Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 19 updates in 9 topics

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 19 09:00PM -0700

On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:43:32 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
 
> <http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf>
 
> Now kindly show us how the USA's NDC is determined by anyone other than the USA.
 
> -hh
 
Not only is that NOT proof, it is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT!
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 19 09:08PM -0700

On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 2:03:58 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> >> In which case, why are you so reluctant to answer?
 
> > The ONLY issue here is WHERE IS THE PROOF? Answer: there IS NO PROOF!
 
> So why are you so afraid to answer my question?
 
Your question is just another libtard move to dodge the fact that you HAVE NO PROOF AND NEVER DID!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 19 09:21PM -0700


>>> The ONLY issue here is WHERE IS THE PROOF? Answer: there IS NO PROOF!
 
>> So why are you so afraid to answer my question?
 
> Your question is just another libtard move to dodge the fact that you HAVE NO PROOF AND NEVER DID!
 
Again,
 
If that is the case, answer the question.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 19 08:35PM -0700

On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 7:42:03 AM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
> > moving the Mexico or any Muslim country. So I guess we know who the
> > real racist are, don't we?
 
> This is an interesting work of fiction. Thanks for the entertainment.
 
Hardly: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/catherinedunn/2016/09/08/these-10-celebrities-say-theyll-leave-the-country-if-trump-is-elected-n2215391
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 19 02:07PM -0500

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:31:14 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>The party of NO.
 
>I noticed that we never hear what was colluded, the impact of
> collusion, how it occurred.
 
Of course not. You really don't understand why?
 
>The obvious reason is that someone would look at it and find nothing.
 
Wrong. "Someone" doesn't need to know until the investigation is over.
Releasing what they may be looking for would give those that are
possibly under investigation what they should hide.
> notice the leadership is avoiding the arena of ideas. They are
> inept, they don't do anything that benefits the country and the
> mush heads don't even notice.
 
As usual your suppositions are just that, and shitty ones to boot.
There are parties from both sides on all of the investigating
committees.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 19 02:10PM -0500

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:59:00 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
>Schiff said Sunday. "But I can say that there is enough that we ought to
>be investigating."'
 
>Ooops.
 
Another instance of Moderate's pure lies.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 19 02:11PM -0500

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:47:06 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
>> be investigating.?'
 
>> Ooops.
 
>Is not the opposite. "No proof to take to a jury."
 
Are you really this stupid? Rhetorical question. Sure you are.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 19 12:19PM -0700

On 2017-06-19 12:18 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> committees.
 
> The perfect sheep.
 
> Ewe are doing a good job, BK.
 
More empty insults...
 
It's really your best move, isn't it?
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Jun 19 03:50PM -0400

>> be investigating."'
 
>> Ooops.
 
> Another instance of Moderate's pure lies.
 
It's hard to know with this one. He's so stupid that he may have legitimately misunderstood Schiff's quote, obvious as it was.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 19 08:08PM -0500

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:18:22 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
>> committees.
 
>The perfect sheep.
 
>Ewe are doing a good job, BK.
 
Because making you look idiotic is so easy.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 19 07:02PM -0700

On 2017-06-19 4:32 PM, Moderate wrote:
> would buy, but he keeps stringing
> along the mush
> heads.
 
Your claim was that he said there was no evidence.
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Jun 20 02:23AM +0200

The troll just wants your attention.
 
Seems not a very big audience.
 
If the creature really cared to discuss Trump, he would not do it here.
 
What a creep.
 
Yea, you win fucking clown. A balding loser no one would want. Thank god no kids, one of you is enough.
 
Good decision asshole, sparing us of another attention seeking creep
tmc1982@gmail.com: Jun 19 04:37PM -0700

http://awfulannouncing.com/fox/joe-buck-golf-gf-mixup-ive-done-way-worse-age-twitter-clickbait.html
 
By Andrew Bucholtz on 06/19/2017
 
One of the more awkward TV moments in some time came Sunday, when Fox play-by-play announcer Joe Buck misidentified U.S. Open winner Brooks Koepka's girlfriend as the two shared a celebratory kiss, saying Koepka was with his former girlfriend Becky Edwards rather than current girlfriend Jena Sims. Buck called into The Dan Patrick Show Monday to talk about that, and said he was given the wrong information by a staffer, but he doesn't see it as a big deal and has made worse mistakes before:
 
Patrick starts by asking "How's morale, Joe?" and Buck responds "Morale's good! I'm happy that a long week of golf is in the books, and obviously with your boy Brooks, we now all know who he's dating, especially me. That's exciting. I wasn't up on that information. I got handed a card by a buddy who was phenomenal all week, and it had old info on it. But we got it right before we got off the air. But that's not the world we live in these days, you have to do the apology tour for getting the week-old girlfriend wrong, so, sorry, world."
 
Patrick then plays the clips of Buck's misidentification and the later correction. Buck then says "It was all a mess, but I mean, you know, I've done way worse things than this, that's the funny thing, but it was before the age of Twitter and kind of clickbait kind of stuff. I asked [former MLB infielder] Tony Womack at the end of a Division Series game, when he was hugging a woman down on the field and I was interviewing him from the booth."
 
"Truth be told, I couldn't really see, but we had just been talking about how he lost his dad on Father's Day that year. And he's hugging this woman, and I said 'Hey, Tony, I can't imagine how that feels. Who are you hugging down there, is that your mom?' And then the needle came off the record and he goes 'No, that's my wife!' You talk about feeling bad. This is the week-old girlfriend, I think the world will continue to spin, but I just confused somebody's wife for the guy's mother."
"I actually sent her flowers and went down and apologized. And he was great about it, and so was she. But that to me is way worse than anything that happened yesterday. And the best part of this was, I thought for us at Fox we had a really fun, good event, and we're showing that we can do golf and do it well, despite the whole WAGs segment at the end."
 
Patrick then asked if Buck talked to Koepka afterwards, and Buck said "No, I got the hell out of Wisconsin. I just put the pedal down and said 'See you.' But you've been there! We've all been there. It's live TV. The funny thing is, I guess again it's kind of a show of the world we live in, but that was the end of, we're doing, I'm personally doing seven and a half hours of live TV a day, and there are going to be mistakes all over the place. And that's the nature of it."
 
"If you're not making mistakes, you're boring. You're not trying things, you're not trying to do stuff. So that's just…whatever. It's not a huge deal. But I will reach out to Brooks. And the only person I feel bad for in this whole situation is his ex-girlfriend. I don't know her name, I don't know the name of the current girlfriend, the week-old girlfriend, and I probably won't know going forward. But good for him."
 
Buck goes on to talk about the difficulties of calling golf, in particular being unable to see what's actually going on beyond the monitors and being reliant on the information he's given. And he's right that this isn't a huge mistake in the grand scheme of things, and it really wasn't his fault; he read what was handed to him. But the world's not wrong to discuss this mistake, either, as it certainly was an awkward and unusual moment. And it might be worth it for everyone involved to be a little more careful before identifying girlfriends.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 19 02:18PM -0500


> As usual your suppositions are just that, and shitty ones to boot.
> There are parties from both sides on all of the investigating
> committees.
 
The perfect sheep.
 
Ewe are doing a good job, BK.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 19 01:47PM -0500

>> media. The next thing he knows he is fired.
 
> Very poor hypotheses. He wasn't asked to tell the media.Neither was
> Comey.
 
Horse shit.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 19 06:32PM -0500

>>be investigating."'
 
>>Ooops.
 
> Another instance of Moderate's pure lies.
 
Simply makes my case. Schiff admits there is no evidence a jury
would buy, but he keeps stringing
along the mush
heads.
--
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Jun 19 10:31PM +0200

FOr not spawning.
 
The world will be a better place without any offspring from you.
 
Gotta given the women of the world credit, they all know better.
 
No one wants an attention seeking troll, when there are successful men out there that have a lot better use of their time.
 
And they finished college, unline the stain!
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 19 02:12PM -0500

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:47:51 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> Very poor hypotheses. He wasn't asked to tell the media.Neither was
>> Comey.
 
>Horse shit.
 
Which is all you know.
"Willie Brennan" <bbren@aol.com>: Jun 19 09:29AM -0400

The only thing the bald headed, Shit Stain chicken fucker can do, is role
reversal.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment