Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

Sunday, July 23, 2017

The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 02:08AM -0700


> > > Max
 
> > Like an asshole!
 
> I'm not dutch, you dimwit. Never was and never will be.
 
you soon will be, the EUSSR is moving to make you lot all one nation, the German identity hasn't got long before being merged into nothing, thanks goodness for Brexit.
calimero377@gmx.de: Jul 23 02:44AM -0700

On Sunday, July 23, 2017 at 11:08:15 AM UTC+2, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> > > Like an asshole!
 
> > I'm not dutch, you dimwit. Never was and never will be.
 
> you soon will be, the EUSSR is moving to make you lot all one nation,
 
 
Who tells you that nonsense, kid?
 
 
> the German identity hasn't got long before being merged into nothing, thanks goodness for Brexit.
 
Lol
 
 
Max
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Jul 23 04:28AM -0700

> So does my grandma and my hairdresser.
> So what, Guppy boy?
 
> Max
 
No motherfukker, you said you know more than the prof who wrote in the NYT, ok, scumbag.
You know fukk anout tennis, politics or anything, go suck steffis asshole and fukk offf
Bye bye steffi!
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 04:35AM -0700

On Sunday, 23 July 2017 12:28:17 UTC+1, Guypers wrote:
 
> No motherfukker, you said you know more than the prof who wrote in the NYT, ok, scumbag.
> You know fukk anout tennis, politics or anything, go suck steffis asshole and fukk offf
> Bye bye steffi!
 
he prob does know more than the 'professor' that wrote in the NYT - that guy is prob nothing but a bitter Hillary fan, professor of liberal arts or some nonsense.
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Jul 23 04:46AM -0700

On Sunday, July 23, 2017 at 7:35:36 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
> > You know fukk anout tennis, politics or anything, go suck steffis asshole and fukk offf
> > Bye bye steffi!
 
> he prob does know more than the 'professor' that wrote in the NYT - that guy is prob nothing but a bitter Hillary fan, professor of liberal arts or some nonsense.
 
Dont burn the burgers okay?
Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: Jul 23 08:04AM +0100

If you can bear to read it!
 

<http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/donald-trumps-new-york-times-interview_uk_5970803be4b0aa14ea779c40?utm_hp_ref=uk-donald-trump>
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 02:06AM -0700

On Sunday, 23 July 2017 08:04:36 UTC+1, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
> If you can bear to read it!
 
> <http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/donald-trumps-new-york-times-interview_uk_5970803be4b0aa14ea779c40?utm_hp_ref=uk-donald-trump>
 
Huffingtonpost LOL
 
Hey Brian, can you tell us why you hate Trump? are you as dumb and childish as this total nobody Akie Abe that pretended not to speak English for hours? these Hillary fans sure still are bitter LOL
Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: Jul 23 10:59AM +0100

On 23/07/2017 10:06, The Iceberg wrote:
>> If you can bear to read it!
 
>> <http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/donald-trumps-new-york-times-interview_uk_5970803be4b0aa14ea779c40?utm_hp_ref=uk-donald-trump>
 
> Huffingtonpost LOL
 
It's a transcript of the interview he gave to 3 NYT journalists.
Verbatim, in his own, garbled, incomprehensible, ramblings. Even
includes an intervention from a granddaughter and her mother.
 
> Hey Brian, can you tell us why you hate Trump?
 
What makes you think I 'hate' him. I don't think I've ever hated anyone.
 
> are you as dumb and childish as this total nobody Akie Abe that pretended
> not to speak English for hours?
 
Clearly not.
 
> these Hillary fans sure still are bitter LOL
 
You know, it's possible to criticise Trump without being a 'Hillary
fan', not that I profess to know what one of those might be.
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
calimero377@gmx.de: Jul 23 03:12AM -0700

On Sunday, July 23, 2017 at 11:06:42 AM UTC+2, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> > <http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/donald-trumps-new-york-times-interview_uk_5970803be4b0aa14ea779c40?utm_hp_ref=uk-donald-trump>
 
> Huffingtonpost LOL
 
> Hey Brian, can you tell us why you hate Trump? are you as dumb and childish as this total nobody Akie Abe that pretended not to speak English for hours? these Hillary fans sure still are bitter LOL
 
 
Iceybaby, most GOP senators are decent people. That's why they detest the orange clown. Until now they didn't dare to attack him openly for fear of losing a big part of their base (dumb and frustrated losers like you). But when the time or Robert Mueller comes they will stab the clown in the back. Because that's what any decent person would do, GOP or no GOP.
 
 
Max
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 03:22AM -0700

On Sunday, 23 July 2017 10:59:57 UTC+1, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
> > these Hillary fans sure still are bitter LOL
 
> You know, it's possible to criticise Trump without being a 'Hillary
> fan', not that I profess to know what one of those might be.
 
99% of people that criticise Trump ARE just bitter Hillary fans. CNN had features on Trump being afraid of stairs and that Trump gets 2 scoops of icecream! says everything of these idiots.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 03:26AM -0700


> > Huffingtonpost LOL
 
> > Hey Brian, can you tell us why you hate Trump? are you as dumb and childish as this total nobody Akie Abe that pretended not to speak English for hours? these Hillary fans sure still are bitter LOL
 
> Iceybaby, most GOP senators are decent people. That's why they detest the orange clown. Until now they didn't dare to attack him openly for fear of losing a big part of their base (dumb and frustrated losers like you). But when the time or Robert Mueller comes they will stab the clown in the back. Because that's what any decent person would do, GOP or no GOP.
 
how are they decent people? they're not clever or decent enough to come up with an alternative to Obamacare, yet want to destroy it and supported the corrupt healthcare monopoly pre-Obamacare. They also invaded Iraq cos they thought they'd get something out of it and didn't even have an exit plan. These guys all supported Bush 100%. Trump is a far more decent person than they are.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: Jul 23 12:30PM +0200


>> Iceybaby, most GOP senators are decent people. That's why they detest the orange clown. Until now they didn't dare to attack him openly for fear of losing a big part of their base (dumb and frustrated losers like you). But when the time or Robert Mueller comes they will stab the clown in the back. Because that's what any decent person would do, GOP or no GOP.
 
> how are they decent people? they're not clever or decent enough to come up with an alternative to Obamacare, yet want to destroy it and supported the corrupt healthcare monopoly pre-Obamacare. They also invaded Iraq cos they thought they'd get something out of it and didn't even have an exit plan. These guys all supported Bush 100%. Trump is a far more decent person than they are.
 
Well said.
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
calimero377@gmx.de: Jul 23 03:39AM -0700

On Sunday, July 23, 2017 at 12:30:31 PM UTC+2, *skriptis wrote:
 
> > how are they decent people? they're not clever or decent enough to come up with an alternative to Obamacare, yet want to destroy it and supported the corrupt healthcare monopoly pre-Obamacare. They also invaded Iraq cos they thought they'd get something out of it and didn't even have an exit plan. These guys all supported Bush 100%. Trump is a far more decent person than they are.
 
> Well said.
 
The professional Putin troll and the useful British idiot - you should marry ...
 
 
Max
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 04:38AM -0700


> > Well said.
 
> The professional Putin troll and the useful British idiot - you should marry ...
 
no defence then!Trump is so tewible and 'not decent' cos he goes against the status quo and calls journos out on fake news, whereas Iraqi/Syria/Libya murderers are 'decent' LOL
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 04:39AM -0700

On Sunday, 23 July 2017 11:30:31 UTC+1, *skriptis wrote:
 
> >> Iceybaby, most GOP senators are decent people. That's why they detest the orange clown. Until now they didn't dare to attack him openly for fear of losing a big part of their base (dumb and frustrated losers like you). But when the time or Robert Mueller comes they will stab the clown in the back. Because that's what any decent person would do, GOP or no GOP.
 
> > how are they decent people? they're not clever or decent enough to come up with an alternative to Obamacare, yet want to destroy it and supported the corrupt healthcare monopoly pre-Obamacare. They also invaded Iraq cos they thought they'd get something out of it and didn't even have an exit plan. These guys all supported Bush 100%. Trump is a far more decent person than they are.
 
> Well said.
 
it lucky didn't mention how Obama/Hillary and all the 'decent' types Brian and co look up to just let the inhuman Yemen war happen.
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Jul 22 10:09PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 4:16:31 PM UTC-4, grif wrote:
> > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> > http://www.avg.com
 
> I haven't seen it yet, but I suggested this film to RaspingDrive a while back since it's about his hero.
 
Srinivasa Ramanujan is one of a kind, a Double 4 to boot, and everybody's hero from his part of the world. Where I live presently a nearby library has the DVD and after finishing a two-day trip next week I hope to rent it and watch the film. Will give you my thoughts on it after that. I hope it won't be like Matt Damon doing/lecturing math in that movie whose name I forget.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 03:15AM -0700

On Saturday, 22 July 2017 18:03:23 UTC+1, TT wrote:
> the past. I thought a very good lifelike film, although a bit overrated
> by the critics (Metacritic 9,2 - get outta here). I enjoyed it a lot and
> felt like drinking wine afterwards. I think around 7,5/10.
 
Sideways was average, think a lot of 40+ year old middle-class types dreamt about being in it or something cos they all give it 10/10, bizarre really, but never understood the big deal, I'd give it maybe 5.
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: Jul 23 06:28PM +1000

On 23/07/2017 11:34 AM, Makarand Patil wrote:
> the serve was also exaggerated by wimpy big serve returning skills of the
> players of his era. No top player with Hewitt's or Federer's big-serve
> returning caliber in Sampras era.
 
 
I think you're overestimating guys like Hewitt. He won 2 slams in his
career, & in both he was mere points from losing in 5 set cliffhangers
in earlier rds. That's very close to being a slamless wonder.
 
To really make solid arguments you have to use something meatier than eg
Hewitt, or Fed of 2001 who was completely bamboozled by Henman's serving
at Wimbledon.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
John Liang <jliang70@gmail.com>: Jul 23 03:15AM -0700

On Sunday, July 23, 2017 at 6:28:56 PM UTC+10, Whisper wrote:
 
> I think you're overestimating guys like Hewitt. He won 2 slams in his
> career, & in both he was mere points from losing in 5 set cliffhangers
> in earlier rds. That's very close to being a slamless wonder.
 
To say Hewitt is not a good returner is underestimating his ability as a returner. He had a good record against just about any s/v type player of Sampras era. Not just Sampras but also Rafter and against Henman. I don't know how did Henman ever bamboozled Hewitt with his serving because he had 0:8 record against Hewitt. If there is anyone that Henman hated to play he will be Hewitt. Winning clift hanger in early round does not mean the guy is not a worthy champion, there were plenty of greater players winning from impossible position in the early round, Becker won against Nystrom in 5 in one of his first Wimbledon in 80s, Edberg won against Masur in 85 AO after been down 2 sets, Sampras himself was almost out to Hrbarty in AO in an early round in 94 before winning AO against Martin. Agassi was down 0:2 against Medvedev in 99 FO. Any guy who won the last point of a grand slam championship is a grand slam champion that is how they will be remembered not how they nearly lost the early round. A two time slam champion is a two time slam champion.
 
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 02:12AM -0700


> > Will Trump introduce some Russians, finally?
 
> Russia with her less than 200 million people and her fourth tier economy is only relevant due to her cast nuclear arsenal. Otherwise it would be comparable to Brazil or Indonesia.
 
so the obsession by CNN and democrats about Russia is pretty pointless.
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Jul 22 10:16PM -0700

On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 7:58:19 AM UTC-4, Federer Fanatic wrote:
> is Fed as a 10 year old getting a medal from Edberg along with the other ball boys:
 
> https://youtu.be/l0PtT9mKIeo?t=6m13s
 
> FF
 
For some reason I was reminded of the August 18th born American actor who died a few years back. He acted in a movie called Road House? I can Google the name ...
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jul 23 02:10AM -0700

On Saturday, 22 July 2017 20:35:55 UTC+1, AZ wrote:
 
> > The measure of a man is what he does with power.
> > - Plato
 
> That's when the ceremonial passing of the talent happened. The silky smooth style of Stich flowed into the little boy unbeknownst to mere mortals.
 
you'll be adding another TV set to your Fed shrine, eh!
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Jul 22 10:14PM -0700

On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 9:51:29 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
> 2015 61 20 0.75308642 0
> 2016 39 14 0.735849057 0
> 2017 46 7 0.867924528 2
 
The Nadal data should be at least from 2008 or even 2007.
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: Jul 23 06:24PM +1000

On 23/07/2017 11:24 AM, Carey wrote:
 
> I think even they will get that, eventually.
 
'Fedfuckers' is not directed at normal Fed/tennis fans, rather the
extreme types who not only idolize the guy, but disparage all his
opponents & exaggerate Fed's achievements - eg Fed 'crushed' Rafa at AO
& Sampras at Wimbledon. What's wrong with simply stating what happened
- ie Fed won by the skin of his teeth? It doesn't diminish the narrow
victories.
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
RaspingDrive <raspingdrive@gmail.com>: Jul 22 10:22PM -0700

On Friday, July 21, 2017 at 6:38:19 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
 
> > Yep, it's very entertaining watching them scramble to weave together a rationale from imaginary facts. I've been mostly sitting back and enjoying it for the whole week. If Federer were to win # 20 at the USO, the lot of them would probably have a collective stroke. :)
 
> It seems to me that Fedfans are currently having a collective stroke, so
> to speak.
 
Fed fans are dancing on the table.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 13 updates in 6 topics

Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Jul 23 04:32AM -0400

On 07/22/2017 11:49 PM, Scott M. Kozel wrote:
>> face to play flop shots like that without having to carry a 5th wedge.
 
> I will be experimenting to see what works best overall. Also determine
> the yardages for each of the wedges when used as full-swing irons.
 
I used to hit a full LW about 80 yards, and about twice that when bladed.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 22 10:55PM -0700

Carbs, I know you have a Miata and thought I'd get in on the
discussion.
 
I had a Mazda RX-7 Convertible in the 90s. Great car, Wankel engine,
fully loaded. Really fast and I loved it. The top automatically went
in the trunk which just flabbergasted a guy with a similar aged
Mercedes rag top sports car. Unfortunately in 1999 the Wankel blew.
They wanted too much for a new engine so I sold it for $2500 and
bought a
used 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse convertible for $5,000. It was OK, but
in 2014 I got the best car ever, a brand new G35 Infinity coupe
loaded, and sold the Eclipse for $5500, because the guy wanted a car
from the movie Fast and Furious. LOL.
 
I still have the Infiniti. 13 years old and except for a couple of
scratches in great condition. A year ago I took it into the dealer
service department and gave the manager a blank check to do whatever
it took to put it in new shape. He called the next day and said it
was ready. When I asked what they did he said that they changed the
oil. Period. I told him that I was thinking about a new one and he
asked me why I would pay almost 6O grand for something I already had.
It'll be my last car.
 
Anyway, I saw the posts about cars and thought I'd get involved.
 
Jeep Wrangler here. Fun..fun...fun. Perfect rig for Az
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 10:56PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 10:55 PM, Dene wrote:
> It'll be my last car.
 
> Anyway, I saw the posts about cars and thought I'd get involved.
 
> Jeep Wrangler here. Fun..fun...fun. Perfect rig for Az
 
Sadly under-engineered American crap.
 
Sorry, but it's true.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Jul 23 04:30AM -0400

> asked me why I would pay almost 6O grand for something I already had.
> It'll be my last car.
 
> Anyway, I saw the posts about cars and thought I'd get involved.

 
That's awesome Bobby. People overlook the cost per mile angle, but it's important.
 
My wife has a 2012 v6 awd rav6, the last year it came with that engine. So far it has been utterly bulletproof. We fully plan on keeping it until it becomes unreliable, which could be a long time.
 
I came of age during the Malaise Era (approx. '75 to '85) when American cars were almost comically bad. I still trust Japanese cars more, but it's entirely likely that domestic cars are much better by now.
 
The first time in my life that I really defied my dad when he was dead set on getting a Caddilac Cimmaron, which was nothing more than a X-Body Chevy Citation, a shitbox if there ever was one, with extra velour and chrome and a 100% price bump for the rubes.
 
Dad: It's a Cadillac!
 
Me: It's a shitbox with a Cadillac badge!
 
We laughed about it later, but I think at the time I hurt his feelings. It worked out though: he bought a Toyota Supra instead and drove it for years with only routine maintenance. That is something that probably cannot be said for any Cimmaron ever made.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:02PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 11:00 PM, Dene wrote:
> did before the election but not about the hackings.
 
> He lied and now is tap dancing around it. U.S. Intel is the source.
 
> Ah....another illegal leak from the intel community. Does that not concern you?
 
So you admit that the information is valid...
 
...but the perjury doesn't concern you.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Jul 23 04:13AM -0400

On 07/23/2017 02:00 AM, Dene wrote:
>> did before the election but not about the hackings.
 
>> He lied and now is tap dancing around it. U.S. Intel is the source.
 
> Ah....another illegal leak from the intel community. Does that not concern you?

Like any sane person, the treason bothers me more than the whistleblowing.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 22 11:25PM -0700

- hide quoted text -
On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 11:01:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
> hockey, playing music...
 
> Etc.
 
> :-)
 
Now, that wasn't that hard, now was it?
 
Look Toms...the deal with the Resident Asshole Troll (RAT) is quite simple.
If you respond to him, you lose.
You ignore him...you win.
 
Case in point, look at how many times he tries to get me to bite his stinky bait. Every time I see it, I chuckle, ignore, and win. This has been going on for months and I've won each time.
 
Cheap entertainment!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:36PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 11:25 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> Now, that wasn't that hard, now was it?
 
> Look Toms...the deal with the Resident Asshole Troll (RAT) is quite simple.
> If you respond to him, you lose.
 
Which, in effect, you just did.
 
> You ignore him...you win.
 
> Case in point, look at how many times he tries to get me to bite his stinky bait. Every time I see it, I chuckle, ignore, and win. This has been going on for months and I've won each time.
 
And yet here you are...
 
...replying by proxy.
 
:-)
 
 
> Cheap entertainment!
 
Indeed you are.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:01PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 10:58 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> - show quoted text -
> I am not allowed? Are you the Speech Police now? So, what is rude?
 
> Why are you letting him string you along?
 
Complete lack of self-control?
 
BTW, why are you stick your nose in where you've declared you were out?
 
> He's Canadian. He lives in a shithouse condo in Vancouver BC.
 
I live in a condo 2.5 blocks from the beach and sailing, 20 minutes from
golf and 45 minutes from skiing. It's really rough.
 
:-)
 
> He spends most of his existence trolling newsgroups.
 
And racing cars (and teaching it to others), playing golf, playing
hockey, playing music...
 
Etc.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:06PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 10:50 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> a tax reform bill or an immigration bill. You're giving Trump
> credit for things that haven't happened. Obama pushed for and signed legislation raising the top income tax bracket to 39.5% He pushed for an immigration bill that Congress considered but didn't pass. If you think Dodd-Frank wasn't major legislation, then you're more ignorant than I thought.
 
> You've confirmed how close minded you are
 
Irony!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:35PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 11:24 PM, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
 
>> I was pointing out the logical inconsistency in Greg's post.
 
> Greg did not claim the ACA was not a major bill. It was not passed in
> the first six months so it was no under consideration for this topic.
 
He made a blanket statement:
 
'Something your empty suit of a President never even tried to take on.'
 
So the time frame is irrelevant.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jul 23 06:21AM

Dene wrote:
 
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 12:45:43 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gds...@aol.com>
- show quoted text -
The source? He failed to report meetings with Russian ambassador,
when asked if he had any such meetings his response at first was
"no". That was a lie. Then under oath he hedged and now is saying
that he did before the election but not about the hackings.
 
He lied and now is tap dancing around it. U.S. Intel is the source.
 
Ah....another illegal leak from the intel community. Does that not
concern you?
 
It should do, but that is a separate issue. Did the intel community
leak like this under Obama? Why do you think this is happening under
Trump?
 
You seem very concerned about the sources of media stories but far less
concerend about the sources of claims by the president.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jul 23 06:24AM

Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > > must be major too...
 
> > Somewhat ignoring the topic.
 
> I was pointing out the logical inconsistency in Greg's post.
 
Greg did not claim the ACA was not a major bill. It was not passed in
the first six months so it was no under consideration for this topic.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for alt.sports.football.pro.sf-49ers@googlegroups.com - 4 updates in 4 topics

Saturday, July 22, 2017

"Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty" <moaulanui@hotmail.co.nz>: Jul 23 08:09AM +1200

SAN FRANCISCO — 31 JULY, 1987 \ FALSE FLAG ARSONIST JEWS
 
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/music_mafias.html
 
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/earthquake.mp3
 
 
 
 



ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty
Maangai Kaawanatanga - Tainui Kiingitanga - Te Aotearoa
http://www.exorcist.org.nz — Ko te Mana Motuhake
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/iankahi_eriya_nation_john_frum.html
ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
 
——> "I may state without fear of contradiction
that there is not one inch of land in the
New Zealand Islands which is not claimed
by the Maoris; and is not a hill, or a valley,
stream, river, or forest, which has not a name,
the index of some point of Maori history"
 
— John White
Maori Land Tenure
 
Taamau Mate: Ngāti Parekawa
Ngāti Tamainupo
Ngāti Ngutu
Tainui Waka Confederation
Ngāti Maniapoto
Ngai Tūhoe
Marutūahu
Tāmaki
Ngāti Toarangatira
Te Tau Ihu
Hauraki
Ngāti Raukawa
"Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty" <moaulanui@hotmail.co.nz>: Jul 23 08:06AM +1200

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/21/sanctuary-city-standoff-looms-as-ice-director-vows-agent-surge.html
 
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/music_mafias.html
 
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/earthquake.mp3
 
 
 
 



ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty
Maangai Kaawanatanga - Tainui Kiingitanga - Te Aotearoa
http://www.exorcist.org.nz — Ko te Mana Motuhake
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/iankahi_eriya_nation_john_frum.html
ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
 
——> "I may state without fear of contradiction
that there is not one inch of land in the
New Zealand Islands which is not claimed
by the Maoris; and is not a hill, or a valley,
stream, river, or forest, which has not a name,
the index of some point of Maori history"
 
— John White
Maori Land Tenure
 
Taamau Mate: Ngāti Parekawa
Ngāti Tamainupo
Ngāti Ngutu
Tainui Waka Confederation
Ngāti Maniapoto
Ngai Tūhoe
Marutūahu
Tāmaki
Ngāti Toarangatira
Te Tau Ihu
Hauraki
Ngāti Raukawa
"Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty" <moaulanui@hotmail.co.nz>: Jul 23 08:06AM +1200

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/21/sanctuary-city-standoff-looms-as-ice-director-vows-agent-surge.html
 
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/music_mafias.html
 
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/earthquake.mp3
 
 
 
 



ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty
Maangai Kaawanatanga - Tainui Kiingitanga - Te Aotearoa
http://www.exorcist.org.nz — Ko te Mana Motuhake
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/iankahi_eriya_nation_john_frum.html
ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
 
——> "I may state without fear of contradiction
that there is not one inch of land in the
New Zealand Islands which is not claimed
by the Maoris; and is not a hill, or a valley,
stream, river, or forest, which has not a name,
the index of some point of Maori history"
 
— John White
Maori Land Tenure
 
Taamau Mate: Ngāti Parekawa
Ngāti Tamainupo
Ngāti Ngutu
Tainui Waka Confederation
Ngāti Maniapoto
Ngai Tūhoe
Marutūahu
Tāmaki
Ngāti Toarangatira
Te Tau Ihu
Hauraki
Ngāti Raukawa
"Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty" <moaulanui@hotmail.co.nz>: Jul 23 08:10AM +1200

SAN FRANCISCO — 31 JULY, 1987 \ FALSE FLAG ARSONIST JEWS
 
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/music_mafias.html
 
[THOSE WHITE TENTS]
 
* DENVER AIRPORT
* SHORELINE AMPHITHEATER
 
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/earthquake.mp3
 
 
 
 
 



ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty
Maangai Kaawanatanga - Tainui Kiingitanga - Te Aotearoa
http://www.exorcist.org.nz — Ko te Mana Motuhake
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/iankahi_eriya_nation_john_frum.html
ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
 
——> "I may state without fear of contradiction
that there is not one inch of land in the
New Zealand Islands which is not claimed
by the Maoris; and is not a hill, or a valley,
stream, river, or forest, which has not a name,
the index of some point of Maori history"
 
— John White
Maori Land Tenure
 
Taamau Mate: Ngāti Parekawa
Ngāti Tamainupo
Ngāti Ngutu
Tainui Waka Confederation
Ngāti Maniapoto
Ngai Tūhoe
Marutūahu
Tāmaki
Ngāti Toarangatira
Te Tau Ihu
Hauraki
Ngāti Raukawa
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to alt.sports.football.pro.sf-49ers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 4 topics

Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 22 11:00PM -0700

On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 12:45:43 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gds...@aol.com>
- show quoted text -
The source? He failed to report meetings with Russian ambassador,
when asked if he had any such meetings his response at first was "no".
That was a lie. Then under oath he hedged and now is saying that he
did before the election but not about the hackings.
 
He lied and now is tap dancing around it. U.S. Intel is the source.
 
Ah....another illegal leak from the intel community. Does that not concern you?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:02PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 11:00 PM, Dene wrote:
> did before the election but not about the hackings.
 
> He lied and now is tap dancing around it. U.S. Intel is the source.
 
> Ah....another illegal leak from the intel community. Does that not concern you?
 
So you admit that the information is valid...
 
...but the perjury doesn't concern you.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 11:13PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 11:02:04 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > Ah....another illegal leak from the intel community. Does that not concern you?
 
> So you admit that the information is valid...
 
> ...but the perjury doesn't concern you.
 
I think you guys should get Bill Clinton to decide whether it was perjury or not...
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:15PM -0700


>> So you admit that the information is valid...
 
>> ...but the perjury doesn't concern you.
 
> I think you guys should get Bill Clinton to decide whether it was perjury or not...
 
I think you should think about why you need to deflect to a guy who was
last in office more than 16 years ago...
 
...who's "perjury" was about a blowjob...
 
...not about whether or not he was colluding with Russia.
 
:-)
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 09:58PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 9:54:49 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
> that something is false.
 
> So say exactly what you mean, or stop wasting my time.
 
> :-)
 
Do you remember the part "The problem is that calling it Obamaphone is dead assed wrong?"
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 10:00PM -0700


>> So say exactly what you mean, or stop wasting my time.
 
>> :-)
> Do you remember the part "The problem is that calling it Obamaphone is dead assed wrong?"
 
Yup. Do you recall that that IS dead assed wrong?
 
The existence of a website created by a private individual doesn't
change that.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 10:12PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 10:00:11 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> Yup. Do you recall that that IS dead assed wrong?
 
> The existence of a website created by a private individual doesn't
> change that.
 
Obamaphone is like Obamacare: both have entered into the common lexicon.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 10:16PM -0700


>> The existence of a website created by a private individual doesn't
>> change that.
 
> Obamaphone is like Obamacare: both have entered into the common lexicon.
 
OK. But that doesn't make their MEANING what you want it to be.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 10:45PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 10:16:16 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
> >> change that.
 
> > Obamaphone is like Obamacare: both have entered into the common lexicon.
 
> OK. But that doesn't make their MEANING what you want it to be.
 
Progress - we agree on something. I don't want the meaning to be anything - it is what the public decides it to be. But, for sure, Fox did not invent it.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 10:51PM -0700


>>> Obamaphone is like Obamacare: both have entered into the common lexicon.
 
>> OK. But that doesn't make their MEANING what you want it to be.
 
> Progress - we agree on something. I don't want the meaning to be anything - it is what the public decides it to be. But, for sure, Fox did not invent it.
 
No. You DID want the the meaning to be something.
 
I asked you what the existence of a website "PROVED".
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 11:07PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 10:51:38 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > Progress - we agree on something. I don't want the meaning to be anything - it is what the public decides it to be. But, for sure, Fox did not invent it.
 
> No. You DID want the the meaning to be something.
 
> I asked you what the existence of a website "PROVED".
 
Simple: Fox didn't make it up.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:08PM -0700


>> No. You DID want the the meaning to be something.
 
>> I asked you what the existence of a website "PROVED".
 
> Simple: Fox didn't make it up.
 
They did call it "Obamaphone" when it wasn't a program originated by him.
 
The fact that someone created a website called "obamaphone.com" doesn't
change that.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 10:00PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 9:53:15 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > So, what is it, then?
 
> You can't figure out that you're rude?
 
> Interesting..
 
No I can't - what did I write that was rude?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 10:01PM -0700


>> You can't figure out that you're rude?
 
>> Interesting..
 
> No I can't - what did I write that was rude?
 
I'll take a page out of your playbook:
 
Look it up yourself.
 
:-)
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 10:05PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 10:01:45 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> I'll take a page out of your playbook:
 
> Look it up yourself.
 
> :-)
 
I can't: it is you're assertion. So what was rude?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 10:07PM -0700


>> Look it up yourself.
 
>> :-)
 
> I can't: it is you're assertion. So what was rude?
 
You're not allowed to use that retort as you refuse to abide by it yourself.
 
:-)
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 10:47PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 10:07:15 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > I can't: it is you're assertion. So what was rude?
 
> You're not allowed to use that retort as you refuse to abide by it yourself.
 
> :-)
 
I am not allowed? Are you the Speech Police now? So, what is rude?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 10:52PM -0700


>> You're not allowed to use that retort as you refuse to abide by it yourself.
 
>> :-)
 
> I am not allowed? Are you the Speech Police now? So, what is rude?
 
Sorry. Look it up.
 
That's your stock response, so why is it wrong for me to use it with you?
 
:-)
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 22 10:58PM -0700

- show quoted text -
I am not allowed? Are you the Speech Police now? So, what is rude?
 
Why are you letting him string you along?
He's Canadian. He lives in a shithouse condo in Vancouver BC.
He spends most of his existence trolling newsgroups.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:01PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 10:58 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> - show quoted text -
> I am not allowed? Are you the Speech Police now? So, what is rude?
 
> Why are you letting him string you along?
 
Complete lack of self-control?
 
BTW, why are you stick your nose in where you've declared you were out?
 
> He's Canadian. He lives in a shithouse condo in Vancouver BC.
 
I live in a condo 2.5 blocks from the beach and sailing, 20 minutes from
golf and 45 minutes from skiing. It's really rough.
 
:-)
 
> He spends most of his existence trolling newsgroups.
 
And racing cars (and teaching it to others), playing golf, playing
hockey, playing music...
 
Etc.
 
:-)
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 11:05PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 11:01:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
> hockey, playing music...
 
> Etc.
 
> :-)
 
Now, that wasn't that hard, now was it?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 11:07PM -0700


>> Etc.
 
>> :-)
 
> Now, that wasn't that hard, now was it?
 
I never imagined it was hard.
 
Equally, it wouldn't have been hard for you to find out the answer for
yourself as I've never tried to make a secret of it.
 
:-)
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 22 10:50PM -0700

- hide quoted text -
On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 3:44:28 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
> Every one of those bills was more significant than anything Trump has
> signed to date, particularly Dodd-Frank.
 
> Hardly major legislation. ACA and it's repeal is major legislation. So is tax reform, immigration, etc. Something your empty suit of a President never even tried to take on. But he sure looked good...
 
This is ridiculous. Congress has not passed an ACA replacement.
 
Reread. ACA and it's repeal is major legislation. It happened in Obamas 2nd year.
 
a tax reform bill or an immigration bill. You're giving Trump
credit for things that haven't happened. Obama pushed for and signed legislation raising the top income tax bracket to 39.5% He pushed for an immigration bill that Congress considered but didn't pass. If you think Dodd-Frank wasn't major legislation, then you're more ignorant than I thought.
 
You've confirmed how close minded you are
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jul 22 10:53PM -0700

OK, here's your answer: There is nothing about Trump or the
republican agenda that I approve of.
 
Shocker!
 
I'm not familiar with all his EOs, as there have been so many. I know of one that overturned an Obama administration rule prohibiting coal mining operations from polluting rivers and streams. He said falsely that that would put coal miners back to work. Any president can make a SCOTUS nomination. The state of the economy has little or nothing with anything
he has done. His foreign policy decisions have been uniformly awful and he has offended and alienated all our most important allies. He was a pariah at the G20 meeting. Under Trump, ICE has visited a reign of terror on immigrants, breaking up families, deporting people who were brought
here as children and have done nothing wrong. You insult my
intelligence, and cast doubt on your own, by telling me I'm captive
to the "lying, leftist media."
 
Close mindedness is not a characteristic of intelligence.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 10:54PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 10:53 PM, Dene wrote:
> intelligence, and cast doubt on your own, by telling me I'm captive
> to the "lying, leftist media."
 
> Close mindedness is not a characteristic of intelligence.
 
What a complete lack of self-awareness...
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 5 topics

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 06:16PM -0700


>>> What do you think it DOESN'T prove?
 
>> Failure to answer my question...
 
> That the premise of the original post is false.
 
What premise would that be?
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 06:57PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 6:16:55 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> >> Failure to answer my question...
 
> > That the premise of the original post is false.
 
> What premise would that be?
 
Read the post.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 07:24PM -0700


>>> That the premise of the original post is false.
 
>> What premise would that be?
 
> Read the post.
 
You've now replied three times and still can't come up with a straight
answer...
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 08:50PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 7:24:45 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > Read the post.
 
> You've now replied three times and still can't come up with a straight
> answer...
 
Guess you don't know how to look up past posts:
 
The problem is that calling it Obamaphone is dead assed wrong since
the program began during the Reagan administration. But Fox can get
some jabs at Obama in by falsely using his name.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 09:20PM -0700


> The problem is that calling it Obamaphone is dead assed wrong since
> the program began during the Reagan administration. But Fox can get
> some jabs at Obama in by falsely using his name.
 
And what part of that is false and how does a posting of a website that
some person created show it?
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 09:31PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 9:20:58 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
> > some jabs at Obama in by falsely using his name.
 
> And what part of that is false and how does a posting of a website that
> some person created show it?
 
First you tell me if you're Canadian or not.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 09:46PM -0700


>> And what part of that is false and how does a posting of a website that
>> some person created show it?
 
> First you tell me if you're Canadian or not.
 
Nope.
 
Look up "false equivalence".
 
You're the one making a claim. I haven't claimed anything about my
nationality.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 09:52PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 9:46:33 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> Look up "false equivalence".
 
> You're the one making a claim. I haven't claimed anything about my
> nationality.
 
Then tell me if you think it is true.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 09:54PM -0700


>> You're the one making a claim. I haven't claimed anything about my
>> nationality.
 
> Then tell me if you think it is true.
 
Nope.
 
You made a claim that the presentation of a website that someone made up
(remember: I could register tomeism2-is-a-twit.com tonight) "proves"
that something is false.
 
So say exactly what you mean, or stop wasting my time.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 06:15PM -0700

>> whole car above the belt line is dark. I heartily recommend the look.
 
>> :-)
 
> You must have missed my post: are you Canadian?
 
I didn't miss it.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 06:58PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 6:15:30 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> >> :-)
 
> > You must have missed my post: are you Canadian?
 
> I didn't miss it.
 
Well, then, are you?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 07:24PM -0700


>>> You must have missed my post: are you Canadian?
 
>> I didn't miss it.
 
> Well, then, are you?
 
Why would I tell you?
BK@Onramp.net: Jul 22 09:35PM -0500

On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 18:15:28 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
>> You must have missed my post: are you Canadian?
 
>I didn't miss it.
 
He may have replying to me and doesn't know what <PLONK>means.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 08:51PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 7:25:01 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> >> I didn't miss it.
 
> > Well, then, are you?
 
> Why would I tell you?
 
Why not?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 09:22PM -0700


>>> Well, then, are you?
 
>> Why would I tell you?
 
> Why not?
 
You're rude for one thing.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 09:37PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 9:22:11 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> >> Why would I tell you?
 
> > Why not?
 
> You're rude for one thing.
 
What is rude about asking of one's nationality? Are you ashamed of being Canadian?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 09:46PM -0700


>>> Why not?
 
>> You're rude for one thing.
 
> What is rude about asking of one's nationality? Are you ashamed of being Canadian?
 
I didn't say asking about my nationality was rude.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jul 22 09:49PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 9:46:51 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> >> You're rude for one thing.
 
> > What is rude about asking of one's nationality? Are you ashamed of being Canadian?
 
> I didn't say asking about my nationality was rude.
 
So, what is it, then?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 09:53PM -0700


>>> What is rude about asking of one's nationality? Are you ashamed of being Canadian?
 
>> I didn't say asking about my nationality was rude.
 
> So, what is it, then?
 
You can't figure out that you're rude?
 
Interesting..
"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@comcast.net>: Jul 22 07:02PM -0700

On Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 10:02:41 PM UTC-4, Scott M. Kozel wrote:
> area.
 
> I will report on it in a week or so after I receive it and practice
> with it.
 
I got the club today ... latest design (2016) and a forged club head,
so it is a high quality club.
 
It will take plenty of practice to become reliable with this club,
but it does as advertised. Pops the ball up higher and with less roll
than the 60 degree wedge. Tried hitting the ball over a sand trap to
a narrow green, about 50 feet distance and pin about 15 feet from the
trap. Properly hit the ball goes about 50 feet up in the air and
lands with very little roll. Don't think I could do that shot with
anything other than a lob wedge or high lob wedge.
 
I may now carry all 5 wedges when I play, and take the 3-iron out,
see how that works out.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 07:25PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 7:02 PM, Scott M. Kozel wrote:
> anything other than a lob wedge or high lob wedge.
 
> I may now carry all 5 wedges when I play, and take the 3-iron out,
> see how that works out.
 
I used to carry a low bounce gap wedge just because I could open the
face to play flop shots like that without having to carry a 5th wedge.
"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@comcast.net>: Jul 22 08:49PM -0700

On Saturday, July 22, 2017 at 10:26:01 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
> > see how that works out.
 
> I used to carry a low bounce gap wedge just because I could open the
> face to play flop shots like that without having to carry a 5th wedge.
 
I will be experimenting to see what works best overall. Also determine
the yardages for each of the wedges when used as full-swing irons.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 09:21PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 8:49 PM, Scott M. Kozel wrote:
>> face to play flop shots like that without having to carry a 5th wedge.
 
> I will be experimenting to see what works best overall. Also determine
> the yardages for each of the wedges when used as full-swing irons.
 
Take the time to learn a half swing distance for every club from about 9
iron down at the least. If you have good full swing and half swing
distances, you can get very accurate with your distances on pitches.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jul 22 08:46PM -0700

On 2017-07-22 8:26 PM, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
 
>> If repealing the ACA is major legislation, then surely the ACA must
>> be major too...
 
> Somewhat ignoring the topic.
 
I was pointing out the logical inconsistency in Greg's post.
 
Of course, refuting Greg logically will usually get him to killfile you.
 
:-)
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jul 23 03:26AM

Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > President never even tried to take on. But he sure looked good...
 
> If repealing the ACA is major legislation, then surely the ACA must
> be major too...
 
Somewhat ignoring the topic.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.