Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 10 topics

Friday, June 9, 2017

TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 09 09:56PM +0300

Won...
 
-Best Picture
 
-Best Actress in a Leading Role
Gwyneth Paltrow
 
-Best Actress in a Supporting Role
Judi Dench
 
And what a totally crap picture! No wonder I never watched it before.
I think the worst Best Pic winner I've seen. Really hard time getting
through it, and I gave up after an hour plus.
 
Perhaps even more surprising must be Gwynnie's Oscar, her performance
was as mediocre as it gets. She showed some breasts so maybe it was for
that?
 
I guess Dench was ok for the few minutes she was on screen. Although it
felt like her performance was for some other film.
 
Joseph Fiennes was terrible as Shakespeare, and I have no idea who
Affleck had to sleep with to get the role.
 
Now don't tell me Courtsie that you loved the film...
calimero377@gmx.de: Jun 09 11:59AM -0700

On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 8:56:06 PM UTC+2, TT wrote:
 
> Joseph Fiennes was terrible as Shakespeare, and I have no idea who
> Affleck had to sleep with to get the role.
 
> Now don't tell me Courtsie that you loved the film...
 
 
I recommend "John Wick" to you.
 
Max
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: Jun 09 12:00PM -0700

When had Gwyneth been a good actress? Or been beautiful? Total hype for a bitch with No tits or ass
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 09 10:04PM +0300


>> Now don't tell me Courtsie that you loved the film...
 
> I recommend "John Wick" to you.
 
> Max
 
Even John Wick 2 is better than this trite unfunny bore.
SliceAndDice <vishalkn@gmail.com>: Jun 09 12:05PM -0700

On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 2:56:06 PM UTC-4, TT wrote:
 
> Joseph Fiennes was terrible as Shakespeare, and I have no idea who
> Affleck had to sleep with to get the role.
 
> Now don't tell me Courtsie that you loved the film...
 
I did not think it was crap, wasn't great either. And Blanchett was totally robbed of the Oscar for Elizabeth that year.
calimero377@gmx.de: Jun 09 12:08PM -0700

On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 9:03:50 PM UTC+2, TT wrote:
 
> > I recommend "John Wick" to you.
 
> > Max
 
> Even John Wick 2 is better than this trite unfunny bore.
 
 
I'm sure it is, that's why I recommended it.
 
Max
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 09 10:09PM +0300

soccerfan777 kirjoitti 9.6.2017 klo 22:00:
> When had Gwyneth been a good actress?
 
Never. But she got leading actress Oscar here for doing exactly same
thing she does in every film. Unfathomable.
 
Must have been a terribly good promo campaign from film producers.
 
> Or been beautiful? Total hype for a bitch with No tits or ass
 
She's not ugly, although you have a point about her curves.
Federer Fanatic <TheRelentlessTide@nospam.invalid>: Jun 09 01:59PM -0500

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:18:54 -0700 (PDT), calimero377@gmx.de <calimero377@gmx.de> wrote:
| On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 6:43:53 PM UTC+2, Federer Fanatic wrote:
|> On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 09:09:28 -0700 (PDT), calimero377@gmx.de <calimero377@gmx.de> wrote:
|> | On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 4:06:09 PM UTC+2, Federer Fanatic wrote:
|> |> And Any has figured out how to play on clay. Impressive.
|> |>
|> |> FF
|> |
|> |
|> | Yes, impressive.
|> | Who would have thought that Andy would win 2.(!) sets agianst Stan.
|> |
|> |
|> | Max
|>
|>
|> Yes. That's a valid point ;-) Should have been straights for Stan.
|>
|> FF
|
|
| Yes, even though clay is too slow for Stan.
|
|
| Max
 
 
Not too slow that he can NOT win is my point Max, but
it a lot more entertaining when those missle shots go
for repeated winners. Murray is impressive from the
standpoint of hanging in as long as he did.
 
FF
calimero377@gmx.de: Jun 09 12:03PM -0700

On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 8:59:56 PM UTC+2, Federer Fanatic wrote:
> for repeated winners. Murray is impressive from the
> standpoint of hanging in as long as he did.
 
> FF
 
 
We are in full agreement.
 
 
Max
calimero377@gmx.de: Jun 09 12:02PM -0700

On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 5:42:42 PM UTC+2, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> > But maybe 18 minutes were erased accidentally?
 
> It's reaching the point where people that serve him will have to choose between loyalty and doing the right thing.
 
He is a clown and an enbarrassment, yes.
But there is no shred of evidence that he did something criminal until now.
 
 
Max
Carey <carey_1959@yahoo.com>: Jun 09 11:24AM -0700

Makes Final without loss of even a set.
 
shell of
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 09 09:38PM +0300

Carey kirjoitti 9.6.2017 klo 21:24:
> Makes Final without loss of even a set.
 
> shell of
 
Underwhelming from Thiem and mediocre at best from Rafa.
Rafa may have to play a lot better in the final if he wants to win the
title... if he plays like this then Stan could beat him.
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jun 09 06:53PM

On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 21:38:18 +0300, TT wrote:
 
> Underwhelming from Thiem and mediocre at best from Rafa.
> Rafa may have to play a lot better in the final if he wants to win the
> title... if he plays like this then Stan could beat him.
 
OK Jaros
Federer Fanatic <TheRelentlessTide@nospam.invalid>: Jun 09 01:53PM -0500

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:38:18 +0300, TT <ascii@dprk.kp> wrote:
| Carey kirjoitti 9.6.2017 klo 21:24:
|> Makes Final without loss of even a set.
|>
|> shell of
|>
|
| Underwhelming from Thiem and mediocre at best from Rafa.
| Rafa may have to play a lot better in the final if he wants to win the
| title... if he plays like this then Stan could beat him.
 
Geese, you are a hard critic...I did not see the match.
 
FF
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 09 09:57PM +0300

jdeluise kirjoitti 9.6.2017 klo 21:53:
>> Rafa may have to play a lot better in the final if he wants to win the
>> title... if he plays like this then Stan could beat him.
 
> OK Jaros
 
Rafa is doomed.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: Jun 09 08:40PM +0200


> Underwhelming from Thiem and mediocre at best from Rafa.
> Rafa may have to play a lot better in the final if he wants to win the
> title... if he plays like this then Stan could beat him.
 
Agreed. Very nervous and not finishing enough points with winners,
also not aggressive much.
 
Nadal of today could lose to in-form Wawrinka.
 
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 09 11:56AM -0700

His decision about Qatar.
TT <ascii@dprk.kp>: Jun 09 10:00PM +0300

PeteWasLucky kirjoitti 9.6.2017 klo 21:56:
> His decision about Qatar.
 
Please elaborate.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: Jun 09 09:00PM +0200

> His decision about Qatar.
 
Yes it's good but Qatar are second biggest bad guys, but saudis
are even worse with their wahabi ideology.
 
95% of all suicide bombers are wahabi Sunni Muslims which is
official Saudi ideology.
 
I hope Qatar is only the beginning so I support it.
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
DavidW <no@email.provided>: Jun 10 05:03AM +1000

If Simona Halep wins, Court_1 and Whisper will tie for the contest win,
otherwise Guypers will either win outright or tie with Thomas R.
Kettler, depending on the men's result.
 
http://home.pacific.net.au/~davidw/tennis/contest/rst_2017sp_RG.html
calimero377@gmx.de: Jun 09 12:00PM -0700

On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 7:25:05 PM UTC+2, Carey wrote:
> Badly.
 
> Just sayin'
 
For what?
 
 
Max
Bharath Purohit <acebharath@gmail.com>: Jun 09 11:57AM -0700

Best Semi final record at a perticular slam 10-0
 
 
Rafa has reached slam final without losing a set for the 5th time. A record in itself.
 
Previous holder was Borg with 4.
Federer Fanatic <TheRelentlessTide@nospam.invalid>: Jun 09 01:56PM -0500

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 10:40:46 -0700 (PDT), Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com> wrote:
| On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 1:33:55 PM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
|> > Stop dreaming. Stan isn't going to beat Nadal at the FO when Nadal is in decent form
|>
|> I just told Stan this and he still insists to play the final.
|
| I don't care what you told Stan. Stan won't beat Nadal. Nadal will wear him down and frustrate him and he'll start spraying errors. If Stan gets a set it will be a good outcome for him.
 
 
More importantly, Nadal is an agressive ball striker, he actually can attack relentlessly unlike Andy.
 
FF
SliceAndDice <vishalkn@gmail.com>: Jun 09 11:28AM -0700

On Friday, June 9, 2017 at 2:05:30 PM UTC-4, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
 
> --
> "Donald Trump is the weak man's vision of a strong man."
> -- Charles Cooke
 
I have never been sold on Thiem, to be honest. He lacks the tennis smarts, also that backhand is a liability.
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.com>: Jun 09 09:54PM +0300

On 9.6.2017 21:28, SliceAndDice wrote:
>> "Donald Trump is the weak man's vision of a strong man."
>> -- Charles Cooke
 
> I have never been sold on Thiem, to be honest.
 
He's a lot of fun to watch. Maybe not today, but ...
 
> He lacks the tennis smarts, also that backhand is a liability.
 
Yes. And like Icey says, he has to work so much he's knackered in the
deciders. I think he was out of sorts in the second already.
 
--
"Donald Trump is the weak man's vision of a strong man."
-- Charles Cooke
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment