Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 4 topics

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Aug 08 08:56PM -0400

>>> inveterate liar that will be the big change.
 
>> You are the inveterate liar.
 
> No one else calls me that. You can't say the same.

Excellent point.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 08:05PM -0500

>here.....except for 9/11.
 
>So far...
>But apparently you have no regard for current immigration law, which is what sanctuary cities disregard.
 
If you mean the EO by Trump you bet I have no regard for it.
Stupidity. But what else could one expect?
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Aug 08 06:35PM -0700

If you mean the EO by Trump you bet I have no regard for it.
Stupidity. But what else could one expect?
 
The original discussion was about sanctuary cities. Support them??
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 08:36PM -0500

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:30:04 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> that has occurred here has been by American Citizens born
>> here.....except for 9/11.
 
>You are grossly misinformed or lying.
 
Actually since 9/11 there has been a total of 26 attacks noted as
terrorism. only one was not an American citizen, a Somali Muslim
involved in what was reported as a terrorist act. He injured 13
students at Ohio State University in 2016 by ramming into them with
his car.
 
http://people.com/politics/donald-trump-refugee-muslim-ban-terrorist-attack-us-statistics/
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 08:41PM -0500


>If you mean the EO by Trump you bet I have no regard for it.
>Stupidity. But what else could one expect?
 
>The original discussion was about sanctuary cities. Support them??
 
Of course, but that wasn't the original discussion. Check the Subject
line above.
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Aug 08 07:01PM -0700

Bobby wrote:
- hide quoted text -
 
>>The original discussion was about sanctuary cities. Support them??
 
> Of course, but that wasn't the original discussion. Check the Subject
> line above.
 
Notice also how Greg has dodged my comments on how Sanctuary Cities vs Immigration
enforcement is an issue of balancing divergent public interests, plus the Fed is now trying
to shove it through as an Unfunded Mandate...a policy which has been an anathema of
Republican & conservative values since at least Ronald Reagan.
 
 
-hh
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Aug 09 02:03AM

Moderate wrote:
 
 
> > I was aware of the show, but there is absolutely no comparison
> > between Obama and Trump to begin with.
 
> You got that right Obama was unqualified and he created a mess.
 
You think Trump has demonstrated qualifications to be President?
 
I think a lot of people expected a hell of a lot more from this self
proclaimed god of business.
 
Perhaps you identify with his lack of knowledge on most subjects. His
instability and unprofessional lack of good leadership are both a
surprise and an embarrassment.
 
He has shown his only real tactic is bullying.
 
--
Trump ***Irresponsible, unprofessional and sending the wrong message.***
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Aug 08 07:34PM -0700

Bobby wrote:
- hide quoted text -
 
>>The original discussion was about sanctuary cities. Support them??
 
> Of course, but that wasn't the original discussion. Check the Subject
> line above.
 
Notice also how Greg has dodged my comments on how Sanctuary Cities vs Immigration
enforcement is an issue of balancing divergent public interests, plus the Fed is now trying
to shove it through as an Unfunded Mandate...a policy which has been an anathema of
Republican & conservative values since at least Ronald Reagan.
 
Notice how Greg rarely reads your blather...
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Aug 08 07:35PM -0700

- hide quoted text -
 
>If you mean the EO by Trump you bet I have no regard for it.
>Stupidity. But what else could one expect?
 
>The original discussion was about sanctuary cities. Support them??
 
Of course, but that wasn't the original discussion. Check the Subject
line above.
 
Is there an answer to my question?
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 09:41PM -0500

>to shove it through as an Unfunded Mandate...a policy which has been an anathema of
>Republican & conservative values since at least Ronald Reagan.
 
>Notice how Greg rarely reads your blather...
 
Obvious that you didn't read this one. try the last sentence. Most
conservatives would be upset.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 09:44PM -0500


>Of course, but that wasn't the original discussion. Check the Subject
>line above.
 
>Is there an answer to my question?
Already answered, you missed it.
Yes.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 09:54PM -0500

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 21:39:19 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> his car.
 
>> http://people.com/politics/donald-trump-refugee-muslim-ban-terrorist-attack-us-statistics/
 
>The San Bernardino attack that killed 14?
 
From the cite I linked:
 
2015 San Bernardino attack:
 
A married couple, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, killed 14
civilians and injured 22 others in a mass shooting at the Inland
Regional Center in San Bernardino, California. Farook was born in the
U.S. to Pakistani parents, and Malik, who was a permanent U.S.
resident, was born in Pakistan but grew up in Saudi Arabia.
 
As I said, you don't know you're dumb. Have someone read the above to
you and explain what "born in the U.S." and "a permanent U.S.
resident" means.
 
 
>Since your own cite disproves your previous statement and your
> current statement I count that as two lies.
 
Oversight isn't a lie you fucking moron.
 
>Maybe you are just stupid and they aren't lies, but you claim to
> be much smarter than I am and that is a lie.
 
Well, I can read and comprehend English. That alone makes me smarter
than you. Then there's education....of which you're devoid.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 08 08:24PM -0700

On 2017-08-08 7:03 PM, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
> instability and unprofessional lack of good leadership are both a
> surprise and an embarrassment.
 
> He has shown his only real tactic is bullying.
 
You forgot blaming others for his failures.
 
Can't get healthcare passed: blame the Democrats and Republicans who
were honest enough to stand up to a terrible bill.
 
North Korea's getting belligerent: blame China.
 
And so on...
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 08 08:25PM -0700

On 2017-08-08 3:44 PM, Dene wrote:
> willing to put themselves in peril to do so. They're in their right
> minds and to be honored for such humanitarianism.
 
> Apparently you have no regard for taxpayer money spent, trying to retrieve hostages.
 
When has that actually happened?
 
> to commit a terrorist crime. As a matter of fact, none have been
> committed by an immigrant.
 
> Apparently you have no regard for federal law.
 
Non sequitur.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 08 08:26PM -0700

On 2017-08-08 4:30 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> that has occurred here has been by American Citizens born
>> here.....except for 9/11.
 
> You are grossly misinformed or lying.
 
And you've done nothing to correct that...
 
What a shock.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 08 08:27PM -0700

On 2017-08-08 7:34 PM, Dene wrote:
> to shove it through as an Unfunded Mandate...a policy which has been an anathema of
> Republican & conservative values since at least Ronald Reagan.
 
> Notice how Greg rarely reads your blather...
 
...because Greg is a coward.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Aug 08 08:23PM -0700

On 2017-08-08 5:08 PM, Carbon wrote:
>> resulting in less & less for the plaintiff to potentially collect.
 
>> (Sorry, busy ... have to read the rest later)
 
> OMG, that is just asinine. How can these companies get away with this kind of crap?
 
Well the fact that the party that's all in for big business is in power
seems to help.
 
:-(
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 08:40PM -0500

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 19:53:01 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>This is dumber than Baker's claim that Obama's budget is
> responsible for the reduction in the national debt.
 
>Your economic acumen is zip.
 
You're the perfect example of Dunning-Krueger's study.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Aug 08 10:17PM -0400

>> responsible for the reduction in the national debt.
 
>> Your economic acumen is zip.
 
> You're the perfect example of Dunning-Krueger's study.

 
As is Trump. Which is why this poor fool likes him so much.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 09:38PM -0500

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 21:25:24 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>>>Your economic acumen is zip.
 
>> You're the perfect example of Dunning-Krueger's study.
 
>So explain why Carbon and Baker are right while I make some popcorn.
 
Sorry, but you've proved to be what I stated above. Whatever anyone
tries to explain to you, you always think you're smarter. That's what
Dunning-Krueger is all about. You don't know you're dumb.
BK@Onramp.net: Aug 08 09:59PM -0500

On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 21:47:18 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> tries to explain to you, you always think you're smarter. That's what
>> Dunning-Krueger is all about. You don't know you're dumb.
 
>Another claim you made and can't back up. Popcorn is getting cold.
 
The claim I made was that You're the perfect example of
Dunning-Krueger's study. And you just backed me up. Eat your dinner.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 08 07:53PM -0500


>>> Job openings hit an all time high.
 
>> When things are going up, and up, they hit all time highs with regularity.
 
> FY17 is also Obama's budget.
 
This is dumber than Baker's claim that Obama's budget is
responsible for the reduction in the national debt.
 
Your economic acumen is zip.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 08 09:25PM -0500

>> responsible for the reduction in the national debt.
 
>>Your economic acumen is zip.
 
> You're the perfect example of Dunning-Krueger's study.
 
So explain why Carbon and Baker
are right while I make some popcorn.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 08 09:39PM -0500

> students at Ohio State University in 2016 by ramming into them with
> his car.
 
> http://people.com/politics/donald-trump-refugee-muslim-ban-terrorist-attack-us-statistics/
 
The San Bernardino attack that killed 14?
 
Since your own cite disproves your previous statement and your
current statement I count that as two lies.
 
Maybe you are just stupid and they aren't lies, but you claim to
be much smarter than I am and that is a lie.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Aug 08 09:47PM -0500


> Sorry, but you've proved to be what I stated above. Whatever anyone
> tries to explain to you, you always think you're smarter. That's what
> Dunning-Krueger is all about. You don't know you're dumb.
 
Another claim you made and can't back up. Popcorn is getting cold.
 
 
--
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment