Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 3 topics

Monday, July 10, 2017

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 10 10:57AM -0700

On 2017-07-09 2:28 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfMXlskrDuA
 
> My recollection of Obama and Russia was when he laughed at Romney
> for saying they were a threat during the debate.
 
Which rebuts what Bobby just said in what way at all?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 10 11:11AM -0700

On 2017-07-09 1:22 PM, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
> is not the definition of someone begging for attention...
 
> Looks like you'll need no. 13 sooner than you expected.
 
> GNF
 
What's hilarious is that he makes post after post after post...
 
...saying that I'M the one begging for attention.
 
It must really gall him to realize that I don't even bother with a
killfile; I just ignore them.
 
:-)
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 10 11:30AM -0700

> in an interview on Meet the Press John Brennan, ex CIA chief discusses
> it. This is the full interview and all of it is enlightening.
 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfMXlskrDuA
 
And today a lot is being said about Russia, Russia, Russia on CNN. Will they every learn that most normal Americans don't care.
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 10 01:34PM -0500

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:30:27 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> it. This is the full interview and all of it is enlightening.
 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfMXlskrDuA
 
>And today a lot is being said about Russia, Russia, Russia on CNN. Will they every learn that most normal Americans don't care.
 
How do you know that? Give a cite.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jul 10 12:13PM -0700

Where you get the idea that "normal Americans" don't care is beyond me. DT Jr., Kushner and Manafort met w a Russian representative and later said they had never done so. Both sides had something they wanted from the other. If any deal was made, the three can be indicted. The campaign and the White House have said repeatedly that these was no contact between them and any Russians. If you don't care about that, then you're the one who isn't normal.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jul 10 07:14PM

Dene wrote:
 
> And today a lot is being said about Russia, Russia, Russia on CNN.
> Will they every learn that most normal Americans don't care.
 
I think Trump is lucky.
 
You are probably right, it's a sad indictment of the American public
that most of his supporters who might swing are too inward looking to
see anything that they don't perceive as directly affecting them as
important.
 
I think you partly understand how serious the issue is which is why you
are as desperate for it to go away and why you pretend the very serious
incidents that have come out are not though you must know very
different.
 
Like I said, Trump is lucky, they could be spending more time looking
at what Trump ahs been doing and saying that does affect them more
directly. They should be dissecting his EO's and his everyday lies to
better expose the corruption and inadequacy of this administration.
 
Trump is getting off light and the media is partly to blame.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 10 12:39PM -0700

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:13:12 AM UTC-8, John B. wrote:
> Where you get the idea that "normal Americans" don't care is beyond me. DT Jr., Kushner and Manafort met w a Russian representative and later said they had never done so. Both sides had something they wanted from the other. If any deal was made, the three can be indicted. The campaign and the White House have said repeatedly that these was no contact between them and any Russians. If you don't care about that, then you're the one who isn't normal.
 
The WH said there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump Campaign. There were appropriate contacts.
 
Furthermore....most Americans know this is a BS red herring story. The ones who care are you liberals, who cannot accept the fact your ilk lost the election and previous ones.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 10 12:40PM -0700

On 2017-07-10 11:30 AM, Dene wrote:
>> it. This is the full interview and all of it is enlightening.
 
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfMXlskrDuA
 
> And today a lot is being said about Russia, Russia, Russia on CNN. Will they every learn that most normal Americans don't care.
 
You don't care if Russia was influencing your election to get a
particular candidate elected, Greg?
 
You don't care that they wouldn't have done it without expecting a
return on their investment, right?
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 10 12:41PM -0700

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:17:58 AM UTC-8, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
> directly. They should be dissecting his EO's and his everyday lies to
> better expose the corruption and inadequacy of this administration.
 
> Trump is getting off light and the media is partly to blame.
 
Trump is innocent of collusion so in that respect, I disagree with that notion he is getting off light.
 
Agree with you about the media. Much of the MSM overplayed a very weak hand ad nauseum, revealing their bias and destroying their credibility.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 10 12:44PM -0700

On 2017-07-10 11:37 AM, Moderate wrote:
> Dene <gdstrue@aol.com> Wrote in message:
 
>> And today a lot is being said about Russia, Russia, Russia on CNN. Will they every learn that most normal Americans don't care.
 
> Did they mention they Comey's notes were classified?
 
Nope. Because they weren't.
 
> Any mention
> that the folks Democrats used for the fake dossier had Russian
 
Who would those be?
 
> connections? How about Haiti contributions that were used to pay
> for Chelsea's wedding?
 
Cite, please...
 
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 10 12:44PM -0700

On 2017-07-10 12:39 PM, Dene wrote:
> On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:13:12 AM UTC-8, John B. wrote:
>> Where you get the idea that "normal Americans" don't care is beyond me. DT Jr., Kushner and Manafort met w a Russian representative and later said they had never done so. Both sides had something they wanted from the other. If any deal was made, the three can be indicted. The campaign and the White House have said repeatedly that these was no contact between them and any Russians. If you don't care about that, then you're the one who isn't normal.
 
> The WH said there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump Campaign. There were appropriate contacts.
 
The WH also said there were no contacts...
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 10 12:44PM -0700

On 2017-07-10 12:28 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> Where you get the idea that "normal Americans" don't care is beyond me. DT Jr., Kushner and Manafort met w a Russian representative and later said they had never done so. Both sides had something they wanted from the other. If any deal was made, the three can be indicted. The campaign and the White House have said repeatedly that these was no contact between them and any Russians. If you don't care about that, then you're the one who isn't normal.
 
> A Russian representative?
 
> Where did you hear that?
 
Donald Trump Jr. said as much
 
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 10 11:31AM -0700

> http://www.knowyourmobile.com/nokia/nokia-3310/19848/history-mobile-phones-1973-2008-handsets-made-it-all-happen
> Cell phones were popular in the 90s, not 2008.
 
And Reagan was president for the glorious years of 1980-88...when only the affluent had cell phones.
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 10 01:39PM -0500

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:31:40 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> http://www.knowyourmobile.com/nokia/nokia-3310/19848/history-mobile-phones-1973-2008-handsets-made-it-all-happen
>> Cell phones were popular in the 90s, not 2008.
 
>And Reagan was president for the glorious years of 1980-88...when only the affluent had cell phones.
 
The Lifeline Program was begun during his presidency, he type of
phone isn't a factor.
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: Jul 10 01:43PM -0500


>> And Reagan was president for the glorious years of 1980-88...when only the affluent had cell phones.
 
> The Lifeline Program was begun during his presidency, he type of
> phone isn't a factor.
 
It clearly is a factor.
 
http://federalsafetynet.com/lifeline-obama-phone.html
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 10 11:57AM -0700


> >And Reagan was president for the glorious years of 1980-88...when only the affluent had cell phones.
 
> The Lifeline Program was begun during his presidency, he type of
> phone isn't a factor.
 
Nor is the fact that there are only 4 Co-ops left from what ObamaCare and Obama started...originally 36. Millions of tax payer money down the toilet.
 
Anything attached with Obama name is like that. He and Dems were great at spending other people's money.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jul 10 12:14PM -0700

Again the Reagan admin. gave subsidies to poor people for land-line phones.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jul 10 07:23PM


http://www.knowyourmobile.com/nokia/nokia-3310/19848/history-mobile-phones-1973-2008-handsets-made-it-all-happen
> Cell phones were popular in the 90s, not 2008.
 
WTF does it matter?
 
What a pointless fucking conversation about a non-issue set up by a
resident troll. No-one can win when none of you respect the truth. You
are all losers.
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 10 02:30PM -0500

>> phone isn't a factor.
 
>It clearly is a factor.
 
>http://federalsafetynet.com/lifeline-obama-phone.html
 
Not when the program was initiated.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 10 12:36PM -0700

On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 11:27:16 AM UTC-8, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
 
> What a pointless fucking conversation about a non-issue set up by a
> resident troll. No-one can win when none of you respect the truth. You
> are all losers.
 
Bobby is not a resident troll.
Had the topic been initiated by our RAT, I would not be participating in it.
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: Jul 10 02:37PM -0500


>> It clearly is a factor.
 
>> http://federalsafetynet.com/lifeline-obama-phone.html
 
> Not when the program was initiated.
 
The program DID NOT ALLOW FOR CELL PHONES UNTIL 2008. What happened to
the program once cell phones were allowed?
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 10 02:42PM -0500

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:57:34 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> phone isn't a factor.
 
>Nor is the fact that there are only 4 Co-ops left from what ObamaCare and Obama started...originally 36. Millions of tax payer money down the toilet.
 
>Anything attached with Obama name is like that.
 
Only to lamebrains who haven't a clue.
 
>He and Dems were great at spending other people's money.
 
Well it lasted through the Bush era didn't it? Another little fact
that lamebrains overlook.
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: Jul 10 12:52PM -0500

John B. wrote:
 
>>> As if anybody but shrieking leftists give a shit.
 
>> Yes. Under which president did this cost of this program explode?
 
> It didn't explode at all.
 
http://federalsafetynet.com/lifeline-obama-phone.html
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 10 01:17PM -0500

On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 11:27:24 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
>> long before those hand held bricks came out. I never bought one of
>> those.
 
>I have told you five times.
 
Told me what?
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 10 01:33PM -0500


>>> Yes. Under which president did this cost of this program explode?
 
>> It didn't explode at all.
 
>http://federalsafetynet.com/lifeline-obama-phone.html
 
As per usual this thread changed from my original statement.
 
Calling it Obamaphone, no matter when or who started it, is wrong.
He neither started the program or did anything personally to advance
it. From it's beginning it has been an FCC problem.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment