Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 7 updates in 5 topics

Sunday, July 9, 2017

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 09 12:01AM -0700


>> Nope.
 
>> "you're lying" is not a personal attack.
 
> I decide what is personal to me, NOT you!
 
You don't get to decide about reality and the English language.
 
When you state something as a fact that you know you cannot actually
know is true...
 
...you're lying.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 09 12:00AM -0700


>> Apparently you are.
 
>> Since it's your claim and yet you can't produce it.
 
> Go read the executive order: it's in the FIRST sentence.
 
If that's true...
 
...quote it and provide a link.
 
:-)
Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org>: Jul 09 03:09AM

Dadi, is that you?
 
No,troll.
 
It's michael, bend over you balding college dropout.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 08 05:15PM -0700

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/30/senate-democrat-blasts-obamaphone-over-fraudulent-findings-complete-lack-oversight.html
 
Wingnuts are always bitching about falsehoods and incorrect inferences
by the major networks. This story is about cell phones that are given
by the government to low income people to give them communication
help.
 
The problem is that calling it Obamaphone is dead assed wrong since
the program began during the Reagan administration. But Fox can get
some jabs at Obama in by falsely using his name.
 
Cell phones existed during the Reagan Admin? If they did, only for the affluent.
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 08 07:49PM -0500

>the program began during the Reagan administration. But Fox can get
>some jabs at Obama in by falsely using his name.
 
>Cell phones existed during the Reagan Admin? If they did, only for the affluent.
 
As if you had a clue\.
 
https://www.fcc.gov/general/lifeline-program-low-income-consumers
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 08 09:03PM -0500

On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 18:48:52 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> some jabs at Obama in by falsely using his name.
 
>> I don't think that CNN has done anything that low.
 
>https://youtu.be/tpAOwJvTOio
 
So that's the kind of proof you've been using all along. Someone who
is connected and knows the background of the subject.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 08 06:12PM -0700


>> Weird how in this case you're more concerned about the alleged collusion
>> and not concerned about the leaking at all, huh?
 
> Weird how you ALWAYS deflect when hard evidence of unethical and illegal behavior by the Obama administration comes up.
 
What hard evidence would that be?
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment