Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 11 updates in 6 topics

Sunday, June 11, 2017

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Jun 11 05:08AM +0200

The Motherfucker died of lung cancer
 
and I foamed even more when the insurance arrived.
 
Sorry motherfucker, but I won.
 
A troll asshole as I never loses.
 
Lololololololololol
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Jun 11 04:19AM +0200

Booooooooooo
 
Could not resist balding animal.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 10 05:37PM -0700

'For Reality 2, the most serious concern is not that a foreign power
interfered in the 2016 election, nor that the President may have
committed obstruction of justice — which was part of the impeachment
charges against both Nixon (which he ducked by resigning) and
Clinton — but government employees leaking information on these and
other topics to the media.'
 
<https://arcdigital.media/what-happened-in-the-comey-hearing-depends-on-your-reality-e3c270ab6857>
 
'Of course, Comey did have a problem with what Lynch told him to do,
saying it "confused me and concerned me." He didn't follow Lynch's
request, continuing to use the term "investigation." And Comey was so
concerned Lynch undermined the credibility of the Justice
Department — both with this request, and by talking to Bill Clinton on
the tarmac at the Phoenix airport in June 2016 — that he felt he had to
take the unusual step of publicly commenting on an FBI investigation.
 
But none of that exists in Reality 2. (Or, rather, the Lynch-Clinton
airport meeting exists — and is really bad — but Comey's reaction to it
doesn't).
 
I haven't seen anyone defending Lynch's directive — it's clearly
inappropriate — but if Obama fired Comey for refusing to follow it, it
would be a much bigger deal. And, like the rest of Reality 1, I'm much
more concerned with a big accusation against people currently in power
than a small one against people who no longer have any.'
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 10 09:49AM -0700

On 2017-06-10 1:18 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
> The evidence shows you witch hunters will say or do anything.
> Zero credibility or morality. Same losing strategy over and
> over.
 
You DO realize that the investigation of Russian interference in the
election was started by the intelligence and law enforcement
professionals of your country, right?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: Jun 10 10:03AM -0700

On 2017-06-10 10:00 AM, Moderate wrote:
>> election was started by the intelligence and law enforcement
>> professionals of your country, right?
 
> Which has zero to do with your continual attacks on the President.
 
I'm not attacking Trump with anything other than the facts.
 
He's a liar, a cheat, a defrauder, a sexual predator...
 
...and it looks increasingly like he colluded with Russia to influence
the election.
 
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: Jun 10 01:22PM -0400

On 06/10/2017 01:03 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
 
>> Which has zero to do with your continual attacks on the President.
 
> I'm not attacking Trump with anything other than the facts.
 
> He's a liar, a cheat, a defrauder, a sexual predator...
 
These low-information zealots really aren't equipped to deal with facts. They operate on a purely emotional level, fueled by sites like this:
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/
 
It's a waste of time trying to reason with them.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 10 12:25PM -0500

On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 10:03:45 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
 
>> Which has zero to do with your continual attacks on the President.
 
>I'm not attacking Trump with anything other than the facts.
 
>He's a liar, a cheat, a defrauder, a sexual predator...
 
Plus unethical, egotistical, and above all a despicable human being.
 
>...and it looks increasingly like he colluded with Russia to influence
>the election.
 
I don't think that he, personally, was involved.
 
He was too busy finding ways to defraud the lower income people that
voted for him, and further lining the pockets of the one per centers.
 
>> Just more deflection.
 
Just more truth.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 10 03:18AM -0500

>> a meaningless difference to you lying scum.
 
> Russia really did interfere and influence your election.
 
> That still matters today.
 
Immediate deflection. Your, 'but, but, but Hillary' fell flat.
Your Russian ploy is worse.
 
The evidence shows you witch hunters will say or do anything.
Zero credibility or morality. Same losing strategy over and
over.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: Jun 10 12:00PM -0500


> You DO realize that the investigation of Russian interference in the
> election was started by the intelligence and law enforcement
> professionals of your country, right?
 
Which has zero to do with your continual attacks on the President.
 
Just more deflection.
--
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 10 09:16AM -0500

On Fri, 9 Jun 2017 21:36:48 -0500 (CDT), Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>
wrote:
 
 
>You have been doing all the deflection. You are too much of an ass
> to admit Comey initiated the one on one format.
 
>You deflected Comey's lead.
 
So you think that if Comey asked for the first meeting all the rest
were on him? That's preposterous, and coming from the biggest ass
here.
BK@Onramp.net: Jun 10 09:22AM -0500

On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 03:12:24 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
> one on one.
 
>So why does Comey need to get his version out by nefarious means
> if it agrees with the tape?
 
He explained that doofus. Refresh your "memory".
 
http://time.com/4810345/james-comey-testimony-real-time-transcript/
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment