Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 7 topics

Friday, May 12, 2017

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 12 01:50PM -0700

On 2017-05-12 1:39 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
> $700,000 from Hillary obviously.
 
> Need a cite? Bwaahaahaa.
 
Yes.
 
Provide an actual authoritative cite.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 12 01:50PM -0700

On 2017-05-12 1:34 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> The grand jury is being used to FACILITATE the ongoing investigation by
>> the issuance of subpoenas.
 
> Bwaahaahaa Cite.
 
I can...
 
...and I will...
 
...after you provide a few first.
 
:-)
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:15PM -0500

On Wed, 10 May 2017 17:48:50 -0400, Carbon
>> Trump-haters, you'd see this action as badly needed. Obama should have
>> done it.
 
>If Comey really were incompetent Trump wouldn't have fired him.

Funny thing is I remember several months ago you democrats implying
how incompetent Comey was when the FBI was investigating Hillary and
her emails.
 
Harry Reid: Comey Should Resign
 
Charles Schumer: I've lost confidence in FBI director
 
Maxine Water: The FBI director has no credibility
 
Hank Johnson: My confidence in the FBI director's ability to lead this
agency has been shaken
 
Steve Cohen: For the sake of the FBI, Comey should resign
 
Nancy Pelosi: Maybe he's not right for the job
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:16PM -0500

On Wed, 10 May 2017 15:44:53 -0400, Carbon
 
>Morons like immoderate will believe anything, but Trump has truly stirred
>the hornet nest with this one. There is no way he's getting away with
>this. It's going to get pretty rowdy before the inevitable train wreck.

Unlike you he didn't believe Hillary was going to win the election.
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:16PM -0500

On Wed, 10 May 2017 11:19:58 -0400, Carbon
>at this point. I'm sure even a zealot like yourself can see that this is
>completely ludicrous, and that the real reason is to attempt to derail the
>ongoing Russian collusion investigation.
 
So back in October when the democrats were screaming for Comey's head
that was an attempt to derail the investigation into Hillary and the
email scandal?
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:16PM -0500

On Wed, 10 May 2017 08:41:23 -0400, Carbon
>Russia investigation, so I agree with John that this will most likely be
>Trump's next step.
 
>This ongoing saga is going to be the end of this administration.

What next, Tiger is going to shatter Jack's major record....oh wait...
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:16PM -0500

On Tue, 9 May 2017 20:18:14 -0400, Carbon
 
>>> As long as the Russians approve it.
 
>> Better them than our resident Canadians. ;-)
 
>Well no, that wouldn't be fair. We didn't buy the election.

Hillary must have bought it since she got 3,000,0000 more votes.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 12 02:29PM -0700

On 2017-05-12 2:16 PM, David Laville wrote:
 
> So back in October when the democrats were screaming for Comey's head
> that was an attempt to derail the investigation into Hillary and the
> email scandal?
 
Nope.
 
Because the investigation was over.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 12 02:30PM -0700

On 2017-05-12 2:16 PM, David Laville wrote:
 
> So back in October when the democrats were screaming for Comey's head
> that was an attempt to derail the investigation into Hillary and the
> email scandal?
 
And note that the then sitting president DIDN'T fire him.
 
Obama let him do his job.
 
Simple question, David:
 
Do you accept Trump's stated rationale for firing Comey?
 
Even considering all the contradictory statements that Trump and his
staff have made?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 12 02:30PM -0700

On 2017-05-12 2:15 PM, David Laville wrote:
> agency has been shaken
 
> Steve Cohen: For the sake of the FBI, Comey should resign
 
> Nancy Pelosi: Maybe he's not right for the job
 
And what happened?
 
Did Obama fire him?
 
:-)
BK@Onramp.net: May 12 04:37PM -0500

On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:34:19 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>>> It was his claim. He made just it again. He did not read his own
>>> cite that said two have covened and one is nearly
>>> complete.
 
Liar. Go back and read it. I never said they had convened, I said
that they were beginning to set up.
 
>>>> That's just not so.
 
>>> My claim was that Comey being fired does not compromise an
>>> investigation that is already at the grand jury.
 
 
Correct...unless the FBI is in charge. Then it would be questionable
to some.
 
>> The grand jury is being used to FACILITATE the ongoing investigation by
>> the issuance of subpoenas.
 
>Bwaahaahaa Cite.
 
Why? You'd just reply, after modifying it, and deny it.
BK@Onramp.net: May 12 02:56PM -0500

On Fri, 12 May 2017 13:51:13 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>Carbon will be pleased with this.
 
>http://www.vivaliberty.com/wikileaks-bombshell-democrats-and-steph
>en-colbert-collusion-unmasked/
 
LOLOLOLOLO
What a naive schmuck you are. First, Vivaliberty.com, and you believe
the crap they post? Colbert has never liked Trump and consistently
has hilarious bits about him. No one "has him do" things on his show.
 
This isn't fake news, it's no news.
BK@Onramp.net: May 12 04:33PM -0500

On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:33:02 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>You obviously didn't read the cite. You simply respond with crazy
> talk about Trump who isn't mentioned in the article.
 
>Crazy BK.
 
I read the whole thing, and it was stupid.
He didn't have to be mentioned in the article because I know the
situation. I mentioned Trump because I watched Colbert last night and
he was hilarious about Trump. I've seen several of his shows and his
opening bit is always anti Donny boy. You should watch it some time.
It might wake you up about your hero.
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:11PM -0500

On Fri, 5 May 2017 16:49:19 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
>> laugh, clown.
 
>There is not one single Canadian who would trade their system for
>ours.
 
Tell this to Mr. Shamblaw;
 
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2016-08-03/canadians-increasingly-come-to-us-for-health-care
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:12PM -0500

On Fri, 5 May 2017 18:04:42 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>>> http://tiny.cc/ut6yky
 
>> And yet our per capita health care costs are less than yours...
 
>Canada has substandard care. Canucks who can afford it come to the US.

Notice how he left out "since Obamacare"?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 12 02:21PM -0700

On 2017-05-12 2:12 PM, David Laville wrote:
 
>>> And yet our per capita health care costs are less than yours...
 
>> Canada has substandard care. Canucks who can afford it come to the US.
 
> Notice how he left out "since Obamacare"?
 
I left it out because it's not so.
 
It has been less expensive per capita than yours for a long time.
 
<http://kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/snapshots-health-care-spending-in-the-united-states-selected-oecd-countries/>
 
You lose.
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:12PM -0500

On Fri, 5 May 2017 16:40:55 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
>> authors name not the content.
 
>Is that right? Reviewers had a different point of view about that,
>but what do they know? They're obviously not as smart as you are.

Was this the same reviewers who were fainting and hyperventilating at
Obama campaign rallies?
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:13PM -0500

On Fri, 5 May 2017 16:35:44 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
 
>Yes, I remember and the controversy was not about the amount.
>It was about the appropriateness of an incoming Speaker of the
>House cashing in on his party's electoral victory.
 
Yet you same liberals had no problem with the appropriateness of an
incoming President of the United States cashing in on his presidential
victory.
David Laville <dlaville@bellsouth.net>: May 12 04:15PM -0500

On Fri, 5 May 2017 16:38:58 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
 
>> http://tiny.cc/445yky
 
>> That's not making a lot of money?
 
>Your link doesn't go to any site about Obama.
 
I don't know why, I just clicked it and it worked fine.
 
>How did he earn
>$20 million?
 
130K Corporate Boards
3.1M Presidential salary
610K Senate Salary
760K University of Chicago Hospitals
250K Miscellaneous
6.8M Dreams of My Father
8.8M Audacity of Hope & Of Thee I Sing
 
>Was it by defrauding people like Trump did to the
>students of his so-called university?

But this wasn't what you claimed. Your exact words were "Obama, up
til now, hasn't made a lot of money." When pointed out he's made 20
million while in Washington you turned it into an attack against
Trump.
 
But, but, but Trump.....must suck to be a liberal.
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 12 04:54PM -0400

But nothing can really improve your homely looks.
 
http://tinyurl.com/l5b5elz
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: May 12 10:45PM +0200

Comes time you need a toupee.
 
The combover has failed.
 
You are one lonely ugly soul with no chin.
 
Yes, there comes a time to buy that toupee and be at least half presentable.
 
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 12 07:54PM

In a tweet where he openly threatens the former FBI director.
 
"James Comey better hope that there are no "tapes" of our conversations
before he starts leaking to the press!"
 
Disgusting villianous behaviour. Does your president think he is a mob
boss?
 
--
Most people believe there is truth and there are lies. "Alternative
facts" are lies.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 12 03:33PM -0500

> the crap they post? Colbert has never liked Trump and consistently
> has hilarious bits about him. No one "has him do" things on his show.
 
> This isn't fake news, it's no news.
 
I know who Wikileaks is. So does Hillary.
 
You obviously didn't read the cite. You simply respond with crazy
talk about Trump who isn't mentioned in the article.
 
Crazy BK.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 12 03:34PM -0500


> That's the point: the investigation ISN'T at the grand jury.
 
> The grand jury is being used to FACILITATE the ongoing investigation by
> the issuance of subpoenas.
 
Bwaahaahaa Cite.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 12 03:39PM -0500


>> I think there are many factors, including loyalty. However, subversion
>> of an ongoing investigation makes no sense.
 
> Then why are the immediately looking to replace McCabe?
 
$700,000 from Hillary obviously.
 
Need a cite? Bwaahaahaa.
 
--
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment