Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 6 topics

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

TennisGuy <TGuy@techsavvy.com>: May 17 03:06PM -0400

On 5/17/2017 12:40 PM, The Iceberg wrote:
> Age of the Young Guns! Lol
And you need to consider this...
It is common tennis knowledge that an ATP tennis generation is 5 years.
Real life generation is 20 years. This is for a life expectancy of
approx. 75 yrs (let's make that 80 for round numbers).
For ATP tennis, the life expectancy is usually 10 years, occasionally
15, and rarely 15+.
So real life:
Life expectancy 80, generation 20 (generation a factor of .25)
ATP tennis:
(Let's bump up the life expectancy a bit)
Life expectancy 15, generation 5 (generation a factor of .33)
Why am I mentioning all of this?
Can you imagine a great grandfather getting on a tennis court and
playing their great grand child a tennis match? Who do you think would win?
Well this is exactly what Federer is doing every time he steps on
court an plays a 20 or 21 year old!
And you know what?
He still beats them almost every time!
Incredible eh Icey?
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: May 17 08:03PM +0300

17.5.2017, 2:49, stephenJ kirjoitti:
> No Serena, and now no Sharapova? What reason is there to watch?
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: May 17 08:03PM +0300

17.5.2017, 2:59, Gracchus kirjoitti:
>> Terrible decision. No Serena, and now no Sharapova? What reason is there
>> to watch?
> Bouchard!
Fuck hard?
calimero377@gmx.de: May 17 10:01AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 2:32:57 PM UTC+2, The Iceberg wrote:
> Only cos you were scared he was going to clamp down on money obsessed amoral corrupt bankers like you.
Clamping down on bankers?
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: May 17 07:55PM +0300

17.5.2017, 1:17, arahim kirjoitti:
> Outdoor Grass: Federer 2-1 (Nadal 33.33%, Federer 66.67%)
> Equalizing for surfaces (If they played a 100 on each surface):
> Nadal 198.21, Federer 201.79
Indoor hard is not a surface.
Also, 3 matches is too few for statistical analysis, as is 6.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: May 17 08:00PM +0300

17.5.2017, 18:14, kaennorsing kirjoitti:
> That's why those samples sizes (in Fed's favour) are so small.
Too small to draw conclusions on. Plus indoor hard is not a surface,
it's just part of the matches played on hard.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 17 09:57AM -0700

That sucks, sorry to hear it.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 17 09:54AM -0700

You were one of those students that cried when Trump won and demanded to be taken to a safe space eh!
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.


Post a Comment