Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 9 topics

Friday, June 30, 2017

PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 30 11:05AM -0400

https://www.tennisplayer.net/public/avancedtennis/john_yandell/mod
ern_pro_slice_1/
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 30 06:09PM +0300

PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 30.6.2017 klo 18:05:
> https://www.tennisplayer.net/public/avancedtennis/john_yandell/mod
> ern_pro_slice_1/
 
Stupid headline... everyone hits more spin on slice...
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:12AM -0700

> Stupid headline... everyone hits more spin on slice...
 
But who hits more rpm on it, this is the point.
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:17AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 8:12:34 AM UTC-7, PeteWasLucky wrote:
 
> > Stupid headline... everyone hits more spin on slice...
 
> But who hits more rpm on it, this is the point.
 
Why would anyone care, though? It has no bearing on anything.
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:04AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 4:48:13 AM UTC-7, soccerfan777 wrote:
 
> Henin backhand was quite erratic. When on fire she was fun to watch, but it could go off the boil in important matches
 
I'd rather have a backhand like that than a reliable boring one like Wilander's.
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 08:09AM -0700

Mandlikova. Perfect balance, nearly always.
 
Henin hit off her back foot too much.
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:16AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 8:09:41 AM UTC-7, Carey wrote:
 
> Mandlikova. Perfect balance, nearly always.
 
> Henin hit off her back foot too much.
 
Yeah, I loved Mandlikova's backhand. It was like one flowing motion from backswing to follow-through. She didn't telegraph whether it would be slice or topspin. I think her backhand was less dependent on perfect timing than Henin's or Mauresmo's.
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:03AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 4:51:32 AM UTC-7, soccerfan777 wrote:
 
> So certain extremely fit women with great forehand like Moody and Graf can beat lower ranked men... Just not fat arse Serena
 
Alternate explanations: (1) everyone played patty-cake tennis in the 1920s-30s (2) Neer took it easy on Moody in the exo because he was her friend (3) Moody gave Neer a blowjob in exchange for the win.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 30 05:55PM +0300

Giovanna kirjoitti 30.6.2017 klo 15:04:
> How unfair this is~~
 
I think Murray does.
 
Rafa could lose on 2nd round to Donald Young/Istomin...
 
Then there's Karlovic/Muller
 
Cilic in quarters.
 
Murray is probably tougher than Djokovic.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 30 05:58PM +0300

PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 30.6.2017 klo 15:26:
> Federer has the two Zverev brothers or Roanic and djokovic before the final.
 
Federer has the crap Zverev brother who doesn't even get far enough to
face Fed.
 
Dolgopolov could be dangerous though, although apparently he was injured
in his last match.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:58AM -0700

> Murray is probably tougher than Djokovic.
 
Murray is injured
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 30 06:01PM +0300

PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 30.6.2017 klo 17:58:
>> Murray is probably tougher than Djokovic.
 
> Murray is injured
 
Hip sore is typical for too much play on grass. Not a real injury though
if not serious.
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: Jun 30 10:38PM +1000

On 30/06/2017 10:31 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> years ago & be a commonly accepted view rather than that of minority
> crackpot deniers?
 
> No Whisper, not everything gets exposed, specially when it's meant not to be uncovered.
 
Agreed, but anything on this scale would have been exposed within a day
or 2.
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
TennisGuy <TGuy@techsavvy.com>: Jun 30 10:33AM -0400

On 6/29/2017 11:29 PM, jdeluise wrote:
 
> Now I'm sure TennisGuy will send me a five paragraph angry letter because
> I used the word "rigged", that it proves I am a deep state operative or
> something.
 
jd as I mentioned in my last post, only serious research into the matter
can provide answers to questions you raise here.
 
If/when you do this research, you will learn about the opportunities
that were provided to plant the explosives.
 
But before you even begin to study that, it's best to read/hear about
the testimony of hundreds of witnesses to explosions on 9/11.
 
A good place to start with that is the research done by Graeme MacQueen,
Founding Director of the Centre for Peace Studies (McMaster University,
Hamilton, Ontario).
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:46AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 10:33:54 AM UTC-4, TennisGuy wrote:
 
> A good place to start with that is the research done by Graeme MacQueen,
> Founding Director of the Centre for Peace Studies (McMaster University,
> Hamilton, Ontario).
 
Oh no, believe Canucks?
Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: Jun 30 03:19PM +0100

On 30/06/2017 08:53, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> Wonder if she'll still play Wimbledon!
 
> Venus Williams at fault in fatal car crash in Florida - police
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-40452270
 
It says in the article, "Ms Williams' lawyer Malcolm Cunningham told CNN
in a statement: "Ms Williams entered the intersection on a green light.
The police report estimates that Ms Williams was travelling at 5mph when
Mrs Barson crashed into her."
 
"Authorities did not issue Ms Williams with any citations or traffic
violations. This is an unfortunate accident and Venus expresses her
deepest condolences to the family who lost a loved one."
 
Why wouldn't she play Wimbledon? She doesn't appear to have committed
any offence.
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:31AM -0700

> Why wouldn't she play Wimbledon? She doesn't appear to have committed
any offence.
 
Because she was involved in an accident that caused loss of lives.
It's not about offence, she is probably very shaky and emotional.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:08AM -0700

With his usual fixed cakewalk draw, Murray/Djoker chilling out on holiday and Nadal being out of sorts and wanting to rest his knees, Fed should totally walk this Wimbledon. In fact he should get to the final without dropping a single set, so instead why don't we just guess how many games he'll lose instead?
I say about 42 cos I including at least 1 walk over and a retirement. What you lot reckon?
Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: Jun 30 03:13PM +0100

On 30/06/2017 14:08, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> With his usual fixed cakewalk draw, Murray/Djoker chilling out on holiday and Nadal being out of sorts and wanting to rest his knees, Fed should totally walk this Wimbledon. In fact he should get to the final without dropping a single set, so instead why don't we just guess how many games he'll lose instead?
> I say about 42 cos I including at least 1 walk over and a retirement. What you lot reckon?
 
More than he wins.
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:29AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 10:13:45 AM UTC-4, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
 
95 games lost 7 matches won a day 8th Wednesday!
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 05:52AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 5:25:17 AM UTC-4, Whisper wrote:
 
> I'm just wondering if I'll get any apologies from rst should Rafa beat
> Fed in straights?
 
You won't be getting anything from me because if Federer and Nadal make the final, the outcome will not be decided in straights either way IMO.
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:50AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 8:52:03 AM UTC-4, Court_1 wrote:
 
> > I'm just wondering if I'll get any apologies from rst should Rafa beat
> > Fed in straights?
 
> You won't be getting anything from me because if Federer and Nadal make the final, the outcome will not be decided in straights either way IMO.
 
Fed could beat Kneedal in straight sets, if kneedal gets to meet him!
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 06:51AM -0700

On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 9:50:04 AM UTC-4, Guypers wrote:
> > > Fed in straights?
 
> > You won't be getting anything from me because if Federer and Nadal make the final, the outcome will not be decided in straights either way IMO.
 
> Fed could beat Kneedal in straight sets, if kneedal gets to meet him!
 
No way.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:52AM -0700

> Fed could beat Kneedal in straight sets, if kneedal gets to meet him!
 
Muller or Cilic will do.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jun 30 12:29AM -0700

He's not different he just somehow upset you a lot though, not sour grapes?
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment