Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: May 10 08:46AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 7:30:02 AM UTC-7, *skriptis wrote:
> his opponents off balance. He's a step ahead of them all the
> time.
> Losers. :)
 
Looking in at "Trump's America" from the slight remove of Canada, the only real issue seems to be "will he survive himself", his anti-governmentalism, the posturing rhetoric, the media savagery, his playing both sides of issues, the lying as normative justification for behaviour, the counter intuitive billionaire as people's champion, the lack of policy knowledge... it's absolutely spellbinding in many ways and such a cautionary tale that most knowledgeable people are worried for the US...
 
P
stephenJ <sjaros3@cox.net>: May 10 11:00AM -0500

On 5/10/2017 9:30 AM, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
> Someone said a few days ago that the President seemed to be settling
> down to a normal, run of the mill Republican. Now he's looking more
> and more like Tricky Dicky!
 
Only to biased Trump haters. :)
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
heyguys00@gmail.com: May 10 09:22AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 10:48:48 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
> Lol 0 evidence of any election hacking - the whole mass media backed her but Hillary lost, Trump won!
 
How much are you getting paid to post russian twitter-bot type posts? If nothing then you're missing out...lol
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: May 10 09:58AM -0700

> On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 10:48:48 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
> > Lol 0 evidence of any election hacking - the whole mass media backed her but Hillary lost, Trump won!
 
> How much are you getting paid to post russian twitter-bot type posts? If nothing then you're missing out...lol
 
Wendy's pays him $5 an hour, to match his talent!
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 10 06:44PM +0200

>> Losers. :)
 
> Looking in at "Trump's America" from the slight remove of Canada, the only real issue seems to be "will he survive himself", his anti-governmentalism, the posturing rhetoric, the media savagery, his playing both sides of issues, the lying as normative justification for behaviour, the counter intuitive billionaire as people's champion, the lack of policy knowledge... it's absolutely spellbinding in many ways and such a cautionary tale that most knowledgeable people are worried for the US...
 
> P
 
Fair points I won't go into arguing, but just this.
The fact he's a billionaire doesn't mean he's disqualified from
being a people's man. Some billionaires love people much more
than some poor or middle class persons do.
 
Of course some billionaires are hyenas and dangerous because of
their wealth and power, but poorer people can be sick perverts
too.
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 10 06:52PM +0200

> On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 10:48:48 AM UTC-4, The Iceberg wrote:
>> Lol 0 evidence of any election hacking - the whole mass media backed her but Hillary lost, Trump won!
 
> How much are you getting paid to post russian twitter-bot type posts? If nothing then you're missing out...lol
 
You think Russians have that much money?
Pay Trump, pay Le Pen, pay brexiters, pay rst guys? Etc
 
Their economy is on pair with Italy I believe, which is not great,
considering they have 2.5 more population and vast country to
govern, so huge expenses.
Of course, immense devastation, many wars, demographic losses in
past 100 years are much to blame.
 
So, where does the money come from?
 
 
I think you're just a feeble minded individual who's swallowing
mass media shit in huge quantities since it's a comfort
zone?
You're letting them to influence your judgement, no?
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: May 10 06:03PM +0100

On 10/05/2017 15:54, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> Brian is a big Hillary fan, he would like there to be more than what actually happened.
 
Broken record :-)
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: May 10 06:10PM +0100

On 10/05/2017 15:48, The Iceberg wrote:
 
> Lol 100% evidence of any election hacking - the whole mass media backed her but Hillary lost, Trump won!
 
Fixed it for u :-)
 
I suppose you are aware that the US 'saw' Russia hacking the Macron
campaign? They immediately warned their French counterparts, and have
been liasing with German & British intelligence agencies regarding
potential Russian hacks during their elections.
 
Hillary lost you know, you need to move on.
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
calimero377@gmx.de: May 10 10:14AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 2:31:45 PM UTC+2, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> This has nothing to do with D-Rats, this is all about Trump, Russia and Comey not kissing Trump's behind.
 
But didn't Comey cost your precious Hillary the presidency? Didn't almost all leading DemocRats say they lost trust in him?
 
Max
heyguys00@gmail.com: May 10 10:19AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 1:01:03 PM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:
 
> --
 
> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
Yes, I let facts and information influence my judgment...you ought to try it sometime.
Brian W Lawrence <brian_w_lawrence@msn.com>: May 10 06:25PM +0100

On 10/05/2017 15:20, *skriptis wrote:
 
> Ok, but hasn't basically everyone been saying he's behaved
> unethically during the campaign.
 
Some may have said that, but Trump was praising him before the
election, maybe since too. Everyone is a DJT/WH false claim.
 
> Meaning, you'd have no problem Hilary firing him. Now that Trump
> does it's a problem?
 
The President can fire the FBI Director, but he needs to have a
pretty good reason. Saying 'he wasn't doing a good job' doesn't
satisfy people, including Republicans. And the timing raises even
more questions. Suddenly last week Comey asks the DoJ for more
funding to expand the Russian connection investigations. The WH
panics and asks the DoJ to come up with a reason to fire him. The
President is barely seen for two days, then Comey is 'terminated'.
Sessions' letter was partly cut n pasted from a Hillary memo too :-)
 
> Btw Trump is an entertainer, this is, another move of his to throw
> his opponents off balance. He's a step ahead of them all the
> time.
 
He is a clown, and it's probably deflecting attention from his other
failures too. He certainly makes us laugh at his ignorance and
ineptitude.
 
> Losers. :)
 
The Reps will be in ~18 months, Dems probably controlling the House, the
Senate, and several more state Governors.
 
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
heyguys00@gmail.com: May 10 10:50AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 1:25:59 PM UTC-4, Brian W Lawrence wrote:
 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
 
Not to mention Sean Spicer caught hiding in the bushes from reporters too scared to say why Comey was fired...lol Totally makes it all look like it's on the up and up.
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: May 10 08:37AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 7:17:33 AM UTC-7, soccerfan777 wrote:
> They would make a nice douchy couple
 
Bouchard speaks her mind and takes the winds of criticism... so, nothing really to get too touchy about... Sharapova's a champion and experienced in the PR battles that go with a public life... so, I say settle things on the court and let them be free to dislike one another... :)
 
P
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 10 08:44AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 9:30:03 AM UTC-5, *skriptis wrote:
 
> You're again demonstrating your inability to have a civilised
> dialogue. You're hopeless.
> --
Not with you... why would have civilized dialogue with *YOU*
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 10 08:45AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 10:38:00 AM UTC-5, Patrick Kehoe wrote:
> > They would make a nice douchy couple
 
> Bouchard speaks her mind and takes the winds of criticism... so, nothing really to get too touchy about... Sharapova's a champion and experienced in the PR battles that go with a public life... so, I say settle things on the court and let them be free to dislike one another... :)
 
> P
 
Blame has to fall to Sharapova... she shouldn't have lost that match.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 10 06:54PM +0200

> |
> | ;)
 
> I would imagine court1 is bit like Genie, no? ;-)
 
 
Don't have that vibe. Females are bitches to each other, quite
natural.
 
Feminists otoh are abomination, they're bitching against men and
pursuing unnatural ideologies such as "women solidarity" etc.

 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
soccerfan777 <zepfloyes@gmail.com>: May 10 10:20AM -0700

Court1 is fine, apart from her unusual disdain for all things not Canadian or American or British. You on the other hand are worse than a maggot.
 
PS: nothing wrong with feminists that don't hate men. Not all feminists do.
arahim <arahim_arahim@hotmail.com>: May 10 10:38AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 3:53:19 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
 
> > They would make a nice douchy couple
 
> I like them both in certain respects. They have balls and speak their mind and I usually don't mind what they have to say unlike that fool Gulbis for example. Kyrgios off the court is actually supposed to be the polar opposite of how he is on court. He's supposed to be a mama's boy and is very respectful of his girlfriend publicly which is important.
 
> You know that Bouchard and Sharapova are equally unpopular in the locker room right? I like Sharapova too though.
 
According to Bouchard she is the champion gladiator taking requests from everyone to defeat Sharapova.
 
> Seriously, who wouldn't rather watch a Bouchard-Sharapova match than any other current WTA match-up? They draw in spectators.
 
If so that says more about the quality of WTA tennis than about the watchablity of a Bouchard-Sharapova match.
*skriptis <skriptis@post.t-com.hr>: May 10 07:03PM +0200

> Is Germany on the UN Security Council?
 
You can't be there without nukes.
 
I think someone from Asian subcontinent should be there, that part
of the world, so one of these India/Pakistan. But since they're
regional rivals admitting both would be counterproductive.

 
They should wage a total war against each other until
unconditional surrender with winner getting full UN security
council membership with a veto right, and the losers get annexed.

 
 
--
 
 
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
heyguys00@gmail.com: May 10 09:28AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 5:09:06 AM UTC-4, PeteWasLucky wrote:
> --
 
> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
Just wait til the indictments come out. Supposedly a dozen are ready to go, with more on the way.
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: May 10 08:40AM -0700

On Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 1:53:06 PM UTC-7, StephenJ wrote:
> "Damnit! Trump is getting everything he said he would done and it's
> awful for humanity!".
 
> Any day now?
 
Move just a bit too far left OR right on the political spectrum in the US and everyone sounds a few items short on their grocery lists...
 
P
heyguys00@gmail.com: May 10 09:26AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 11:01:03 AM UTC-4, *skriptis wrote:
> --
 
> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/
 
Because the law says so.
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: May 10 09:02AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 4:43:07 AM UTC-7, Whisper wrote:
> chances to seal that match.
 
> Maybe if Rafa has the worst day of his life & Fed goes for the lines it
> may happen?
 
Rafa would just/normally mug Federer at Roland Garros... that much hasn't changed in men's tennis... :)
 
P
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: May 10 08:57AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 4:38:27 AM UTC-7, Whisper wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 9:02 AM, soccerfan777 wrote:
> > Justin Beiber,the greatest thing to come out of Canada after Celine Dion
 
> Buble?
 
:))))))))
 
 
P
John Liang <jliang70@gmail.com>: May 10 07:54AM -0700

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 12:28:24 AM UTC+10, Pelle Svanslös wrote:
 
> Which reminds me ... recently bumped into this:
 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgB5dNcsLh8
 
> Entertaining.
 
If Nadal was like Muster he probably would burn out very quickly but he could have around 80-90 clay court titles.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment