Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 13 topics

Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 09 09:25AM -0700

'FBI raided former Trump campaign manager Manafort's home in July'
 
<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort-idUSKBN1AP1OR>
 
'FBI agents seized documents and other material from the Virginia home
of Paul Manafort, President Donald Trump's former campaign manager,
during a July raid as part of a special counsel's probe into alleged
Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, a spokesman for
Manafort said on Wednesday.
 
Manafort spokesman Jason Maloni confirmed that the raid, first reported
by the Washington Post report, had taken place.
 
The predawn raid was conducted at Manafort's home in the Washington
suburb of Alexandria without advance warning on July 26, a day after
Manafort had met with staff members of the Senate Intelligence
Committee, the Post said, citing unidentified people familiar with the
probe.'
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 09 10:38AM -0700

On 2017-08-09 9:25 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
> Manafort had met with staff members of the Senate Intelligence
> Committee, the Post said, citing unidentified people familiar with the
> probe.'
 
And this:
 
<https://www.justsecurity.org/44031/fbi-search-paul-manaforts-home-mean/>
 
In particular, this:
 
'Mueller's use of a search warrant tells us that he was able to
establish on the basis of evidence, and to the satisfaction of a United
States Magistrate-Judge, that there was probable cause to believe that
evidence of a specific crime or crimes existed in the location to be
searched. That standard is significantly higher than what is required to
obtain a grand jury subpoena, which can be used to obtain any evidence
that a grand jury (under the direction of a prosecutor) decides will be
helpful to their investigation.'
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 09 11:00AM -0500

THE red line has been drawn and crossed already. What the hell was
Trump thinking? Military experts have called it a blunder and doubt
that it was vetted with any of the current Joint Chiefs of Staff, or
even John Kelly. Of course the White house is pushing that back with
no specifics.
 
Now that Kim-Jong-un has defied him by threatening Guam in less than a
day how does Trump de-escalate the rhetoric?
Tillerson says "Americans should sleep well" though. With two insane
world leaders threatening nuclear war?
 
Our resident nut job will try to make comparisons of this to Obama and
be laughed at now.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 09 10:37AM -0700

> world leaders threatening nuclear war?
 
> Our resident nut job will try to make comparisons of this to Obama and
> be laughed at now.
 
I can't believe the insanity of this hasn't gotten more attention.
 
Trump is the only president that's ever made me afraid that nuclear
weapons might actually be used.
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Aug 09 07:22PM +0200

Must of had a cockroach on it when he fucked mommi.
 
Look at the outcome, very roach like.
 
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Aug 09 04:00AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 10:34:39 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
>> to shove it through as an Unfunded Mandate...a policy which has been an anathema of
>> Republican & conservative values since at least Ronald Reagan.
 
> Notice how Greg rarely reads your blather...
 
Except that your actions reveal your words to be a lie: the truth is that Greg does read.

Greg lies about it because otherwise, he would have to concede being shown wrong.
 
 
Greg's cognitive dissonance stems from his unwillingness or inability to be honest
with himself in the face of reality which clashes with his worldview. It is therefore
no surprise that he then tries to blame others when silence/avoidance doesn't work.
 
TL;DR: even a puppy is eventually smart enough to figure it out when their trainer rubs
their nose in their own poop ... to "wise up" and stop pooping in the wrong places.
 
 
 
-hh
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 09 09:37AM -0500

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 07:55:23 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>>> that has occurred here has been by American Citizens born
>>> here.....except for 9/11"
 
>It doesn't. The above statement was a proven lie.
 
Not a lie, an oversight which I corrected. You never corrected your
oversight about San Bernadino....or shall we call that a lie? How does
that square with your definition?
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 09 11:02AM -0500

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:48:57 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> that square with your definition?
 
>You corrected it? When? How?
>Was there an admission you were wrong? An apology?
 
An apology for an oversight? You're a real dick.
> terrorist wife and how she got into the country. It was
> discussed in an LA times article at the time.
 
>Your 'People' source omits relevant details.
 
Then enlighten us and correct 'People'.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 09 09:27AM -0700

On 2017-08-09 8:48 AM, Moderate wrote:
> terrorist wife and how she got into the country. It was
> discussed in an LA times article at the time.
 
> Your 'People' source omits relevant details.
 
Since you almost never provide sources (and on the rare occasions you
do, you neglect to quote the text you're citing), you really don't get
to complain about the quality of anyone else's.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 09 12:00PM -0500

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:14:32 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> An apology for an oversight? You're a real dick.
 
>So you did nothing.
 
>We simply have different values.
 
Since you have none, of course.
 
>You are a lying fuck.
 
>Simple as that really.
 
ESAD
"Shit Stain Baker" <shitstainbaker@nowhere.com>: Aug 09 12:53PM -0400

PWWWWEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZZZZZZE.
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Aug 09 06:29PM +0200

Would like to know what was growing in that shit to produce what he did.
 
Hate to think of the slime that produced this human anamoly.
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Aug 09 04:23AM -0700

On Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 8:08:05 PM UTC-4, Carbon wrote:
> > had to fight, the more they spent out of that $100K in legal fees,
> > resulting in less & less for the plaintiff to potentially collect.
 
> > (Sorry, busy ... have to read the rest later)
 
This experience was with my Father-in-Law ... rehab center had him out
in a wheelchair, neglected to use the safety strap, and he fell forward,
resulting in a head trauma & brain injury - - additional medical bills and
treatments which ultimately lead to his death.
 
 

> OMG, that is just asinine. How can these companies get away with this kind of crap?
 
It is what happens when one realizes how the laws for Corporations provide a nice
liability shield - - the victim can only ever receive up to what the corporation is worth,
and setting up multiple small corporations is pretty cheap.
 
FWIW, a similar "corporate shell game" has been used locally for decades in real estate,
including individual homes:
 
1. Developer sets up a new Corp
2. He builds the homes
3. He sells the homes, usually with some sort of 'home warranty'.
 
(time passes)
 
4. Homeowner finds problem, tries to go back after the builder - - finds that the
Corporation is "gone" and/or essentially has zero remaining assets to fix the
problem.
 
Similarly, the 'home warranty' turns out to be pretty lame & toothless - - and they
don't really have any recourse against a now-defunct corporation either.
 
I've seen this game happen with a family member (out of state) & coworker (local);
both times it was a new construction single family homes in the ~$500K price range
and it took a few years for a design problem (caused by straightforward stupidity)
to come to light.
 
For example, the former was a bathroom vent that didn't vent to the exterior (which
has only been code for decades), resulting in a delayed-detection interior mold problem.
 
And the latter was a flawed roof design which would accumulate and then leak every
time there was a decent snowfall. Since it doesn't snow in the Spring/Summer/Fall,
and his first winter in the house was warm (no snow) the design flaw wasn't immediately
evident. IIRC, he ended up spending around $15K out of his own pocket to change the
roof design (intersections & pitch, plus flashing) to solve the roof water leak problem.
 
 
-hh
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 09 09:28AM -0700

On 2017-08-09 4:23 AM, -hh wrote:
> evident. IIRC, he ended up spending around $15K out of his own pocket to change the
> roof design (intersections & pitch, plus flashing) to solve the roof water leak problem.
 
> -hh
 
This is one of the problems with court rulings that corporations are
"persons" deserving of the same rights as... ...actual human beings.
 
Actual human beings can close down shop and evade their responsibilities.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 09 07:43AM -0500


>>Another claim you made and can't back up. Popcorn is getting cold.
 
> The claim I made was that You're the perfect example of
> Dunning-Krueger's study. And you just backed me up. Eat your dinner.
 
You made the claim, because I pointed out the errors made by Baker
and Carbon. You can't prove I was wrong and you know
it.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 09 07:55AM -0500

>> be much smarter than I am and that is a lie.
 
> Well, I can read and comprehend English. That alone makes me smarter
> than you. Then there's education....of which you're devoid.
 
How does this square with this statement you made earlier?
 
"Every terrorist act
>> that has occurred here has been by American Citizens born
>> here.....except for 9/11"
 
It doesn't. The above statement was a proven lie.
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 09 10:48AM -0500


> Not a lie, an oversight which I corrected. You never corrected your
> oversight about San Bernadino....or shall we call that a lie? How does
> that square with your definition?
 
You corrected it? When? How?
Was there an admission you were wrong? An apology?
 
You probably don't recall the circumstances of the San Bernardino
terrorist wife and how she got into the country. It was
discussed in an LA times article at the time.
 
Your 'People' source omits relevant details.
 
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 09 11:14AM -0500


>>You corrected it? When? How?
>>Was there an admission you were wrong? An apology?
 
> An apology for an oversight? You're a real dick.
 
So you did nothing.
 
We simply have different values.
 
You are a lying fuck.
 
Simple as that really.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Aug 09 01:18PM

Moderate wrote:
 
 
> You made the claim, because I pointed out the errors made by Baker
> and Carbon. You can't prove I was wrong and you know
> it.
 
No, actually you simply contradicted them. They countered your
assertion and you have done nothing to support your assertion. Most
would say the ball is in your court. Provide some support for your
claims showing the cause and effect so they can be discussed. Without
it your claims are hollow.
 
--
Trump ***Irresponsible, unprofessional and sending the wrong message.***
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 09 09:33AM -0500

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 07:43:48 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>You made the claim, because I pointed out the errors made by Baker
> and Carbon. You can't prove I was wrong and you know
> it.
 
The only claim I made was that you're the perfect example of
Dunning-Krueger's study. You must really revel in being wrong since it
is your raison d'etre.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 09 09:00AM -0700

On 2017-08-09 5:43 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
> You made the claim, because I pointed out the errors made by Baker
> and Carbon. You can't prove I was wrong and you know
> it.
 
What errors did you point out?
 
To clarify for you: simply saying "you're wrong" is not pointing out an
error.
"Shit Stain Baker" <shitstainbaker@nowhere.com>: Aug 09 08:04AM -0400

wrote in message
news:c9cf9048-cd00-4ecc-85e9-4d986fc63050@googlegroups.com...
 
>Don't worry about hitting your brain. There's not much in there.
 
I am a great marksman, Michael. I can hit anything with ease. I am great
at everything.
"Shit Stain Baker" <shitstainbaker@nowhere.com>: Aug 09 07:59AM -0400

I will never, ever, fall under their spell.
"Shit Stain Baker" <shitstainbaker@nowhere.com>: Aug 09 07:58AM -0400

And Booby K is my biggest fan along with the other Shit Stains.....
 
We all talk about deep subjects and we all agree on everything.
 
I am a happy little shit.
 
:-)
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Aug 09 03:36AM -0700

Heard some on this story yesterday ... Apparently, using a Stock Photo for your profile
is a common trend on a fake account - and it looks like the Stock photography company
who owns the pics is getting engaged to protect their IP. So not only are these bot folks
Liars and Fakes, they're also literally a Theif too.
 
 
-hh
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment