Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: Aug 08 04:15PM +0100

On 08/08/2017 14:58, Carey wrote:
 
>>> bob
 
> You're conflating 'private email' with a *private server*. False equivalence,
> but nice try.
 
Was I? Damn, I should read more carefully. Anyway, it was still known in
March 2015 that she had used a *private server*.
 
> And no, the FBI did not determine that HRC "didn't break any laws".
> Please provide a source for that quote.
 
It wasn't a quote, I typed it based on the fact that the FBI
investigations concluded "we are expressing to Justice our view that no
charges are appropriate in this case", James B. Comey, July 5, 2016
 
 
> For whom do you work, Sir?
 
I don't work for anyone. When I was employed I worked for the United
Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA).
 
<https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/uk-atomic-energy-authority>
 
Who do you work for?
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Aug 08 08:34AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:15:09 AM UTC-7, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
> It wasn't a quote, I typed it based on the fact that the FBI
> investigations concluded "we are expressing to Justice our view that no
> charges are appropriate in this case", James B. Comey, July 5, 2016
 
...which is not an FBI statement that no laws were broken.
 
> Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA).
 
> <https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/uk-atomic-energy-authority>
 
> Who do you work for?
 
laborer
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Aug 08 08:55AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:15:09 AM UTC-7, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
 
Adding: What's your take on the Treeza and Arlene show, so far?
Will the former still be PM in six months?
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 08 07:15PM +0300

Brian W Lawrence kirjoitti 8.8.2017 klo 18:15:
> When I was employed I worked for the United Kingdom Atomic Energy
> Authority (UKAEA)
 
Sounds impressive.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 08 07:13PM +0300

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMpSET3t40k
 
Priceless.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 08 07:12PM +0300

...because of his short attention span. Can't even concentrate more than
half page of bullet points memo on Afghanistan.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k7Pazr0NHE
 
Interesting tidbit end of the clip: Remember Peter Thiel who backed
Trump, and Bob bragged about it... well now when he's asked to describe
Trump administration with one word, the word is "incompetence". lol
 
I would have posted only the clip but suspect that Trump supporters are
two minute men as well...
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Aug 08 07:14AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 5:42:08 AM UTC-7, StephenJ wrote:
 
 
> If by "neoliberalism" you mean the general system of "free enterprise",
 
I don't. Neoliberalism is a set of policies primarily emanating from
the Mont Pelerin Society ca 1947, led by Friedrich von Hayek, with Milton
Friedman of the the University of Chicago being the great popularizer (and
vulgarizer) of those ideas in the US.
 
> guess, visceral satisfaction of storming the King's castle and
> confiscating the crown jewels, which would have bought each peasant
> about one day's worth of additional gruel.
 
Those are beliefs, not facts, and I'd be happy to debate them offline
if you like.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: Aug 08 04:21PM +0200

> technological, engineering goal with little real purpose beyond that.
> Chances are no government will want to spend the money, and so it
> may need to be a business-led project, with profit being the motive.
 
 
 
 
If it's not a state-led race for prestige between USA, Russia and
China then nothing will happen.
 
Besides, corporations should be banned from anything pertaining to
the outer space. We don't want weyland industries or skynet
happening.
 
Are you up to date with what's Google done recently?
 
 
 
 
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: Aug 08 10:54AM -0500

On 8/8/2017 9:14 AM, Carey wrote:
> the Mont Pelerin Society ca 1947, led by Friedrich von Hayek, with Milton
> Friedman of the the University of Chicago being the great popularizer (and
> vulgarizer) of those ideas in the US.
 
What strikes me about critiques of the Bogey Monster of NeoLiberalism is
how vastly they overstate its impact and prevalence. I mean, in 2014,
the USA spent more than $2 Trillion on entitlements such as social
security, medicare, medicaid, and unemployment benefits. Those are pure
socialistic expenditures.
 
What's more, those expenditures have risen significantly during the
alleged post-1970s era of neoliberal dominance. In 1970, it was around
5% of GDP, now it's around 14% of GDP.
 
So the evidence seem to show that in the USA at least, socialism has
crushed neoliberalism the past 40+ years.
 
 
>> about one day's worth of additional gruel.
 
> Those are beliefs, not facts, > and I'd be happy to debate them offline
> if you like.
 
No thanks. :)
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 08 06:16PM +0300

Brian W Lawrence kirjoitti 8.8.2017 klo 16:14:
> treatment.
 
> But she had dropped some pills on a kitchen worktop where tortellini and
> broth were later prepared."
 
lol
 
Sure...
What a ridiculous excuse.
 
 
Couple other athletes caught from same substance. Male weightlifter and
MMA fighter:
 
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/dec/17/kim-un-guk-olympic-champion-fails-doping-test
 
https://www.mmafighting.com/2016/7/19/12221804/jon-jones-doping-case-what-we-know-so-far
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 08 06:27PM +0300

TT kirjoitti 8.8.2017 klo 18:16:
 
> https://www.mmafighting.com/2016/7/19/12221804/jon-jones-doping-case-what-we-know-so-far
 
TWO MONTHS????
 
She's doing the really hard stuff and they give TWO MONTHS only. Hingis
got 2 years from recreational coke use. There's no consistency
whatsoever with severity of punishments on doping bans. The ones who
come up with most nonsensical excuses are punished the least.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: Aug 08 05:33PM +0200

> got 2 years from recreational coke use. There's no consistency
> whatsoever with severity of punishments on doping bans. The ones who
> come up with most nonsensical excuses are punished the least.
 
 
Yes. What's unusual there?
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
AZ <arnab.zaheen@gmail.com>: Aug 08 07:38AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:08:04 PM UTC+6, Whisper wrote:
 
> > After a decade of trolling and insulting Fed fans, it appears that Whimpy has now finally jumped on the bandwagon of being the biggest Fedfuçķer of all time. Transition >status: 80%.
 
> A true Fedfucker wouldn't mention Fed lost the match, thus minimizing
> the feat.
 
Stop being delusional. This isn't a PR battle. Only a true Fedhater would think like you do.
 
> But yes I thought this was a stunning shot to keep the match alive -
> hard to believe he even went for it, let alone hit it inch perfect under
> that kind of pressure. The look on Rafa's face was priceless.
 
Obvious stuff. Too bad you wrote nothing remotely this positive as this back in 2008. And trolled every single Fedfan who actually did write something similar as youn just did. Doing a 180 degrees and waxing lyrical 9 years later doesn't cut it. It's Trumplike opportunism in a way. Very sleazy. Just a reminder for everybody.
 
So füçk off this thread, lying sack of šhit.
 
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: Aug 08 04:49PM +0200

>> that kind of pressure. The look on Rafa's face was priceless.
 
> Obvious stuff. Too bad you wrote nothing remotely this positive as this back in 2008. And trolled every single Fedfan who actually did write something similar as youn just did. Doing a 180 degrees and waxing lyrical 9 years later doesn't cut it. It's Trumplike opportunism in a way. Very sleazy. Just a reminder for everybody.
 
> So füçk off this thread, lying sack of ?hit.
 
 
Disgusting post, says a lot about you.
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
AZ <arnab.zaheen@gmail.com>: Aug 08 07:54AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:49:59 PM UTC+6, *skriptis wrote:
 
> --
 
> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
Yes. That I don't tolerate bullßhit. Stop pretending to be a passive agressive aßshole.
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: Aug 09 01:04AM +1000

On 9/08/2017 12:54 AM, AZ wrote:
 
>> Disgusting post, says a lot about you.
 
> Yes. That I don't tolerate bullßhit. Stop pretending to be a passive agressive aßshole.
 
I complimented Fed on this shot back in 2008. You can look it up & then
come back & apologize to me.
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: Aug 08 05:14PM +0200


>> Yes. That I don't tolerate bullßhit. Stop pretending to be a passive agressive aßshole.
 
> I complimented Fed on this shot back in 2008. You can look it up & then
> come back & apologize to me.
 
 
Why do you have to even say it? It's one of the best
shots/momements ever in tennis but that match was one of the best
ever, and it wouldn't have been, if it weren't for such moments
from both players.
 
These fedtards now act as if they have a monopoly on
admiration/respect when it comes to Federer.
 
That's even more sick than simply insulting fans of other players
or insulting people who are sometimes critical of Federer.

 
Now they want to decide who can admire Federer's shots.
 
Sick.
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
AZ <arnab.zaheen@gmail.com>: Aug 08 08:15AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:04:28 PM UTC+6, Whisper wrote:
 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
 
Links? Or it never happened. I will apologize if given proof.
 
Oh, and you don't "compliment" Fed on a forum undrer an anonymous handle. People pay compliments in a personal exchange kind of situation.
AZ <arnab.zaheen@gmail.com>: Aug 08 08:25AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 9:14:08 PM UTC+6, *skriptis wrote:
 
> --
 
> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
What is truly, utterly sick is harassing Fed fans for over a decade for saying remotely positive things about Fed and pretending after all that that nothing happened and changing tunes. Whimpy knows what he did and what he is doing and he thoroughly deserves this virtual busting of his nuts. The more he and you say fednuts, fedfuçķer or sick stuff like that, the more you are going to get it. :)
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: Aug 08 05:32PM +0200


>> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
>> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
> What is truly, utterly sick is harassing Fed fans for over a decade for saying remotely positive things about Fed and pretending after all that that nothing happened and changing tunes. Whimpy knows what he did and what he is doing and he thoroughly deserves this virtual busting of his nuts. The more he and you say fednuts, fedfuç?er or sick stuff like that, the more you are going to get it. :)
 
 
The problem is most of fedfuckers are simply nuts/deranged.
 
E.g. Whisper saying Federer beating Baghdatis to win AO was a slam
title won against softcock opponent.
It's very much spot on, it's not even insulting to Federer, let
alone to his fans.
 
Yet fedfuckers get offended personally and start their tantrums.
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Aug 08 07:35AM -0700

Interesting ideas here, quite counter to the mainstream Narrative™:
 
https://straightlinelogic.com/2017/08/06/is-trump-winning-by-robert-gore/
AZ <arnab.zaheen@gmail.com>: Aug 08 08:08AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:35:35 PM UTC+6, Carey wrote:
> Interesting ideas here, quite counter to the mainstream Narrative™:
 
> https://straightlinelogic.com/2017/08/06/is-trump-winning-by-robert-gore/
 
Sounds reasonable to me. T, crude as he is, is beating the entire DC elite at their own game. If he just stopped tweeting utter nonsense, he would be winning even bigger. But at the end of the day, he is just another crook. Just not the kind that DC likes.
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Aug 08 08:25AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:08:16 AM UTC-7, AZ wrote:
> > Interesting ideas here, quite counter to the mainstream Narrative™:
 
> > https://straightlinelogic.com/2017/08/06/is-trump-winning-by-robert-gore/
 
> Sounds reasonable to me. T, crude as he is, is beating the entire DC elite at their own game. If he just stopped tweeting utter nonsense, he would be winning even bigger. But at the end of the day, he is just another crook. Just not the kind that DC likes.
 
 
I like your last sentence, and agree that the DC Blob *does not* like T's
exposure of their seedy underbelly, which is why I think it's good he's
there to do so. I do think Robert Gore give T too much credit for 11-dimensional chess abilities, but that's just a quibble. So far, I see little
in his blog post that doesn't align with reality.
AZ <arnab.zaheen@gmail.com>: Aug 08 07:44AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:04:31 PM UTC+6, Whisper wrote:
 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
 
This is a tennis forum. Blue chips belong in casinos. Wrong analogy. Dismissed.
John Liang <jliang70@gmail.com>: Aug 08 07:47AM -0700

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 12:04:31 AM UTC+10, Whisper wrote:
 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
 
All slams are blue chip events. so Federer is still 5 slam in front of Nadal. Now if we are talking about bluest of blue chip events then it is 13 against 5.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment