Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 6 topics

Saturday, August 5, 2017

Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Aug 05 04:47PM -0700

at USO or later or at all?
 
I think he's done, but ?
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Aug 05 04:52PM -0700

Mirka will get it done.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Aug 05 03:17PM -0700

Commit suicide?
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Aug 05 10:22PM

On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 15:13:38 -0700, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> what would you like Trump to do for you to like him? and no stupid
> things, come on, tell us what he could do or could do better?
 
What has he accomplished?
 
Sorry to say but imo Trump may not be polished/PC, but at his core he's
not really very different from those who came before him and will
undoubtedly follow him.... that is, he's a selfish, shameless political
opportunist.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Aug 05 03:28PM -0700

On Saturday, 5 August 2017 23:22:19 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
> not really very different from those who came before him and will
> undoubtedly follow him.... that is, he's a selfish, shameless political
> opportunist.
 
so would you be this critical if Hillary was president? were you like this with Obama?
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Aug 05 10:38PM

On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 15:28:10 -0700, The Iceberg wrote:
 
>> opportunist.
 
> so would you be this critical if Hillary was president? were you like
> this with Obama?
 
Yes. When I have I ever praised Hillary or Obama? I was a Sanders
supporter, primarily because I felt he actually stood for something and
believed in his ideas... I'm still not convinced he could have converted
his relatively one-track agenda into concrete policies though.
 
Clinton and Trump are shameless liars and shape-shifters. Obama was
essentially an extension of GWB besides Obamacare (which, if you'll read
back on rst I was never a big fan of, besides removing insurance pre-
existing conditions)
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 06 02:18AM +0300

jdeluise kirjoitti 6.8.2017 klo 1:22:
> not really very different from those who came before him and will
> undoubtedly follow him.... that is, he's a selfish, shameless political
> opportunist.
 
Trump is much worse than those before him...
 
Luckily he's dumb as hell and his achievements will be mainly focused on
getting impeached and prosecuted.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 06 02:20AM +0300

The Iceberg kirjoitti 6.8.2017 klo 1:28:
>> undoubtedly follow him.... that is, he's a selfish, shameless political
>> opportunist.
 
> so would you be this critical if Hillary was president? were you like this with Obama?
 
Obama wasn't a criminal, idiot & deplorable human being.
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Aug 05 11:26PM

On Sun, 06 Aug 2017 02:18:25 +0300, TT wrote:
 
> Trump is much worse than those before him...
 
> Luckily he's dumb as hell and his achievements will be mainly focused on
> getting impeached and prosecuted.
 
Well, as long as he can be obstructed for the rest of his single term it
won't be too terrible :) I wouldn't bet on impeachment though (wouldn't
mind seeing it)...
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 06 02:40AM +0300

jdeluise kirjoitti 6.8.2017 klo 2:26:
 
> Well, as long as he can be obstructed for the rest of his single term it
> won't be too terrible :) I wouldn't bet on impeachment though (wouldn't
> mind seeing it)...
 
I'm close to 100% certain than Muller will find lots of stuff since he
seems to be really serious about it and competent. And I'm full 100%
certain that there's lots of stuff Trump can be caught on.
 
Another thing is when... these things may last long.
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Aug 05 04:40PM -0700

On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 4:20:26 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
> >> opportunist.
 
> > so would you be this critical if Hillary was president? were you like this with Obama?
 
> Obama wasn't a criminal, idiot & deplorable human being.
 
 
Heh
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Aug 05 04:42PM -0700

On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 3:09:14 PM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 15:04:17 -0700, Carey wrote:
 
> > strawman much
 
> Sure. And yours wasn't?
 
JD, which part of which post of mine do you see as strawmanning? TIA.
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Aug 05 07:50PM -0400

On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 14:22:30 -0700 (PDT), Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>
wrote:
 
>> Visa, Nokia, and Microsoft railed against the bill.
 
>> http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/08/03/silicon-valley-raise-act-immigration-economy/
 
>Excellent. Immigration is used by the few to drive down the wages of the many.
 
bernie nailed immigration in the campaign and his own party dissed
him, of course.
 
>I've know too many engineers, for example, who've lost their jobs to H1b holders, who are then, as bob I think pointed out, more or less captives
>of their employers.
 
absolutely. they work at ~1/2 or 1/3 pay for 10+yrs because it's
better than working for 1/10th wage in asia, phillipines, whatnot, and
the company plays them for slaves, and it affects american workers'
wages obviously too.
 
bob
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 06 02:51AM +0300

bob kirjoitti 6.8.2017 klo 2:50:
> bernie nailed immigration in the campaign and his own party dissed
> him, of course.
 
What's his own party?
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Aug 05 07:46PM -0400

>includes, and your follow-up posts backed that up. I'm glad to have been
>of some service educating you though. Now you won't make that mistake
>again.
 
are you trying to say buffalo is not in upstate NY? sheesh!

 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Aug 05 07:46PM -0400

>> beautiful as fussen!
 
>> bob
 
>I know what rafting is, but was is "fussen"?
 
a town near Schwangau!
 
bob
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Aug 05 03:50PM -0700

On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 6:14:16 PM UTC-4, soccerfan777 wrote:
> Most Trumpers are fundamentalists striving for racial purity. No doubt about it
 
Yes, probably right paki!
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Aug 05 03:55PM -0700

Thanks gipper.
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Aug 05 07:43PM -0400

On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT), soccerfan777
 
>All fundamentalists need to be stoned. And yes that includes Trumpers
 
your response makes a great case for limited immigration.
 
bob
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Aug 06 02:35AM +0300

bob kirjoitti 5.8.2017 klo 23:43:
> me alt-right? you must be kidding.
 
There was an interesting article in WAPO yesterday...
 
It said that there is no such thing as a 'Trump Democrat" - aka people
who are Democrats but voted for Trump. There are some people who voted
for Obama and now Trump - but they are actually Republicans who made an
exception with Obama and voted for a Democrat.
 
You are one of these. A true blue republican, perhaps even alt-righ...
 
At least I don't recall seeing any complaints about supreme court
nomination etc from you. You listen to rightwing radio hosts and read
breitbart... why shouldn't you be called alt-right?
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Aug 05 11:38PM

On Sun, 06 Aug 2017 02:35:40 +0300, TT wrote:
 
 
> At least I don't recall seeing any complaints about supreme court
> nomination etc from you. You listen to rightwing radio hosts and read
> breitbart... why shouldn't you be called alt-right?
 
bob is alt-right alright. Though there are some more extremist members
of that group than he is.
MBDunc <michaelb@dnainternet.net>: Aug 05 03:37PM -0700

On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 9:07:44 PM UTC+3, Whisper wrote:
> fortunate to have this direct evidence, rather than just making stuff up
> in coulda/woulda land.
 
> : )
 
...of course Fed won his last eight meetings with Agassi 2003-2005 and also totally trounced him at their AO slam meeting 2005. You probably cannot do better than that.
 
Even Sampras was trailing 0-5 h2h against Chang at some point before sorted things right.
 
.mikko
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Aug 05 10:43PM

On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 15:37:15 -0700, MBDunc wrote:
 
 
> Even Sampras was trailing 0-5 h2h against Chang at some point before
> sorted things right.
 
> .mikko
 
Must have been peakity peak Chang against baby Pete? :)
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Aug 05 03:47PM -0700

On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 6:43:48 PM UTC-4, jdeluise wrote:
> > sorted things right.
 
> > .mikko
 
> Must have been peakity peak Chang against baby Pete? :)
 
LOL, whimpy, like booby gets fukked up his again?
MBDunc <michaelb@dnainternet.net>: Aug 05 03:47PM -0700

On Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 1:43:48 AM UTC+3, jdeluise wrote:
> > sorted things right.
 
> > .mikko
 
> Must have been peakity peak Chang against baby Pete? :)
 
Of course Chang is younger than Pete.... :)
 
.mikko
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment