Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 10 topics

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

Shakes <kvcshake@gmail.com>: Jun 06 11:41PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 6:42:59 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
> > it.
 
> > bob
 
> Do you believe in the Loch Ness monster too? How about Bigfoot? :)
 
Hey, I know a few perfectly sane and earthy folks (Americans) who claim they have seen Bigfoot. Personally, I have never seen Bigfoot but I know these folks well enough to know that they are not lying.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 07 11:45AM +0300

Court_1 kirjoitti 7.6.2017 klo 3:52:
>> I've done enough 'lists' around here, LOL. Mine, this one, TT's 250,
>> seems enough to show I top all the lists.
 
> You are avoiding the topic. We want to get an idea of how many of the films considered some of the greatest of all time on that list (everything to big budget classics to classic indies and some foreign language films) you've seen. The fact that you're avoiding it makes me think you are a film buff mostly of current and bigger budget films of the last 20 years(that's ok but at least admit it.) And no, the fact that you see 100s of films in the cinema a year doesn't make you more of a film buff than other people who enjoy films in whatever way they choose to watch them.
 
Well put.
I've now rated 800 titles from that list. :)
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 07 11:57AM +0300

Shakes kirjoitti 7.6.2017 klo 9:41:
 
>>> bob
 
>> Do you believe in the Loch Ness monster too? How about Bigfoot? :)
 
> Hey, I know a few perfectly sane and earthy folks (Americans) who claim they have seen Bigfoot. Personally, I have never seen Bigfoot but I know these folks well enough to know that they are not lying.
 
Did they see Hendersons too?
Federer Fanatic <TheRelentlessTide@nospam.invalid>: Jun 07 04:17AM -0500

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 21:22:16 -0400, bob <bob@nospam.net> wrote:
| On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 15:58:55 +0300, TT <ascii@dprk.kp> wrote:
|
|>bob kirjoitti 5.6.2017 klo 4:08:
|>> On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:15:12 -0700 (PDT), Court_1
|>> <olympia0000@yahoo.com> wrote:
|>>
|>>> On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 2:19:22 PM UTC-4, bob wrote:
|>>>
|>>>> lol. i think she's almost calling you a liar!
|>>>
|>>>
|>>> I am. I don't believe he's seen 996/1001 movies on that list of greatest all time movies.
|>>
|>> jaros sees movies almost every day, he posts when he goes and i've
|>> witnessed it for a couple yrs.
|>>
|>> bob
|>>
|>
|>You can not be this silly... nobody has seen 996 films from that list
|>unless they have gone through that exact list for weeks/months.
|>...I would imagine someone could have seen at best 850-900 titles if
|>they had seen ALL the important classics & watched lots of new films.
|>(around half in the list are prior 1990 - and half after it, including
|>lots of unimportant modern titles)
|
| i know for a fact that jaros sees movies in the theater at a pace like
| i've never seen. i'm certain it's easily > 100 movies/yr.
|
|>What Stephen said was that he has not seen 5 films from first hundred
|>most important films. I have seen 100/100 and my total is around 800 titles.
|
| i have no idea how/when you watch movies. but if you say so, i believe
| it.
|
| bob
 
 
My guess is he's feelin up the ladies and pays little or no attention to what's on
the screen?
 
FF
Federer Fanatic <TheRelentlessTide@nospam.invalid>: Jun 07 04:16AM -0500

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 20:33:58 -0400, bob <bob@nospam.net> wrote:
| On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 04:34:43 -0700 (PDT), calimero377@gmx.de wrote:
|
|>https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t0VOTUagv_A
|>
|>The 90s really was the Golden Age in WTA tennis - so many classic slam finals! The FO 99 final was the greatest.
|>
|
| likely the greatest women's match i've ever seen. don't even need to
| open the link to which one it is.
|
| bob
 
 
The French crowd was pretty vicious to Hingis. But yes, Graf winning last slam was awesome.
 
FF
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 07 11:54AM +0300

bob kirjoitti 7.6.2017 klo 4:49:
 
>> Who's the real father?
 
> john travolta.
 
> bob
 
Roger Federer, obviously. (after all it's twins)
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jun 07 02:01AM -0700

Court1 has repeatedly said that she has 100% proof and it well known that Clooney is a raving and proud gay! :)
Federer Fanatic <TheRelentlessTide@nospam.invalid>: Jun 07 04:09AM -0500

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:54:04 +0300, TT <ascii@dprk.kp> wrote:
| bob kirjoitti 7.6.2017 klo 4:49:
|> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:38:15 -0700 (PDT), Court_1
|> <olympia0000@yahoo.com> wrote:
|>
|>> Who's the real father?
|>
|> john travolta.
|>
|> bob
|>
|
| Roger Federer, obviously. (after all it's twins)
 
 
Haha. Fed's real source of income?
 
FF
bmoore@nyx.net: Jun 06 10:44PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 5:20:09 PM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
 
> > why don't you try refuting his post. otherwise, i'm inclined to believe
> > it's true.
> Did iceberg cite anything or provide any links?
 
No, of course not, but the point is not that what he says is wrong, it's that it's not relevant to the conversation. Iceberg is a full on moron.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jun 07 02:05AM -0700

Hey jd, there this amazing thing called Google, just go there and Google "Sadiq Khan and Farrakhan", it really not that difficult.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jun 07 02:05AM -0700

Yep!
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jun 07 02:07AM -0700

The point is really you're a mindless Hillary fan who only votes for them cos your parents did and are still bitter that TRUMP WON!! you'd also clearly vote for your new hero Sadiq "Farrakhan defender" Khan if you could!
Federer Fanatic <TheRelentlessTide@nospam.invalid>: Jun 07 04:08AM -0500

On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 04:00:05 +0200 (CEST), *skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
| Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
|> On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 6:49:52 PM UTC-7, bob wrote:
|>> On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:20:07 GMT, jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com> wrote:
|>>
|>> >On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 19:55:57 -0400, bob wrote:
|>> >
|>> >
|>> >> why don't you try refuting his post. otherwise, i'm inclined to believe
|>> >> it's true.
|>> >
|>> >Did iceberg cite anything or provide any links?
|>>
|>> no. should be easy to prove wrong then?
|>
|> True until proven false? Seems counterintuitive.
|>
|
|
| Well that's a privilege tier 1 posters have. They don't have to
| back up every little sentence or a claim with a link.
|
 
 
You are joking...I hope ;-) Icey should be subject to an experiment of how
may icecubes can be forcibly jammed up it's asshole...
 
FF
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: Jun 07 01:59AM -0700

Well that's not very nice, shows how much you Democrats care for the disabled eh!
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 06 10:46PM -0400


>On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:37:24 -0400, bob wrote:
 
>> she's an opportunist nothing more
 
>As is Trump
 
no problem with that, but he did run and win the presidency. she's
just a 2 bit change with the wind "journalist" - and not a very good
one.
 
you ever listen to her questions? no thought put into it, no
intelligence - just a bulldog's approach and uses what she believes is
looks to get her way through. if i were a woman i'd demand my money
back after watching her.
 
bob
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jun 07 03:34AM

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:46:40 -0400, bob wrote:
 
> you ever listen to her questions? no thought put into it, no
> intelligence - just a bulldog's approach and uses what she believes is
> looks to get her way through.
 
lol... Behavior you praise in Trump of course
Shakes <kvcshake@gmail.com>: Jun 07 12:58AM -0700

On Tuesday, June 6, 2017 at 5:25:25 PM UTC-7, bob wrote:
 
> >"Mahatama" ? It's Mahatma.
 
> thought bharath was indian. wow.
 
> bob
 
Yeah, me too. Now I have my doubts.
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.com>: Jun 07 10:43AM +0300

On 7.6.2017 4:18, bob wrote:
> the last 8 yrs, but when obama does things like this without specific
> senate approval, it opens the door for trump to 1 man rule it his way.
> and then the whining starts.
 
Yes. However, Obama was withing his legal powers in signing Paris.
Contrary to what you claimed.
 
>> could accept without seeking congressional approval.
 
> bingo. and therin lies the problem. it's how he ran the last few yrs
> of his presidency.
 
Executive action was within Obama's powers. Just as it is within Trump's
now. Nobody is questioning this.
 
Except you.
 
>> to report on progress in implementing them.
 
> NDCs are a joke btw. what kind of moronic "treaty" would use something
> like that?
 
You're wrong, other countries adhere to them. Paris has already produced
results.
 
>> approve it by executive action.
 
> and the non binding trait of the "treaty" is what allowed him to sign
> it - and what allowed trump to immediately "unsign" it.
 
Nobody's questioning Trump's legal footing (in this case).
 
>> The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), as
>> explained by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions:
 
> sorry, this is bunk.
 
So, what's bunk about it? Try to be a bit more specific than "CNN? Lol!".
 
 
--
"Donald Trump is the weak man's vision of a strong man."
-- Charles Cooke
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 06 08:58PM -0700

> NBC only has weekends
 
I had FO on channel 10 dish Network yesterday, let me check.
 
Yes, it's NBC.
Bharath Purohit <acebharath@gmail.com>: Jun 06 10:52PM -0700

Same here in india. I had to buy Star Select 1 and Star select 2 to watch French open.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 07 12:24AM -0400

https://youtu.be/iVJSO8QtkmM
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Bharath Purohit <acebharath@gmail.com>: Jun 06 10:51PM -0700

Up 5-2 and yet loses the first set. What a loser
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 06 10:45PM -0400


>> Now nothing is preventing Trump from doing the same. In fact, his
>> fans, I mean supporters will demand it.
 
>Won't mean a thing to me if Trump does it... I'd expect he would anyway.
 
i wouldn't.
 
>After all, he was doing it before he ran this time, except he was pushing
>Hillary's and the neocon agenda.
 
he was a private citizen, billioinaire. being an ex president is
supposed to hold a certain class and dignity, and bowing out
gracefully is part of that. obama is losing all his class, or the
class people thought he had.
 
bob
bob <bob@nospam.net>: Jun 06 10:22PM -0400


>2 second search... article from 11/2013
 
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-may-be-a-rare-ex-president-who-stays-in-washington/2013/11/29/81ba049c-5912-11e3-8304-caf30787c0a9_story.html
 
>Now where's your link from breitbart?
 
oh, that's november. my reading of it was from post inauguration, feb
or later. and just look at the WaPo headline url: "may be a rare ex
president who stays in washington!"
 
lmao!!! get it yet?
 
bob
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jun 07 03:35AM

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 22:45:09 -0400, bob wrote:
 
> supposed to hold a certain class and dignity, and bowing out gracefully
> is part of that. obama is losing all his class, or the class people
> thought he had.
 
Nobody would ever accuse Trump of having class.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment