's
> 8/16 or 8/100.
 
> :)
 
Double edged sword. If you win 8/8 with players like
Fed/Rafa/Djoker/Sampras/Borg/McEnroe etc in the field then wow amazing.
If it's Bagditis/Hewitt/Roddick etc then not so much imo.
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 31 09:22AM -0700

On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 10:39:37 AM UTC-5, bob wrote:
> "taunting us to impeach."
 
> trump had this little grin on his face. lol
 
> bob
 
Feel sad for the democrats. They have been had. I think Trump will completely whoop Biden in 2020. They are seriously deluded if they think Biden will do any better than Hillary.
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:21PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 22:32:32 +0300, Pelle Svanslös <pelle@svans.los>
wrote:
 
>gloves are off ...
 
>HA HA HA HA HA HA.
>OMG.
 
why OMG? it's a pretty simple siutation.
 
how are things in the baltic sea going - can you see any russian ships
3mi off of stockholm?
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:09PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 12:00:52 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>> are you a racist?
 
>> bob
 
>Yes,
 
well, i knew that.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:10PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 12:50:16 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>> > Yes, to idiots.
 
>> Finally he admits he's WACIST!
 
>George Carlin was wacist too? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AckrIIZzYwI
 
maybe he was. you surely are, as you admit.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:10PM -0400

>> ronald reagan.
 
>> bob
 
>Classic! :)
 
saw it on a bumper sticker last week.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 11:56AM -0400

>>> --
 
>> No it is a formula, which is even more nerdy than averaging win-loss for best 7 years.
 
>win/loss without the slam trophies to back it up is worth what?
 
it's worth raja.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 11:59AM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 14:59:32 -0700 (PDT), Calimero
 
>Golden Slams and matches like the FO 99 final count.
>Again, which Serena slam final match will be remembered in 20 or 30 years from now?
>Right, not even ONE.
 
last yr's USO will be remembered for decades!
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:00PM -0400

>win 10 slams or 15 slams or 20 slams.
 
>What matters is how many years it has taken Graf to win 23 slams - right
>now, it's 37 years and counting, LOL.
 
 
typo checker...
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:06PM -0400

On Fri, 31 May 2019 02:48:08 +1000, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>Serena's longevity at the elite level is simply phenomenal. She's been
>able to maintain slam winning form far longer than any of the greats
>before her. You have to respect that.
 
 
the bottom line of the measurement we're looking for is dominance. who
was the better player. who dominated more. who achieved more.
 
i brought it up a decade ago related to the men: was there a "sweet
spot" for how much you won VS a given time period? is 10 slams in 10
yrs better than 12 slams in 20 yrs?
 
i know everybody relevant to this discussion replied. it can be
googled. :-)
 
so total trophies VS better slam trophy %. do we want to measure
*dominance* or *achievement*.
 
the answer is obvious. a far higher slam win % measure dominance.
total slam count (or 7543 if you prefer) measures achievement. we're
back to BOAT vs GOAT - all over again.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:07PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 09:54:01 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>> > Steffi herself has never been comfortable with the GOAT title. She announced Martina Navratilova is the GOAT after she retired.
 
>> Serena's longevity at the elite level is simply phenomenal.
 
>Don't think it matters. If you stick around for long you would eventually have longevity.
 
doesn't mean you'll keep winning though.
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:07PM -0400

On Thu, 30 May 2019 18:55:57 +0200 (CEST), *skriptis
 
>> Don't think it matters. If you stick around for long you would eventually have longevity.
 
>Very smart thing to say. All you need to do is stick around for
> long and you'll win slams.
 
well, raja is high IQ don't forget. :-)
 
bob
bob <bob@bob.com>: May 31 12:08PM -0400

>it is clear to her that is unlikely she will win more slams.
 
>She's just been able to maintain that window far longer than anyone,
>which is one reason she is the GOAT.
 
it's also a sign of the times - 40 is the new 30? 32?
fed/djok/rafa.
 
bob
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 31 05:59PM +0200


> an "undocumented" (as they're called) being allowed to vote in an
> american election is pure criminal fraue. no other way to say it.
 
> citizens should vote. legal citizens.
 
 
 
Sure, but their plan is ominous. If they succeed at it, aliens
don't even have to vote on order for a large scare fraud to be
committed.
 
Citizens will vote, democrats will win, and they'll get
overrepresented in the electoral college because illegals would
have been counted in population, thus giving California or New
York more electors.
 
 
Is this perhaps the biggest conspiracy in history?
 
 
 
 
 
 
>> want to know if those are actually Bulgarian citizens?
 
> good example, but pelle won't reply. he's more interested in donald
> trump than sweden.
 
 
He won't. But it's so clear. E.g. Bulgaria is potentially
pro-Russian as both are orthodox Slavs.
 
So Bulgaria doesn't have to import Russians at all. They could
import Malaysians and not give them citizenship but demand to
have more MPs in the EU.
 
So when pro-Russians win in Bulgaria, they get twice as much MPs
in the EU.
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 31 08:57AM -0700

> that's when the FO really starts.
 
FO start is decided on Federer? Nice to hear
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.