Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 12 topics

Friday, August 11, 2017

Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 11 08:24PM -0500

> He shouldn't do anything. What would you do if you were president?
 
Doing nothing is how we got to where we are.
--
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 11 05:39PM -0500

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 14:01:45 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> of which 1,800 is ready to be deployed on command with GPS accuracy.
 
>> Kim Jong-un knows the fate of his country if he does something stupid.
 
>Bingo!
 
Trump obviously doesn't.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 11 05:43PM -0500

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:00:29 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>>>OWNED!
 
>> Nah, I don't own anyone.
 
>Everyone owns you.
 
LOL. This from one who has had his ass kicked by the majority of this
list. No one owns me.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Aug 11 11:01PM

David Laville wrote:
 
 
> > You don't need to know the solution to know that Trump humiliating
> > the US and NK is not it.
 
> Another liberal imbecile.
 
Another stupid ad hominen. Left or right is not important here. If you
think the right all think Trump is doing a wonderful job of
representing the Us you are an even bigger fuckwit than you first
appear.
 
> Let me see if I understand your asinine
> liberal logic;
 
Of course you don't understand. If you understood you wouldn't be
making half-witted responses.
 
 
> North Korea started this shit with missile test and threatening to
> shoot missiles at Guam. Not a word from you snowflakes.
 
Who is "you snowflakes", shit for brains?
 
> Trump threatens to respond with fire and fury
 
What does that even mean? What a ridiculous thing to threaten. It's
meaningless at best; at worst he is a madman threatening the lives of
millions of innocent people.
 
> if they do and he's the
> one you consider dangerous with a nuclear weapon and humiliating the
> U.S.?
 
Yup. Except, of course he and you are the snowflakes. Getting your
delicate knickers in a twist and mouthing off instead of taking an
intelligent approach to what has to potential to escalate into
something fatal.
 
> left wing religion tells you to repeat. Sorry snowflake but your
> ignorance and childish thought process is what's humiliating to the
> U.S.
 
Sorry, but you don't know me at all. You make an idiot of yourself with
vapid comments like the above based on thin air thinking. Liker Trump,
you engage your mouth before your brain has warmed up.
 
You are clueless neanderthal if you are impressed by Trumps schoolyard
rhetoric.
 
The more he says the more he looks like a mouthy child. How do you
think that plays in NK? Perfect for thier proganda machine.
 
Of course he is humiliating the US. Normally the world would expect to
see a statesman with and intelligent measured response.
 
KJu is spitting in his face and he reacts to the provocation with empty
bluster and all the dignity of a snotty nosed fat kid with his shirt
hanging out.
 
Where are your statesmen and why aren't they being heard? Have you none?
 
 
--
Trump ***Irresponsible, unprofessional and sending the wrong message.***
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Aug 11 05:07PM -0700

So when KJU threatens Guam, what should Trump do, according to the brilliant armchair strategist from Texas?
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Aug 11 06:02PM -0700

He shouldn't do anything. What would you do if you were president?
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 11 08:06PM -0500

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>So when KJU threatens Guam, what should Trump do, according to the brilliant armchair strategist from Texas?
 
Again Greg, I'm not as well versed on foreign relations as you think
you are. So don't ask me. It would also behoove you to stop the
childish terms. It doesn't serve you well.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 11 08:17PM -0500

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:02:39 -0700 (PDT), "John B."
 
>He shouldn't do anything. What would you do if you were president?
 
From his usual stance I'd say that he would escalate the situation by
threats that he couldn't carry out. Just like Trump. Every time he
says that a threat from NK will bring retaliation....they do and he
doesn't.
Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org>: Aug 12 01:00AM

What do you get out of all this trolling and attention seeking.
 
Are you THAT bored?
 
Do you need attention that bad?
 
Fucking coward will read this, but no balls to respond.
 
Dumb little shit. Fucking pathetic degenerate recluse.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 11 05:38PM -0500

On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 13:59:27 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> ><nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
 
>> >>As one would expect from a compulsive liar...
 
>> >>"Trump will sometimes respond to a shot he duffed by simply playing a second ball and carrying on as if the first shot never happened. In the parlance of the game, Trump takes floating mulligans, usually more than one during a round. Because of them it is impossible to say what he has actually shot on any given day, according to 18 people who have teed it up with Trump over the last decade, including SI senior writer Michael Bamberger, who has done so nine times. In 2007, Trump called Bamberger to brag about a 68 he had shot at Bel-Air Country Club in Los Angeles. Trump's handicap index is officially 2.8, but he has posted only three scores since '14. Els, a South Florida resident who has known Trump for many years, estimates he is "an eight or a nine." For Trump to shoot 68 on a tough course like Bel-Air would require him to play nearly perfectly from tee to green while making a number of substantial putts. One of his playing partners that day confirmed that Trump played
"good,"
>> to you then that's childish.
 
>Wow....that is quite a stretch, even by your standards.
>Arnold Palmer took a mulligan on the first tee when playing with his buddies. Guess he is a crook too.
 
First, learn to read. Trump is the POTUS and commands the nation, and
the free world with his statements. Lies mean something when he says
them and he does that a lot.
 
Taking a mulligan on the first tee isn't quite the same as Trump's
cheats.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Aug 11 11:12PM

David Laville wrote:
 
> >> I mostly care about his signature.
 
> > Be honest, you only care about yourself Greg.
 
> So do most liberals.
 
You haven't quite grasped the concept of liberalism.
 
> Trump won approx. 84% of the geographic United
> States and 9 months later you leftist are still crying to have him
> thrown out of office because he doesn't support your agendas.
 
Dumb is as dumb says.
 
WTF do you think you are kidding with meaningless and misleading
statistics as above. You can tell you are a Trumpet that is for sure.
 
So I know what and who you are.
 
You don't have a clue who or what I am.
 
I am not a US citizen, nor do I live there.
 
My comments are those of an interested independent.
 
You emmotive, unintelligent and meaningless comment is typical of a
Trump supporter.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Aug 11 11:15PM

David Laville wrote:
 
 
> Is Trump cheating at golf preventing you from earning a living? Is it
> preventing you from putting food on the table? Until it does stop
> acting like a 3 year old child.
 
Lol, [INSERT Tumpets name here] pretends not to understand that it's
not about golf, it's
about integrity; something Trump is daily proven to lack in spades.
 
Here two more blantant examples
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/02/boy-scouts-and-mexico-both-deny-claims-of-calling-trump-to-offer-praise
 
Just in case Trumpets are thinking of calling FAKE news below is the
transcript of one of the lies in the telling.
 
WSJ: They seemed to get a lot of feedback from former scouts and –
 
TRUMP: Did they like it?
 
WSJ: It seemed mixed.
 
TRUMP: They loved it. [Laughter.] It wasn't — it was no mix. That was a
standing –
 
WSJ: In the — you got a good — you got a good reaction in –
 
TRUMP: I mean, you know, he writes mostly negative stuff. But that was
a standing ovation –
 
WSJ: You got a good reaction inside the arena, that's right.
 
TRUMP: ... from the time I walked out on the stage — because I know.
And by the way, I'd be the first to admit mixed. I'm a guy that will
tell you mixed. There was no mix there. That was a standing ovation
from the time I walked out to the time I left, and for five minutes
after I had already gone. There was no mix.
 
WSJ: Yeah, there was a lot of supporters in the arena.
 
TRUMP: And I got a call from the head of the Boy Scouts saying it was
the greatest speech that was ever made to them, and they were very
thankful. So there was — there was no mix.
 
--
Trump ***Irresponsible, unprofessional and sending the wrong message.***
 
--
Trump ***Irresponsible, unprofessional and sending the wrong message.***
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Aug 11 07:50PM -0400

On 08/11/2017 04:59 PM, Dene wrote:
>> to you then that's childish.
 
> Wow....that is quite a stretch, even by your standards.
> Arnold Palmer took a mulligan on the first tee when playing with his buddies. Guess he is a crook too.

 
Did he claim to have shot 68 after?
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Aug 11 05:41PM -0700

On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 4:28:53 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
> > thrown out of office because he doesn't support your agendas.
 
> Trump won less than 50% of the PEOPLE, David.
 
> But then I guess people aren't important to you.
 
This metric of "geographic area" is an interesting new snake oil twist in
all things Trump. First time I've heard it - - wonder where it originates from?
... any help here, David?
 
Unfortunately, the Constitution works on people, not acres, so this argument falls
apart immediately, particularly when one realizes that population isn't homogeneously
distributed. For example, 17.5% of this 84% is Alaska, which has 0.22% of the US population.
 
And there's several other "big but empty" States which IIRC which also went - some
barely - to Trump. Consider then too Wyoming, North & South Dakotas, Montana,
Idaho, & Nebraska: they represent 30% of the US landmass, but happen to contain
only 7.58M people - - which is a cool million less than just New York City's population.
 
Yeah, I know: "But, but, but ... LAND MASS!"
Never mind it isn't Constitutional.
 
Its a classical example of Fake News: take something that is a fact, and have a semi-
plausible link - - it doesn't matter that this association is flawed, because the strategy
is to distract critics by using its red herring and how its a "verifiable fact".
 
 
-hh
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Aug 12 02:00AM +0200

Oh, sorry , no one wants you.
 
A recluse troll and attention seeker.
Dadi knew what everyone knows, you pathetic shit.
now start babbling again creature, post away, you have mastered the craft.
 
DLS
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Aug 12 02:00AM +0200

We all know.
 
Dadi knew.
 
Sad......
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Aug 11 07:54PM -0400

On 08/11/2017 03:30 PM, -hh wrote:
 
>> Greg's rebuttals tend to consist of two words, e.g., Trump hate,
>> butt-hurt, or don't care.
 
> Or: "too long"

 
What else is he going to say? It's not like he can defend his position on its merits.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Aug 11 05:01PM -0700

What else is he going to say? It's not like he can defend his position on its merits.
 
You enjoy wasting your time?
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Aug 11 05:02PM -0700

On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 7:54:16 PM UTC-4, Carbon wrote:
> >> butt-hurt, or don't care.
 
> > Or: "too long"
 
> What else is he going to say? It's not like he can defend his position on its merits.
 
Well, he could point to those elements in the Democratic platform on the
Environment and ESA that he finds as even more offensive than the Republican's
points, particularly if he's able to articulate his rationale for why they're worse policy.
 
 
-hh
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Aug 11 07:56PM -0400

On 08/11/2017 03:21 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
> won on the basis of turnout.
 
> 3. Pay no attention to Trump's tweets. They're becoming increasingly
> bizarre and irrelevant.
 
 
True... but I have real concerns that he may try to get the US into a war trying to deflect from the Russia scandal.
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Aug 12 01:29AM +0200

Thousands of posts.
What do you have to show for it?
 
Are you THAT bored, you have no better use of your time.
 
Grow up, you pathetic lonely imbecile.
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Aug 12 01:29AM +0200

Pathetic.
 
His dadi was not like this.
 
What the fuck went wrong with this human aberration ?
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Aug 12 12:32AM +0200

A recluse balding college dropout.
 
That lives for trolling and attention.
 
Wonder the last time the jerk off got laid, no real person would want to be around him.
 
His dadi knew what we all know.
 
Fucking recluse garbage, let's all have a good laugh at this desperate attention seeker.
 
Lololololololololol
michaelunowho@gmail.com: Aug 11 03:36PM -0700

On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 6:35:23 PM UTC-4, Nomen Nescio wrote:
 
> Wonder the last time the jerk off got laid, no real person would want to be around him.
 
> His dadi knew what we all know.
 
> Fucking recluse garbage, let's all have a good laugh at this desperate attention seeker.
 
And, IT'S a frightened, little coward.
michaelunowho@gmail.com: Aug 11 03:36PM -0700

On Friday, August 11, 2017 at 5:27:11 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > Everything the RAT (resident asshole troll) posts is for the purpose of an argument. When he rarely asserts his own view, it's leftist, as are the ignored OT posts he generates.
 
> > Of course he denies this, only proving that he is a chronic liar and troll.
 
> Says the coward.
 
Ah! The role reversal defense!! The #1 defense of abject losers.
 
You doofus, are the one hiding in your little rat hidey hole, breaking balls.
 
Because in a face to face, you would lose more teeth, Shit Stain.
 
Why don't you off yourself? You really have nothing to live for.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment