Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 13 topics

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: Jun 20 12:24PM -0500

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-obama-nsc-advisor-susan-rices-unmasking-material-obama-library/
 
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that the National
Security Council (NSC) on May 23, 2017, informed it by letter that the
materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor
Susan Rice of "the identities of any U.S. citizens associated with the
Trump presidential campaign or transition team" have been removed to the
Obama Library.
 
Documents from the Obama administration have been transferred to the
Barack Obama Presidential Library. You may send your request to the
Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential
Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five
years after an administration has left office.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 20 10:27AM -0700

On 2017-06-20 10:24 AM, MNMikeW wrote:
> Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential
> Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five
> years after an administration has left office.
 
Riiiiiiight.
 
Keep the attention on the unmasking...
 
...rather than what the unmasking revealed!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 20 12:32PM -0700

On 2017-06-20 12:29 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Keep the attention on the unmasking...
 
>> ...rather than what the unmasking revealed!
 
> Obviously. The unmasking and leaking was the crime.
 
Well leaking is technically a crime...
 
...but the unmasking was not.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 20 12:44PM -0700

On 2017-06-20 12:36 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Well leaking is technically a crime...
 
>> ...but the unmasking was not.
 
> You can't defend that.
 
I can, and I have.
 
> Unmasking requires strict parameters be
> used.
 
Yup. And since the person who requested the unmasking isn't the one who
decided whether those parameters were met, but rather the career
officers of the agencies that collected the intelligence....
 
> Based on the evidence that these names were widely
> distributed it is clearly a violation.
 
Nope. The leaking is a violation, but that doesn't make the unmasking
into one.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 20 09:24PM -0500

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:29:06 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> Keep the attention on the unmasking...
 
>> ...rather than what the unmasking revealed!
 
>Obviously. The unmasking and leaking was the crime.
 
There was no crime committed.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 20 09:26PM -0500

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:36:03 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>You can't defend that. Unmasking requires strict parameters be
> used. Based on the evidence that these names were widely
> distributed it is clearly a violation.
 
It's patently apparent that you don't keep up. There was no
violation. Period. But you are welcome to keep looking like the ass
we know.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 20 07:38PM -0700


> >> ...rather than what the unmasking revealed!
 
> >Obviously. The unmasking and leaking was the crime.
 
> There was no crime committed.
 
How do YOU know - are you a criminal attorney?
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 20 07:36PM -0700

https://www.yahoo.com/news/republican-karen-handel-projected-win-close-georgia-house-race-beating-back-liberal-wave-021234603.html?soc_trk=gcm&soc_src=60f73942-c8f9-11e5-bc86-fa163e798f6a&.tsrc=notification-brknews
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: Jun 20 07:25PM -0700

Suppose your boss said to you, "Greg, I hope you will come in an hour
early tomorrow." Would you consider that an optional suggestion or
would you come in an hour early? Let's note for the record that Comey
didn't do what Trump said he hoped he would do and the next thing
he knew he was fired.
 
I wouldn't let my boss be this vague. I doubt Trump is vague either. When he issues an order, you know it.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 20 05:20AM -0500

>> along the mush
>> heads.
 
> Your claim was that he said there was no evidence.
 
There isn't. You are being played.
 
Where is the Democrat health care Bill? The Democrat leadership
is making an issue of the secret Republican Bill.
 
It is a game to distract mush heads. The Democrats aren't doing
anything.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 20 07:14AM -0500


> Gosh ... zero penalties. That's really _harsh_! /S
 
> -hh
 
Trump did change it to zero.
 
Nobody doubts that had Hillary would have imposed costly controls
on businesses just like Obama did. The regulations were absurd.
We all remember the trillion in stimulus money Obama pissed away
on failed green energy companies.
 
The Tesla business model is to take $500 billion in subsidies to
fund his luxury car business. Cash for clunkers?
 
Meanwhile China and India do nothing.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 20 01:27PM -0500

> Obama Library. However, you should be aware that under the Presidential
> Records Act, Presidential records remain closed to the public for five
> years after an administration has left office.
 
More convenience:
 
http://tinyurl.com/ydfod8g6
 
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 20 02:29PM -0500


> Riiiiiiight.
 
> Keep the attention on the unmasking...
 
> ...rather than what the unmasking revealed!
 
Obviously. The unmasking and leaking was the crime.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 20 02:36PM -0500


>> Obviously. The unmasking and leaking was the crime.
 
> Well leaking is technically a crime...
 
> ...but the unmasking was not.
 
You can't defend that. Unmasking requires strict parameters be
used. Based on the evidence that these names were widely
distributed it is clearly a violation.
--
"Willie Brennan" <bbren@aol.com>: Jun 20 03:12PM -0400

It really won't take much money.
"Willie Brennan" <bbren@aol.com>: Jun 20 03:05PM -0400

:-)
"Willie Brennan" <bbren@aol.com>: Jun 20 02:53PM -0400

What a slovenly looking POS.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 20 10:51AM -0700

'Donald Trump's nominee to be the director of the FBI, Christopher Wray,
represented an American energy executive in 2006 who was being
criminally investigated by the Russian government.
 
The detail, which was included on Wray's biography on the website of the
law firm King and Spalding dating back to 2009, was removed in 2017,
according to a KFile review of the Web Archive.'
 
<http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/20/politics/kfile-fbi-nominee-law-firm-bio/index.html>
 
'King and Spalding said Wray made the change himself in January 2017
before he considered whether he might be nominated for any
administration post.
 
"Chris made this change to his bio, along with other minor tweaks, in an
attempt to make the material more current. At the time he made the
adjustments -- January 12, 2017 -- he was not being considered for, and
did not anticipate being nominated for, FBI Director, or any position in
government," Micheline Tang, a spokeswoman for the firm said.'
 
Riiiiiiiiiight.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 19 02:07PM -0500

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:31:14 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>The party of NO.
 
>I noticed that we never hear what was colluded, the impact of
> collusion, how it occurred.
 
Of course not. You really don't understand why?
 
>The obvious reason is that someone would look at it and find nothing.
 
Wrong. "Someone" doesn't need to know until the investigation is over.
Releasing what they may be looking for would give those that are
possibly under investigation what they should hide.
> notice the leadership is avoiding the arena of ideas. They are
> inept, they don't do anything that benefits the country and the
> mush heads don't even notice.
 
As usual your suppositions are just that, and shitty ones to boot.
There are parties from both sides on all of the investigating
committees.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 19 12:19PM -0700

On 2017-06-19 12:18 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> committees.
 
> The perfect sheep.
 
> Ewe are doing a good job, BK.
 
More empty insults...
 
It's really your best move, isn't it?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 20 09:47AM -0700

On 2017-06-20 3:20 AM, Moderate wrote:
>>> heads.
 
>> Your claim was that he said there was no evidence.
 
> There isn't. You are being played.
 
You claimed Schiff SAID there was no evidence.
 
Do you admit that claim was wrong?
 
 
> Where is the Democrat health care Bill?
 
They passed it a number of years back.
 
why are you deflecting?
 
> is making an issue of the secret Republican Bill.
 
> It is a game to distract mush heads. The Democrats aren't doing
> anything.
 
Irony.
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Jun 19 10:31PM +0200

FOr not spawning.
 
The world will be a better place without any offspring from you.
 
Gotta given the women of the world credit, they all know better.
 
No one wants an attention seeking troll, when there are successful men out there that have a lot better use of their time.
 
And they finished college, unline the stain!
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 20 06:50AM -0700

> > > real racist are, don't we?
 
> > This is an interesting work of fiction. Thanks for the entertainment.
 
> Hardly: https://townhall.com/tipsheet/catherinedunn/2016/09/08/these-10-celebrities-say-theyll-leave-the-country-if-trump-is-elected-n2215391
 
If someone said he was going to move to Canada rather than Mexico or
a Muslim country, it just might be because Canadians speak English. To
say that choosing not to move to a Muslim country makes one an
Islamophobe is incredibly stupid.
"Willie Brennan" <bbren@aol.com>: Jun 20 09:09AM -0400

The world would be a better place.
 
:-)
"Willie Brennan" <bbren@aol.com>: Jun 20 09:09AM -0400

The little POS should concern ITself with making a living.......Oh,
right...inheritance.
 
If that worthless, little POS were dead, the world would be a better place.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment