Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 4 topics

Friday, June 2, 2017

Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 05:12AM -0500

> https://theduran.com/hillary-clinton-now-blames-macedonia-for-election-loss-in-bizarre-onstage-interview/
 
The poor Macedonian content farmers just trying to earn a living.
Obviously Hillary provides a lot of fertilizer.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 05:23AM -0500

> so....including Mobil, who has more to lose by staying.
 
> Now the USA is locked in with Syria and Nicaragua, and against 195
> other countries. Shameful.
 
It was not as important to the United States as it was to China.
Glad I was able to correct you yesterday.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 09:12AM -0500

> membership of the UN and required no ratification by Congress, just
> the signatory of the country agreeing to it.
 
> So you learned something today, raising your IQ to double figures.
 
Then cancelling it was no big deal.
 
It was a bad deal for America, because Obama made bad deals.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 09:19AM -0500

> There was nothing to correct. But nice try, dick head.
 
> Do you actually think that anyone believes you any more? You not only
> are a liar but a silly shit.
 
I didn't edit anything.
 
You certainly touted China for signing the Accord.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 01:23PM -0500

> of such major companies suggestions to forgo it shows his hard headed
> idiocy. Hell, even his daughter and her husband who is part of his
> administration were against it.
 
You obviously haven't read the Paris Accord.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 01:26PM -0500


> I certainly did not and you can't point out where I did...
> just another one of your statements that there is no way to back up.
> Your ability to correct anyone is amazingly weak.
 
Try to tell the Chinese and Japanese that. They have to wear
masks in order to survive the man-made smog. But they are still
in the Paris Climate Agreement
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 06:15PM -0500


> China is doing far more than the U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
> Of course, that's not saying much because the U.S. isn't doing
> anything.
 
Complete BS.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 06:19PM -0500

> nutshell that's it and unarguable. Google it and you'll learn
> something. Now, if you read Breitbart and that ilk they talk doomsday
> as usual, but their thinking is as small as yours.
 
I read the Accord.
 
So when you said, 'The Paris Accord was too important to dump'
what did you mean?
 
You now say it is nothing.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 08:56PM -0500

> wrote:
 
>>I read the Accord.
 
> Then you owe me an apology....oh, wait. You didn't understand it.
 
You don't understand it, because you didn't read it.
 
 
> You're such a dick. How Mike and Greg can say that Alan just looks
> for an argument and never calls you on it I don't understand.
> So wrong so much, you should be ashamed to try this any more.
 
It is a direct quote from you in the post that started this thread.
 
You can't stop lying.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 02 09:05PM -0500

> anything.
 
> Hmmm....so the solar panels I see everywhere in Arizona and wind farms in Oregon and Washington state do not amount to anything.
 
> Perhaps the rest of the world need to catch up to us.
 
How can global warming enthusiasts be so ignorant?
 
https://tinyurl.com/y9d2atn9
 
--
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Jun 03 04:03AM +0200

AN AGING TROLL MOTHERFUCKER!
 
WHO WOULD WANT THIS ASSHOLE?
 
KEEP SEEKING ATTENTION ASSWIPE, WE WILL GLADLY GIVE IT TO YOU!
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 02 09:04AM -0500


>> Now the USA is locked in with Syria and Nicaragua, and against 195
>> other countries. Shameful.
 
>If this "agreement" was so damn good WHY didn't Obummer have it ratified by Congress?
 
As I said, you're a typical wingnut. It was an agreement made by the
membership of the UN and required no ratification by Congress, just
the signatory of the country agreeing to it.
 
So you learned something today, raising your IQ to double figures.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 02 09:09AM -0500

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 05:23:55 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> other countries. Shameful.
 
>It was not as important to the United States as it was to China.
> Glad I was able to correct you yesterday.
 
Doofus. As it showed perfectly in the text that you wisely edited
out, I made no comment regarding China other than the smog problem.
There was nothing to correct. But nice try, dick head.
 
Do you actually think that anyone believes you any more? You not only
are a liar but a silly shit.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 02 09:34AM -0500

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:12:42 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> So you learned something today, raising your IQ to double figures.
 
>Then cancelling it was no big deal.
 
>It was a bad deal for America, because Obama made bad deals.
 
You obviously know little about the Paris agreement. There was no
"deal", no penalties, any country could take their own pace in
reducing carbon emission, or leave at any time. The idea was that in
agreeing to the overall idea of reduction of such emissions it would
put pressure in the signatory companies to continue that.
 
It seems that Trump just wants to undo anything that Obama did,
whether or not it was positive. The fact that he did this in the face
of such major companies suggestions to forgo it shows his hard headed
idiocy. Hell, even his daughter and her husband who is part of his
administration were against it.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 02 09:37AM -0500

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 09:19:02 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> are a liar but a silly shit.
 
>I didn't edit anything.
 
>You certainly touted China for signing the Accord.
 
I certainly did not and you can't point out where I did...
just another one of your statements that there is no way to back up.
Your ability to correct anyone is amazingly weak.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 02 03:39PM -0500

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:23:30 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> idiocy. Hell, even his daughter and her husband who is part of his
>> administration were against it.
 
>You obviously haven't read the Paris Accord.
 
Yes I have. If you disagree with anything above then you are more than
an idiot. Basically a gentleman's agreement between the signatories,
each country sets its own goals and there' no penalty for not reaching
them. There's no cost to belong and all that is expected is that each
country do it's best to reach the goal that they have set. In a
nutshell that's it and unarguable. Google it and you'll learn
something. Now, if you read Breitbart and that ilk they talk doomsday
as usual, but their thinking is as small as yours.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 02 03:44PM -0500

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:26:38 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>Try to tell the Chinese and Japanese that. They have to wear
> masks in order to survive the man-made smog. But they are still
> in the Paris Climate Agreement.
 
You are making a fool of yourself and should stop. There is nothing
there that touts China. The sentence, if read by a person with a
brain, says that even though they are suffering from pollution they
haven't left the agreement. That's neither a plus or a minus in my
opinion, but a fact.
 
Fool.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 02 03:01PM -0700

> haven't left the agreement. That's neither a plus or a minus in my
> opinion, but a fact.
 
> Fool.
 
China is doing far more than the U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Of course, that's not saying much because the U.S. isn't doing
anything.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jun 02 05:13PM -0700

- show quoted text -
China is doing far more than the U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Of course, that's not saying much because the U.S. isn't doing
anything.
 
Hmmm....so the solar panels I see everywhere in Arizona and wind farms in Oregon and Washington state do not amount to anything.
 
Perhaps the rest of the world need to catch up to us.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 02 07:15PM -0500

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 18:19:19 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> something. Now, if you read Breitbart and that ilk they talk doomsday
>> as usual, but their thinking is as small as yours.
 
>I read the Accord.
 
Then you owe me an apology....oh, wait. You didn't understand it.
 
>So when you said, 'The Paris Accord was too important to dump'
> what did you mean?
 
>You now say it is nothing.
 
Wrong again. That was never said.
 
You're such a dick. How Mike and Greg can say that Alan just looks
for an argument and never calls you on it I don't understand.
So wrong so much, you should be ashamed to try this any more.
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Jun 02 05:43PM -0700

Greg wrote:
 
> Hmmm....so the solar panels I see everywhere in Arizona and wind farms in
> Oregon and Washington state do not amount to anything.
 
> Perhaps the rest of the world need to catch up to us.
 
Perhaps you need to go see the rest of the world to see how extant wind & solar
has become, particularly relative to the US. I can recall a drive from Brussels
to Stuttgart which had wind turbines on ridge after ridge...a decade ago. And a
Colleague was building a new house for himself on a design that was energy neutral.
Think about how much your monthly heating + AC bills sum to ... and now cut it by 90%.
Just how much would this save you per year? Probably $1K-2K?
 
Well, that is where the rest of the world is going, Greg...and the USA is behind, let alone being in the lead.
 
 
-hh
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 02 08:02PM -0500

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 17:43:53 -0700 (PDT), -hh
>Think about how much your monthly heating + AC bills sum to ... and now cut it by 90%.
>Just how much would this save you per year? Probably $1K-2K?
 
>Well, that is where the rest of the world is going, Greg...and the USA is behind, let alone being in the lead.
 
Trump ran on calling wind turbines an eyesore and bird killers. The
largest wind farm in the world is in Kern County, CA.
 
I don't recall him criticizing solar panels but wouldn't be surprised.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 02 10:31AM -0700

On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 8:43:46 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> > So is there a liberal bias?
 
> When did I say that?
 
> Didn't claim you did. The inquiry is too genuinely seek your opinion, based on your vast experience.
 
If you're asking me about liberal bias at CNN or other TV news
channels, I have no opinion because I never watch them.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jun 02 11:11AM -0700

On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 9:31:32 AM UTC-8, John B. wrote:
 
> > Didn't claim you did. The inquiry is too genuinely seek your opinion, based on your vast experience.
 
> If you're asking me about liberal bias at CNN or other TV news
> channels, I have no opinion because I never watch them.
 
Fine...is their liberal bias in the print media you read?
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 02 02:59PM -0700

On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 2:11:16 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> > If you're asking me about liberal bias at CNN or other TV news
> > channels, I have no opinion because I never watch them.
 
> Fine...is their liberal bias in the print media you read?
 
Not much. I try to avoid publications that are biased one way
or the other.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment