Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 7 topics

Saturday, June 10, 2017

Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 06:11PM -0500


> Nope. Comey wanting to brief Trump privately about something very
> personal to him is entirely different than Trump wanting to talk about
> ongoing investigations of members of his administration.
 
That is Comey's perspective. Trump wasn't privy to Comey's mindset.
 
The FBI Director shuffled everyone out and had a private meeting.
For all Trump knows that is how Comey wants to meet.
 
That is certainly no indication of something nefarious on Trump's part.
 
By the way since you knew what lead I was talking about it is
clear you were just being an asshole. Interactions don't occur
in a vacuum. On Usenet or the Oval Office.
 
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 06:12PM -0500


>> What does this have to do with Democrats knowing lying?
 
> Why have you deflected this conversation?
 
That is what I asked him.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 06:14PM -0500


> <http://gizmodo.com/trump-accuses-comey-of-perjury-while-dodging-questions-1795971885>
 
> 'Maybe Merriam-Webster can just tweet the definition of ?vindication? so
> the president can learn to use it properly.'
 
Why didn't Comey offer his resignation to Trump? Loss of
principles or he lied about the conversation?
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 07:15PM -0500

>> clear you were just being an asshole. Interactions don't occur
>> in a vacuum. On Usenet or the Oval Office.
 
> Spare us.
 
Spin it however you want. The facts are that Comey initiated the
one on one and you are an asshole.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 08:42PM -0500

> On 2017-06-09 5:15 PM, Moderate wrote:
us.
>> one on one and you are an asshole.
 
> No. Comey had a private meeting with Trump to discuss one very private
> matter.
 
The very private matter from Comey's one on one was leaked.
 
No more leaks since Comey was canned.
 
Hmmm....
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 09:36PM -0500


>> No more leaks since Comey was canned.
 
>> Hmmm....
 
> Yet more deflection...
 
You have been doing all the deflection. You are too much of an ass
to admit Comey initiated the one on one format.
 
You deflected Comey's lead.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 10 01:53AM -0500


> I already admitted it arguendo, but your claim that Trump was "just
> following Comey's lead" is based on your apparent ability to read
> Trump's mind.
 
Not at all. I have been giving Comey the benefit of doubt.
 
Comey testified he leaked his version of the meeting after he
learned Trump might have a tape. Why?
 
Why did he need to get out in front of this? Is his story of
being fearful of Trump and not wanting to be one on one some sort
of cover? It makes no sense that a tape of the meeting motivated
him to get his weird version out there unless....
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 10 01:57AM -0500


>> Meanwhile, another major insurer withdraws from Washington state. Yet the Democrats can only cry Marsha Marsha Marsha. Excuse me? Russia Russia Russia.
 
> Sort of like the "Clinton, Clinton, Clinton!" cries of you wingnuts.
 
> :-)
 
Except Clinton did the things we are upset about. I know that is
a meaningless difference to you lying scum.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 10 03:12AM -0500


> That addresses in no way what we were just discussing (your claim that
> Trump was "just following Comey's lead" on one-on-one meetings).
 
> What a shock to find you clipped all of that out, huh?
 
I did not cut out the part where you agreed Comey initiated the
one on one.
 
So why does Comey need to get his version out by nefarious means
if it agrees with the tape?
--
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jun 09 08:09PM -0700

Comey's testimony shows Russia controversy is an anti-Trump witch hunt
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/09/opinions/comey-testimony-shows-anti-trump-witch-hunt-scaramucci/index.html
 
Note the quotations from Comey about the mainstream press coverage.
 
Meanwhile, another major insurer withdraws from Washington state. Yet the Democrats can only cry Marsha Marsha Marsha. Excuse me… Russia Russia Russia.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 08:15PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 8:09 PM, Dene wrote:
> Comey's testimony shows Russia controversy is an anti-Trump witch hunt
> http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/09/opinions/comey-testimony-shows-anti-trump-witch-hunt-scaramucci/index.html
 
So CNN is only credible when they agree with you?
 
 
> Note the quotations from Comey about the mainstream press coverage.
 
> Meanwhile, another major insurer withdraws from Washington state. Yet the Democrats can only cry Marsha Marsha Marsha. Excuse me… Russia Russia Russia.
 
Sort of like the "Clinton, Clinton, Clinton!" cries of you wingnuts.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 10 12:00AM -0700

On 2017-06-09 11:57 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> :-)
 
> Except Clinton did the things we are upset about. I know that is
> a meaningless difference to you lying scum.
 
Russia really did interfere and influence your election.
 
That still matters today.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 04:17PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 4:11 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> personal to him is entirely different than Trump wanting to talk about
>> ongoing investigations of members of his administration.
 
> That is Comey's perspective. Trump wasn't privy to Comey's mindset.
 
"Will no one rid me of this meddlesome priest".
 
 
> The FBI Director shuffled everyone out and had a private meeting.
> For all Trump knows that is how Comey wants to meet.
 
Bullshit.
 
 
> That is certainly no indication of something nefarious on Trump's part.
 
It certainly is.
 
 
> By the way since you knew what lead I was talking about it is
> clear you were just being an asshole. Interactions don't occur
> in a vacuum. On Usenet or the Oval Office.
 
Spare us.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 05:18PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 5:15 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Spare us.
 
> Spin it however you want. The facts are that Comey initiated the
> one on one and you are an asshole.
 
No. Comey had a private meeting with Trump to discuss one very private
matter.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 06:43PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 6:42 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
> The very private matter from Comey's one on one was leaked.
 
> No more leaks since Comey was canned.
 
> Hmmm....
 
 
Yet more deflection...
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 07:39PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 7:36 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Yet more deflection...
 
> You have been doing all the deflection. You are too much of an ass
> to admit Comey initiated the one on one format.
 
I already admitted it arguendo, but your claim that Trump was "just
following Comey's lead" is based on your apparent ability to read
Trump's mind.
 
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 11:58PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 11:53 PM, Moderate wrote:
> being fearful of Trump and not wanting to be one on one some sort
> of cover? It makes no sense that a tape of the meeting motivated
> him to get his weird version out there unless....
 
That addresses in no way what we were just discussing (your claim that
Trump was "just following Comey's lead" on one-on-one meetings).
 
What a shock to find you clipped all of that out, huh?
Silvio <silvio@internet.com>: Jun 08 11:15PM +0200

On 06/08/2017 08:52 PM, Scott M. Kozel wrote:
 
> distance you need to hit it pretty hard, because with that loft
> a lot of the flight goes vertically. If you hit it fat (as
> someone else pointed out) it may go 100 yards into wherever.
 
Yes, wedges are like that. Even a PW can easily fly the green from 110
yards out if you skull it but the effect increases with the loft so a 64
will require proper contact.
If the ball is sitting up just right on some grass you can simply use
its bounce but on a tight lie the margin for error is minimal since a
skull is usually deadly from so close to the green.
And don't forget that a 64 can easily slide cleanly under the ball on
tuffy lies.
 
Carry distance (and angle of descent) can be manipulated quite easily by
varying the position of the hands. But that takes skill and having the
hands backward increases the risk of a skulled shot.
 
Can't you borrow one to see if it fits your game?
"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@comcast.net>: Jun 09 06:59PM -0700

On Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 5:15:06 PM UTC-4, Silvio wrote:
> varying the position of the hands. But that takes skill and having the
> hands backward increases the risk of a skulled shot.
 
> Can't you borrow one to see if it fits your game?
 
I don't personally know anyone with a 64 degree lob wedge. Sounds like
from what I am reading here, not very many golfers have one. I saw
about 20 at Golf Galaxy near here.
 
Of course there is always the issue of what club do you take out of
your bag, if you want to carry this club. Carrying 5 wedges seems like
a stretch. Maybe take out the 60 degree wedge.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 06:43PM -0700

<https://www.facebook.com/senatorelizabethwarren/videos/794896667339495/>
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Jun 09 07:31PM -0400

On 06/09/2017 09:45 AM, MNMikeW wrote:
>> Caller is a great source for you though. They print what you want to
>> hear.
 
> Says the NBC sheep.

But not a discerning man of science like yourself, right Mike?
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 09 07:14PM -0500

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 19:31:06 -0400, Carbon
>>> hear.
 
>> Says the NBC sheep.
 
>But not a discerning man of science like yourself, right Mike?
 
 
Especially since I didn't even check news sources. I saw the
interrogation and heard every word.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 03:01PM -0700

'In the wake of Comey's testimony and Trump's rebuttal, the American
public has been left with the difficult decision. Should they believe
the G-man who once threatened to quit his job as a US attorney on
principle and whose former employees can't find anything bad to say
about him? Or the former casino owner who paid $25 million to settle a
class-action fraud lawsuit six months ago and was recently outed for
stealing kids' cancer charity money? Tough call.'
 
<http://gizmodo.com/trump-accuses-comey-of-perjury-while-dodging-questions-1795971885>
 
'Maybe Merriam-Webster can just tweet the definition of "vindication" so
the president can learn to use it properly.'
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 04:18PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 4:14 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> the president can learn to use it properly.'
 
> Why didn't Comey offer his resignation to Trump? Loss of
> principles or he lied about the conversation?
 
Why should he have offered his resignation?
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 09 06:27PM -0500

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 16:18:04 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
 
>> Why didn't Comey offer his resignation to Trump? Loss of
>> principles or he lied about the conversation?
 
>Why should he have offered his resignation?
 
Mod has gone off the very deep end. Everything he's written today is
absolute garbage. He's making far-fetched presumptions based on what
he would like for the facts to be. We watched the interrogation and
it was almost diametrical opposite of his view.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment