Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

Sunday, May 28, 2017

undecided <costasz@gmail.com>: May 27 02:47PM -0700

On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 8:09:58 AM UTC-4, DavidW wrote:
> http://home.pacific.net.au/~davidw/tennis/contest/rst_2017sp_RG.html
 
> Entries must be posted before the first ball is struck in Paris on Sunday.
 
> Good luck.
 
Nadal Def. Murray
Muguruza Def. Navarro
Maria Miller <nospammariami@xxxremovegazeta.pl>: May 27 11:49PM +0200

1. Wawrinka
2. Thiem
 
1. Muguruza
2. Konta
 
M.M.
"Michał Jankowski" <michalj@fuw.edu.pl>: May 27 11:52PM +0200

A. Zverev def. Nadal
Svitolina def. Muguruza
 
MJ
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: May 27 05:17PM -0700

On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 5:52:12 PM UTC-4, Michał Jankowski wrote:
> A. Zverev def. Nadal
> Svitolina def. Muguruza
 
> MJ
 
Nadal b Stan
Mugulooza b Halep
Yama <yama212NOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk>: May 28 03:28AM +0300

Hommes: Wawrinka d. Goffin
Mademoiselles: Muguruza d. Pavlyuchenkova
Scott <scottl44@yahoo.com>: May 27 06:45PM -0700

On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 8:52:07 PM UTC-4, Scott wrote:
 
> Djoker def Stan
> Pliskova def Lerner
 
> Thanks, David!
 
Spell check got me.
 
Djoker def Stan
Pliskova def Kerber
DavidW <no@email.provided>: May 28 12:22PM +1000

On 28-May-17 11:45 AM, Scott wrote:
>> Pliskova def Lerner
 
> Spell check got me.
 
> Pliskova def Kerber
 
Yeah, I figured it out after a while. L is next K and B is next to N on
the keyboard.
TennisGuy <TGuy@techsavvy.com>: May 28 12:26AM -0400

On 5/26/2017 8:11 AM, DavidW wrote:
> http://home.pacific.net.au/~davidw/tennis/contest/rst_2017sp_RG.html
 
> Entries must be posted before the first ball is struck in Paris on Sunday.
 
> Good luck.
 
 
Thanks again David for hosting. You are a wise man to step in only when
needed most here. :)
 
My picks:
 
Djok d Waw
Konta d Kerber
b <butterflyyear@gmail.com>: May 27 10:11PM -0700

On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 7:09:58 AM UTC-5, DavidW wrote:
> http://home.pacific.net.au/~davidw/tennis/contest/rst_2017sp_RG.html
 
> Entries must be posted before the first ball is struck in Paris on Sunday.
 
> Good luck.
 
venus d pliskova
DavidW <no@email.provided>: May 28 04:19PM +1000

Nadal d. Fognini
Konta d. Mladenovic
b <butterflyyear@gmail.com>: May 28 12:45AM -0700

On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 12:11:27 AM UTC-5, b wrote:
 
> > Entries must be posted before the first ball is struck in Paris on Sunday.
 
> > Good luck.
 
> venus d pliskova
 
that is ka pliskova... realised later that both sisters in main draw
 
nadal d wawrinka
b <butterflyyear@gmail.com>: May 28 01:05AM -0700

On Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 2:45:52 AM UTC-5, b wrote:
 
> > venus d pliskova
 
> that is ka pliskova... realised later that both sisters in main draw
 
> nadal d wawrinka
 
nadal d nishikori
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 28 12:52AM +0200

> the European money should have been put.
 
> This is patently silly. I would understand it if it was for local
> consumption, the Jaros/bob types, but it seems not to be.
 
 
It's about (some) Europeans being belligerent and warmongering
while not spending anything on military. Trump Obviosky won't
tolerate it anymore.
 
E.g. if the paranoid Balts are so scared of Russia why don't they
spend not 2% but 3.7% of their GDP as USA does?
Everyone can spend 3.7%
 
Instead they're not spending but demand/whine/lie how Russia is a
threat to them so USA sends their troops, weapons there to the
very Russian border, spending US tax payers' money and actually
provoking Russia and destabilizing situation.
 
Why is that shit happening in the first place?
 
 
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 28 12:12AM -0700

On Saturday, 27 May 2017 18:58:49 UTC+1, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
> the European money should have been put.
 
> This is patently silly. I would understand it if it was for local
> consumption, the Jaros/bob types, but it seems not to be.
 
know you thicko Hillary fans keep lying and misinforming about Trump, but even the NYT(LOL) writes this:
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/26/world/europe/nato-trump-spending.html?_r=0
What is Mr. Trump's complaint?
 
"NATO members must finally contribute their fair share and meet their financial obligations, for 23 of the 28 member nations are still not paying what they should be paying and what they're supposed to be paying for their defense," he said.
 
Yes and No. NATO has a budget to cover common civilian and military costs, and some NATO-owned assets are also commonly funded when they are used in operations. The United States pays 22 percent of those costs, according to a formula based on national income. None of the NATO allies are in arrears on these contributions.
 
Mr. Trump is referring imprecisely to a goal NATO has set for each member to spend at least 2 percent of its gross domestic product on its own defense each year. He is correct that only five of the 28 members currently meet that goal, and they are the United States, Greece, Britain, Estonia and Poland.
calimero377@gmx.de: May 27 01:21PM -0700

On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 12:33:23 AM UTC+2, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> US media published photos of evidence from the scene of Monday night's blast.
 
> Earlier, UK police said they had stopped sharing information with the US as a consequence but those ties have now been resumed.
 
> The decision to end the suspension was taken after assurances were received by counter-terrorism officers in the UK.
 
 
 
Since the orange clown is a pathological liar I would be very afraid as a Brit ...
 
 
Max
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 28 12:04AM -0700


> > The decision to end the suspension was taken after assurances were received by counter-terrorism officers in the UK.
 
> Since the orange clown is a pathological liar I would be very afraid as a Brit ...
 
 
afraid of what? why? no wonder anxiety pills sell so much, when your type seems to get worried about absolutely nothing, it a real shame.
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: May 27 02:23PM -0700

On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 8:23:50 AM UTC-4, StephenJ wrote:

> > Baywatch? Seriously, I wouldn't think anybody above age 20 would pay to see that movie?
 
> That's because you have a very limited and immature view of what people
> like in movies.
 
People or more specifically Neanderthals? You are going to see movies such as Baywatch and Pirates of the Caribbean Part 900 and you are saying my movie expertise is limited and immature? *ok, sure*
 
> You need some greater exposure to the broader world. Do
> you live in a cave somewhere in a national park?
 
What was the last movie you watched where an actor spoke words with more than one syllable?
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: May 27 02:24PM -0700

On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 11:25:47 AM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
 
> > I definitely going to see this film now!! used to love Baywatch! am sure it can't be any worse than Arrival, the dullest most boring film ever.
 
> If someone never saw another post from Iceberg except this one, it would tell them all they need to know.
 
+1. :)
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: May 27 02:27PM -0700

On Saturday, May 27, 2017 at 11:38:06 AM UTC-4, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
 
> Apparently both Dwayne Johnson and Zac Efron are
> quite funny -
 
Seeing the names of those two "actors" starring in any movie would be enough for me to run the other way. Good grief!
grif <griffin_230@hotmail.com>: May 27 10:41PM +0100

On 27/05/2017 22:24, Court_1 wrote:
 
>>> I definitely going to see this film now!! used to love Baywatch! am sure it can't be any worse than Arrival, the dullest most boring film ever.
 
>> If someone never saw another post from Iceberg except this one, it would tell them all they need to know.
 
> +1. :)
 
Man, film threads are so entertaining. RST is a hidden gem of a ng for film fans. This is where it's at.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.tennis/nb_tJp9HmfA/elxyNhi7bCkJ
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 28 12:02AM -0700

On Saturday, 27 May 2017 13:22:45 UTC+1, StephenJ wrote:
 
> > Weird.
 
> Oh no, they are miles apart, about 600 points on my scale. POTC is quite
> good, Baywatch is dreadful.
 
get the impression a lot of people on here only watch a very narrow range of films, Court1 and Raja types only watch what some idiot critic likes or they think their colleagues will allow them to watch.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 28 12:15AM +0200

> | It's about credibility and you've failed.
> |
 
> You've got the hots for her don't you? She won't respond to a paranoid like yourself ;-)
 
 
You think Trump is addressing Rosie O'Donnell because he wants to
talk to her?
 
Yeah, he could be desperate to get her approval, but it's more
likely another option, he's sending a message to his fans out
there, as well as other people whom he wants to influence and
ultimately save.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
grif <griffin_230@hotmail.com>: May 27 10:49PM +0100

On 26/05/2017 23:42, TT wrote:
> Gracchus kirjoitti 27.5.2017 klo 1:03:
>> "Radio Days" also is tied strongly to Woody Allen's very NYC-centric experience, so that's another factor. As a counter-example, I like "Summer of '42" a lot even though it's set in the same era. Watching that one made me feel nostalgia for a time I never even knew.
 
> Still not seen '42'.... but watched Bogdanovich's PAPER MOON which I thought was great - the characters gradually grow on you during the film. Maybe the B/W cinematography also created some feel of past/depression era.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQpmVVK6ce8
calimero377@gmx.de: May 27 01:22PM -0700

On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 11:46:56 AM UTC+2, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
> policy.) Unsurprisingly, reported the Süddeutsche Zeitung, there was "no
> rapprochement" in economic and trade issues.
 
> https://qz.com/992271/trump-reportedly-called-germany-bad-very-bad-and-threatened-to-stop-americans-from-buying-bmws/
 
 
 
Der Spiegel?
Süddeutsche Zeitung?
 
Loooooooooooooooooooooooooooool!!!!!
 
 
Max
MBDunc <michaelb@dnainternet.net>: May 27 12:55PM -0700

Went to watch this with my wife (who loves the series)
++ Final 15-30mins
+ Entertaining if humor was a bit scarce/cheaper than before.
+ Solid "summer flick", better than previous PoC.
- Way too much fantasy/effects
- Disney-violence where nothing is actually shown.
- Barbossa story was total mess this time; he was geriatric, clown, pirate, daddy, caring, ruthless...BIG MESS...
? Jack Sparrow was more like harmless sidekick who just was there to justify the brand. Main plot would have progressed fine without him...
 
.mikko
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment