Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 11 topics

Friday, July 14, 2017

SliceAndDice <vishalkn@gmail.com>: Jul 14 06:56PM -0700

On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 2:58:32 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> he played a bad one.
 
> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
Do you happen to know what Cilic's stats are, going into the final?
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Jul 14 07:16PM -0700

2-3 in the third v Berdych, Fed down double break point: ace wide, ace up the T,
service winner up the T, ace up the T. Then breaks Berdy in the next game.
 
And this was one a mediocre day for the Great (Old!) Man. :)
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jul 14 10:55PM -0400


>> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
>> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
> Do you happen to know what Cilic's stats are, going into the final?
 
I calculated it for you :)
 
This includes the SF matches
 
 
Player Cilic Federer
1st % 62 66
1st serve won% 84 83
2nd serve won% 58 66
 
 
Federer played almost one set in the first round.
 
Also stats varied by opponents.
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
SliceAndDice <vishalkn@gmail.com>: Jul 14 08:23PM -0700

On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 10:55:14 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
 
> Federer played almost one set in the first round.
 
> Also stats varied by opponents.
> --
 
Thanks :) very close again.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 15 12:51AM +0300

TT kirjoitti 15.7.2017 klo 0:49:
> doesn't necessarily tell much of the quality of a film) and Pulp Fiction
> dancing scene was a homage to dancing scene in this film (best scene in
> the film imo).
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1MKUJN7vUk
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jul 14 03:42PM -0700

On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 2:20:54 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
> one of the best films of the 60s when it comes to cinematic
> storytelling. Wonderful ending. Hell, I'll give it 8/10.
 
> I think IMDB's short description of the plot is totally fucked up.
 
Ingmar Bergman, when talking about Antonioni, said (typically) "his muse Monica Vitti is a terrible actress." As much as I like "Red Desert," I agree that her skills fall short at times.
Jason White <infiniti_g35_guy88@yahoo.com>: Jul 14 06:32PM -0700

On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 5:36:54 AM UTC-7, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> Damn
 
More dangerous, in theory, than Safin. More reliable and consistent for certain.
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Jul 14 06:44PM -0700

On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 6:32:29 PM UTC-7, Jason White wrote:
> On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 5:36:54 AM UTC-7, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> > Damn
 
> More dangerous, in theory, than Safin. More reliable and consistent for certain.
 
 
Agree... what I saw of Cilic was fearsome. FedGod better show up on Sunday.
John Liang <jliang70@gmail.com>: Jul 14 07:35PM -0700

On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 1:59:44 AM UTC+10, TT wrote:
 
> > Pathetic. Just as bad a trump voters and corrupt neoliberal democrats.
 
> As if fedfans weren't pissing their pants earlier.
 
> Besides, 8 is kinda no biggie compared to 10...
 
8 is a biggie compare to Nadal's 2 and of course 5 or 6 times out before the QF.
John Liang <jliang70@gmail.com>: Jul 14 07:39PM -0700

On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 2:59:52 AM UTC+10, TT wrote:
 
> Frankly I think modern grass game is damn boring compared to matches on
> clay which is for real tennis players. You know the surface where the
> player who plays better tennis wins and not the bigger server...
 
Sure, I wouldn't trust the opinion of someone who believe Borg had a single handed backhand.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jul 14 10:03PM -0400

https://youtu.be/hXlmKPdQaGo
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
OW <bjmet1@aol.com>: Jul 14 07:01PM -0700


> the way Mugu's played the last 3 matches, Venus is toast.
 
I agree Venus is toast if it goes three. But I think Venus will finish her off in two.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 15 01:00AM +0300

stephenJ kirjoitti 15.7.2017 klo 0:41:
> details. Emotionally and cognitively resonant, it hits all the marks.
 
> A-
 
> Highly recommended.
 
An entire planet of apes? And they have war? This sounds like really
intriguing concept... thanks!
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jul 14 10:46PM

On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 16:41:56 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
 
> Highly recommended.
 
So it must be mediocre.
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jul 14 03:50PM -0700

On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 3:00:35 PM UTC-7, TT wrote:
 
> > Highly recommended.

> An entire planet of apes? And they have war? This sounds like really
> intriguing concept... thanks!
 
Didn't you love the snappy review though? Only a real cinephile could write something that sophisticated. Almost makes you forget he's talking about an ape movie.
krisraja777@gmail.com: Jul 14 05:55PM -0700

On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 5:50:30 PM UTC-5, Gracchus wrote:
 
> > An entire planet of apes? And they have war? This sounds like really
> > intriguing concept... thanks!
 
> Didn't you love the snappy review though? Only a real cinephile could write something that sophisticated. Almost makes you forget he's talking about an ape movie.
 
I am sure the apes in the movie are more intelligent than Jaroast.
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: Jul 14 04:49PM -0500

On 7/14/2017 12:04 PM, Whisper wrote:
 
> Kerber's results are no.1 worthy. The computer got it it right.
> Completely fucked up with Pliskova though. Nothing in her record
> warrants no.1 status.
 
Yes, Kerber was a worthy #1, she had the results. Raharocker has some
weird hatred of her. Hard to figure.
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
arahim <arahim_arahim@hotmail.com>: Jul 14 02:59PM -0700


> > I think she's the worst no.1 ever right?
 
> No that would be Kerber. It doesnt matter how you get there; it matters what you do once you get there. She has not been #1 for a day yet. Stop judging her.
 
No. Rankings represent the past ie some period of the past and how you did in that determines whether you are number one now. Your play after you are number one will determine your ranking in future...perhaps that is why Kerber is no longer number one.
krisraja777@gmail.com: Jul 14 05:53PM -0700

On Friday, July 14, 2017 at 4:59:49 PM UTC-5, arahim wrote:
 
> > > I think she's the worst no.1 ever right?
 
> > No that would be Kerber. It doesnt matter how you get there; it matters what you do once you get there. She has not been #1 for a day yet. Stop judging her.
 
> No. Rankings represent the past ie some period of the past and how you did in that determines whether you are number one now. Your play after you are number one will determine your ranking in future...perhaps that is why Kerber is no longer number one.
 
You guys are not getting my point. I meant Kerber is the worst #1 because he hasn't done squat since she became #1. She is basically the modern day Wilander. Her 2017 is like Wilander 1989.
 
Pliskova has just got to #1. Lets see what she does when she is #1. Too early to judge her.
SliceAndDice <vishalkn@gmail.com>: Jul 14 05:01PM -0700

http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/news/media/5507619728001.html
rrfarwell@comcast.net: Jul 14 04:49PM -0700

It's all about the net. Clay no. Grass yes. HC maybe
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jul 14 03:19PM -0700

Good picks WendyG
DavidW <no@email.provided>: Jul 15 07:25AM +1000

If Muguruza wins, Manuel aka Xax and Michal Jankowski will tie for 1st
place, otherwise WendyG will win if Federer wins, otherwise Whisper will
win.
 
http://home.pacific.net.au/~davidw/tennis/contest/rst_2017sp_WM.html
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 15 01:02AM +0300

arahim kirjoitti 15.7.2017 klo 0:45:
>> https://join.worldcommunitygrid.org?recruiterId=123388
 
> Frequent and passionate kissing as a masking agent
> http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2721712-olympic-runner-gil-roberts-says-kissing-girlfriend-caused-failed-drug-test?utm_source=cnn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=editorial
 
Took a page out of Gasquet playbook, bastard.
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jul 13 10:15PM

On Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:58:00 -0500, stephenJ wrote:
 
> I didn't say it's a great movie, but it is a good movie. You should go
> see it. :)
 
I've seen a few that you recommended here (not based on your
recommendations though), haven't liked a single one so far.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment