Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 18 updates in 6 topics

Thursday, July 13, 2017

BK@Onramp.net: Jul 12 08:32PM -0500

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 19:26:29 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> Perhaps you should look up the Magnitsky Act that DTJ admitted they
>> were discussing.
 
>Confirming Don jr version of events.
 
His version is going to get him in a pile of trouble. What a dumb
move to be his own "Deep Throat". He is his father's son though.
"Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com>: Jul 13 06:13AM

Moderate wrote:
 
 
> > Perhaps you should look up the Magnitsky Act that DTJ admitted they
> > were discussing.
 
> Confirming Don jr version of events.
 
...of the campaign discussing sanctions against Russia with the
Russians during the campaign.
 
I wouldn't say it confrims his version but it verifies there is reason
for concern.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 12 09:22PM -0700

'FDA abruptly drops request for more drug data after maker's CEO meets
Trump'
 
<https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/07/after-pharma-ceo-pushes-trump-fda-drops-request-for-more-data-on-his-drug/>
 
'In a rare and surprising reversal, the Food and Drug Administration
gave Amicus Therapeutics Inc. the greenlight Tuesday to submit its
rare-disease drug, Galafold, for an accelerated review process. That's
despite the agency previously saying that the drug maker needed to run
another clinical trial to better evaluate side-effects—which it
hasn't—before the agency would consider reviewing the drug.
 
The reversal is raising eyebrows—and stocks—amid speculation that the
FDA's about-face on Galafold was political and a sign of easier times
for the makers of lucrative rare-disease drugs.
 
Central to that speculation is a meeting back in February between
President Trump and Amicus' CEO, John Crowley, STAT reports. Crowley got
the president's ear following the FDA's request for more data last year,
which spurred Crowley to publicly campaign for the FDA to lower its
standards for bringing drugs for rare diseases to market.'
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 12 06:25PM -0500

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 18:15:46 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> What if Trump pulls a Nixon and bolts before the indictment lands?
 
>> He would actually be smart to cut-n-run now, because the Russia investigation is going to get much worse.
 
>Carbon bites at every conspiracy theory that comes down the pipe.
 
Are you so stupid that you think the Mueller investigation is a
chasing a conspiracy?
 
>Speaking of which I heard the FBI is restarting the email
> investigation next week.
 
They have a much more important email investigation now.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 12 04:36PM -0700

- show quoted text -
What if Trump pulls a Nixon and bolts before the indictment lands?
 
He would actually be smart to cut-n-run now, because the Russia investigation is going to get much worse.
 
Keep dreaming.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jul 12 04:41PM -0700

> chasing a conspiracy?
 
> >Speaking of which I heard the FBI is restarting the email
> > investigation next week.
 
Where did you hear that? Infowars? Drudge?
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 12 08:28PM -0500

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 16:36:39 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>What if Trump pulls a Nixon and bolts before the indictment lands?
 
>He would actually be smart to cut-n-run now, because the Russia investigation is going to get much worse.
 
>Keep dreaming.
 
You've said over and over that it is a witch hunt. Christopher Wray
disagrees with both Trump and you. He thinks that Mueller is not on a
witch hunt. When are you going to wake up and stop blindly thinking
that Trump is qualified to be POTUS. The GOP is about to bolt.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Jul 12 10:48PM -0400

> chasing a conspiracy?
 
>> Speaking of which I heard the FBI is restarting the email
>> investigation next week.
 
Yeah, about that. Crackpots are not legitimate news sources.
 
> They have a much more important email investigation now.

I actually would be surprised if Trump lasts as POTUS until 2020.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 12 08:59PM -0700

You've said over and over that it is a witch hunt. Christopher Wray
disagrees with both Trump and you. He thinks that Mueller is not on a
witch hunt. When are you going to wake up and stop blindly thinking
that Trump is qualified to be POTUS. The GOP is about to bolt.
 
GOP is not bolting...unless you're talking about McCain, who needs to retire.
Trump beat your 2 candidates and 16 Republican....fair n square.
Get over it.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 12 09:08PM -0700

On 2017-07-12 8:59 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> GOP is not bolting...unless you're talking about McCain, who needs to retire.
> Trump beat your 2 candidates and 16 Republican....fair n square.
> Get over it.
 
He lost the popular vote.
 
The Democrats gained ground in both your congress and senate.
 
And that was with help from Russia.
 
:-)
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 12 06:20PM -0500

Trump's nominee for FBI director dispute shim. Says that "I do not
consider Director Mueller to be on a witch hunt".
 
How long will he last?
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 12 05:22PM -0700

Trump's nominee for FBI director dispute shim. Says that "I do not
consider Director Mueller to be on a witch hunt".
 
How long will he last?
 
He will get shit canned if he attempts to meddle in future elections. :-)
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 12 08:30PM -0500

On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:22:36 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>consider Director Mueller to be on a witch hunt".
 
>How long will he last?
 
>He will get shit canned if he attempts to meddle in future elections. :-)
 
That isn't what happened with Comey. Wray is open to investigating
the whole administration.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jul 12 06:15PM -0500


> What if Trump pulls a Nixon and bolts before the indictment lands?
 
> He would actually be smart to cut-n-run now, because the Russia investigation is going to get much worse.
 
Carbon bites at every conspiracy theory that comes down the pipe.
 
Speaking of which I heard the FBI is restarting the email
investigation next week.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jul 12 07:21PM -0500

>> > investigation next week.
 
> Where did you hear that? Infowars? Drudge?
 
>> They have a much more important email investigation now.
 
Julian Assange
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jul 12 07:24PM -0500


>>Too early to say. It is certainly odd.
 
> It seems to shoot down Velnitskaya's claim of separation from Russian
> leaders.
 
Seems like she has associations with the group that worked on the
fake dossier.
 
http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/12/russian-lawyer-has-ties-to-firm-
that-compiled-trump-dossier/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source
=Twitter&utm_medium=Social
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jul 12 07:26PM -0500

>> -veselnitskaya-pictured-obama-ambassador-russia-8-days-trump-jr-mtg/
 
> Perhaps you should look up the Magnitsky Act that DTJ admitted they
> were discussing.
 
Confirming Don jr version of events.
--
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Jul 12 10:00PM +0200

Sadly, we all have this scumbags number.
 
An aging lonely fewl, thank goodness he did not spawn.
 
Who would want such a sorry specimen. And an ugly balding specimen at that.
 
Look in the mirror you creature....yea, you win!
 
LOL!
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment