Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 20 updates in 8 topics

Friday, June 23, 2017

tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 22 09:08PM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 2:05:35 PM UTC-7, DumbedDownUSA wrote:
 
> > YAWN....
 
> Dogs also do that when they are stressed.
 
> Are you even house trained?
 
YAAAAWWWWWNNNNNN...
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 06:12AM


> > Dogs also do that when they are stressed.
 
> > Are you even house trained?
 
> YAAAAWWWWWNNNNNN...
 
Awww, don't poop the carpet just 'cos you can't win an *honest*
argument.
 
Shall I get you some pet pampers? 'cos you are going to be doing a lot
of this deflecting and lying and shit if you want to avoid manning up
to the truth about Trump.
 
I wouldn't YAWN again with all the shit flying but then you can't be a
Trump supporter without getting a taste for it, I suppose.
 
Lap it up boy.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:32PM -0700

>> million by groups backing Ossoff or opposing Handel.'
 
>> Oops.
 
> WHEN are you going to get the message? Dimocrats spent $32M, give or take, and they LOST! Now many want Pelosi out, which I think is their smartest move in years. Repeat: you guys LOST, what you're doing ISN'T WORKING!!!
 
Where do you get your new figure?
 
Fact: the Republicans spent more than the Democrats.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:32PM -0700

On 2017-06-22 4:28 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>>> So how does that impact the polls being wrong? It doesn't.
 
>> The predictions being wrong doesn't make the polls wrong, doofus.
 
> No, the results made the polls and predictions wrong.
 
Nope. They made the predictions wrong.
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:32PM -0700


>>> So how does that impact the polls being wrong? It doesn't.
 
>> The predictions being wrong doesn't make the polls wrong, doofus.
 
> Yeah, right - the polls were SO ACCURATE last Nov. NEWSFLASH: when something ain't working try something DIFFERENT!
 
The polls aren't the predictions, doofus.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 06:05AM

Moderate wrote:
 
> > Moderate wrote:
 
> >> So how does that impact the polls being wrong? It doesn't.
 
> > The polls weren't wrong, you are, unsurprisingly.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia%27s_6th_congressional_district_special_election,_2017#Polling
 
> > The latest polls had Handel ahead in 2 out of three and tied in the
> > third.
 
> Not according to your cite or the actual polls.
 
I see your problem there. You're illiterate... or are you just lying
again?
 
Obviously I am taking that infromation directly from the cited page.
 
Do you need help finding it? Perhaps you don't know what month it is?
 
/spoonfeeding mode/
 
1. Click on the link.
2. Wait for the page to load. (perhaps you are still on a 56k)
3. Scroll down the page until you get to the latest polls preceeding
the election. (June 15th to 20th)
4. They look something like this, i.e. *exactly* as I stated.
 
WSB/Landmark Communications[83] June 18, 2017 49% 49%
Trafalgar Group[84] June 17–18, 2017 49% 51%
CSP Polling[85] June 15–17, 2017 48% 49%
 
5. Lie, deflect, ignore or whatever else you usually do when faced with
honest rebuttal of your false claims.
 
/spoonfeeding mode off/
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:34PM -0700

On 2017-06-22 4:18 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> You thicktard, how can you negotiate when the republicans refuse to
>> even consult?
 
> We have to pass Obamacare to find out what is in it.
 
But that isn't what actually happened, is it?
 
Republicans were given the bill to read, had many many hearings to
discuss it and offered something like 160 amendments.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 05:54AM

Moderate wrote:
 
 
> > You thicktard, how can you negotiate when the republicans refuse to
> > even consult?
 
> We have to pass Obamacare to find out what is in it.
 
No answer and a change of subject So clearly you concede your original
point.
 
Lying and then deflecting when challenged may work in school but in the
real world you are just being patently dishonest, just like your
president.
 
Next!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:30PM -0700

> Typical libtard. Therefore Trump DOESN'T LIE!
 
Trump is proven to lie.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 05:44AM


> Typical libtard. Therefore Trump DOESN'T LIE!
 
No what you did is make very clear that you would not admit that Trump
is a liar in any circumstances.
 
That Trump is a pathalogical liar is well documented.
 
Some media were running weekly round ups of his lies during the
campaign.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/series/lyin-trump-a-weekly-fact-check
 
All unproven? Sure.
"DumbedDownUSA" <dumb.america@gmail.com>: Jun 23 05:48AM


> Typical libtard. Therefore Trump DOESN'T LIE!
 
Even his own lawyer said he was a liar.
 
Trump: "I am under investigation..."
 
Sekulow: "he is not under investigation"
 
So either Trump was lying or he was telling his lawyer to lie.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 22 09:13PM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 5:54:08 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
> The Democrats did not pass ACA in secret. It was an open process from beginning to end.
 
WHAT planet were you living on?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:43PM -0700

> On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 5:54:08 PM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
>> The Democrats did not pass ACA in secret. It was an open process from beginning to end.
 
> WHAT planet were you living on?
 
Sorry, but he's telling the truth, and you're living in a fantasy world.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:45PM -0700

On 2017-06-22 4:16 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
> Carbon's memory is nonexistent.
 
> 'We have to pass the Bill to find out what is in it.'
 
Sorry, but that was a metaphorical statement that in order to truly
understand how it would work out in practice, one would have to
experience it.
 
The bill itself was debated and discussed and available for all
legislators to read for quite a time before it was passed.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:45PM -0700

On 2017-06-22 2:56 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> It was flawed and set for changes, but better than the first two tries
> by the GOP this year. I don't think this last one will pass either.
 
> We all agree that ACA is flawed. What confounds me is why aren't the Democrats working for a solution? What ideas they bring to the table?
 
In what manner could they do that?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:33PM -0700


>>> Why are you a FRAUD?
 
>> Answer my question...
 
> When pigs fly...
 
So you're afraid to answer...
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:33PM -0700


>>> Why are you a FRAUD?
 
>> Answer my question...
 
> OK, you're NEVER going to provide the PROOF - because you don't have any. This conversation is OVER.
 
You lack the willpower.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: Jun 22 09:06PM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 2:03:16 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > When did Trump say he had tapes?
 
> He implied it to attempt to intimidate Comey.
 
> The fact that he phrased it in weasel words doesn't change anything.
 
You mean weasel words like "It depends upon what the definition of is is?"
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 22 09:31PM -0700


>> He implied it to attempt to intimidate Comey.
 
>> The fact that he phrased it in weasel words doesn't change anything.
 
> You mean weasel words like "It depends upon what the definition of is is?"
 
Deflection!
"Willie Brennan" <bbren@aol.com>: Jun 22 07:40AM -0400

Such an amusing, little POS.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment