Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 9 topics

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:12AM -0700

Forgot to say this yday, old Birdman took out Thiem, quite straight-forwardly if we're honest, despite it being 5 sets. I reckon Thiem is just a more entertaining version of Dimitrov, the chances of him getting to a slam final are zero, a bit like Nishi really. Have long said it's cos he puts so much effort into every shot and so he can't last that long. Find it a shame, as I like watching him play. Anyone agree/disagree with this?
SliceAndDice <vishalkn@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:28AM -0700

On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 12:12:14 PM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
> Forgot to say this yday, old Birdman took out Thiem, quite straight-forwardly if we're honest, despite it being 5 sets. I reckon Thiem is just a more entertaining version of Dimitrov, the chances of him getting to a slam final are zero, a bit like Nishi really. Have long said it's cos he puts so much effort into every shot and so he can't last that long. Find it a shame, as I like watching him play. Anyone agree/disagree with this?
 
Nishi has already been to a slam final.
Thiem is getting to a French Open final at some point. Grass isn't really his surface.
Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: Jul 11 04:57PM +0100

... the evidence.
 
"Rob Goldstone wrote:
 
The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and
in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some of the
official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and
her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.
 
This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part
of Russia and it's government's support for Mr Trump - helped along by
Aras and Emin.
 
What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would
you like to speak to Emin about it directly?
 
I can also send this info to your father via Rhona [Vice President of
the Trump Organisation], but it is ultra sensitive and I wanted to run
it by you first."
 
And this was 3 June 2016.
 
One might say that the Trump family knew Russia was targeting Clinton
before anyone else did.
 
Also perhaps noteworthy that his father has remained silent on this.
 
I'll also add that it's likely any info the Russian's might have said
they had might never have existed.
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 11 07:08PM +0300

Brian W Lawrence kirjoitti 11.7.2017 klo 18:57:
 
> And this was 3 June 2016.
 
> One might say that the Trump family knew Russia was targeting Clinton
> before anyone else did.
 
So this is email to Trump jr?
How was it leaked?
 
> Also perhaps noteworthy that his father has remained silent on this.
 
Guilty as hell, the whole bunch of them...
 
> I'll also add that it's likely any info the Russian's might have said
> they had might never have existed.
 
That's not very relevant though.. Jr & pals committed crime when going
to meet the Russians in order to get stolen material. Could be called
'treason'. Or high treason, whatever the difference is...
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 11 07:11PM +0300

TT kirjoitti 11.7.2017 klo 19:08:
 
> That's not very relevant though.. Jr & pals committed crime when going
> to meet the Russians in order to get stolen material. Could be called
> 'treason'. Or high treason, whatever the difference is...
 
Oh, I see, Jr tweeted himself. lol!
Was he afraid it would leak anyway?
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 11 07:17PM +0300

TT kirjoitti 11.7.2017 klo 19:11:
>> 'treason'. Or high treason, whatever the difference is...
 
> Oh, I see, Jr tweeted himself. lol!
> Was he afraid it would leak anyway?
 
...the emails were going to be published by NYT. Jr just wanted to be
first to 'appear' less guilty.
 
Why didn't he publish them months ago...
The answer is obviously that Trump & team & family never do anything
right before they are caught. (same with firing Flynn, admitting
meetings with Russians etc)
 
The question is, will Trump go down with them.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:19AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 16:57:30 UTC+1, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
> Also perhaps noteworthy that his father has remained silent on this.
 
> I'll also add that it's likely any info the Russian's might have said
> they had might never have existed.
 
targeting Hillary with a fishing email that any 14 year old could've sent? targeting Hillary by mentioning her dodgy email server in her house that everyone knew about?
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 11 07:22PM +0300

TT kirjoitti 11.7.2017 klo 19:17:
> The question is, will Trump go down with them.
 
Even if he would argue that he knew nothing about anything ever... while
half of his team colluded with Russians - he certainly would be
impeachably bad leader, totally incapable of leading his team.
 
Of course Trump (and Pence to an extent) were in on it.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 11 07:24PM +0300

The Iceberg kirjoitti 11.7.2017 klo 19:19:
 
>> I'll also add that it's likely any info the Russian's might have said
>> they had might never have existed.
 
> targeting Hillary with a fishing email that any 14 year old could've sent? targeting Hillary by mentioning her dodgy email server in her house that everyone knew about?
 
This is collusion with Russians. There isn't going to be better evidence
unless someone has recorded their conversations.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 08:54AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 16:49:06 UTC+1, soccerfan777 wrote:
> She is a Manchester. She's got nothing
 
what is a Manchester? is she 'Mad for it'?
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Jul 11 08:56AM -0700

Man-chester
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:18AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 16:56:06 UTC+1, soccerfan777 wrote:
> Man-chester
 
you're more a Halep sort of bloke.
MBDunc <michaelb@dnainternet.net>: Jul 11 09:12AM -0700

On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:25:36 PM UTC+3, Carey wrote:
 
> What I wanna know is, what happened to Raffi's hair? Odd to be going bald
> at 31, when his whole extended family have thick heads of hair...
 
> Or not.
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3952158/Game-set-thatch-Tennis-star-Rafa-Nadal-undergoes-Wayne-Rooney-style-hair-transplant-restore-thinning-locks.html
 
.mikko
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:16AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 14:15:59 UTC+1, SliceAndDice wrote:
> > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
 
> Think he will be back. He was just super annoyed with this loss, is all. He really thought he had a great chance to go the distance this year.
 
I'd be(and was) super annoyed at that git Muller playing like that too.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 08:57AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 14:22:32 UTC+1, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> > yes they fix it to give Fed the easiest ride possible. A few years ago, even the Fedfans laughed at how easy they'd made the draw for him. It's cos of $$$ and audience.
 
> Get over it, nadal lost.
 
Trump won!
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 08:59AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 14:42:45 UTC+1, RaspingDrive wrote:
> > > yes they fix it to give Fed the easiest ride possible. A few years ago, even the Fedfans laughed at how easy they'd made the draw for him. It's cos of $$$ and audience.
 
> > Get over it, nadal lost.
 
> Icey is secretly nervous over Andy's prospects. He (Andy) could have his increasing posterior kicked soon. That he (Icey) will take some time to get over.
 
what's there to be nervous about? he's practically hobbling about every match, but what do you expect when he's been on holiday since December. Unlike Fed who's been practicing as much as physically possible to keep himself at peak and only had the rest when he was too chicken to play Nadal on clay.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:00AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 15:19:05 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 9:42:45 AM UTC-4, RaspingDrive wrote:
 
> > He (Andy) could have his increasing posterior kicked soon.
 
> Let's hope it's by Federer in the final! :)
 
lol you're so into RST you want this instead of your own Canadian, Raonic LOLOL
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:03AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 15:19:05 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 9:42:45 AM UTC-4, RaspingDrive wrote:
 
> > He (Andy) could have his increasing posterior kicked soon.
 
> Let's hope it's by Federer in the final! :)
 
oh yeah let's not.
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:05AM -0700

On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 9:03:17 AM UTC-7, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> > > He (Andy) could have his increasing posterior kicked soon.
 
> > Let's hope it's by Federer in the final! :)
 
> oh yeah let's not.
 
Why? Don't you like roasted capon?
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 09:05AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 16:39:51 UTC+1, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
> limited meaning to argue one way or another.' It is real data though,
> but it need to be interpreted, which leads to arguments without
> resolution.
 
it's so obvious it's fixed for Fed, it's ridiculous, one or two guys also ALWAYS retire against him making it even easier.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Jul 11 08:54AM -0700

None of the women have a grass court game. Truck driver doesn't for sure
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 11 08:55AM -0700

On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 15:31:04 UTC+1, Court_1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 10:16:30 AM UTC-4, SliceAndDice wrote:
> > Not counting Ostapenko out, but seems to be heading in that direction. Would be nice to see Coco Vandeweghe get to the final, personally. She has a true blue grasscourt game, which I like.
 
> You can't count out Konta/Halep yet either. With the women, you simply don't know.
 
it not like the men where Fed has been given a cake walk draw + he's "at peak" and Nadal/Djoker/Murray are out of sorts.
 
it would be wonderful if Coco Vanderbelt got to the final as that guy who always posted "COCO UPDATE" could post again!
SliceAndDice <vishalkn@gmail.com>: Jul 11 07:54AM -0700

On Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 10:38:45 AM UTC-4, Whisper wrote:
 
> Yes remarkable shotmaking skills, & what really impresses me is her
> mind. She seems to be a 10/10 in mental stakes. I wonder if Sharapova
> was a role model?
 
I think it's Serena.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 11 05:51PM +0300

> Please, invite code t3nnis.tv
 
> hectormadorran2000@gmail.com
 
Fuck off
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jul 11 05:50PM +0300

stephenJ kirjoitti 11.7.2017 klo 14:42:
 
>> You never provided a number. What is it?
 
> What? I listed the movies out of 1000 that I hadn't seen. You can't add
> it up? IIRC, it came to about 88 unseen, or 912 seen as of that moment.
 
That's a lie. One doesn't post such number on that list without
systematically going through art films etc which I'm certain you have
not done.
 
Post again the list of 88 films you have not seen.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment