Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 6 topics

Saturday, May 27, 2017

stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: May 27 12:37PM -0500

On 5/27/2017 8:31 AM, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
 
>> In 20+ years, I've never come close to blocking anyone from my RST
>> feed, but I'm edging toward doing so for Pelle
 
> Considering Trump WON, you guys sure seem miffed.
 
You made a good post the other day about groundstrokes on grass. We need
more of that, not endless anti-Trump nonsense.
 
Fact is, the mainstream news media broadcasts anti-Trump 24/7 so you're
not contributing anything with these posts. In contrast, insights about
groundstrokes on grass are in much shorter supply, so you can do a lot
more good in that area. :)
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.com>: May 27 09:01PM +0300

On 27.5.2017 20:37, stephenJ wrote:
 
>> Considering Trump WON, you guys sure seem miffed.
 
> You made a good post the other day about groundstrokes on grass. We need
> more of that, not endless anti-Trump nonsense.
 
I don't care what you think.
 
--
"Donald Trump is the weak man's vision of a strong man."
-- Charles Cooke
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: May 27 01:30PM -0500

On 5/27/2017 1:01 PM, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
 
>> You made a good post the other day about groundstrokes on grass. We
>> need more of that, not endless anti-Trump nonsense.
 
> I don't care what you think.
 
That's because you're too bile-ridden and bitter to see sense when it
slaps you in the face. Pathetic little boy.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.com>: May 27 09:44PM +0300

On 27.5.2017 21:30, stephenJ wrote:
 
>> I don't care what you think.
 
> That's because you're too bile-ridden and bitter to see sense when it
> slaps you in the face. Pathetic little boy.
 
Just move on, buddy. If you announce kill-filing, either do it or don't.
But don't expect me to "discuss" it in your idiotic cajoling terms.
 
--
"Donald Trump is the weak man's vision of a strong man."
-- Charles Cooke
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: May 27 01:45PM -0500

On 5/27/2017 1:44 PM, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
 
>> That's because you're too bile-ridden and bitter to see sense when it
>> slaps you in the face. Pathetic little boy.
 
> Just move on, buddy.
 
Pathetic little boy.
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
nuwildcat90@gmail.com: May 27 11:08AM -0700

David, thank you for continuing this. This is Thomas
R. Kettler using Google Groups since I'm away and
don't have Wifi.
 
Gentlemen- Stanislas Wawrinka defeats Novak
Djokovic
Ladies- Garbine Muguruza defeats Simona Halep
nuwildcat90@gmail.com: May 27 11:15AM -0700

Thank you DavidW for continuing this. This is
Thomas R. Kettler using Google Groups since I'm
away and don't have Wifi.
 
Gentlemen- Stanislas Wawrinka defeats Novak
Djokovic
Ladies- Garbine Muguruza defeats Simona Halep
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.com>: May 27 08:58PM +0300

On 27.5.2017 18:55, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
> No NATO member contributes money to NATO for military purposes. The only
> money is paid - to NATO - for admin, or building the new HQ. Quite where
> he thinks this money is pouring in is a mystery.
 
Indeed.
 
Trump also apparently calculates the "debt" the Europeans owe to the US
from the baseline 2% of GDP spending. But that is not a NATO rule, it is
a political target which is supposed to be met in 2024 or 2020.
 
Also, the US spends 3.7% of its GDP in defense. most of the growth to
that has come from non-NATO operations. So, it's unclear where he thinks
the European money should have been put.
 
This is patently silly. I would understand it if it was for local
consumption, the Jaros/bob types, but it seems not to be.
 
--
"Donald Trump is the weak man's vision of a strong man."
-- Charles Cooke
TennisGuy <TGuy@techsavvy.com>: May 27 01:28PM -0400

On 5/22/2017 7:14 AM, Whisper wrote:
 
> Let me guess - this 'list' of magical players contains 1 name?
 
 
What you on about son?
 
Patrick produced a list.
I told him it was a good list.
End of 'list' story.
 
Next chapter. I mention I won't be watching them after Fed retires
because I like to watch magical players.
 
Inference, Fed is a magical player.
BTW, he is also YOUR favourite player since 2002 as you mentioned here a
few months ago.
 
Are there any other magical players today for me?
Nope.
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: May 27 12:29PM -0500

On 5/27/2017 9:01 AM, Whisper wrote:
 
> He looked unstoppable last yr in 1st 2 rds before mysteriously pulling out.
 
 
No question, looks can be deceiving, and Rafa is prone to injury. Those
are two reasons why we'll tune in.
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
TennisGuy <TGuy@techsavvy.com>: May 27 01:10PM -0400

On 5/27/2017 5:40 AM, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> Also Ermm Fed *IS* at peak, as proven by him winning to the AO. Also
> ALEX Zverev has long been my pick to be the best new guy and I long
> said Thiem uses too much power to win stuff.
 
OK now I understand your logic.
Thiem should change his schedule so that Icey will be satisfied
that Patrick's prediction was correct.
 
How stupid of me for not getting this the first time!
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment