Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 7 topics

Friday, May 5, 2017

Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: May 06 12:19AM +1000

On 5/05/2017 6:04 AM, jdeluise wrote:
>> you 61 60.
 
> The point is only children or duffers who play double with elderly ladies
> on the weekend pick pre-strung rackets off the shelf.
 
Why is that? I have about 15 rackets so haven't bought in a while - 3
the same that I always use & 12 or so in the shed. They are only
'pre-strung' for a short period.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 05 08:13AM -0700

> Why is that? I have about 15 rackets so haven't bought in a while - 3
the same that I always use & 12 or so in the shed. They are only
'pre-strung' for a short period.
 
I expected you to have 20-30 racquets if you are buying strung racquets from Walmart and replace them when the string gets broken.
PeteWasLucky <waleed.khedr@gmail.com>: May 05 08:17AM -0700

Got the racquets, different feel for sure than the 90, it requires more hitting up or brushing on the ball than flat hitting that was a beauty on the older frame.
 
I can see why Federer handles Rafa topspin easily now. As I mentioned in other threads this racquet helped Federer against Rafa than any other opponent.
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 04 11:54PM -0700

On Friday, 5 May 2017 01:01:15 UTC+1, jdeluise wrote:
 
> If by getting things done you mean "bowing to Democrat demands" and
> "caving or failing on nearly all of his campaign promises", sure. I hope
> he continues this!
 
is it as embarrassing as voting for Hillary and then Trump winning! LOL
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 04 11:55PM -0700

On Friday, 5 May 2017 00:38:03 UTC+1, reilloc wrote:
 
> Did we blink and he signed the Free Cheetos and Mountain Dew Executive
> Order?
 
> Damn...
 
that would rule if he did that! you college age guys would like that too!
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: May 05 07:11AM -0500

On 5/4/2017 9:53 PM, jdeluise wrote:
 
>>> Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor"
 
>> Doubling down on stupid, LOL.
 
> Well you have to admit your post was stupid
 
My post was spot-on. Your reply was really dumb, hence the embarrassment
of tripling-down on it.
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 05 06:01AM -0700

Stephen J cannot be older than 10. Truly juvenile dumbass
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: May 06 12:23AM +1000

On 5/05/2017 10:01 AM, jdeluise wrote:
>> mean that a bill has become law.
 
> Like I said, it's embarrassing to have to inform a "professor" of this
> basic piece of information about his own government. What a disgrace!
 
Not all professors are bright. We had a female one here in the paper
yesterday blaming casinos for her addiction, losing 300k & going bankrupt.
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.los>: May 05 05:59PM +0300

On 5.5.2017 17:23, Whisper wrote:
>> basic piece of information about his own government. What a disgrace!
 
> Not all professors are bright. We had a female one here in the paper
> yesterday blaming casinos for her addiction, losing 300k & going bankrupt.
 
"A new longitudinal study into the relationship between measured levels
of intelligence, and addiction shows a marked tendency toward more
addiction behavior among those with higher IQs -- twice as much for men,
and a three times greater likelihood among women."
 
http://www.cnsproductions.com/drugeducationblog/dr-darryl-inaba/1198
 
:)
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 05 12:32AM -0700

Lol Not a word from Pelle, Brian or PWL about how the EUSSR is trying to interfere with the UK general election, even though it was a big headline from our PM Thersea May lol shows how unbiased they are lol.
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.com>: May 05 12:21PM +0300

On 5.5.2017 10:32, The Iceberg wrote:
> Lol Not a word from Pelle,
 
Don't worry, I have posted.
 
As for the topic line, you're being a bit too clever, if I may say so.
The difference between November and now is that Russia never was an
issue in the elections other than the meddling.
 
The EUSSR, OTOH, is a part, just about the biggest, of your elections.
All the while the divorce proceedings are under way. It's fair game for
either party to make the most out of it.
 
To sum it up: "Buu huu huu".
 
--
"Donald Trump is the weak man's vision of a strong man."
-- Charles Cooke
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 05 04:25AM -0700

That must be their tears as they desperately trying to cling to their big EUSSR gravy train!
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 05 01:35PM +0200

> All the while the divorce proceedings are under way. It's fair game for
> either party to make the most out of it.
 
> To sum it up: "Buu huu huu".
 
 
 
If you activate your brain you'll see that being threatened with a
gun actually concerns you far more than if you're divorcing
someone.
 
No?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: May 05 07:09AM -0500

On 5/5/2017 4:21 AM, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
 
> As for the topic line, you're being a bit too clever, if I may say so.
> The difference between November and now is that Russia never was an
> issue in the elections other than the meddling.
 
That's pretty silly. US relations with Russia are always important in
the US, and it was a pretty big foreign policy issue in the election.
There were significant tensions with Russia leading up to the vote,
especially once Russia began airstrikes in Syria in late September.
 
Bottom line is that Hillary supporters have been massively hypocrital
about "meddling". Nary a word of complaint about Obama's attempts to
influence the Brexit vote. Everyone with a stake in an election -
including foreign governments - try to influence them one way or another.
 
Crossing the line means actually tampering with the mechanisms of voting
- voting rollings, machines, etc. Everything else is just whining.
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.los>: May 05 03:55PM +0300

On 5.5.2017 15:09, stephenJ wrote:
 
> Bottom line is that Hillary supporters have been massively hypocrital
> about "meddling". Nary a word of complaint about Obama's attempts to
> influence the Brexit vote.
 
Why should there have been?
 
Voicing an opinion is not the "moral equivalent" of illegal breaking
into computers. It's ludicrous to expect a POTUS *not* to have/voice an
opinion on topics like Brexit.
 
Drawing a parallel between Obama's opinions an Russian tampering is
idiotic. You come up with these DF/court speed correlations a bit too
often for my tastes.
 
> including foreign governments - try to influence them one way or another.
 
> Crossing the line means actually tampering with the mechanisms of voting
> - voting rollings, machines, etc. Everything else is just whining.
 
What does your attempt at defining what constitutes what have to do with
the present, namely Brexit and the UK vote situation?
 
Please, keep your eye on the ball. If you don't know what the ball is,
find out.
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: May 05 08:25AM -0500

On 5/5/2017 7:55 AM, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
 
> Voicing an opinion is not the "moral equivalent" of illegal breaking
> into computers. It's ludicrous to expect a POTUS *not* to have/voice an
> opinion on topics like Brexit.
 
Sad that you would have to invoke "illegality" of methods here, as that
is and was manifestly not what Hillary-loving complainers about Russian
meddling complained about. The issue here is a foreign entity's attempt
to impact another country's election, not the method used. Obama
attempted to sway the Brexit vote in a much more overt and public way
than the Russians did the US vote via hacking. Is public more effective
than covert email hacking? I don't know, but the attempted impact was
the same, and the moral equivalence is clear.
 
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
"Pelle Svanslös" <pelle@svans.los>: May 05 05:50PM +0300

On 5.5.2017 16:25, stephenJ wrote:
 
> Sad that you would have to invoke "illegality" of methods here, as that
> is and was manifestly not what Hillary-loving complainers about Russian
> meddling complained about.
 
I can't be answering what "Hillary-loving complainers" are supposedly
doing. But it's clear as a whistle that the end does not justify means.
 
There's also the possibility that Obama was simply voicing the truth
about who is in what place in the trade queue. Initially, Trump-o was
eager to reverse what Obama said but has now come to the Obama stance.
Maybe after somebody told him the EU is 300 and the UK 60 M.
 
If you see saying the truth as manipulating, so be it. But this line of
discussion is completely irrelevant to the UK vote and EU's place in
that. You'll be discussing it alone.
 
The EU OTOH is a reluctant but a Cameroon invited guest in the UK
election. None of us would care a hoot unless ...
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 05 01:22PM +0200

Fires his entire camp, Vajda, fitness coaches, everyone.
 
Says he still enjoys tennis and is eternally grateful to these men
for their dedication and success they've helped him to hsve, but
wants "new challenges".
 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: May 06 12:25AM +1000

On 5/05/2017 9:22 PM, *skriptis wrote:
 
> Says he still enjoys tennis and is eternally grateful to these men
> for their dedication and success they've helped him to hsve, but
> wants "new challenges".
 
Must be the Trump effect. Clearing the swamp?
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 04 11:59PM -0700

On Friday, 5 May 2017 03:33:23 UTC+1, John Liang wrote:
 
> > --
> > "A GOAT who isn't BOAT can never become GOAT if he plays alongside BOAT"
 
> Then again Mac claim to have more talent in his little pinky than Lendl's whole body, that really did not reflect in their achievements on court. Lendl was way behind Borg but not far away from Mac and Connors.
 
so he was behind them then. Everyone knows it's because of Mac's amazing year and because of Wimbledon - that's why Raja hates Pat Cash.
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 05 04:31AM -0700

I hate Pat Cash because he is a well known cunt. He was a great player when on fire
Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com>: May 06 12:14AM +1000

On 5/05/2017 4:56 AM, Carey wrote:
> John McEnroe and Ivan Lendl head to head, according to the ATP:
 
> http://www.atpworldtour.com/en/players/fedex-head-2-head/ivan-lendl-vs-john-mcenroe/L018/M047
 
You didn't post Fed v Rafa stats?
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 05 12:34AM -0700

You only can't find something positive to say cos your parents have always voted Democrat and you've been fooled by the media for so long, perhaps look at some other news sources?
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 05 12:37AM -0700

How are you not one of their sheep when you totally agree and comply with absolutely any opinion they make or say?
The Iceberg <iceberg.rules@gmail.com>: May 04 11:53PM -0700

On Friday, 5 May 2017 02:12:11 UTC+1, TennisGuy wrote:
> No funds are received from corporations, government organizations etc.
> So in other words they are not pushing out propaganda or a hidden agenda.
 
> Check it out!
 
Pelle, Brian and PeteWasLucky do not understand why this is wanted/needed LOL
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment