Digest for rec.sport.football.college@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 11 topics

Thursday, June 22, 2017

Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: Jun 22 11:35AM -0700

In article <oifnc0$s9s$1@dont-email.me>,
> > <http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/21/prisoners-save-guards-life-get-sentences-cut-by-25/>
> > <http://tinyurl.com/yaqlm4jp>
 
> Not all of us who worked or locked in prison are assholes.
 
That never occurred to me.
 
--
Michael Press
michael anderson <mianderson79@gmail.com>: Jun 22 11:23AM -0700

the worst thing about osoff wasn't his age. 30 is young, but it's not too young to be a newly elected congressman. Certainly competent people even younger have been elected.
 
The worst part of osoff was he was an unemployed bum millenial type....and he's the best guy dems could find to blow 25 mill on....lmao
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: Jun 22 11:33AM -0700

In article <54073d31-222d-4b72-a90d-eeed19a78514@googlegroups.com>,
 
> > --
> > Michael Press
 
> You missed the best - variations of which were: "There are chants of "not my congressman" at the Ossoff consolation party. WRT Ossoff, they're correct"
 
That vein is not played out.
Hear about the pay bar at the Ossoff election night doings?
The best is the Disney light comedy.
 
--
Michael Press
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 22 03:47PM

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:07:09 -0700 (PDT), tim.vanwagonerspam@gmail.com
wrote:
 
>Hugh, here is an easy trick. Replace with he or him. If he fits, it's who; him, it's whom. Should be the same with they or they.
 
Thank you very much. I'm not too old to learn yet.
 
I always avoided who and whom before.
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: Jun 22 11:28AM -0700

In article <594bb6f5.345862875@news.eternal-september.org>,
 
> Actually the sentence would have been okay without either who or whom.
 
> I never learned about the proper use of who and whom. Would you
> recommend flogging?
 
For college presidents.
 
--
Michael Press
michael anderson <mianderson79@gmail.com>: Jun 22 11:27AM -0700

https://www.vox.com/2017/6/20/15843864/jon-ossoff-special-election
 
This is bad for dems. If dems couldnt win this seat(a 50-50 district now) running against *that* weak non-incumbent gop candidate, where can they win?
Some dued <theodoreward@gmail.com>: Jun 22 06:50AM -0700

It sure sounds like fans of rival sports teams up in here.
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <iamtj4life@gmail.com>: Jun 22 07:40AM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 8:50:36 AM UTC-5, Some dued wrote:
> It sure sounds like fans of rival sports teams up in here.
 
Sure seems to be heading that way, doesn't it?
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 22 03:50PM

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 06:50:34 -0700 (PDT), Some dued
 
>It sure sounds like fans of rival sports teams up in here.
 
Some fans can multi-task - especially winners.
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
michael anderson <mianderson79@gmail.com>: Jun 22 10:03AM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 1:04:44 AM UTC-5, Michael Press wrote:
 
> Jon @Ossoff came within 5% in a district that elected @SecPriceMD
> by 23% 7 months ago.]
 
 
or Jon Ossoff did worse in a district that Hillary clinton essentially tied just 8 months ago.....so they have lost votes since then in that district.
 
The dems didn't spend 25 million on this race because it was a 'longshot'. They spent the 25 million because it is now a 50/50 district. And they got their ass kicked.
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: Jun 22 11:25AM -0700

In article <48086b7e-c7e0-48c8-89a5-3a7725588846@googlegroups.com>,
 
> It sure sounds like fans of rival sports teams up in here.
 
True to our nature.
 
--
Michael Press
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 22 04:00PM

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 05:17:42 -0700 (PDT), "The Cheesehusker, Trade
 
>Ken is gonna dig this...
 
>What the article doesn't talk about, are the technical aspects required to take such a shot - humidity, wind speed and rotation of the earth all have to be accounted for - more like firing artillery than anything
 
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4628224/Canadian-sniper-kills-ISIS-fighter-TWO-MILES-away.html
 
Once in OK when I was about 12 I was riding in the country. My uncle
stopped, handed me a hand gun and pointed to a jackrabbit more than
100 yards away in a field.
 
I shot the rabbit!!! Elementary - point the gun at the rabbit and aim
exactly high enough to account for the distance.
 
And they thought it was luck.
 
Hugh
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: Jun 22 01:42PM -0400

On 6/22/2017 8:17 AM, The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior wrote:
> Ken is gonna dig this...
 
> What the article doesn't talk about, are the technical aspects required to take such a shot - humidity, wind speed and rotation of the earth all have to be accounted for - more like firing artillery than anything
 
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4628224/Canadian-sniper-kills-ISIS-fighter-TWO-MILES-away.html
 
 
When they start talking of flight time in seconds it's a long damb shot.
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <iamtj4life@gmail.com>: Jun 22 10:50AM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 12:42:38 PM UTC-5, Ken Olson wrote:
 
> > What the article doesn't talk about, are the technical aspects required to take such a shot - humidity, wind speed and rotation of the earth all have to be accounted for - more like firing artillery than anything
 
> > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4628224/Canadian-sniper-kills-ISIS-fighter-TWO-MILES-away.html
 
> When they start talking of flight time in seconds it's a long damb shot.
 
No kidding.
 
Interesting teh Canucks are so good - small numbers and all that, but still. Must be their hockey training!
Futbol Phan <sgzphd@gmail.com>: Jun 22 07:53AM -0700

On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 1:01:59 PM UTC-5, michael anderson wrote:
 
> I live in a very red state. One of the reddest possible. The county I live is blue overall, yet the specific area I live is very red. The people who are receiving govt $$s in this county are overwhelmingly blue voters, and I don't know anyone where I live(mostly red voters) who receive federal dollars....
 
> your way of breaking down everything into state lines obscures the real picture- that for the most part it's democratic voters in those states who are receiving the federal $$....and likewise in many states there are still large numbers of republicans(generally 35-40%) who mostly are why the state is giving more money to the govt than they are.
 
> All these realities you ignore because they don't fit the picture you want. So yeah, I agree with you that it's a shame so much of the country is taking more than they get. But those are mostly *YOUR SIDE'S* voters for the most part.
 
And you know that welfare recipients disproportionately vote Dem how? All of the Trump voters are employed, right?
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 22 03:26PM

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:53:26 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
 
>And you know that welfare recipients disproportionately vote Dem how? All =
>of the Trump voters are employed, right?
 
It's logical that welfare bums would not bite the hand that feeds
them. Thus they logically vote Socialist.
 
But, since logic is a foreign language to you, we forgive this time.
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
michael anderson <mianderson79@gmail.com>: Jun 22 10:00AM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 9:53:30 AM UTC-5, Futbol Phan wrote:
 
> > your way of breaking down everything into state lines obscures the real picture- that for the most part it's democratic voters in those states who are receiving the federal $$....and likewise in many states there are still large numbers of republicans(generally 35-40%) who mostly are why the state is giving more money to the govt than they are.
 
> > All these realities you ignore because they don't fit the picture you want. So yeah, I agree with you that it's a shame so much of the country is taking more than they get. But those are mostly *YOUR SIDE'S* voters for the most part.
 
> And you know that welfare recipients disproportionately vote Dem how?
 
well a disproportionate percentage(relative to their overall population) of pts on govt assistance are minorities, and we do know that they almost all vote dem here....
 
we can also track it county by county....shelby co, for example, has incredibly low numbers of people on welfare(it would definately be a county that pays a lot more than they get as you like to state) and it's HEAVILY GOP....whereas the counties here that are heavily democratic are definately in the recieve more than they pay category.
 
So within the states, your party is definately the "get more than they pay" group, so this line of thinking you are always bringing up is twisted and actually means something very different than you think.
"the_andrew_smith@yahoo.com" <agavinsmith@gmail.com>: Jun 22 09:20AM -0700

http://washingtonbabylon.com/scoop-trial-for-corrupt-buffoonish-leader-set-for-september-process-could-lead-to-his-ouster-for-collusion/
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 22 04:53PM

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:20:37 -0700 (PDT), "the_andrew_smith@yahoo.com"
 
>http://washingtonbabylon.com/scoop-trial-for-corrupt-buffoonish-leader-set-for-september-process-could-lead-to-his-ouster-for-collusion/
 
Was Obama the teacher or the pupil?
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
"Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger" <damonhynes@gmail.com>: Jun 22 08:06AM -0700

1100 sq ft would be right up my alley. I don't need much as long as I have a computer.
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 22 03:55PM

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:06:34 -0700 (PDT), "Damon Hynes, Cyclone
 
>1100 sq ft would be right up my alley. I don't need much as long as I have a computer.
 
We have about 2400 sq. ft. She has a family room and I have a den -
that may be one reason we are still married.
 
Hugh
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Futbol Phan <sgzphd@gmail.com>: Jun 22 07:45AM -0700

On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 10:30:52 PM UTC-5, Michael Press wrote:
> <http://tinyurl.com/y9d8g9nh>
 
> --
> Michael Press
 
Thankfully she apparently didn't open her mouth and you know, actually say something...
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 22 03:44PM

On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:45:40 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
 
>> --
>> Michael Press
 
>Thankfully she apparently didn't open her mouth and you know, actually say something...
 
Yeah. Hillary lost the election by speaking (which may not be the only
reason she opens her mouth).
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Emperor Wonko the Sane <doug@sorensensdomain.net>: Jun 22 08:46AM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 9:45:44 AM UTC-5, Futbol Phan wrote:
 
> > --
> > Michael Press
 
> Thankfully she apparently didn't open her mouth and you know, actually say something...
 
Her husband should follow her example.
 
Doug
JGibson <james.m.gibson@gmail.com>: Jun 22 06:44AM -0700

On Thursday, June 22, 2017 at 8:17:48 AM UTC-4, J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
 
> I would advise you not to push your socialism there. That can give you
> a permanently sore butt. Of course there is always a chance the move
> will make you more politically intelligent than liberals.
 
It's Austin, Hugh.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.football.college+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment