Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 7 topics

Friday, May 19, 2017

"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 19 05:13PM -0400

That Dumb Cluck is incapable of earning a living.
 
A "Natural Born Loser".
michaelunowho@gmail.com: May 19 02:04PM -0700

Looks like it was another slow job week....
...as usual.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 19 01:55PM -0500

> who you'll be unmasking until after you DO it?
 
> Would you or one of the other wingnuts please explain HOW this was
> supposed to have happened and account for that fact?
 
I already did.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 19 01:58PM -0500

> unmasking is supposedly a crime.
 
> Nor does it address the central issue that you unmask people without
> knowing who they are until you do it.
 
Really. You don't know that spying on people is a crime? Read the
FISA Act.
It specifically deals with this issue.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 19 02:19PM -0500


>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/05/susan-rices-alleged-unm
>> asking-requests-not-so-routine-ex-officials-say.html
 
> Nothing in that refutes what I said, doofus.
 
It specifically refutes what you said.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 19 02:22PM -0500


> ...because you've got nothing...
 
> ...and everyone knows it.
 
> :-)
 
You replied to my cite from today.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 19 02:25PM -0500


> Intimidating an underling by demanding he state publicly that you're
> not under investigation, and asking same to drop said investigation
> are obstruction of justice.
 
Except it did not happen. On May 3rd Comey testified it did not happen.
 
 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/
post-politics/wp/2017/05/03/read-the-full-testimony-of-fbi-directo
r-james-comey-in-which-he-discusses-clinton-email-investigation/#a
mpshare=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/
05/03/read-the-full-testimony-of-fbi-director-james-comey-in-which
-he-discusses-clinton-email-investigation/
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 19 03:46PM -0500

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/266714/anonymous-sources-washingto
n-post-and-cnn-fake-daniel-greenfield
--
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 19 11:57AM -0700

On 2017-05-19 11:55 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Would you or one of the other wingnuts please explain HOW this was
>> supposed to have happened and account for that fact?
 
> I already did.
 
No.
 
You did not.
 
If you did, then you wouldn't hesitate to produce a link to the post
where you did it.
 
But you haven't...
 
...and you won't...
 
...because you've got nothing...
 
...and everyone knows it.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 19 12:02PM -0700

On 2017-05-19 11:58 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
> Really. You don't know that spying on people is a crime? Read the
> FISA Act.
> It specifically deals with this issue.
 
But surveillance of foreign nationals is legal, correct?
 
(Let's walk this through. One step at a time.)
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 19 12:10PM -0700

On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 10:31:59 AM UTC-4, MNMikeW wrote:
 
> >> The REAL scandal is the unmasking that took place. Collusion is not a crime.
 
> > Collusion is a crime. Unmasking is not.
 
> Umasking for political reasons is.
 
Which was not the case with Susan Rice.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 19 12:13PM -0700

On 2017-05-19 12:10 PM, John B. wrote:
 
>>> Collusion is a crime. Unmasking is not.
 
>> Umasking for political reasons is.
 
> Which was not the case with Susan Rice.
 
Still waiting to see just one of the wingnuts explain how you can unmask
someone of whom you cannot know the actual identity for "political reasons".
 
That motive pre-supposes knowledge of the person to be unmasked.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 19 12:21PM -0700

On 2017-05-19 12:19 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Nothing in that refutes what I said, doofus.
 
> It specifically refutes what you said.
 
No it doesn't
 
Tell you what:
 
Quote what I actually said (now snipped--coincidence?).
 
Then quote what from that article refutes it and explain how.
 
You can't pretend that this is hard to do without basically admitting
you're not bright enough to copy and paste.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 19 12:27PM -0700

On 2017-05-19 12:22 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> ...and everyone knows it.
 
>> :-)
 
> You replied to my cite from today.
 
Again. If you have a link to a post where you address the question of
HOW you can know who you're unmasking before you do it, let's see it.
 
But you haven't...
 
...and you won't...
 
...because you've got nothing...
 
...and everyone knows it.
 
:-)
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 19 01:17PM -0700

On 5/19/2017 12:22 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> ...and everyone knows it.
 
>> :-)
 
> You replied to my cite from today.
 
You have never had an honest discussion from the R.A.T. (resident
asshole troll) and you never will. So why try...ignore IT. BK, Carbs,
and John are honest and sincere. The RAT is neither.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 19 12:06PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 11:14:23 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
> this was obstruction of justice. It was pointing out that Comey was
> leery of Trump and wanted to keep him at a distance.
 
> Care to explain John's choice of words in the subject line???
 
Intimidating an underling by demanding he state publicly that you're
not under investigation, and asking same to drop said investigation
are obstruction of justice.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 19 12:07PM -0700

On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 12:26:50 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> >> Care to explain John's choice of words in the subject line???
 
> > No.
 
> Understandable.
 
Why should he speak for me?
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 19 12:11PM -0700

- show quoted text -
Intimidating an underling by demanding he state publicly that you're
not under investigation, and asking same to drop said investigation
are obstruction of justice.
 
Baloney
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 19 12:13PM -0700

On 2017-05-19 12:11 PM, Dene wrote:
> not under investigation, and asking same to drop said investigation
> are obstruction of justice.
 
> Baloney
 
Wow.
 
Why is that "baloney", Greg?
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 19 12:29PM -0700

On 2017-05-19 12:25 PM, Moderate wrote:
> mpshare=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/
> 05/03/read-the-full-testimony-of-fbi-director-james-comey-in-which
> -he-discusses-clinton-email-investigation/
 
What a shame you don't know how to post support.
 
What is the text from that link that you claims supports your claim.
 
Post it in your reply.
 
But you won't...
 
...because you've got nothing...
 
...and everyone knows it.
BK@Onramp.net: May 19 02:52PM -0500

On Fri, 19 May 2017 12:11:47 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>not under investigation, and asking same to drop said investigation
>are obstruction of justice.
 
>Baloney
 
Then you should get in touch with the independent counsel who is
heading the investigation and tell him he's FOS. I'm sure he'll close
it.
BK@Onramp.net: May 19 02:57PM -0500

On Fri, 19 May 2017 14:25:23 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
>mpshare=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/
>05/03/read-the-full-testimony-of-fbi-director-james-comey-in-which
>-he-discusses-clinton-email-investigation/
 
Your rambling URL doesn't work.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 19 01:14PM -0700


> Then you should get in touch with the independent counsel who is
> heading the investigation and tell him he's FOS. I'm sure he'll close
> it.
 
I'll definitely wait to hear his report and meanwhile, give the
Trump-hating speculation it's due respect.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 19 12:09PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 10:52:51 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> Or that Comey was fired because he requested more resources..
> Or that MLK bust was removed from the Oval Office...
> Or.... https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/four-fake-news-stories-liberals-gobbled-up-this-week
 
No one stated as fact that Comey was fired for that reason. The story
about the MLK bust was a mistake, which was corrected and for which
the reporter apologized.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 19 12:04PM -0700


> >Then what election illegality was he referring to?
 
> Probably Trump's asking that the investigation of Flynn be stopped,
> and that is just part of the investigation.
 
He also demanded a public statement from the FBI that he was not
under investigation.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment