Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 24 updates in 5 topics

Monday, May 29, 2017

Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 28 08:03PM -0700

'GOOD FAITH EFFORT': Senate's No. 2 Dem wants both parties to 'sit down together' to rework ObamaCare http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/28/durbin-to-senate-republicans-lets-sit-down-together-on-obamacare-overhaul.html
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 28 08:45PM -0700

On 2017-05-28 8:03 PM, Dene wrote:
> 'GOOD FAITH EFFORT': Senate's No. 2 Dem wants both parties to 'sit down together' to rework ObamaCare http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/28/durbin-to-senate-republicans-lets-sit-down-together-on-obamacare-overhaul.html
 
Funny no Republican ever "stepped up", huh?
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 28 07:33AM -0700

> I don't hate Trump. He's just unfit to be president.
 
Bingo.
 
The RAT actually asserted something. How unusual and commendable.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 28 07:58AM -0700

They're far outnumbered by the present administration.
 
Not true. One of your warped suppositions.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 28 08:24AM -0700

Trump could walk out the front door of Emoluments Plaza and shoot an innocent bystander in the face, and people like you would still make excuses for him.
 
Depends whether the victim is a liberal loon...
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 10:56AM -0500

On Sun, 28 May 2017 07:58:23 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>They're far outnumbered by the present administration.
 
>Not true. One of your warped suppositions.
 
Very true. Count the idiots in this administration, and there are
quite a few, and the legitimate media is small in comparison.
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 10:58AM -0500

On Sun, 28 May 2017 08:24:35 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
> Trump could walk out the front door of Emoluments Plaza and shoot an innocent bystander in the face, and people like you would still make excuses for him.
 
>Depends whether the victim is a liberal loon...
 
So an innocent liberal is fair game for execution? I know this was
supposed to be funny, but it's telling.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 28 09:01AM -0700

On Sun, 28 May 2017 08:24:35 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gds...@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
> Trump could walk out the front door of Emoluments Plaza and shoot an innocent bystander in the face, and people like you would still make excuses for him.
 
>Depends whether the victim is a liberal loon...
 
So an innocent liberal is fair game for execution? I know this was
supposed to be funny, but it's telling.
 
It tells only one thing....your suppositions are warped.
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 11:35AM -0500

On Sun, 28 May 2017 09:01:48 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
>So an innocent liberal is fair game for execution? I know this was
>supposed to be funny, but it's telling.
 
>It tells only one thing....your suppositions are warped.
 
What suppositions? Your words are in print Greg, and they're warped.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 28 09:57AM -0700

Below is an example of your warped suppositions. Most of Trump's admin are fine, qualified patriots.
 
"Very true. Count the idiots in this administration, and there are
quite a few, and the legitimate media is small in comparison."
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 02:28PM -0500

On Sun, 28 May 2017 09:57:17 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>Below is an example of your warped suppositions. Most of Trump's admin are fine, qualified patriots.
 
>"Very true. Count the idiots in this administration, and there are
>quite a few, and the legitimate media is small in comparison."
 
It is absolutely true. Very few are qualified. Patriots? I think
they are, but only in the literal definition. Idiots? Start with
Trump and go down the list through his staff too. A few only.
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 02:30PM -0500


>It is absolutely true. Very few are qualified. Patriots? I think
>they are, but only in the literal definition. Idiots? Start with
>Trump and go down the list through his staff too. A few only.
 
That last sentence should be " A few aren't"
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 28 01:15PM -0700

On 2017-05-28 7:33 AM, Dene wrote:
 
>> I don't hate Trump. He's just unfit to be president.
 
> Bingo.
 
> The RAT actually asserted something. How unusual and commendable.
 
I assert positions all the time, Greg; and then argue them cogently and
civilly.
 
Too bad you can't say the same.
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 05:51PM -0500

On Sun, 28 May 2017 15:52:45 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> Very true. Count the idiots in this administration, and there are
>> quite a few, and the legitimate media is small in comparison.
 
>No kidding. Fox is about the only legitimate media.
 
 
You just love to be wrong.
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 05:58PM -0500

On Sun, 28 May 2017 15:50:54 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> So an innocent liberal is fair game for execution? I know this was
>> supposed to be funny, but it's telling.
 
>There is no such thing as an innocent liberal loon.
 
It's easy to dismiss your stupidity when your position on dog fighting
is taken into consideration. You didn't think that would be
remembered did you?
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: May 28 09:36PM -0400

>>> quite a few, and the legitimate media is small in comparison.
 
>> No kidding. Fox is about the only legitimate media.
 
> You just love to be wrong.

Fox News is pretty terrible overall, although their polling is well regarded.
 
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 28 03:50PM -0500


>>Depends whether the victim is a liberal loon...
 
> So an innocent liberal is fair game for execution? I know this was
> supposed to be funny, but it's telling.
 
There is no such thing as an innocent liberal loon.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 28 03:52PM -0500


>>Not true. One of your warped suppositions.
 
> Very true. Count the idiots in this administration, and there are
> quite a few, and the legitimate media is small in comparison.
 
No kidding. Fox is about the only legitimate media.
--
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 28 07:54AM -0700

Just remember folks, it's not the treason that's important, it's the whistleblowers who disclosed it.
 
Given this rationale, Snowden must be a saint in your eyes and should be returned to my country with the ticker parade.
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 10:54AM -0500

On Sun, 28 May 2017 07:54:54 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>Just remember folks, it's not the treason that's important, it's the whistleblowers who disclosed it.
 
>Given this rationale, Snowden must be a saint in your eyes and should be returned to my country with the ticker parade.
 
Whooooooooosh!!!
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 28 09:26AM -0700

>Just remember folks, it's not the treason that's important, it's the whistleblowers who disclosed it.
 
>Given this rationale, Snowden must be a saint in your eyes and should be returned to my country with the ticker parade.
 
Whooooooooosh!!!
 
Relook what Carbs said about the whistleblower, then read what I wrote, and try to connect the dots. If you are still confused, I'll attempt to put the correlation in more explicit terms for you.
BK@Onramp.net: May 28 11:38AM -0500

On Sun, 28 May 2017 09:26:41 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
>Whooooooooosh!!!
 
>Relook what Carbs said about the whistleblower, then read what I wrote, and try to connect the dots.
>If you are still confused, I'll attempt to put the correlation in more explicit terms for you.
 
I'm not confused, you are. Carbon was using irony and you didn't get
it.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 28 01:14PM -0700

On 2017-05-28 7:54 AM, Dene wrote:
> Just remember folks, it's not the treason that's important, it's the whistleblowers who disclosed it.
 
> Given this rationale, Snowden must be a saint in your eyes and should be returned to my country with the ticker parade.
 
I don't know about saint...
 
...but any patriotic American should thank him for upholding your
Constitution, you'd think, wouldn't you?
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: May 28 05:12PM +0200

He posts crap we can all find ourselves and then answers himself.
 
He sits at his PC wanking off, hoping for a bite.
 
Not many fish left shit stain, they got you #.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment