Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 23 updates in 8 topics

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 09 11:48PM -0700

...couldn't handle a few simple questions:
 
'In response to a follow-up question, Blum said: "I don't represent all
Iowans. I represent the first district of Iowa. That would be like
saying, 'Shouldn't I be able to, even though I live in Dubuque, go vote
in Iowa City during the election because I'd like to vote in that
district instead?'"
 
Scheinblum replied by asking Blum whether he would still be willing to
accept a donation from a Republican in Iowa City, a question that
prompted the congressman to scoff and announce "I'm done" as he stood up
to remove his microphone. "This is ridiculous. He's going to sit here
and just badger me," Blum said, seemingly gesturing to a staff member of
his off camera.'
 
<http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/09/rod-blum-walks-out-of-interview-238145>
 
And I just LOVED this part:
 
'The children Blum had insisted on using as a backdrop filed out with
him as he left. The entire interview lasted just over two minutes.'
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: May 09 05:10PM -0500

Moderate wrote:
> Good Riddance.
 
> Trey Gowdy would be a good choice.
 
Damn right!
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: May 09 08:06PM -0400

On 05/09/2017 06:10 PM, MNMikeW wrote:
 
>> Good Riddance.
 
>> Trey Gowdy would be a good choice.
 
> Damn right!
 
As long as the Russians approve it.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 09 05:13PM -0700

text -
On 05/09/2017 06:10 PM, MNMikeW wrote:
 
>> Good Riddance.
 
>> Trey Gowdy would be a good choice.
 
> Damn right!
 
As long as the Russians approve it.
 
Better them than our resident Canadians. ;-)
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: May 09 08:18PM -0400

On 05/09/2017 08:13 PM, Dene wrote:
 
>>> Damn right!
 
>> As long as the Russians approve it.
 
> Better them than our resident Canadians. ;-)

Well no, that wouldn't be fair. We didn't buy the election.
BK@Onramp.net: May 09 08:43PM -0500

>> Good Riddance.
 
>> Trey Gowdy would be a good choice.
 
>Damn right!
 
I'm sure that the replacement will be qualified. Trump HAS to make
up for some of his appointments.
What's more important is that Congress continues the Russian
investigation with a bipartisan appointment of an independent counsel
to take over..
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 09 07:05PM -0700

> What's more important is that Congress continues the Russian
> investigation with a bipartisan appointment of an independent counsel
> to take over..
 
I'm bit sure of that at all. Trump will look for someone who
will shut down the Russia investigation.
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 09 06:06PM -0400

BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAAAAAAAAA
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 09 06:19AM -0500

> spoke truth to power, we would have already done so. Particularly since Flynn is
> a hell of a lot more significant Constitutionally than all of the illegal immigrants.
 
> -hh
 
Yates did not speak truth to power. She abused her authority to
declare an order unconstitutional.
She testified she would have
made a different decision for a different President. She is not
the Supreme Court.
 
Flynn is guilty of lying. Hardly a constitutional issue.
 
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 09 07:24AM -0500

> Niggers are always brave in a crowd and when assaulting women.
 
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4482680/Elderly-woman-body-slammed-hurled-pool.html
 
Nice job racist. What I saw was a woman walk into a group of teens
at a pool with her dogs. One of the teens picked her up and
slipped while carrying her to the pool. He picked her up again
and jumped in the pool with her.
 
Why is she at a pool with her dogs? Why did she walk into the
group of people?
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 09 07:51AM -0500

> ...carefully, thoroughly.
 
> <http://www.newyorker.com/news/ryan-lizza/the-continuing-fallout-from-trump-and-nuness-fake-scandal>
 
Here is some more fake news from the left.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/08/politics/trump-liberals/
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 09 04:54PM -0500

Good Riddance.
 
Trey Gowdy would be a good choice.
--
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 09 04:02AM -0700

Dene writes:
> Are you going to cite that 200 year old law as the basis for this
> supposed criminal act?
 
How old something is? Really? "Thou shalt not kill" has been around for a
lot more than 200 years, but it's still been maintained as law.
 
> Furthermore, if the law matters, where is the
> consequential indictment?
 
Good question. Perhaps if Trump hadn't fired the acting Attorney General who
spoke truth to power, we would have already done so. Particularly since Flynn is
a hell of a lot more significant Constitutionally than all of the illegal immigrants.
 
-hh
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 09 06:12AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 2:18:36 AM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> Are you going to cite that 200 year old law as the basis for this
> supposed criminal act? Furthermore, if the law matters, where is the
> consequential indictment?
 
I don't know. Why don't you ask Jeff Sessions?
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 09 07:22AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 7:02:22 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
> > supposed criminal act?
 
> How old something is? Really? "Thou shalt not kill" has been around for a
> lot more than 200 years, but it's still been maintained as law.
 
 
The Constitution is pretty old, too. Maybe we should stop relying
on it.
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 09 09:38AM -0700

On 2017-05-09 4:19 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> -hh
 
> Yates did not speak truth to power. She abused her authority to
> declare an order unconstitutional.
 
She offered her opinion on the order.
 
> She testified she would have
> made a different decision for a different President.
 
Quote and source...
 
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 09 10:42AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 12:39:00 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > She is not
> > the Supreme Court.
 
> > Flynn is guilty of lying. Hardly a constitutional issue.
 
He's guilty of colluding with Russia while working for the
Trump campaign.
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 09 11:43AM -0700

Alan wrote:
> On 2017-05-09 4:19 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
It's times like this that I wish that Moderate hadn't been blocked by Google.
 
 
>> Yates did not speak truth to power. She abused her authority to
>> declare an order unconstitutional.
 
> She offered her opinion on the order.
 
She offered her truthful legal opinion ...and got canned.
 
Her opinion was effectively that the specifics of the case didn't make
it a winning one. This is done quite a lot by DA's and the like.
 
>> She testified she would have
>> made a different decision for a different President.
 
> Quote and source...
 
As we've already seen in the Courts, Trump's campaigning promises for a "Muslim Ban"
are evidence of his underlying motive, and Flynn's testimony pointed out the specifics of
just where that's illegal. That's why decisions can & do vary: in essence, Trump sabotaged
his own agenda.
 
 
>> She is not the Supreme Court.
 
Did she actually make just that claim? Here's where a cite is needed, because someone
who makes a deliberative informed decision doesn't have to be the last court. For example,
ever pay a speeding or parking ticket or the like? Well, why didn't you appeal that all the way up?
Short answer is because you decided at some point that you were on the losing side, so you
cut your losses. Yes, Yates made the same basic type of decision.
 
 
>> Flynn is guilty of lying. Hardly a constitutional issue.
 
Not merely that: the Executive Branch didnt follow the law to have his background
check done properly, despite multiple warnings. Since they can't even be bothered
to get the most basic stuff right, it raises into question the entire Rule of Law compliance
questions...which is the crisis.
 
-hh
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 09 10:03AM -0400

"Moderate" wrote in message news:oesdvm$1in3$1@gioia.aioe.org...
 
 
> <http://www.newyorker.com/news/ryan-lizza/the-continuing-fallout-from-trump-and-nuness-fake-scandal>
 
>Here is some more fake news from the left.
 
>http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/08/politics/trump-liberals/
 
You are wasting your time interacting with that useless POS, Shit Stain.
 
If IT were dead, the world would be a better place.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 09 07:24AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 10:03:06 AM UTC-4, Michael P wrote:
> > ...carefully, thoroughly.
 
> > <http://www.newyorker.com/news/ryan-lizza/the-continuing-fallout-from-trump-and-nuness-fake-scandal>
 
> >Here is some more fake news from the left.
 
 
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/08/politics/trump-liberals/
 
What's fake about it?
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 09 09:11AM -0700

On 5/9/2017 7:24 AM, John B. wrote:
 
>>> Here is some more fake news from the left.
 
> http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/08/politics/trump-liberals/
 
> What's fake about it?
 
Nothing. It's a fair article how some on the Left jump to wrong
conclusions. Same thing happens on the Right.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 09 06:11AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 12:41:36 AM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
> > executive order to restrict travel she would have defended the
> > order. She thinks she is the Supreme Court.
 
> Quote and source, please...
 
She didn't say that or anything like it.
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 09 07:34AM -0400

Niggers are always brave in a crowd and when assaulting women.
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4482680/Elderly-woman-body-slammed-hurled-pool.html
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment