Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 5 topics

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 08 01:26PM -0500


> So?
 
> Cops write their notes in police supplied notebooks...
 
> ...but they keep them when they leave the force.
 
Cite
 
> Mere use of FBI technology doesn't make the CONTENT the property of the FBI.
 
Cite
 
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 08 01:50PM -0500


>>And this Comey POS couldn't tell America that Trump was not being
>> investigated? Fuck him.
 
> Brainless strikes again.
 
Petty insults are no defense against the truth, but that is all
you have little man.
 
Comey thought Lynch and Trump had a conflict of interest. What
does he do in each case?
 
He exonerates Clinton, campaigns for special council.
 
Fuck Comey and fuck you.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 08 01:51PM -0500

> wrote it, it was his property. If he had released it to the press it
> would have had the same effect. This way he kept his privacy since
> there was a host of reporters and photographers at his home.
 
He leaked it weeks ago you moron.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 08 02:26PM -0500


> It's becoming quite clear that Comey says what he believes to be true;
> that he is a man of integrity. The Republicans were on record as saying
> so before he started saying things they didn't want to hear.
 
It would be important if it were true.
 
Comey gets sudden amnesia when it come to 18 U.S.C Sec 4.
 
He is a selfserving asshole.
--
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 08 11:22AM -0700

On 2017-06-08 11:19 AM, Dene wrote:
> to the press himself? NONE.
 
> Aren't you glad you waited?
 
> Memo was written on an FBI laptop.
 
So?
 
Cops write their notes in police supplied notebooks...
 
...but they keep them when they leave the force.
 
Mere use of FBI technology doesn't make the CONTENT the property of the FBI.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 08 11:23AM -0700

On 2017-06-08 11:19 AM, MNMikeW wrote:
> — Columbia law professor Daniel Richman — to leak the content of his
> memos to the media with the hope of triggering the appointment of a
> special counsel.
 
Yes. And?
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 01:27PM -0500

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:00:53 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>It was a conversation, between the President and the Director of
> the FBI. It is exactly a leak and possibly a leak of classified
> information.
 
You're being ridiculous.
It was his opening statement to the Senate Intelligence Committee. He
wrote it, it was his property. If he had released it to the press it
would have had the same effect. This way he kept his privacy since
there was a host of reporters and photographers at his home.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 01:28PM -0500

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:04:26 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
> did.Collusion.
 
>And this Comey POS couldn't tell America that Trump was not being
> investigated? Fuck him.
 
Brainless strikes again.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 01:32PM -0500


>The Lynch thing is nothing. She asked him to do something and it
>didn't work.
 
>BS. She directed him to call criminal investigation of HRC "a matter" and he complied. It was not a "hill to die on."
 
And what would you do about it? Neither of them are government
employees anymore. And the nomenclature of the action is really an
insignificant thing anyway.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 01:38PM -0500


>>https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/7220196?p=AMP&visit_id=1-636325406443894541-3880314683&rd=1
 
>That's a link to a google support page.
 
>Your point?
 
My point is that a google support page doesn't have anything to do
with a statement about the media.
 
>Not unsubstantiated at all. I've read Session's bio and stances he's
>taken over the years.
 
>Then cite some specifics.
 
Read his bio.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 01:52PM -0500

>— Columbia law professor Daniel Richman — to leak the content of his
>memos to the media with the hope of triggering the appointment of a
>special counsel.
 
The special counsel was appointed May 16, the press received Comey's
opening statement on June 6.
 
He asked his friend to have the complete opening statement to the
House Intelligence Committee released to the press. It was his
property, he could release it any way he wanted for whatever reason he
wanted. No harm, no foul.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 01:53PM -0500

>to the press himself? NONE.
 
>Aren't you glad you waited?
 
>Memo was written on an FBI laptop.
 
So what?
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 01:55PM -0500

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:23:45 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net> Wrote in message:
 
>> HIS conversation, doofus. Which the President was lying about.
 
>Cite the lie.
 
Don't you read or listen? It's been in all of the press and TV and
Comey stated it today. Look it up yourself.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 01:56PM -0500

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:26:05 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>Cite
 
>> Mere use of FBI technology doesn't make the CONTENT the property of the FBI.
 
>Cite
 
Where would that be found you YOYO?
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 02:04PM -0500

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:50:01 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
> does he do in each case?
 
>He exonerates Clinton, campaigns for special council.
 
>Fuck Comey and fuck you.
 
LOL. Comey passed up several opportunities to completely suggest that
Trump was guilty of transgressions and answered "I don't know".
 
Idiots like you think that they know the truth and can't fathom that
they've naively bought into blatant lies. I feel sorry for others,
but not you. You're not only naive, but stupid.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 08 12:04PM -0700

Sessions is know to be a racist and is known to have lied about his contacts with the Russian ambassador. Now why don't you explain your assertion that Loretta Lynch was "slimy."
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 08 12:06PM -0700

On 2017-06-08 12:04 PM, John B. wrote:
> Sessions is know to be a racist and is known to have lied about his contacts with the Russian ambassador. Now why don't you explain your assertion that Loretta Lynch was "slimy."
 
Didn't you get the memo, John?
 
Greg doesn't have to actually justify his stances...
 
...but he does get to denigrate others for taking issue with his
unjustified mouthings.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 08 02:08PM -0500

On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 13:51:13 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
>> would have had the same effect. This way he kept his privacy since
>> there was a host of reporters and photographers at his home.
 
>He leaked it weeks ago you moron.
 
You just can't help but be wrong. It was released June 7th, one day
before the meeting with the Senate Intelligence Committee.
 
Check the date here.
 
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/336756-comey-will-confirm-trump-asked-him-to-let-flynn-investigation-go
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 08 12:08PM -0700


> Idiots like you think that they know the truth and can't fathom that
> they've naively bought into blatant lies. I feel sorry for others,
> but not you. You're not only naive, but stupid.
 
This is a very important point.
 
It's becoming quite clear that Comey says what he believes to be true;
that he is a man of integrity. The Republicans were on record as saying
so before he started saying things they didn't want to hear.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 08 12:09PM -0700


>> He leaked it weeks ago you moron.
 
> You just can't help but be wrong. It was released June 7th, one day
> before the meeting with the Senate Intelligence Committee.
 
I believe the "leak" is in reference to the leaking of Comey's memo on
his meeting with Trump where Trump requested he let Flynn off.
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 08 12:04PM -0700

Comey declined to comment on the veracity of the Steele dossier in an
open session.
 
If his answer was that it was totally false, why would he do that?
 
Again, Comey declined to express an opinion on whether he thought Trump
colluded with Russia.
 
If his answer would have been "No.", why would he decline to answer?
Silvio <silvio@internet.com>: Jun 08 06:13PM +0200

On 06/06/2017 04:13 AM, Scott M. Kozel wrote:
> Is this a useful club for the mid-handicapper (upper 80s)?
 
If you can handle it why not? I play a 60, 52 en pitching wedge only. If
the lies are tight opening op the 60 can become tricky because of the
increased bounce. In such cases I would prefer a low bounce 64. But to
be honest this rarely happens.
"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@comcast.net>: Jun 08 11:52AM -0700

On Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 12:13:45 PM UTC-4, Silvio wrote:
> the lies are tight opening op the 60 can become tricky because of the
> increased bounce. In such cases I would prefer a low bounce 64. But to
> be honest this rarely happens.
 
I don't have one yet... but I do have a 60 and I can handle it,
although I need more practice with it, but I enjoy practice so
that is no issue.
 
One thing with a lob wedge is that even to cover 40 or 50 feet in
distance you need to hit it pretty hard, because with that loft
a lot of the flight goes vertically. If you hit it fat (as
someone else pointed out) it may go 100 yards into wherever.
MarkDoubt <markdoubt@gmail.com>: Jun 08 10:01AM -0700

Any Vegas golfers here? Hitting Vegas early Aug for a 50th B-day, golf-centric trip, picking courses and looking for opinions/feedback. Just as an early FYI, we played late June rounds at Cascata and Paiute Wolf on previous trip, mid morning T times, nothing early, so know what to expect heat wise. 2 bogey golfers, 1 horrible guy along for the fun, he'll pick up to keep up. Our main parameter is different than our local courses, Dallas. Also, anyone tried to play 2 rounds in a day there, an early rd, 8:ish, and then an afternoon rd, 2-3:ish? Proximity would need to be taken into account but anyone done it? Looked at all the online stuff so looking for info from folks who have played Vegas courses.
 
This time we're arriving at 12:30 and considering 3:ish T times that day, doable from a daylight standpoint? I've looked and seems like plenty of light but wanted to ask. If doable, considering either Bali Hai or Desert Pines do to proximity to strip hotel. I know they are totally different courses but likes/dislikes?
 
Next question is playing either TPC Las Vegas or Bears Best, which would you prefer and why? Want to play both but don't think it will work and they look at least slightly similar both location wise and type course.
 
Last, is Reflection Bay a good option? It looks like a great location and course. Trying for variety on area for each round.
 
Any and all help appreciated.
longdriver2017@gmail.com: Jun 08 11:19AM -0700

On Thursday, June 8, 2017 at 1:01:50 PM UTC-4, MarkDoubt wrote:
 
> Next question is playing either TPC Las Vegas or Bears Best, which would you prefer and why? Want to play both but don't think it will work and they look at least slightly similar both location wise and type course.
 
> Last, is Reflection Bay a good option? It looks like a great location and course. Trying for variety on area for each round.
 
> Any and all help appreciated.
 
Bears Best is a lot of fun. They did a really good job dupicating the famous Nicklaus holes. Played it several times, I think you will enjoy. Have a great trip
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment