Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 7 topics

Friday, June 9, 2017

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 12:37PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 12:31 PM, Moderate wrote:
> March 10th thar Trump was not being investigated, yet the
> Democrats in the gang of eight continued lying about
> it.
 
Quote and link...
 
> the truth come out.
 
> I am not aware of any leaks coming out of the IC since Comey was
> fired except of course Comey's leaks.
 
But there's so much of which you are not aware...
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 12:37PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 12:31 PM, Moderate wrote:
> jar.
 
> He complains about one on one with Trump, but he initiated that
> format. What a loser.
 
Actually, he said under oath that Trump initiated it each time.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 01:16PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 1:10 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Actually, he said under oath that Trump initiated it each time.
 
> Don't go BK on us. Comey initiated the first one on one meeting.
> He stated that in his testimony yesterday.
 
If that's true, do you accept that Trump initiated the others, that
Trump asked others to leave the room, including Comey's direct boss,
Jeff Sessions?
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 09 03:21PM -0500

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 14:31:34 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
> jar.
 
>He complains about one on one with Trump, but he initiated that
> format. What a loser.
 
All of this depends on one thing, who do you believe;
 
James Comey, a distinguished, educated, and well-respected attorney,
respected by Congress, with an honest, clean record serving as
assistant D.A. for two different federal districts, then as Asst. AG
in the DOJ, and Director of the F.B.I. or
 
Donald Trump, a well known liar in every area of his personal,
business and short political life?
 
 
 
 
 
I
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 01:23PM -0700

> respected by Congress, with an honest, clean record serving as
> assistant D.A. for two different federal districts, then as Asst. AG
> in the DOJ, and Director of the F.B.I. or
 
Who has acted against the wishes of power from both sides of the aisle...
 
 
> Donald Trump, a well known liar in every area of his personal,
> business and short political life?
 
 
"I 100% will release my tax returns"
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 01:50PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 1:31 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> Jeff Sessions?
 
> I think Trump was simply following Comey's lead. Trump is not a
> bureaucrat.
 
What lead would that be?
 
If what Trump had to say to Comey was so normal, why did he ask Sessions
to (and Kushner, I want to say) leave the room when he asked Comey to
let Flynn off?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 01:51PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 1:33 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Donald Trump, a well known liar in every area of his personal,
>> business and short political life?
 
> What does this have to do with Democrats knowing lying?
 
Why have you deflected this conversation?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 01:56PM -0700

On 2017-06-09 1:52 PM, Moderate wrote:
>>> bureaucrat.
 
>> What lead would that be?
 
> The lead I just described.
 
Nope. Comey wanting to brief Trump privately about something very
personal to him is entirely different than Trump wanting to talk about
ongoing investigations of members of his administration.
 
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 09 04:03PM -0500

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:33:38 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> Donald Trump, a well known liar in every area of his personal,
>> business and short political life?
 
>What does this have to do with Democrats knowing lying?
 
Everything doofus. Think. But it was a good diversion to avoid the
question.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 08 05:45PM -0500


>>:-)
> I wasn't confused. He may have been though. His response was to my
> post.
 
Such a liar.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 02:31PM -0500

We know from Comey's testimony that the gang of eight knew on
March 10th thar Trump was not being investigated, yet the
Democrats in the gang of eight continued lying about
it.
 
This fraud
was such a conspiracy that only after firing Comey did
the truth come out.
 
I am not aware of any leaks coming out of the IC since Comey was
fired except of course Comey's leaks.
 
The Democrats and the MSM look like fools. Lying fools. Comey
looks like a crybaby with his hand in the cookie
jar.
 
He complains about one on one with Trump, but he initiated that
format. What a loser.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 03:10PM -0500


>> He complains about one on one with Trump, but he initiated that
>> format. What a loser.
 
> Actually, he said under oath that Trump initiated it each time.
 
Don't go BK on us. Comey initiated the first one on one meeting.
He stated that in his testimony yesterday.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 03:31PM -0500


> If that's true, do you accept that Trump initiated the others, that
> Trump asked others to leave the room, including Comey's direct boss,
> Jeff Sessions?
 
I think Trump was simply following Comey's lead. Trump is not a
bureaucrat.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 03:33PM -0500

> in the DOJ, and Director of the F.B.I. or
 
> Donald Trump, a well known liar in every area of his personal,
> business and short political life?
 
What does this have to do with Democrats knowing lying?
 
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 09 03:52PM -0500


>> I think Trump was simply following Comey's lead. Trump is not a
>> bureaucrat.
 
> What lead would that be?
 
The lead I just described.
 
 
--
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 12:43PM -0700

...to name just one thing of the hundreds he's lied about.
 
<http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40229449>
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 11:36AM -0700

...but none of them will go near him, so he's stuck with Kasowitz:
 
'After the public testimony of former FBI Director James Comey on
Thursday, President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, Marc Kasowitz,
released a statement. In addition to being riddled with typos, it
contained a curious legal argument.
 
Kasowitz contended that Comey broke the law by leaking memos about his
private conversations with the president — what the statement called an
"unauthorized disclosure of private information."
 
The not-so-subtle implication here is that any and every conversation
with the president is privileged, and therefore protected under the law.
That's a rather broad interpretation of executive privilege, and one
that 10 legal experts disputed in interviews with Vox.'
 
<https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/9/15764954/comey-testimony-donald-trump-fbi-executive-privilege>
 
'Jed Shugerman, Professor of Law, Fordham University
 
"Trump waived any claim on executive privilege when he wrote in an
official presidential statement a reference to the "three times" Comey
told him he was not personally under investigation. By referring
publicly to their conversations and this content, he waived his claim
for privilege and secrecy of those exchanges."'
 
There are nine more, wingnuts.
 
Enjoy!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 09 11:16AM -0700

"...so clearly false that it's hard to see how a minimally competent
attorney could have made it in good faith."
 
<https://www.justsecurity.org/41977/parsing-white-house-response-comeys-testimony/>
 
'This is a master class in claiming vindication by denying claims that
haven't been made. I don't know what "numerous false press reports"
Kasowitz is alluding to here, since he conveniently declines to name any
offenders, but I can't recall any reputable news outlets reporting that
Trump was personally the named target of a counterintelligence
investigation.'
 
'Consider, then, what we are being asked to believe here. We are
supposed to believe that Trump sent everyone but Comey out of the room
simply to convey the sentiment that Mike Flynn is a "good guy." Comey
then——in February, with no indication that his job was in
peril——immediately fabricated a request that he "let [Flynn] go," which
he committed to writing and shared with other senior FBI officials, in a
display of prescient strategic planning worthy of Batman.'
 
'Here, again, if we are to believe the White House, we must ascribe to
Comey the Batmanesque foresight of falsely memorializing a request in
January, when he was being asked to stay on as FBI director, presumably
as a hedge against his future dismissal. The White House then attempts
to conflate Comey's recollection of an unclassified private conversation
with the illegal leaking of classified information.'
 
Enjoy, wingnuts!
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: Jun 09 08:45AM -0500

> incorrect. There was nothing said about other reports. The Daily
> Caller is a great source for you though. They print what you want to
> hear.
 
Says the NBC sheep.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 04:37PM -0500

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 14:47:07 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> ...and now you don't like him again.
 
>> :-)
 
>Cite.
 
Please. Are you actually denying this?
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 05:28PM -0500


>>Then cite some specifics.
 
>Read his bio.
 
>Brilliant...
 
No it isn't.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 06:15PM -0500

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:45:01 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> I wasn't confused. He may have been though. His response was to my
>> post.
 
>Such a liar.
 
The proof is in that post. I posted that Comey allowed his opening
statement to the Senatorial Committee to be released one day before
the session, meaning yesterday. You said that it was much earlier.
I'm giving you the benefit of admitting that you were confused. If
you weren't confused then ......
 
My post is dated today at 1:27 PM. It's there for anyone to read.
Your response was in answer to my statement.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 09 09:54AM -0500

>> Caller is a great source for you though. They print what you want to
>> hear.
 
>Says the NBC sheep.
 
LOL
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: Jun 08 03:52PM -0500

Moderate wrote:
 
>> Everything is out there on the web, but remember:
 
>> Both the link and the text have to be provided.
 
> I guess making up rules is your way of not responding.
 
Remember, he's only here to be an asshole.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 08 03:24PM -0700

On 2017-06-08 3:19 PM, Dene wrote:
>> I guess making up rules is your way of not responding.
 
> Remember, he's only here to be an asshole.
 
> The RAT has that M.O. down to a science.
 
That's your idea of taking a stand, is it?
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment