Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 19 updates in 5 topics

Friday, December 19, 2014

Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>: Dec 18 08:46PM -0600

Newt Gingrich says we lost the first cyber war. I say Sony is a
liberal a pussy.
 
This is not is not a cyber war it is liberal stupidity.
 
Amy Pascal made a deal with Al Sharpton to atone for her racist
emails. WTF?
 
Amy won't be fired it'll be blamed on the Koreans.
BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net>: Dec 18 09:03PM -0600

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 20:46:46 -0600 (CST), Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>
wrote:
 
 
>Newt Gingrich says we lost the first cyber war. I say Sony is a
> liberal a pussy.
 
>This is not is not a cyber war it is liberal stupidity.
 
You're absolutely demented.
Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>: Dec 18 09:27PM -0600

>> liberal a pussy.
 
>>This is not is not a cyber war it is liberal stupidity.
 
> You're absolutely demented.
 
Can you think of any US corporate entity that would cave like
Sony? They had an Admin leak and somebody knew it.
 
Policy would have stopped it.
 
It was a well known fact that Limp Junk-Un was getting early
release access to films.
 
They got what he paid for.
 
 
--
BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net>: Dec 18 09:50PM -0600

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:27:39 -0600 (CST), Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>
wrote:
 
 
>It was a well known fact that Limp Junk-Un was getting early
> release access to films.
 
>They got what he paid for.
 
Why it is that you're still in Dumbfuck Arkansas since you think
you're smarter than anyone in corporate America. Surely Sony has
heard of you.
Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>: Dec 18 10:16PM -0600


> Why it is that you're still in Dumbfuck Arkansas since you think
> you're smarter than anyone in corporate America. Surely Sony has
> heard of you.
 
Dumbfuck Arkansas?
 
What does that mean you flat lander bigot?
 
Don't blame Bill and Hillary on me just because they were from
Arkansas.
 
A bigot like you will never understand working for a privately
held company in midst of the tranquility of the OHT, blue grass,
the Buffalo Wilderness or the Lion's Den.
 
Wal-Mart says hey!
 
If you were half as smart as I am I could not play you like a fiddle.
 
twang!
Horvath1758@net.net: Dec 18 07:15PM -0500

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:08:15 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote this crap:
 
>1,000,000, the median is NOT always 500,000. It's only 500,000 when 5
>of those incomes are below 500,000 and 5 are above AND when the
>arithmetic mean of two incomes closest to 500,000... ...is 500,000.
 
That's incorrect. To calculate a median, you take the top number than
add it to the bottom number and divide by two.
 
 
Merry Christmas everyone. God bless us all.
God bless America.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Dec 18 04:23PM -0800

>> arithmetic mean of two incomes closest to 500,000... ...is 500,000.
 
> That's incorrect. To calculate a median, you take the top number than
> add it to the bottom number and divide by two.
 
No. That is NOT how you calculate a median.
 
Here, this should be about your speed:
 
'How to Find the Median Value
To find the Median, place the numbers in value order and find the
middle number.
 
Example: find the Median of 12, 3 and 5
 
Put them in order:
 
3, 5, 12
 
The middle number is 5, so the median is 5.'
 
<http://www.mathsisfun.com/median.html>
 
My your calculation, the result should be (3+12)/2 = 7.5
 
Care to explain?
 
 
Here's a list of 14 numbers:
 
3, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 21, 23, 23, 23, 23, 29, 40, 56
 
Now, by your calculation, you claim the median would be (3+56)/2 = 29.5
 
But Microsoft Excel has a function for finding th median of a list of numbers.
 
Why don't you punch those numbers in and tell us what you get?
 
Or can't a self-described rich guy such as yourself afford a copy of Excel?
 
:-)
 
 
I can go on making you look foolish if you'd like...
 
...or you can cut your losses and actually admit you were wrong.
 
:-)
Horvath1758@net.net: Dec 18 10:02PM -0500

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:23:13 -0800, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote this crap:
 
 
><http://www.mathsisfun.com/median.html>
 
>My your calculation, the result should be (3+12)/2 = 7.5
 
>Care to explain?
 
I dumbed it down for you.
 
>Here's a list of 14 numbers:
 
>3, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 21, 23, 23, 23, 23, 29, 40, 56
 
>Now, by your calculation, you claim the median would be (3+56)/2 = 29.5
 
I didn't believe you actually had the ability to calculate the median.
Now when calculating the median of peoples income, the numbers will be
placed in order and will increase by the value of a dollar. They
won't jump around as in your example. (Except maybe at the higher
incomes, which would move the median higher.)
 
>But Microsoft Excel has a function for finding th median of a list of numbers.
 
>Why don't you punch those numbers in and tell us what you get?
 
>Or can't a self-described rich guy such as yourself afford a copy of Excel?
 
Not a problem. I think this computer came with Excel.
 
>I can go on making you look foolish if you'd like...
 
>...or you can cut your losses and actually admit you were wrong.
 
I always admit my mistakes. In this case, I had none.
 
 
Merry Christmas everyone. God bless us all.
God bless America.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Dec 18 07:12PM -0800


>> My your calculation, the result should be (3+12)/2 = 7.5
 
>> Care to explain?
 
> I dumbed it down for you.
 
So the answer is "no", you can't explain the difference between your
claim and reality.
 
:-)
 
> placed in order and will increase by the value of a dollar. They
> won't jump around as in your example. (Except maybe at the higher
> incomes, which would move the median higher.)
 
Putting the numbers into an order is an integral part of calculating
the median.
 
But that still won't make your claim true.
 
 
>> Why don't you punch those numbers in and tell us what you get?
 
>> Or can't a self-described rich guy such as yourself afford a copy of Excel?
 
> Not a problem. I think this computer came with Excel.
 
And yet, you haven't produced an answer from it...
 
 
>> I can go on making you look foolish if you'd like...
 
>> ...or you can cut your losses and actually admit you were wrong.
 
> I always admit my mistakes. In this case, I had none.
 
Your whole life is a mistake.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Dec 19 12:13AM

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:50:14 -0800, John B. wrote:
>> racism is an issue here is either totally deluded or lying.
 
> But wait! Ann Coulter says there's no racism in the United States! You
> wouldn't argue with her, would you?
 
Ann Coulter sells a lot of books. Good for Ann Coulter.
Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>: Dec 18 06:20PM -0600


> Or, you're just too fucking stupid to understand what is right in front of
> you.
 
I used to think you were borderline retarded. Now I don't care.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Dec 18 04:23PM -0800

On 2014-12-19 00:20:41 +0000, Moderate said:
 
 
>> Or, you're just too fucking stupid to understand what is right in front of
>> you.
 
> I used to think you were borderline retarded. Now I don't care.
 
Caved.
BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net>: Dec 18 06:28PM -0600

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:20:41 -0600 (CST), Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> Or, you're just too fucking stupid to understand what is right in front of
>> you.
 
>I used to think.
 
Too bad you stopped.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Dec 18 04:30PM -0800

On 2014-12-19 00:28:17 +0000, BobbyK said:
 
>>> you.
 
>> I used to think.
 
> Too bad you stopped.
 
I'm actually wondering when this supposedly was...
Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>: Dec 18 06:57PM -0600

>>> you.
 
>>I used to think.
 
> Too bad you stopped.
 
Another Boobyism.
BobbyK <bknight@Conramp.net>: Dec 18 07:13PM -0600

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:57:31 -0600 (CST), Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>
wrote:
 
 
>>>I used to think.
 
>> Too bad you stopped.
 
>Another Boobyism.
 
QED
Horvath1758@net.net: Dec 18 09:53PM -0500

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:20:41 -0600 (CST), Moderate <nomail@nospam.com>
wrote this crap:
 
 
>> Or, you're just too fucking stupid to understand what is right in front of
>> you.
 
>I used to think you were borderline retarded. Now I don't care.
 
I agree. Everybody knows you have a computer in front of you or you
wouldn't be reading this.
 
 
Merry Christmas everyone. God bless us all.
God bless America.
BAR <screw@you.too>: Dec 18 09:13PM -0500

In article <m6vr0q$18g$1@speranza.aioe.org>, nomail@nospam.com says...
 
> > Or, you're just too fucking stupid to understand what is right in front of
> > you.
 
> I used to think you were borderline retarded. Now I don't care.
 
That is hilarious.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Dec 19 12:17AM

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:47:51 -0800, John B. wrote:
 
> I can't believe that voters could look at the presidencies of his father
> and his brother and decide that putting another Bush in the White House
> is a good idea.
 
I know there's a lot of baggage, and I'm not endorsing the guy. But
compared to the half-wits the base will undoubtedly produce Jeb is
actually sane enough to get support from the center. And therefore,
conceivably, he could win if he got the nomination.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Freshers in SAP- Looking for your first SAP consulting job ?


Freshers please pass on your details and we will contact you if we have any suitable opportunity. 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Detroit, Michigan" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to detroitmichigan+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to detroitmichigan@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/detroitmichigan.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Digest for rec.sport.pro-wrestling@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 19 topics

Thursday, December 18, 2014

"Unifarva" <unifarva@robbycabal.com>: Dec 19 12:28AM -0600


> > hahaha!
> > you are frvnny!
 
> whats so funny?
 
youm claiming you dont know what twerking is you jerk
 
 
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
"Unifarva" <unifarva@robbycabal.com>: Dec 19 12:26AM -0600

> >=20
> > who sways I am?
 
> oh it sounded like you were and i'd have to say etu unifarva?
 
no dvde
 
 
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
"Unifarva" <unifarva@robbycabal.com>: Dec 19 12:26AM -0600


> > > your spelling today is awfully horrendous.
 
> > don't change the subject when you know youre losing the argument!!
 
> what arguement?
 
knock off the 'stupid idiot/i dont remember' routine!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Dec 18 11:15PM -0700

The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
 
>>> robby's my new pick on shit fk
 
>> hell yeah.
 
> you actually WANT to be the dumbfuck swho gets shit on?
 
he lives for it
The Brunei Bindlestiff <unifarva@gmail.com>: Dec 18 10:10PM -0800

On Friday, December 19, 2014 1:09:36 AM UTC-5, % wrote:
 
> >> hell yeah.
 
> > you actually WANT to be the dumbfuck swho gets shit on?
 
> he lives for it
 
a strange freak indeed
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Dec 18 11:19PM -0700

The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
 
>>> you actually WANT to be the dumbfuck swho gets shit on?
 
>> he lives for it
 
> a strange freak indeed
 
we're talking the robbette here
"Unifarva" <unifarva@robbycabal.com>: Dec 19 12:24AM -0600


> >> he lives for it
 
> > a strange freak indeed
 
> we're talking the robbette here
 
true
 
--
Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Dec 18 11:31PM -0700

Unifarva wrote:
 
>>> a strange freak indeed
 
>> we're talking the robbette here
 
> true
 
bone salad
CB <cbryant215@aol.com>: Dec 19 04:32AM

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:38:45 -0800, madeforzyngagames wrote:
 
 
> I couldn't help it when I saw the arrest and the bond.
> So what did you do to piss off the judge so badly?
> Please tell me it required you to be put into handcuffs.
 
You're a good little midget dancer, Dink? Why can't you use that "talent"
to actually make money?
CB <cbryant215@aol.com>: Dec 19 06:24AM

On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:01:48 -0800, madeforzyngagames wrote:
 
>> "talent"
>> to actually make money?
 
> Why are you avoiding the questions, Chud?
 
You don't have any valid questions, Dink.
 
Hobble along back to the shire now.
The Brunei Bindlestiff <unifarva@gmail.com>: Dec 18 10:12PM -0800

On Friday, December 19, 2014 1:07:13 AM UTC-5, % wrote:
 
> >> coal pit
 
> > slagheap
 
> coke smoke
 
waste filings
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Dec 18 11:21PM -0700

The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
 
>>> slagheap
 
>> coke smoke
 
> waste filings
 
lung dung
The Brunei Bindlestiff <unifarva@gmail.com>: Dec 18 10:09PM -0800

On Friday, December 19, 2014 12:57:31 AM UTC-5, % wrote:
 
> >> no
 
> > yeah no.
 
> no
 
I don't either and that is why the 80's sucked
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:54PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:24:01 PM UTC-5, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > > then why ask me what sporadic meant then?
 
> > i want to know why you only get sporadic internet! i can get it anytime i want!
 
> mines free dvde
 
lol cheapskate!
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:54PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:25:30 PM UTC-5, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > > um...ye-ah right...
 
> > thats one of my favorite songs ever!
 
> what song?
 
i'll never get over you getting over me by expose. one of the hottest bands of the entire 80s!
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:53PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:26:07 PM UTC-5, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
> > > and we love you four it!
 
> > thats the nicest thing you've ever said to me!
 
> in svre
 
you still to this day can't spell sure right.
"Jason Todd!!!" <janklowicz24@yahoo.com>: Dec 18 09:53PM -0800

Gas/oil is low right now. Really low. Under $2 in some places.
 
Usually when that happens, the Saudis -- the biggest oil producers -- slow down their production to ease demand. They're not doing that this time.
 
Why?
 
Four reasons: Syria, Iran, Russia and ISIS.
 
The Saudis fucking hate ISIS. ISIS keeps stealing oil fields and using them to fund their army. Therefore, if oil keeps falling, it hits ISIS in the wallet.
 
The Saudis don't give too much of a fuck about Syria, Iran and Russia separately, but together, all three of them are causing too much regional upheaval. The Saudis are businessmen. Too much chaos is bad for business. And the thing about all three of these guys is that their economies all rely mainly on oil and gas.
 
Russia most of all. They're choking without oil. The Ruble is crumbling. So much for great man of action.
 
Obama probably made a deal with the Saudis, proving again why he's the FUCKING MAN.
 
Jason
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:52PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:27:59 PM UTC-5, Unifarva wrote:
 
> --
> Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
> http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
 
dont be tripping girl!
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:52PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:28:47 PM UTC-5, Unifarva wrote:
 
> --
> Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
> http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
 
i just called, to say, i love you?
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:52PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:29:24 PM UTC-5, Unifarva wrote:
 
> --
> Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
> http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
 
mick jagger?
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:51PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:33:08 PM UTC-5, Unifarva wrote:
 
> --
> Posted by Mimo Usenet Browser v0.2.5
> http://www.mimousenet.com/mimo/post
 
no sir. couldnt that be dangerous?
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:50PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:21:04 PM UTC-5, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > > butn is one of my wittiest!
 
> > are you taking drugs?
 
> why due you ask?
 
cause you've been acting crazy as hell all day!
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:48PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:21:41 PM UTC-5, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > > vital to your survival!!
 
> > my very soul?
 
> mo5re dire than that!!
 
lol i dont see how anything can be more vital then that.
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:48PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:22:20 PM UTC-5, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
> shakin' it bvoss!
 
you still have not given me any clear instruction on how to use the browser so i can have unlimited posting. you are hogging it all for yourself!
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Dec 18 09:47PM -0800

On Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:23:16 PM UTC-5, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > but oh so true!
 
> irrelevant
> still tni
 
want me to post a pic?
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.pro-wrestling+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.