Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 4 topics

Friday, June 23, 2017

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: Jun 23 02:32AM -0700

DD wrote:
 
> Lying and then deflecting when challenged may work in school but in the
> real world you are just being patently dishonest, just like your president.
 
> Next!
 
In related news this past week,
a grad student admitted on an anonymous site ("[College Name] secrets") admitted
to cheating on exams, with enough detail (dummy!) on how they cheated, such that
the professor they cheated on (a friend of mine) was able to readily figure out just
who the cheater was.
 
Said grad student is screwed. Prof reported them to the Administration.
 
They're now getting:
- kicked out of University;
- having their (already awarded!) degree revoked;
- having their transcript updated to reflect same.
 
Which means that for all practical purposes, the caught cheater pretty much
just ended their own career, before even getting their first full time job...
 
Oh, and not only did they lose probably five years of their life, they still also have
to pay back those years' college loans too, but now without the benefit of the job
that would have come from having that graduate degree.
 
Yeah, the real world can suck pretty bad...even in school.
 
 
-hh
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 23 05:40PM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 11:45:32 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > It is called "bipartisan negotiation." I realize that Dims haven't done that for many years and may have forgotten how.
 
> You mean like the "bipartisan negotiation" the Republicans did while
> Obama was in office that consisted of blocking everything they could?
 
I mean what the Dimocrats DIDN'T DO while enacting Obamacareless.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 23 05:41PM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 2:00:11 PM UTC-7, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
> clearly know shit all about what is going on.
 
> Isn't it time you took an interst in something other than trolling from
> a position of ignorance?
 
Libtards such as yourself JUST WON'T UNDERSTAND. Too bad...
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 23 05:38PM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 11:16:11 PM UTC-7, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
 
> I wouldn't YAWN again with all the shit flying but then you can't be a
> Trump supporter without getting a taste for it, I suppose.
 
> Lap it up boy.
 
YYYYAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN....
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 23 02:28PM -0500

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:45:23 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> I can see why you snipped that out.
 
>> :-)
 
>Another humorless turd.
 
Where's the humor, except in your pretending to understand
simple words and phrases.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 23 12:32PM -0700

On 2017-06-23 11:45 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> I can see why you snipped that out.
 
>> :-)
 
> Another humorless turd.
 
What cause for humour is there in the fact that the leader of your
country (Canada's largest trading partner) lies all the time?
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 07:52PM

Moderate wrote:
 
 
> > What Trump and his lawyer said do matter.
 
> > Quotes above; GFY.
 
> Humorless turds.
 
 
Trump anmd his lawyer?
 
Are you saying you regard the presidency as a sitcom? That would
explain the complete lack of gravity in all your nonsensical responses.
 
Ya know, when it comes to healthcare not everybody can affors to treat
it as a joke, no matter how funny you find it.
 
It goes a long way to explain your mentality when non-us nationals
treat the subject with more seriousness than you can muster.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 08:01PM

Dene wrote:
 
 
> The RAT is not a typical libtard. He's a troll. It's quite possible
> he has not political affiliations. He just wants an argument.
 
> The real question is whether you are going to feed him.
 
There is possibly a lot truth in that but there is also a lot more
truth in the ops the "troll" posts than in the responses he recieves.
 
You Trumpets play into his hands by not having a reasonable response
preferring the seemingly endless diatribe that most threads instantly
veer toward.
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: Jun 23 03:07PM -0500

Moderate wrote:
>> simple words and phrases.
 
> "It's not an investigation. It's a matter."
 
> You are the joke.
 
Woooooosh! as they say.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 23 03:42PM -0500

On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:49:52 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> Where's the humor, except in your pretending to understand
>> simple words and phrases.
 
>"It's not an investigation. It's a matter."
 
You call that humor?

>You are the joke.
 
No, you are if that's humorous to you.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 23 03:45PM -0500


>> "It's not an investigation. It's a matter."
 
>> You are the joke.
 
>Woooooosh! as they say.
 
Nope. I understand it but it's not funny. At least not to adults.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 10:27PM

MNMikeW wrote:
 
 
> > "It's not an investigation. It's a matter."
 
> > You are the joke.
 
> Woooooosh! as they say.
 
Yup, totally whoosed me, just sounds like every other dumb thing you
say... except whithout the random shit stains.
 
So are you able to explain the humour and validate your claim?
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 23 03:55PM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 9:31:01 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
> On 2017-06-22 9:05 PM, tomseim2g@gmail.com wrote:
> > Typical libtard. Therefore Trump DOESN'T LIE!
 
> Trump is proven to lie.
 
Your comment period has ended. You weren't responsive, therefore you have conceded Trump does not lie.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 23 06:16PM -0500

>> > Typical libtard. Therefore Trump DOESN'T LIE!
 
>> Trump is proven to lie.
 
>Your comment period has ended. You weren't responsive, therefore you have conceded Trump does not lie.
 
You don't make rules here you stupid shit. He hasn't conceded
anything. Alan's just playing you for the fool that you are. Donald
Trump is an inveterate liar.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 23 05:21PM -0700

On 2017-06-23 12:49 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> simple words and phrases.
 
> "It's not an investigation. It's a matter."
 
> You are the joke.
 
There was an issue under discussion before that lame attempt at
deflection...
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 23 05:22PM -0700

>>> Typical libtard. Therefore Trump DOESN'T LIE!
 
>> Trump is proven to lie.
 
> Your comment period has ended. You weren't responsive, therefore you have conceded Trump does not lie.
 
No I have not.
 
If you want my response...
 
...answer my question.
 
:-)
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 23 05:36PM -0700

On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 5:22:45 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> If you want my response...
 
> ...answer my question.
 
> :-)
 
Your comment period has ended. You weren't responsive, therefore you have conceded Trump does not lie.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 23 05:38PM -0700


>> ...answer my question.
 
>> :-)
 
> Your comment period has ended. You weren't responsive, therefore you have conceded Trump does not lie.
 
Nope.
 
You saying something doesn't make it so.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 08:13PM

Dene wrote:
 
 
> > The point of this bill is tax cuts for the Republican donor class,
> > which it will definitely provide if it manages to pass.
 
> Point of this bill is to bandaid the failing ACA.
 
You know that is patently false. No-one is even really claiming that.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 23 02:24PM -0700

> On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 5:54:08 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
> > The Democrats did not pass ACA in secret. It was an open process from beginning to end.
 
> WHAT planet were you living on?
 
Do you have some information to the contrary, or are you just mouthing off?
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: Jun 23 02:25PM -0700

On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 1:29:53 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> >> Interesting times ahead.
 
> > The point of this bill is tax cuts for the Republican donor class, which it will definitely provide if it manages to pass.
 
> Point of this bill is to bandaid the failing ACA.
 
And it doesn't do it.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 23 05:29PM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 9:43:17 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
> >> The Democrats did not pass ACA in secret. It was an open process from beginning to end.
 
> > WHAT planet were you living on?
 
> Sorry, but he's telling the truth, and you're living in a fantasy world.
 
Sorry, but that is not what happened:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/26/health-reform-transparency-opaque-to-critics/
I know - I watched the closed-door meetings (from the outside) night after night on the news.
Dimocrats now want to rewrite history - surprise, surprise.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 23 05:35PM -0700

> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/26/health-reform-transparency-opaque-to-critics/
> I know - I watched the closed-door meetings (from the outside) night after night on the news.
> Dimocrats now want to rewrite history - surprise, surprise.
 
How did the Republicans submit 160 amendments to it then (I think the
number was 160)?
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 23 05:35PM -0700

On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 8:36:03 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> Yeah. It does.
 
> It makes what you are trying to insist was literal and makes it obvious
> that it was rhetorical.
 
Hardly. For a change, Pelosi was telling the truth:
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/06/25/lets-recall-why-the-affordable-care-act-is-so-messed-up/?utm_term=.1f26ed852a91
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 23 05:38PM -0700

>> that it was rhetorical.
 
> Hardly. For a change, Pelosi was telling the truth:
 
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/06/25/lets-recall-why-the-affordable-care-act-is-so-messed-up/?utm_term=.1f26ed852a91
 
Sorry, but that article doesn't mention Pelosi, so you're going to have
to provide a quote that you think supports your claims.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment