Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 8 updates in 4 topics

Tuesday, May 2, 2017

The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 02 08:19AM -0700

Typical peak year??? You clearly don't know much about players being "at peak". Nadal up until at least Monte-Carlo has been nowhere near peak and out of sorts mostly.
heyguys00@gmail.com: May 02 08:49AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 11:19:35 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
> Typical peak year??? You clearly don't know much about players being "at peak". Nadal up until at least Monte-Carlo has been nowhere near peak and out of sorts mostly.
 
Poor Nadal, so out of sorts he's making HC slam/event finals and winning clay events like just like 2012 or 2014. Oh wait, his results this year are actually better...lol
 
What years was Nadal a peak again? 2013 when he lost 1st round in W? 2010 when he only made the AO QF?
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 02 09:27AM -0700

> What years was Nadal a peak again? 2013 when he lost 1st round in W? 2010 when he only made the AO QF?
 
You don't get it, let me explain icy logic:
 
Federer is always peak.
When Fed beats Nadal or any of the other top 3, they are not peak.
If Nadal performance is superior to any of his previous years but he loses to Federer, and only Federer, he isn't peak.
If Federer is 35+ he is still peak.
Nadal is 31, but he isn't peak and out of sorts but Federer again is peak.
...
...
...
Federer career victories are worthless because he has been peak but all the opponents were not peak when he beat them.
Federer has nothing to be proud of because his victories are worthless but he has always been peak.
....
....
I flip burgers, again and again.
End of discussion.
fymido_lenito@yahoo.com: May 02 12:09PM -0700

On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 9:27:35 AM UTC-7, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> ....
> I flip burgers, again and again.
> End of discussion.
 
Thanks for the summary. In my 30 years of following tennis, this is easily one of most objective analysis I have seen. It is based on the insights of the three top experts on RST, whose ability to analyze tennis matches and careers beyond just the numbers are better than any tennis player or journalist I can think of. I just read the autobiography of Rod Laver, and I have to say that even an all time great like him haven't displayed the kind of insight summarized above.
Thanks again.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 02 02:42PM -0400

https://www.google.com/amp/deadspin.com/roger-federer-went-to-the-
met-ball-in-a-sweet-ass-cobra-1794845361/amp
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
calimero377@gmx.de: May 02 10:34AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 2:01:03 AM UTC+2, *skriptis wrote:
> Making fun of him would be considered politically incorrect even
> though he's the one that people find abnormal, not someone who
> rides a horse.
 
Why would anyone perceive MACRON (and not Putin) as a perv??
 
Max
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 02 08:37AM -0700

Murray's a legend cos he won Wimbledon, did it twice in-fact and more importantly he was the first Brit to win it in decades - he also won the Olympics twice - these are giant global marketing factors - you either don't understand that or live in a basement, after Fed and Nadal, he's definitely the world's most well known tennis player.
Federer Fanatic <TheRelentlessTide@nospam.invalid>: May 02 11:14AM -0500

On Tue, 2 May 2017 08:37:10 -0700 (PDT), The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com> wrote:
| Murray's a legend cos he won Wimbledon, did it twice in-fact and more importantly he was the first Brit to win it in
| decades - he also won the Olympics twice - these are giant global marketing factors - you either don't understand that
| or live in a basement, after Fed and Nadal, he's definitely the world's most well known tennis player.
 
After Djoker? LOL. You know what kings did with court jesters right that failed to please?
You're living dangerously Icey...;-)
 
Murray is a disgruntled, melencholy Scot....is he a capable talent....certainly...not a legend
in the world outside of GB. Nobody would miss him if he quit tomorrow...at least no one with
any rational thoughts coursing through their brains....I guess that excludes you? ;-)
 
FF
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment