Digest for alt.sports.soccer.manchester.united@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 11 topics

Saturday, October 25, 2014

alt.sports.soccer.manchester.united@googlegroups.com Google Groups
Unsure why you received this message? You previously subscribed to digests from this group, but we haven't been sending them for a while. We fixed that, but if you don't want to get these messages, send an email to alt.sports.soccer.manchester.united+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 25 12:10AM +0100

I bet you will you spineless twat,what the fuck with the
'surprise'don't you read what you sign?
chuck-spears <fishbowl2011@gmail.com>: Oct 25 01:17AM +0100

On 25/10/2014 00:10, Ron wrote:
> I bet you will you spineless twat,what the fuck with the 'surprise'don't
> you read what you sign?
 
For Cameron to claim that he is surprised makes him either a liar or
incompetent. The 'surprise' is necessary only to facilitate the mock
outrage.
Mozzer <mozzer.mozzer@Yahoo.co.uk>: Oct 25 08:30AM +0100

On 25/10/2014 00:10, Ron wrote:
> I bet you will you spineless twat,what the fuck with the 'surprise'don't
> you read what you sign?
 
 
I bet he will as well. Ed and Dave will bend over whenever required by
Europe.
]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con>: Oct 25 01:28PM +1100

It happens that Ron formulated :
 
> just checked my Halifax bank app and my mortgage is 11,221.10 100 grand
> compensation to come and wife on final salary pension no bargen hunting for
> me poor boy lol
 
100 grand compensation for what? Who's paying that bill?
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 25 03:36AM +0100

]v[etaphoid used his keyboard to write :
>> compensation to come and wife on final salary pension no bargen hunting for
>> me poor boy lol
 
> 100 grand compensation for what? Who's paying that bill?
 
The Insurance company we have them in the UK
]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con>: Oct 25 06:29PM +1100

Ron laid this down on his screen :
>>> for me poor boy lol
 
>> 100 grand compensation for what? Who's paying that bill?
 
> The Insurance company we have them in the UK
 
Again, I ask - 100 grand compensation for what?
 
And who's paying the insurance premiums? Why is it that those suckling
on the welfare teat can never comprehend that the money has to come
from somewhere?
Mozzer <mozzer.mozzer@Yahoo.co.uk>: Oct 24 10:32PM +0100

On 24/10/2014 22:16, Ron wrote:
> Baldoni expressed precisely :
>> I seem to have lost my smileys how do I get them back please ?
 
> where is Pope when you need him
 
He went for treatment in Wales Labour controlled NHS. It finished him
off. Apparently, you can get free prescriptions for Aspirin and
Paracetamol on demand but not cancer treatment.
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 24 10:48PM +0100

It happens that Mozzer formulated :
 
> He went for treatment in Wales Labour controlled NHS. It finished him off.
> Apparently, you can get free prescriptions for Aspirin and Paracetamol on
> demand but not cancer treatment.
 
This couldn't be the "The Forgers' Gazette"attempt to undermine
Labour's General Election bid could it? we all know the mail is "fair
and balanced" lol lol lol
Mozzer <mozzer.mozzer@Yahoo.co.uk>: Oct 24 11:00PM +0100

On 24/10/2014 22:48, Ron wrote:
 
> This couldn't be the "The Forgers' Gazette"attempt to undermine
> Labour's General Election bid could it? we all know the mail is "fair
> and balanced" lol lol lol
 
 
Simple Ron,allow an independent enquiry into both the English and Welsh
NHS by the OECD.
 
I take it by your reply you will have no objection to this and will be
supporting David Cameron's calls to allow this to proceed ASAP?
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 24 11:24PM +0100

Mozzer explained on 24/10/2014 :
> by the OECD.
 
> I take it by your reply you will have no objection to this and will be
> supporting David Cameron's calls to allow this to proceed ASAP?
 
So was the english NHS beter under Thatcher or Blair???
"<--->" <me11557@privacy.net>: Oct 25 03:04AM +0100

On 24/10/2014 23:00, Mozzer wrote:
> NHS by the OECD.
 
> I take it by your reply you will have no objection to this and will be
> supporting David Cameron's calls to allow this to proceed ASAP?
 
Nothing wrong with an enquiry. Everything wrong with the
Mail/Cameron/Hunt trying to manipulate public opinion to muddy the
electoral waters.
Still criticising the Welsh NHS diverts attention from the gross
incompetency of Tory policy on the English NHS.
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 25 12:13AM +0100

But December the 2nd is another story lol
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 24 11:52PM +0100

maybe it's only the English, well London left who are namby pandy,we
could do with a Scouse PM, not had one for a 100 years. :/
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 24 10:57PM +0100

It was in the dail mail
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2360116/Aliens-stole-car--Man-recounts-moment-teenage-friends-watched-fleet-spacecraft-belongings-pet-dog.html
 
LOL
Mozzer <mozzer.mozzer@Yahoo.co.uk>: Oct 24 11:04PM +0100

On 24/10/2014 22:57, Ron wrote:
> It was in the dail mail
 
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2360116/Aliens-stole-car--Man-recounts-moment-teenage-friends-watched-fleet-spacecraft-belongings-pet-dog.html
 
> LOL
 
 
No Ron, I demand facts. So let us get an independent enquiry into both
the English and Welsh NHS by the OECD on the way.
 
I presume you have no objection to this? After all, Labour call for 2 or
3 of them a week. Why not let this one proceed?
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 24 11:22PM +0100

Mozzer brought next idea :
> English and Welsh NHS by the OECD on the way.
 
> I presume you have no objection to this? After all, Labour call for 2 or 3 of
> them a week. Why not let this one proceed?
 
Well you could start with this one
 
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/welsh-governments-remarkable-response-daily-7967737
 
But you still fail, starting a thread by the scum faking bastards.
Mozzer <mozzer.mozzer@Yahoo.co.uk>: Oct 21 07:02PM +0100

On 20/10/2014 22:13, michael adams wrote:
> to mix with them any more, eh?
 
> michael adams
 
> ...
 
Did ums, does it upset you that I was insinuating that the"Queens
Council" fat boy lives in a Favela and will be praising the Tories
tonight ?
 
Did you feel the need to resort to your usual selective snipping to come
to his rescue?
 
I am sure the world is a better place for your strong defence of Lance
Armstrong and the morbidly obese one.
chuck-spears <fishbowl2011@gmail.com>: Oct 24 06:56PM +0100

On 24/10/2014 14:56, Neal wrote:
> Not going to lie. It will be stressful to watch. We are most definitely still in a work-in-progress phase while Chelsea are firing on all cylinders.
 
It is difficult to judge the strength of United because of the teams
they have played so far. They should certainly have done better but the
new players missed the first 3 games and injuries have wiped out the
first choice defence.
LVG, for various reasons, has already used the same number of different
players this season, as Moyes used in the whole of last season and that
is without having to play ECL games, so the team is anything but settled.
Mozzer <mozzer.mozzer@Yahoo.co.uk>: Oct 24 10:43PM +0100

On 24/10/2014 14:56, Neal wrote:
> Not going to lie. It will be stressful to watch. We are most definitely still in a work-in-progress phase while Chelsea are firing on all cylinders.
 
I think you will get slaughtered. Like you say, Chelsea are firing on
all cylinders at the moment
 
However, sometimes teams step up to the mark in big games when you least
expect them to.
 
Unfortunately, that never happened when we faced Real Madrid.
Lawrence Jenkins <lawrence13@sky.com>: Oct 24 12:26PM -0700

On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 18:15:30 UTC+1, Ron wrote:
> bills what happens if we have another recession? in a way i want the
> shit bag tories back for another 5 years they are really going to fuck
> things up and maybe the labour party will get some working class mp's.
 
Ron you seem to think the economy works on high taxation therefore people should have high earnings but you leave out a tiny part of the equation THE PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY MAKE IT HAPPEN Yep capitalist with idea, motivation, organisational skills the ability to gather the capital to make it happen , the R&D , the paying of wages, the paying of national insurance, taxation, sick pay, maternity and paternity pay, pension contributions, VAT , corporation tax, disciplinarians, paying the company bills, marketng to sell the product. the sheer headache and bother of employing some right wankers on occasions. Of course there's the business rates, maintenance and it goes on. Why bother when all the government has to do is make businesses pay higher wages workers happy then the government can take more taxes and the people who actually generate the wealth get totally fucked. Ron we've seen economies like this were privileged party idiots -if the can get in the party to start with, are put in factory target lead management positions, they called it a socialist communist society Ron. No brainer or just no brain
Ron <ihatespam@blueyonder.co.uk>: Oct 24 10:14PM +0100

Lawrence Jenkins was thinking very hard :
> like this were privileged party idiots -if the can get in the party to start
> with, are put in factory target lead management positions, they called it a
> socialist communist society Ron. No brainer or just no brain
 
But in Denmark, McDonald's employees make twice what they do in the US,
and the Big Mac costs just 35 cents
more,???????????????????????????????????????????????? explain please
Larry.
Paul Pot <PMD@SIBU.HQ>: Oct 24 08:57PM +0100

Darth Simian laid this down on his screen :
 
>> Darth is a Liverpool fan
 
>> The RED DEVIL
 
> DRIVEL can't come back to the UK because of Operation Yewtree.
 
 
FAF!1
 
--
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Baldoni <baldonixxv@googlemail.com>: Oct 24 09:26PM +0100

Paul Pot wrote on 24/10/2014 :
 
>>> The RED DEVIL
 
>> DRIVEL can't come back to the UK because of Operation Yewtree.
 
> FAF!1
 
HAHA !
chuck-spears <fishbowl2011@gmail.com>: Oct 24 06:36PM +0100

On 24/10/2014 15:10, Neal wrote:
> It's interesting that Valdes is being encouraged to come and train at United right after the rumours emerged of De Gea being touted for Real Madrid. I saw that De Gea laughed off the rumours, but that's kind of normal operating procedure no matter what the level of merit there is to the story.
 
> To be realistic, I would be shocked if De Gea turned down such an offer, assuming the offer becomes a reality. Not only is RM still considered the historical pinnacle of world club football, but they get in the UCL every single year, and what with them being his home country, and the far bigger likelihood of such a position confirming his place as the national goalkeeper, he would be professionally stupid to chose United over RM. Casillas is definitely in his twilight years.
 
> It certainly looks like LVG is hedging his bets.
 
I wouldn't be bothered to see him go, I have never thought he was
anything special, he's certainly no Schmeichel or Van der Sar and
although he is only about 23, I don't think he ever will be.
Neal <nealr2000@gmail.com>: Oct 24 11:19AM -0700

On Friday, October 24, 2014 1:36:49 PM UTC-4, chuck-spears wrote:
 
> I wouldn't be bothered to see him go, I have never thought he was
> anything special, he's certainly no Schmeichel or Van der Sar and
> although he is only about 23, I don't think he ever will be.
 
He's definitely in the development stage of his career. Superb shot-stopper if he anticipates his position correctly, but he sometimes gets his spot wrong. It's hard to tell if Valdes is the better keeper, being that he had the fantastic advantage of having one of the greatest set of players ever in front of him.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to alt.sports.soccer.manchester.united+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.pro-wrestling@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 10 topics

Friday, October 24, 2014

rec.sport.pro-wrestling@googlegroups.com Google Groups
Unsure why you received this message? You previously subscribed to digests from this group, but we haven't been sending them for a while. We fixed that, but if you don't want to get these messages, send an email to rec.sport.pro-wrestling+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:16PM -0700

yes or no?
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:19PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:16:08 AM UTC-4, robert wrote:
> yes or no?
 
why in the hell would be related in any way?
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:18PM -0700

i wanna know.
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Oct 24 10:11PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:05:25 AM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
 
> > > I love that song!!
 
> > why dont you have any taste?
 
> why don't YOU?
 
i do. thats why i'm a dj.
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:15PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:11:52 AM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
 
> > > why dont you have any taste?
 
> > why don't YOU?
 
> i do. thats why i'm a dj.
 
lying bastard!
don't try to steal my identity!!!!!!!!!!!!
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:17PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:15:05 AM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > i do. thats why i'm a dj.
 
> lying bastard!
> don't try to steal my identity!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
yeah i'm a dj at my local radio station.
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:18PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:17:06 AM UTC-4, robert wrote:
 
> > lying bastard!
> > don't try to steal my identity!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
> yeah i'm a dj at my local radio station.
 
liar!
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Oct 24 10:11PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:08:57 AM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > thanks old friend!
 
> lol
> pe3rsents going to be pisse3d!
 
whatever for?
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:15PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:11:41 AM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
 
> > lol
> > pe3rsents going to be pisse3d!
 
> whatever for?
 
you dissing Canada dvde.
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:18PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:15:56 AM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
> > > pe3rsents going to be pisse3d!
 
> > whatever for?
 
> you dissing Canada dvde.
 
it deserves to be.
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:12PM -0700

On Friday, October 24, 2014 8:59:58 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
 
> > > i am not laughing damn it!
 
> > hahahahaha!!
 
> whats so damn funny?
 
hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:17PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:12:40 AM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > > hahahahaha!!
 
> > whats so damn funny?
 
> hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
whats so damn funny?
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:11PM -0700

On Friday, October 24, 2014 9:00:57 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
 
> > lol
> > you ARE raiding the tombs!
 
> hell yeah! or how about that whatthematterwith you girl?
 
robsuxcox?
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:17PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:11:51 AM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
> > > you ARE raiding the tombs!
 
> > hell yeah! or how about that whatthematterwith you girl?
 
> robsuxcox?
 
ha ha yes!
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Oct 24 10:12PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:03:32 AM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
 
> > thats freaky.
 
> yes siree bob.
> may I call you bob?
 
hell no. i hate that name.
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:13PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:12:39 AM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
 
> > yes siree bob.
> > may I call you bob?
 
> hell no. i hate that name.
 
why...bob?
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:15PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:13:34 AM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
> > > may I call you bob?
 
> > hell no. i hate that name.
 
> why...bob?
 
dont call me that again, or else.
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Oct 24 10:12PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:04:42 AM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
 
> > > not the point here dvde
 
> > is the point you want % dead?
 
> I wouldn't be unhappy were it so
 
God wont like that attitude.
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Oct 24 10:14PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:12:23 AM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
 
> > > is the point you want % dead?
 
> > I wouldn't be unhappy were it so
 
> God wont like that attitude.
 
god doesn't like persent
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:14PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 1:14:09 AM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > > I wouldn't be unhappy were it so
 
> > God wont like that attitude.
 
> god doesn't like persent
 
he loves everyone.
The Brunei Bindlestiff <unifarva@gmail.com>: Oct 24 09:59PM -0700

On Friday, October 24, 2014 9:04:42 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
 
> > > was it based on a true story?
 
> > no
 
> i heard it was.
 
you lisyten
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Oct 24 10:14PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 12:59:53 AM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
 
> > > no
 
> > i heard it was.
 
> you lisyten
 
yeah.
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Oct 24 09:55PM -0700

On Friday, October 24, 2014 8:56:39 PM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
> well?
 
happiness is lisa bending over.
The Brunei Bindlestiff <unifarva@gmail.com>: Oct 24 09:58PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 12:55:14 AM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> On Friday, October 24, 2014 8:56:39 PM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
> > well?
 
> happiness is lisa bending over.
 
struck you blind it was so horrible!
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Oct 24 09:59PM -0700

On Saturday, October 25, 2014 12:58:53 AM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
> > > well?
 
> > happiness is lisa bending over.
 
> struck you blind it was so horrible!
 
why do you say that?
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.pro-wrestling+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers@googlegroups.com - 4 updates in 4 topics

alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers@googlegroups.com Google Groups
Unsure why you received this message? You previously subscribed to digests from this group, but we haven't been sending them for a while. We fixed that, but if you don't want to get these messages, send an email to alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
"$Bill" <news@todbe.com>: Oct 24 09:57PM -0700

Lakers had a W and folded in the last 2 minutes similar to PHO OT game. Lin &
Randle had very good games with Randle 1 RB short of DD and Lin 3 ASTs short.
Couple of injuries with a knee bang for Price and a possible concussion for
Ellington. Way too many fouls at 28 leading to 23-31 FTs for SAC - also 10
oORBs partly due to bigs in FT much of game. 92-93 Lakers lose by 1.
 
Game Dbl-figures Leaders:
Player Pts FG% 3P% FT% RB AS BL ST TO PF EFF
Lin 19 (50 /33 /83 )/ 1/ 7/ 0/ 1/ 3/ 5/+18
Randle 12 (50 /0 /0 )/ 9/ 2/ 0/ 1/ 3/ 4/+14
Sacre 12 (43 /0 /0 )/ 5/ 0/ 0/ 0/ 1/ 5/ +8
Clarkson 11 (40 /50 /100)/ 0/ 3/ 0/ 1/ 2/ 5/ +7
 
Next game: HOU at LAL: Tue Oct 28 1930 Game 1
 
#- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
Congrats to me for closest predict - shoulda been a DQ for both of us.
 
SAC at LAL: Fri Oct 24 19:00:00 2014
 
NAME POST TIME LAL OPP DIFF VEC FROM
 
Actual Score 92 93 -1
 
Qualified:
$Bill 24/18:59:11 98 108 -10 16.155 Usenet
svassier 23/09:36:05 100 120 -20 28.160 Online
 
Current prediction contest standings:
 
By vector avg: Usenet Vec
Predictor Tries Firsts Seconds Thirds DQs Score Avg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
$Bill 8 3 2 0 3 18 23.536
Ammammata 2 1 0 0 1 4 24.994
svassier 7 2 2 0 3 13 26.910
MontanaMark 2 0 0 1 1 0 34.236
 
By Usenet 5:3:1 Scoring: Usenet Vec
Predictor Tries Firsts Seconds Thirds DQs Score Avg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
$Bill 8 3 2 0 3 18 23.536
svassier 7 2 2 0 3 13 26.910
Ammammata 2 1 0 0 1 4 24.994
MontanaMark 2 0 0 1 1 0 34.236
 
Laker contest home: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/
YTD standings: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/cgi-bin/lakerytd.pl
HTML Schedule: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/cgi-bin/lakersched.pl?action=html
Cut-n-Paste Sched: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/cgi-bin/lakersched.pl?action=text
 
#- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
Quarterly Laker scoring leaders/notes (pluses OR/ST/BL; minuses TO/PF/oOR):
 
Q1 - Lakers win the Q, but all the bigs are in FT - shooting 48% vs 44%; pluses
1/2/0; minuses 3/10/1 - gotta play D w/o fouling. Lin 5, Sacre 4.
26-22=+4Q.
 
Q2 - Lakers give thier lead back and end up -1 for H - shooting 45% vs 53%;
pluses 1/1/0; minuses 4/9/2 - still too much fouling. Randle 10, Lin 4.
22-27=-5Q.
 
HT - Lakers D still needs work as SAC gets too many PIP and too many FTs -
shooting 46% vs 49%; pluses 2/3/0; minuses 7/19/3. Randle 10, Lin 9.
48-49=-1H.
 
Q3 - Lakers shoot a lot better than SAC in Q3 - shooting 58% vs 29%; pluses
0/0/0; minuses 0/3/1 - no pluses in Q3? Sacre 6, Clarkson/Johnson 5,
Lin 4. 28-15=+13Q (76-64=+12).
 
Q4 - Lakers have a EOG breakdown and give the game away similar to the OT game
with PHO - shooting 35% vs 39%; pluses 3/1/0; minuses 3/6/6. Lin 6.
16-29=-13Q.
 
Final - Lakers had a W and folded in the last 2 minutes similar to PHO OT game.
Lin & Randle had very good games with Randle 1 RB short of DD and Lin 3
ASTs short. Couple of injuries with a knee bang for Price and a
possible concussion for Ellington. Way too many fouls at 28 leading to
23-31 FTs for SAC - also 10 oORBs partly due to bigs in FT much of game.
92-93 Lakers lose by 1.
 
Game Dbl-figures Leaders:
Player Pts FG% 3P% FT% RB AS BL ST TO PF EFF
Lin 19 (50 /33 /83 )/ 1/ 7/ 0/ 1/ 3/ 5/+18
Randle 12 (50 /0 /0 )/ 9/ 2/ 0/ 1/ 3/ 4/+14
Sacre 12 (43 /0 /0 )/ 5/ 0/ 0/ 0/ 1/ 5/ +8
Clarkson 11 (40 /50 /100)/ 0/ 3/ 0/ 1/ 2/ 5/ +7
 
Team scoring by Q (FG%/FG-AT includes 3P%/3P-AT):
Lakers Opponent Lakers Opponent
Q FG-AT 3P-AT FT-AT FG-AT 3P-AT FT-AT FG% 3P% FT% FG% 3P% FT% LAL OPP
1 10-21 3-5 3-4 7-16 0-0 8-12 47.6 60 75 43.8 0 66.7 26 22
2 9-20 1-4 3-4 9-17 2-3 7-8 45 25 75 52.9 66.7 87.5 22 27
H 19-41 4-9 6-8 16-33 2-3 15-20 46.3 44.4 75 48.5 66.7 75 48 49
3 11-19 2-4 4-4 5-17 1-4 4-7 57.9 50 100 29.4 25 57.1 28 15
A3 30-60 6-13 10-12 21-50 3-7 19-27 50 46.2 83.3 42 42.9 70.4 76 64
4 7-20 1-2 1-4 11-28 3-5 4-4 35 50 25 39.3 60 100 16 29
F 37-80 7-15 11-16 32-78 6-12 23-31 46.3 46.7 68.8 41 50 74.2 92 93
 
Team stats by Q (RB includes team RBs):
Lakers Opponent Diff
Q OR RB AS TO ST BL PF OR RB AS TO ST BL PF OR RB AS TO ST BL PF
1 1 9 6 3 2 0 10 1 10 3 4 1 1 5 -1 +3 -1 +1 -1 +5
2 1 8 6 4 1 0 9 2 11 6 3 1 0 4 -1 -3 +1 +5
H 2 17 12 7 3 0 19 3 21 9 7 2 1 9 -1 -4 +3 +1 -1 +10
3 0 9 8 0 0 0 3 1 7 4 2 0 1 6 -1 +2 +4 -2 -1 -3
A3 2 26 20 7 3 0 22 4 28 13 9 2 2 15 -2 -2 +7 -2 +1 -2 +7
4 3 13 3 3 1 0 6 6 16 7 1 1 0 5 -3 -3 -4 +2 +1
F 5 39 23 10 4 0 28 10 44 20 10 3 2 20 -5 -5 +3 +1 -2 +8
 
#- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
Box Score from http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/sacramento-kings-los-angeles-lakers-2014102413
 
Team 1 2 3 4 Tot
Sacramento Kings 22 27 15 29 93
Los Angeles Lakers 26 22 28 16 92 Final
 
PLAYER POS MIN FGM-A 3GM-A FTM-A OR TR AS TO ST BS BA PF PTS +/- EFF
Jason Thompson F 18:11 1-2 0-0 0-1 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 3 2 -13 +1
Rudy Gay F 15:11 3-6 0-0 2-2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 8 -1 +6
DeMarcus Cousins C 26:11 7-11 0-0 7-13 1 10 4 2 0 2 0 2 21 -15 +25
Ben McLemore G 23:43 1-7 1-3 0-0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 3 -11 -1
Darren Collison G 22:04 0-3 0-0 3-3 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 3 3 -16 +2
Nik Stauskas 27:36 3-8 2-4 2-2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 +20 +9
Ramon Sessions 27:08 4-9 0-0 5-6 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 1 13 -3 +16
Derrick Williams 25:25 5-10 2-4 2-2 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 14 -9 +10
Carl Landry 23:16 4-11 0-0 0-0 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 3 8 +14 +6
Reggie Evans 23:11 0-6 0-0 0-0 7 16 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 +14 +12
Ray McCallum 4:12 3-4 1-1 0-0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 +14 +7
Trey Johnson 3:52 1-1 0-0 2-2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 +11 +5
Omri Casspi DNP - Coach's Decision
Ryan Hollins DNP - Coach's Decision
Eric Moreland DNP - Coach's Decision
Totals 32-78 6-12 23-31 10 44 20 10 3 2 0 20 93
Percent 41.0% 50.0% 74.2% Team RBs: 11
 
PLAYER POS MIN FGM-A 3GM-A FTM-A OR TR AS TO ST BS BA PF PTS +/- EFF
Ed Davis F 30:11 6-9 0-0 3-4 2 13 4 0 0 0 0 3 15 +12 +28
Wesley Johnson F 26:29 3-6 2-2 0-0 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 8 +19 +8
Robert Sacre C 26:07 6-14 0-0 0-0 1 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 12 -6 +8
Wayne Ellington G 26:20 2-8 1-2 1-1 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 4 6 +1 +6
Ronnie Price G 2:47 0-1 0-1 0-0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 +1 +0
Jeremy Lin 31:59 6-12 2-6 5-6 0 1 7 3 1 0 0 5 19 +0 +18
Jordan Clarkson 31:01 4-10 1-2 2-2 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 5 11 -13 +7
Julius Randle 29:46 6-12 0-0 0-1 0 9 2 3 1 0 0 4 12 +3 +14
Roscoe Smith 22:06 2-4 0-0 0-2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 -20 +6
Jabari Brown 13:14 2-4 1-2 0-0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 -2 +5
Carlos Boozer DNP - Rest
Kobe Bryant DNP - Rest
Xavier Henry DNP - Sore Right Knee
Jordan Hill DNP - Cervical Strain
Ryan Kelly DNP - Sore Right Hamstring
Steve Nash DNP - Sore Back
Nick Young DNP - Right Thumb
Totals 37-80 7-15 11-16 5 39 23 10 4 0 2 28 92
Percent 46.3% 46.7% 68.8% Team RBs: 8
 
Venue: MGM Grand Garden Arena
 
 
Box Score from http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400584031
 
Team 1 2 3 4 Tot
Sacramento Kings 22 27 15 29 93
Los Angeles Lakers 26 22 28 16 92 - End of Q4
 
PLAYER POS MIN FGM-A 3GM-A FTM-A OR TR AS TO ST BS PF PTS +/- EFF
Jason Thompson PF 18 1-2 0-0 0-1 0 3 0 2 0 0 3 0 2 -1
Rudy Gay SF 15 3-6 0-0 2-2 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 8 -2
DeMarcus Cousins C 26 7-11 0-0 7-13 1 10 4 2 0 2 2 0 21 +4
Darren Collison PG 22 0-3 0-0 3-3 0 1 2 1 0 0 3 0 3 -1
Ben McLemore SG 24 1-7 1-3 0-0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 3 -4
Reggie Evans PF 23 0-6 0-0 0-0 7 16 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 +12
Derrick Williams PF 25 5-10 2-4 2-2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 14 -4
Carl Landry PF 23 4-11 0-0 0-0 0 4 2 1 0 0 3 0 8 -2
Ray McCallum PG 4 3-4 1-1 0-0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 +0
Ramon Sessions PG 27 4-9 0-0 5-6 0 1 8 0 0 0 1 0 13 +3
Nik Stauskas SG 28 3-8 2-4 2-2 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 -1
Trey Johnson SG 4 1-1 0-0 2-2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 +1
Eric Moreland DNP COACH'S DECISION
Omri Casspi DNP COACH'S DECISION
Ryan Hollins DNP COACH'S DECISION
Totals 32-78 6-12 23-31 10 44 20 10 3 2 20 0
Percent 41.0% 50.0% 74.2%
 
Fast break points: 13
Points in the paint: 40
Total Team Turnovers (Points off turnovers): 11 (12)
 
PLAYER POS MIN FGM-A 3GM-A FTM-A OR TR AS TO ST BS PF PTS +/- EFF
Ed Davis PF 30 6-9 0-0 3-4 2 13 4 0 0 0 3 0 15 +13
Wesley Johnson SF 26 3-6 2-2 0-0 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 +0
Robert Sacre C 26 6-14 0-0 0-0 1 5 0 1 0 0 5 0 12 -4
Ronnie Price PG 3 0-1 0-1 0-0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 +0
Wayne Ellington SG 26 2-8 1-2 1-1 0 0 5 0 1 0 4 0 6 +0
Julius Randle PF 30 6-12 0-0 0-1 0 9 2 3 1 0 4 0 12 +2
Jordan Clarkson PG 31 4-10 1-2 2-2 0 0 3 2 1 0 5 0 11 -4
Jeremy Lin PG 32 6-12 2-6 5-6 0 1 7 3 1 0 5 0 19 -1
Roscoe Smith SG 22 2-4 0-0 0-2 2 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 +2
Jabari Brown SG 13 2-4 1-2 0-0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 +0
Carlos Boozer DNP
Totals 37-80 7-15 11-16 5 39 23 10 4 0 28 0
Percent 46.3% 46.7% 68.8%
 
Fast break points: 9
Points in the paint: 38
Total Team Turnovers (Points off turnovers): 10 (4)
 
Flagrant Fouls: None
Technical Fouls: PLAYERS: 1 LALAKERS ( Smith 1 ) - TEAMS: SACRAMENTO (1), LALAKERS (1) - COACHES: None
Officials: Ron Garretson, Leon Wood, Justin Vanduyne
Attendance: 10,890
10:00 PM ET, October 24, 2014 MGM Grand Garden Arena, Las Vegas, NV
 
#- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
Recap whenever.
 
#- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
Game flow URL: http://www.popcornmachine.net/cgi-bin/gameflow.cgi?date=20141024&game=SACLAL
Play-by-play from http://www.nba.com/games/20141024/SACLAL/gameinfo.html#nbaGIPlay
Los Angeles Lakers ( V: Sacramento Kings (2-4)
Start of 1st Quarter
(12:00) Jump Ball Davis vs Thompson (Cousins gains possession)
11:47 V: Cousins Turnover : Bad Pass (1 TO)
11:36 H: Johnson Turnover : Traveling (1 TO)
11:22 H: Sacre Violation:Kicked Ball
11:15 V: Gay Jump Shot: Missed
11:14 H: Davis Rebound (Off:0 Def:1)
10:58 H: Ellington Jump Shot: Missed
10:57 H: Davis Rebound (Off:1 Def:1)
10:56 [LAL 2-0] H: Davis Layup Shot: Made (2 PTS)
10:37 [SAC 2-2] V: Thompson Jump Bank Hook Shot: Made (2 PTS)
10:37 H: Davis Foul: Shooting (1 PF) (1 FTA)
10:37 V: Thompson Free Throw 1 of 1 Missed
10:37 H: Sacre Rebound (Off:0 Def:1)
10:32 [LAL 5-2] H: Johnson 3pt Shot: Made (3 PTS) Assist: Price (1 AST)
10:13 [SAC 4-5] V: Gay Reverse Dunk Shot: Made (2 PTS) Assist: Cousins (1 AST)
10:00 H: Price 3pt Shot: Missed
09:59 V: Thompson Rebound (Off:0 Def:1)
09:57 V: Collison Foul: Offensive (1 PF)
09:57 V: Collison Turnover : Foul (1 TO)
09:54 [LAL 7-4] H: Sacre Jump Shot: Made (2 PTS) Assist: Ellington (1 AST)
09:30 [SAC 6-7] V: Cousins Turnaround Jump Shot: Made (2 PTS)
09:16 H: Sacre Jump Shot: Missed
09:14 V: Collison Rebound (Off:0 Def:1)
09:13 H: Price Foul: Personal (1 PF)
09:13 H: Price Substitution replaced by Lin
08:55 V: Cousins Turnover : Bad Pass (2 TO) Steal:Lin (1 ST)
08:52 V: Gay Foul: Personal (1 PF)
08:35 H: Sacre Hook Shot: Missed
08:33 V: Cousins Rebound (Off:0 Def:1)
08:17 [SAC 8-7] V: Gay Slam Dunk Shot: Made (4 PTS) Assist: Cousins (2 AST)
07:58 H: Lin Turnover : Bad Pass (1 TO) Steal:McLemore (1 ST)
07:50 H: Davis Foul: Personal (2 PF)
07:50 V: Team 5 Sec Inbound Turnover :
07:31 [LAL 9-8] H: Davis Turnaround Jump Shot: Made (4 PTS)
07:07 V: McLemore Jump Shot: Missed
07:06 H: Team Rebound
07:06 V: Thompson Foul: Loose Ball (1 PF)
06:57 H: Sacre Foul: Offensive (1 PF)
06:57 H: Sacre Turnover : Foul (1 TO)
06:39 V: Gay Jump Shot: Missed
06:38 H: Davis Rebound (Off:1 Def:2)
06:21 [LAL 12-8] H: Ellington 3pt Shot: Made (3 PTS)
06:09 [SAC 10-12] V: Cousins Driving Layup Shot: Made (4 PTS) Assist: Collison (1 AST)
06:09 H: Sacre Foul: Shooting Block (2 PF) (1 FTA)
06:09 H: Sacre Substitution replaced by Randle
06:09 [SAC 11-12] V: Cousins Free Throw 1 of 1 (5 PTS)
05:55 [LAL 14-11] H: Lin Driving Layup Shot: Made (2 PTS) Assist: Davis (1 AST)
05:45 V: McLemore Turnover : Bad Pass (1 TO) Steal:Ellington (1 ST)
05:39 H: Johnson Jump Shot: Missed Block: Cousins (1 BLK)
05:39 H: Team Rebound
05:39 H: Team Timeout : Regular
05:35 [LAL 16-11] H: Davis Layup Shot: Made (6 PTS) Assist: Ellington (2 AST)
05:13 H: Davis Foul: Personal (3 PF) (2 FTA)
05:13 [SAC 12-16] V: Cousins Free Throw 1 of 2 (6 PTS)
05:13 H: Davis Substitution replaced by Sacre
05:13 V: Cousins Free Throw 2 of 2 Missed
05:13 H: Randle Rebound (Off:0 Def:1)
05:00 H: Johnson Jump Shot: Missed
04:59 V: Cousins Rebound (Off:0 Def:2)
04:38 [SAC 14-16] V: Gay Fadeaway Jump Shot: Made (6 PTS)
04:10 [LAL 19-14] H: Lin 3pt Shot: Made (5 PTS) Assist: Ellington (3 AST)
"$Bill" <news@todbe.com>: Oct 24 06:59PM -0700

98 108
"$Bill" <news@todbe.com>: Oct 20 07:54PM -0700

We need about 8 or more people to make it interesting.
 
I'm cc'ing the asbnl-l mailing list in addition to usenet - feel
free to pass it on to any other groups you're members of. It's
only a token $5 - same price as the monthly special at Subway.
8 people would mean a $20 split for the two winners, but the more
the merrier. If we get enough, I'll let you know where to send
you $5.
 
Reply and delete the appropriate line below:
 
I'm in this year.
 
I'm gonna pass.
"$Bill" <news@todbe.com>: Oct 20 07:45PM -0700

# Should be interesting to see if they can keep PHO under 100.
 
# Next games following:
# POR at LAL: Wed Oct 22 1930 Preseason Game 7
# SAC at LAL: Fri Oct 24 1930 Preseason Game 8
# HOU at LAL: Tue Oct 28 1930 Game 1
 
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
# Either reply to this post or create a new thread with the same subject line.
# Note that only 'Prediction MMDD' is needed in the subject line, the OPP and
# game time are to make it easy to remember the opponent and the game time.
 
# If replying to a prediction post remove the entire previous message or if
# it's short, top-post to make sure your guess is picked up first. If you make
# a mistake or change your mind, just repost (only last post counts).
 
# Quoted lines from a previous post will be ignored (lines starting with any
# of these characters and any leading spaces : [~+;:|#!<>[](){}-] will be
# assumed to be quoted).
 
# To reply to another poster's post without predicting, change the date to XXXX
# to avoid causing a predict.
 
# Make sure Laker score is first number or is prefixed by a word matching
# this RE: /^la(?!c)(?:l|k)?/i and a space delimiter (if you understand Perl
# regular expr. syntax). See examples below.
 
# Simplest sample post for predicting LA 101 and Seattle opponent 92 :
# ------
# 101 92 Laker score is always first if not qualified
# ------
 
# Equivalent posts :
# ------
# 101
# 92
# ------
# LAL 101
# SEA 92
# ------
# 92 LAL 101
# ------
# SEA 92 LAL 101
# ------
# SEA 92
# LAL 101
# ------
 
# Online Laker prediction contest page: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/
# Predict: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/cgi-bin/laker.pl
# Standings: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/cgi-bin/lakerytd.pl
# Text Schedule: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/cgi-bin/lakersched.pl?action=text
# HTML Schedule: http://www.todbe.com/lakers/cgi-bin/lakersched.pl?action=html
# If nameserver down, try IP of 69.175.58.130 instead of www.todbe.com
 
# You can predict in advance if you won't be able to post on game day.
# You can also get the year-to-date standings and Laker schedule there.
 
# To predict online after predicting on Usenet, you will need to have your
# password reset by me (since it's been set with a default value to prevent
# others from predicting for you). Just email me and I'll set one for you
# and you can change it on your next online predict. If you haven't made a
# prediction on Usenet, you can set your own password on your first online
# predict. NOTE: ONLINE PREDICTIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER USENET PREDICTIONS.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.