Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 4 topics

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 12:51PM -0700

'Russia's cyberattack on the U.S. electoral system before Donald Trump's
election was far more widespread than has been publicly revealed,
including incursions into voter databases and software systems in almost
twice as many states as previously reported.'
 
<https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections>
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 01:20PM -0700

On 2017-06-13 12:59 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> twice as many states as previously reported.'
 
>> <https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections>
 
> Why didn't Obama do something?
 
Who says he didn't?
 
But a better question:
 
Why don't the Republicans want it investigated to the fullest extent?
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 13 03:21PM -0500

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:59:50 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
>> twice as many states as previously reported.'
 
>> <https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections>
 
>Why didn't Obama do something?
 
The CIA, NSA, FBI had started looking into this in 2016. I'm sure
that Obama was informed and suggested that they dig into it further.
 
Fool.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 13 06:05PM -0500

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:32:59 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>I said he didn't.
 
>Democrats aren't interested in the Russians. They have been lying
> about this for six months.
 
Nope, you've been a mental case all of your life.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 04:11PM -0700

On 2017-06-13 3:32 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> But a better question:
 
>> Why don't the Republicans want it investigated to the fullest extent?
 
> I said he didn't.
 
What a shame you have no proof..
 
...or even support for that statement.
 
 
> Democrats aren't interested in the Russians. They have been lying
> about this for six months.
 
Nope.
 
This came from and continues to be investigated by the intelligence and
law enforcement agencies of the US.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 09:42AM -0700

'In Washington today, a bizarre development that breaks with years of
political and press tradition. This can't have anything to do with their
secret plan to take away health care, could it?'
 
<http://boingboing.net/2017/06/13/capitol-censorship.html>
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 09:54AM -0700

On 2017-06-13 9:52 AM, Moderate wrote:
>> secret plan to take away health care, could it?'
 
>> <http://boingboing.net/2017/06/13/capitol-censorship.html>
 
> Obama already did that. It was not a secret it was a lie.
 
Another bit of bullshit you'll never support...
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 13 12:36PM -0500

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:52:35 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
>> secret plan to take away health care, could it?'
 
>> <http://boingboing.net/2017/06/13/capitol-censorship.html>
 
>Obama already did that. It was not a secret it was a lie.
 
Of course you have a cite for that. NOT !!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 11:47AM -0700

On 2017-06-13 11:18 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
>>> Obama already did that. It was not a secret it was a lie.
 
>> Another bit of bullshit you'll never support...
 
> "If you like you insurance you can keep your insurance."
 
Which is irrelevant in a thread about Republicans barring reporters from
interviewing senators.
 
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 13 03:12PM -0500

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 13:18:31 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> Another bit of bullshit you'll never support...
 
>"If you like you insurance you can keep your insurance."
 
>Lie of the year. Ring a bell? Idiots.
 
You stupid shit. That has nothing at all to do with stopping
interviews in the halls of Congress.
 
Again.....you make a fool of yourself.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 13 03:16PM -0500

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:59:03 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>Then why did you bring it up? Idiot.
 
 
YOU are the idiot. He didn't bring it up. There was a passing
reference to healthcare in the story.....not having to do with Obama.
 
Fool.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 01:21PM -0700

On 2017-06-13 12:59 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
> Then why did you bring it up? Idiot.
 
I didn't. And neither did the article I quoted.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 13 06:04PM -0500

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:31:02 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
> with their secret plan to take away health care, could
> it?"
 
>You two lie so much you don't even notice.
 
Fuck off you waste of skin. That was the quote I mentioned from the
link and has absolutely nothing to do with Barack Obama.
You have a real problem with conception and understanding of the
English language.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 04:07PM -0700

On 2017-06-13 3:26 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> I didn't. And neither did the article I quoted.
 
> Liar.
 
Nope.
 
The article brought up nothing about the health care bill passed during
the Obama administration.
 
No wonder you snipped everything, huh?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 13 04:07PM -0700

On 2017-06-13 3:31 PM, Moderate wrote:
> with their secret plan to take away health care, could
> it?"
 
> You two lie so much you don't even notice.
 
Which doesn't mention Obama...
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 13 04:41PM -0500

"I don't recall"
"I don't know"
"I can't answer that"
"Executive Privilege"
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 13 06:06PM -0500

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:34:42 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>Russian collusion
>Russian collusion
> Russian collusion
 
Even if that were true you don't have the IQ to see the difference.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 13 11:52AM -0500

> political and press tradition. This can't have anything to do with their
> secret plan to take away health care, could it?'
 
> <http://boingboing.net/2017/06/13/capitol-censorship.html>
 
Obama already did that. It was not a secret it was a lie.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 13 01:18PM -0500


>> Obama already did that. It was not a secret it was a lie.
 
> Another bit of bullshit you'll never support...
 
"If you like you insurance you can keep your insurance."
 
Lie of the year. Ring a bell? Idiots.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 13 02:59PM -0500


>> Lie of the year. Ring a bell? Idiots.
 
Then why did you bring it up? Idiot.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 13 02:59PM -0500

> including incursions into voter databases and software systems in almost
> twice as many states as previously reported.'
 
> <https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections>
 
Why didn't Obama do something?
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 13 05:26PM -0500

> On 2017-06-13 12:59 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Then why did you bring it up? Idiot.
 
> I didn't. And neither did the article I quoted.
 
Liar.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 13 05:31PM -0500


> YOU are the idiot. He didn't bring it up. There was a passing
> reference to healthcare in the story.....not having to do with Obama.
 
> Fool.
 
You didn't even read his post. Here it is again:
 
"In Washington today, a bizarre development that breaks with years
of political and press tradition. This can't have anything to do
with their secret plan to take away health care, could
it?"
 
You two lie so much you don't even notice.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 13 05:32PM -0500


> Who says he didn't?
 
> But a better question:
 
> Why don't the Republicans want it investigated to the fullest extent?
 
I said he didn't.
 
Democrats aren't interested in the Russians. They have been lying
about this for six months.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 13 05:34PM -0500

> "I don't know"
> "I can't answer that"
> "Executive Privilege"
 
Democrats:
 
Russian collusion
 
Russian collusion
Russian collusion
--
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment