Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

Monday, June 26, 2017

Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 26 03:15PM -0500


>>> Smarter than you, as all are.
 
>>He is a she, dumbass.
 
> Who said otherwise?
 
You did. You were so smart you took two posts to piece together
an insult that backfired.
 
 
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 26 03:20PM -0500

>> election, their support of voter ID is right around the
>> corner.
 
> The two are not in the least bit connected, doofus.
 
Liberalism is not based on facts or logic, just emotion.
 
Insuring voters are eligible makes too much sense for your
emotional brain.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 26 03:24PM -0500


> Where's your proof of your statements?
 
I told you. Alabama and Maine.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 26 03:44PM -0500

> Sheth, doofus.
 
> No man up for once and apologize just like a grown up would do.
 
> :-)
 
Quote it? He posted in this thread.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 26 03:45PM -0500


>> I told you. Alabama and Maine.
 
> Nope. Your claims haven't been supported with anything.
 
> Re-mentioning particular places is not support.
 
Supported by the facts.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 26 03:58PM -0500


> He never said it.
 
> You're either a liar or an idiot: you can pick which.
 
> :-)
 
You read poorly. He started the sentence in one post and ended it
in the next.
 
FAIL.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 26 04:39PM -0500


> You providing the quotes and the message IDs.
 
> But you can't, can you?
 
> :-)
 
I could. I won't.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 26 04:47PM -0500

> over the House bill, which would have cost 23 million people their
> insurance. Senate Republicans should be proud!
 
> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/us/politics/senate-health-care-bill-republican.html?_r=0
 
How many will leave by choice after the penalty is gone?
--
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 26 01:18PM -0700

On 2017-06-26 1:15 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Who said otherwise?
 
> You did. You were so smart you took two posts to piece together
> an insult that backfired.
 
Quote it.
 
You can't, because Bobby never said "he" or "him" in reference to Sonam
Sheth, doofus.
 
No man up for once and apologize just like a grown up would do.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 26 01:25PM -0700

On 2017-06-26 1:20 PM, Moderate wrote:
>>> corner.
 
>> The two are not in the least bit connected, doofus.
 
> Liberalism is not based on facts or logic, just emotion.
 
More non sequiturs...
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 26 01:49PM -0700

On 2017-06-26 1:44 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> No man up for once and apologize just like a grown up would do.
 
>> :-)
 
> Quote it? He posted in this thread.
 
I've reviewed the thread from the beginning to this point:
 
He never said it.
 
You're either a liar or an idiot: you can pick which.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 26 02:15PM -0700

On 2017-06-26 1:58 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
> You read poorly. He started the sentence in one post and ended it
> in the next.
 
> FAIL.
 
You know what would really make that apparent (if it were true)?
 
You providing the quotes and the message IDs.
 
But you can't, can you?
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 26 02:41PM -0700

On 2017-06-26 2:39 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> But you can't, can you?
 
>> :-)
 
> I could. I won't.
 
You picked: you're now a liar.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 26 02:26PM -0700

On 2017-06-23 6:57 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
> ...collected in one place!
 
> <https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html>
 
> Here's the list for January alone...
 
And just this month:
 
JUNE 1 "China will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal
plants. So, we can't build the plants, but they can, according to this
agreement. India will be allowed to double its coal production by 2020."
(The agreement doesn't allow or disallow building coal plants.)
 
JUNE 1 "I've just returned from a trip overseas where we concluded
nearly $350 billion of military and economic development for the United
States, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs." (Trump's figures are
inflated and premature.)
 
JUNE 4 "At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of
London says there is 'no reason to be alarmed!'" (The mayor was
specifically talking about the enlarged police presence on the streets.)
 
JUNE 5 "The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel
Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to
S.C." (Trump signed this version of the travel ban, not the Justice
Department.)
 
JUNE 21 "They all say it's 'nonbinding.' Like hell it's nonbinding."
(The Paris climate agreement is nonbinding — and Trump said so in his
speech announcing the withdrawal.)
 
JUNE 21 "Right now, we are one of the highest-taxed nations in the
world." (We're not.)
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 26 01:44PM -0700


> >http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2017-06-26-US--Supreme%20Court-Travel%20Ban/id-d5738691d91f437d820f25c234304a4a
 
> Did you see the word "partly" in this report? What they allowed is
> NOT what Trump wanted.
 
They didn't issue a ruling, just lifted part of a stay. They will
hear oral arguments in the fall.
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Jun 26 01:55PM -0700

On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 4:44:26 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:02:44 -0700 (PDT), tomseim2g@gmail.com wrote:
 
> > >Really not very surprising - it is clearly spelled out in
> > >the law (Obama did the same thing, but in secret):
 
Not quite, and the outcome of Obama's suspension was that they
did put into effect new policies in a timely fashion. See next.
 
> > NOT what Trump wanted.
 
> They didn't issue a ruling, just lifted part of a stay. They will
> hear oral arguments in the fall.
 
As things stand now with Trump, his request was under the self-
claimed rationale of needing a 120 day suspension to research
and fix shortcomings ... but 120 days have already come & went.
 
Specifically, EO 13769 was published on 1 Feb 2017 (Day 32) and
today (26 June) is Day 177, which means the Administration has
already had 145 days while they claimed that they only needed 120.
 
Granted, things don't always run on time, so some extra amount
of time is fair & reasonable ... but if it comes October and
the Administration still has no plan, then their façade becomes
quite obvious and they should lose based on ... choose your
poison: either gross incompetence, or deliberately false pretenses.
 
 
-hh
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jun 26 02:17PM -0700

- show quoted text -
They didn't issue a ruling, just lifted part of a stay. They will
hear oral arguments in the fall.
 
And the effect is the travel ban.
Victory for the American people.
Defeat for the idealistic.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 26 02:21PM -0700

On 2017-06-26 2:17 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> And the effect is the travel ban.
> Victory for the American people.
> Defeat for the idealistic.
 
Except Trump himself outed the fact that the putative reason for the ban
(time to review the process) wasn't really the reason...
 
...but separating the timelines for the two aspects of the executive order.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 26 01:26PM -0700

On 2017-06-26 1:24 PM, Moderate wrote:
> Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> Wrote in message:
 
>> Where's your proof of your statements?
 
> I told you. Alabama and Maine.
 
Nope. Your claims haven't been supported with anything.
 
Re-mentioning particular places is not support.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 26 01:41PM -0700

On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 11:37:38 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
> money. My guns. If others don't have their own, then tough shit for
> them.
 
> Conservatives are about personal responsibility...and guns. :-)
 
And about selfishness and greed and blaming the unfortunate for
their misfortunes.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jun 26 02:16PM -0700

On Sunday, June 25, 2017 at 11:37:38 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
> money. My guns. If others don't have their own, then tough shit for
> them.
 
> Conservatives are about personal responsibility...and guns. :-)
 
And about selfishness and greed and blaming the unfortunate for
their misfortunes.
 
The Right gives far more money to charitable causes than the Left.
Remember Biden's tax return.
I want to help those who want to help themselves.
You just want to distribute wealth and keep people on the government tit.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 26 01:49PM -0700

The CBO scored the Senate health care bill and found it would cost
22 million people their health insurance. That's a big improvement
over the House bill, which would have cost 23 million people their
insurance. Senate Republicans should be proud!
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/us/politics/senate-health-care-bill-republican.html?_r=0
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jun 26 02:12PM -0700

The CBO scored the Senate health care bill and found it would cost
22 million people their health insurance. That's a big improvement
over the House bill, which would have cost 23 million people their
insurance. Senate Republicans should be proud!
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/26/us/politics/senate-health-care-bill-republican.html?_r=0
 
By year 2026, after billions are saved both in the national budget and in health insurance premiums. Of course the Left fails to mention these pertinent facts nor emphasize the absurdity of 23 million people who going to choose not to be covered.
 
There is an excellent CNN article that gives the bigger picture. Essentially the GOP should try for this Band-Aid fix but if it fails, let Obamacare fail, forcing the Democrats to finally come up with a bipartisan solution. This happened to Reagan early in his first term when he tried to fix Social Security. Of course the Left shrilled but a few years later, acted responsibly in fixing SS. Let Obamacare fail, leaving it up to Schwarmey and Plastic Pelosi to come up with a solution.
 
Here is the link...
 
On healthcare, GOP loss could be a win
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/25/opinions/gop-health-care-complicated-zelizer-opinion/index.html
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 26 12:04PM -0500


>>> You are the joke.
 
>> No, you are if that's humorous to you.
 
>Sarcasm is a bit over you head it seems.
 
I'm well aware of sarcasm, but it's sometimes an excuse that's given
for idiocy.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 26 11:57AM -0500


>> But that's what trolls do. For instance, he knows that Trump is a
>> liar but can keep a thread going by continuing to deny the obvious.
 
>You libtards had PLENTY of opportunity to provide PROOF that Trump lied and just deflected.
I offered three sites that had dozens of proven lies that can't be
denied by anyone with an IQ of room temperature, plus a way for an
idiot like you to google many,many more. Yet you don't mind showing
your ass just to keep this crap alive.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment