Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 11 topics

Thursday, June 29, 2017

Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jun 29 06:05PM -0700

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 5:39:44 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
 
> > > I recommended "9 to 5," but C1 won't watch it cause of Lily Tomlin.
 
> > Love it, full of my favourite actors.
 
> Lily Tomlin and Dolly Parton are a couple of your favorite actors?
 
He's probably referring to Fonda and Dabney Coleman, who was fantastic. But Tomlin and Parton were perfect for the roles they played. I love the film and I'm not even a "male feminist" in the Andy Murray sense.
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 09:21PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:34:27 -0700 (PDT), Court_1
 
>> >I do hate John Wayne
 
>> that's it, i'm done with you. ;-)
 
>You're too busy trying to come up with alternate theories as to why Nadal isn't playing some of the best tennis of his career.
 
last 3 months, he is playing some of the best. just different.
jan-mar, i don't believe so, although he played pretty well.
 
> Anything will work for you except the truth that Federer has changed the script a bit on Nadal off clay, i.e. strengthened his bh/ROS/mentality.
>But keep going as your theories are amusing!
 
fed has a bit to go to prove to me he's changed anything concerning
nadal.
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 09:19PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:43:19 -0700 (PDT), Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>
wrote:
 
>SW says she's "too busy" to play Mac... she knows she'd lose. Heh.
 
i believe mac could beat her today. she'd have trouble with a guy who
just serves and rushes net every pt IMO. no way he'd let her get into
a groove IMO.
 
surprised other gals haven't tried it a bit.
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:54PM -0400

i'll be out for a few weeks so forced to make my wimbledon prediction
without the draw.
 
federer over murray
konta over venus
 
bob
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 29 06:02PM -0700

There's no internet connection where you are going? Are you going to Mars?
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 29 06:11PM -0700

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 6:02:55 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
 
======= That's Classified =======
 
:)
 
P
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 09:12PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:02:53 -0700 (PDT), Court_1
 
>There's no internet connection where you are going? Are you going to Mars?
 
europe, and i hear germany's like 3rd world. :-)
 
i won't have my laptop with newsreader, only a company cell, so i'll
take a wimbledon guess now.
 
bob
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 29 06:13PM -0700

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 5:54:42 PM UTC-7, bob wrote:
 
> federer over murray
> konta over venus
 
> bob
 
Murray's hip might be an issue, for him making his standard level run OR even starting the tournament.
 
Are you sure you don't want a Mulligan on your men's singles pick?
 
P
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 29 06:17PM -0700

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 9:13:03 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
 
> i won't have my laptop with newsreader, only a company cell, so i'll
> take a wimbledon guess now.
 
> bob
 
Are you sure you're not going to visit your relatives on Mars? Be honest. :)
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:50PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:22:19 -0700 (PDT), Gracchus
>> someone does that to them.
 
>> Weird.
 
>You really don't get it, do you? When Trump took the oath of office, he stopped being a private citizen and became chief representative of the USA and successor to all the presidents that came before him. When a president gets down in the gutter, he's dragging the whole country down with him and permanently soiling the office he holds. Maybe where you grew up, it's ok for your leader to act like the worst kind of dick possible. We have different traditions.
 
maybe but everybody knew that personality wise this leopard couldn't
change the spots.
 
bob
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 30 03:51AM +0300

bob kirjoitti 30.6.2017 klo 3:46:
 
> 140 characters in a tweet's all u get. and from a 70 yr old non tech
> savvy businessman. what do you expect a novel?
 
> bob
 
Well what do you expect from your president... tweets that sound like
coming from a severely disturbed teen? Shameful.
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 09:17PM -0400


>> bob
 
>Well what do you expect from your president... tweets that sound like
>coming from a severely disturbed teen? Shameful.
 
i've got an opinion on the tweets, hasn't changed in a year now.
 
1. i like that he tweets, i'm happy to hear anything right from the
horse's mouth with no CNN intervention. i wish more politicians
tweeted more often, actually. and i think we can all agree by now that
media from both sides lies, fakes the news and such.
 
2. yes, i wish he's put more thought into the tweets, take his time,
have someone proofread the details, grammar, etc.
 
again, tweets are compact mini messages, everybody that tweets comes
up with bad grammar, mis spellings, words that don't exist, etc. not a
perfect thing for sure, but we get the point.
 
bob.
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:59PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:12:09 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg
 
>You must be the biggest stalker of Trump out there, you research and post stuff hourly about the guy!
 
he's positively obsessed!
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 09:01PM -0400


>> Bizarre indeed.
 
>"Bizarre"??
 
>Now Trump is nice and friendly to a young woman and you STILL moan and whine!
 
even don lemon, big anchor at CNN, admitted today that trump making a
nice comment to a pretty reporter is not out of line and never was.
 
CNN licking arse now! lmao!
 
bob
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 29 06:15PM -0700

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 6:01:55 PM UTC-7, bob wrote:
> nice comment to a pretty reporter is not out of line and never was.
 
> CNN licking arse now! lmao!
 
> bob
 
Lemon seems caught between a rock and a politically correct place.
 
P
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Jun 29 05:51PM -0700

On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 11:15:23 PM UTC-7, John Liang wrote:
 
> > honest from liang? lol
 
> > bob
 
> Dim wit like you does not know what is honesty ? Obedience is your only positive attribute little bob.
 
 
Yep.
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Jun 29 05:52PM -0700

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 5:47:02 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
> > that this spring. maybe he'll do it at wimbledon, but i doubt it.
 
> Nadal was hitting that high topspin fh to Fed's bh but Federer was coming over the ball earlier and also hitting it more aggressively. He also started hitting the bh ROS flat and aggressively against Nadal instead of chipping it. That made the difference in their last three matches. That and not folding mentally as before.
 
> I'm not sure what you were watching.
 
 
bnb's been gaslighting RST for the last five months WRT Nadal. Puh-thetic.
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 29 06:13PM -0700

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 8:52:57 PM UTC-4, Carey wrote:
 
> > Nadal was hitting that high topspin fh to Fed's bh but Federer was coming over the ball earlier and also hitting it more aggressively. He also started hitting the bh ROS flat and aggressively against Nadal instead of chipping it. That made the difference in their last three matches. That and not folding mentally as before.
 
> > I'm not sure what you were watching.
 
> bnb's been gaslighting RST for the last five months WRT Nadal. Puh-thetic.
 
First he told us that Nadal was in poor form and that's why Federer beat him but then when he saw that was not going to work because Nadal has made seven out of 10 finals, he came up with the Nadal has changed his game too much vs Fed theory. Why the hell would Nadal be changing anything w/ respect to a guy he owned in the past especially with his OCD? That makes no sense.
 
On the other hand you have Whisper admitting to us after the AO final that Nadal played great and that the difference was that Federer altered his bh and slowly but surely over the past few weeks Whisper has tweaked that theory to Nadal elevated his level at the FO vs Stan so that must mean that at Wimbledon on a grass court Nadal can do same to Federer, i.e. thrash Fed in embarrassing straights.
 
You have to love these characters on RST.
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 09:04PM -0400

>> Maybe some humourless leftist, but else, real people?
 
>Had Brian not revealed it was fake I could imagine an rster or two
>gloating that they have that issue in mint condition...
 
wouldn't be me, in canceled my time subscription last yr along with a
few others.
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:57PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 06:36:24 -0500, Federer Fanatic
>Part I: http://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-hate-koch-brothers-part-1/
>Part II: http://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-hate-koch-brothers-part-2/
>Interestingly enough he described the choice between Hillary and Trump as: Cancer and Heartattack.
 
charles koch. :-)
 
i did engineering consulting for the koch brothers' enterprises for 3
yrs. he's famous for telling his employees the gov't is driving the
country off a cliff: democrats at 100mph, republicans at 70mph - but
same cliff.
 
they have a terrible medical plan too, btw.
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:35PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 18:40:59 -0400, TennisGuy <TGuy@techsavvy.com>
wrote:
 
>a pedestrian head on, the pedestrian will be injured or die and
>the car will suffer damage, even though it is much stronger than
>the pedestrian?
 
will the car have a broken windshield?
 
>before it even happens!
>And how would they know?
>How many do you think have witnessed such an accident before in their lives?
 
your example is completely irrelevant, a straw man if there ever was
one.
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:37PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:23:35 -0400, TennisGuy <TGuy@techsavvy.com>
wrote:
 
>year, a decade, whatever, you will understand that it was of the utmost
>importance that the buildings did not topple over and cause extra
>destruction, ESPECIALLY to the 'bathtub floor' (look it up dear).
 
so it's just fine to kill 3000 people, but not 4000, in order to
protect the facade (no pun intended) of a "controlled demolition"?
 
huh?
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:30PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:54:06 -0700 (PDT), Gracchus
>> and had a model of trump being hung, etc. in obama's hometown no less.
>> i shook hands with rahm emanuel, then promptly washed my hands.
 
>Was George Clooney there?
 
didn't see him. nor travolta. but i'm sure they would've protested
Trump heavily had they been there.
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:19PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 11:00:13 +0300, Pelle Svanslos <pelle@svans.los>
wrote:
 
>> CNN.
 
>Nice dodge.
 
>And what wars did Obama start?
 
syria.
 
> What wars did Obama start that had +500k
>casualties?
 
syria.
 
> In general, why do you always have to bring Obama into
>something that has nothing to do with him? That's dumb. It's the
>equivalent of saying "I can't argue on the merits of what I say".
 
why don't you ever bring obama up, as if he's a saint who didn't do
some of these things also? why do you force me to?
 
if you weren't biased you'd realize he's no different from bush in
that regard.
 
 
>> a helluva lot of german citizens were responsible for it.
 
>A much better case can be made of you being responsible for 500k
>casualties in Iraq. And Polar Bears too.
 
yes, bob who owns the electric car, rides public transportation daily,
starts recycling programs in communities, has all LED bulbs in the
house for yrs, works as a professional pushing LEED and energy saving
electrical technologies for humongous industrial enterprises like
utilities, plus talks green to anyone who will listen. yeah, that
"bob" is responsible for the polar bear's demise.
 
yet you people talking it don't live it. you cast a vote for hillary
(who doesn't have a green bone in her body) and think you're green.
you're f'ing hilarious, really. i oughta slap you face.
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 29 08:20PM -0400

On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:51:12 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg
 
>Obama caused the latest disaster in Iraq and destroyed Libya and Syria. He even purposely allowed Turkey to keep ISIS supply lines open, furthering the awfulness of Syria and Iraq. Also
>He pretty much caused the war in Ukraine too by trying to bring down the democratically elected govt.
 
pelle's not interested in "inconvenient truths."
 
bob
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment