Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 6 topics

Thursday, May 18, 2017

"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 07:41AM -0700

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-contacts-idUSKCN18E106?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social
 
Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump's campaign were in contact with Russian officials and others with Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told Reuters.
 
The previously undisclosed interactions form part of the record now being reviewed by FBI and congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the U.S. presidential election and contacts between Trump's campaign and Russia.
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 18 01:25PM -0400

"John B." wrote in message
news:633aae2b-c5f5-44f2-9cb6-7e0d2a51fdb9@googlegroups.com...
 
>reviewed by FBI and congressional investigators probing Russian
>interference in the U.S. presidential election and >contacts between Trump's
>campaign and Russia.
 
Got a name on who disclosed that info?
 
Possibly the tooth fairy?
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: May 18 12:48PM -0500

Michael P wrote:
>> Trump's campaign and Russia.
 
> Got a name on who disclosed that info?
 
> Possibly the tooth fairy?
 
The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no
evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in
the communications reviewed so far.
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 01:00PM -0500


>The people who described the contacts to Reuters said they had seen no
>evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between the campaign and Russia in
>the communications reviewed so far.
 
Isn't the problem not only wrongdoing or collusion but the call
itself? Were they supposed to make any contact at all?
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: May 18 01:09PM -0500

>> the communications reviewed so far.
 
> Isn't the problem not only wrongdoing or collusion but the call
> itself? Were they supposed to make any contact at all?
 
The REAL scandal is the unmasking that took place. Collusion is not a crime.
Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org>: May 18 05:17AM

A wig ain't that expensive shit stain!
 
No wonder you hide behind a computer. If you were out in public, you would be laughed at.
 
You are laughable dude, of course you remain in perpetual denial. You win!!! LOL
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: May 18 07:00AM +0200

Thanks dipshit!
 
No need to watch the news with you around.
 
You cut and paste and give us the news.
 
Shit, you must be really bored. Please keep on troll!
 
Maybe take one hour off and get a wig dude. Look in the mirror, really look!
 
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: May 18 07:39AM -0400

On 05/17/2017 11:18 PM, Dene wrote:
>> yet another impeachable offense. He's an idiot, a walking train wreck.
 
> "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting
> Flynn go. He is a good guy." That statement is an impeachable offense.

Correct.
 
 
>> Again, it'll be the Republicans who'll slide the knife in. The Dems don't
>> have the votes to do it by themselves.
 
> True. Republicans are generally law and order people.

I guess you can think that if it makes you feel better, but it's purely a
political calculation. As Trump's ratings continue to tank he will become
such a re-election liability that it will make sense to break with the
party. And it will be relatively safe after the trailblazers make the
outcome inevitable.
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 18 04:53AM -0700

Carbon wrote:
 
RE: Republicans being "law & order"
 
> such a re-election liability that it will make sense to break with the
> party. And it will be relatively safe after the trailblazers make the
> outcome inevitable.
 
The terminology of "Law & Order" carries undertones other than of equality
& justice. It is more White Privilege, as illustrated how "inner city" crack use
was penalized much more severely than the cocaine used in white suburbs,
as well as how white collar crime gets minimal punishment in comparison to
other crimes.
 
Similarly, look at how anti-consumer protection the Republican platforms have
been, even when raised literally to blatant violations of the intent of the law.
Case I point, how we were about to finally get fiduciary ethical requirements
for brokers...but which has been deliberately obstructed. Think about this the
next time we all open a quarterly statement on our retirement accounts.
 
-hh
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 08:46AM -0500

>> twelfth in the list of best presidents. Trump is in the bottom three
>> already.
 
>So says you and people who think like you.
 
Cop out.
So says historians that have no agenda except to study such.
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 08:48AM -0500


> "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting
>Flynn go. He is a good guy." That statement is an impeachable offense.
 
>LOLOLOLOL!
 
With the new guy running the investigation, it may be.
 
>> Again, it'll be the Republicans who'll slide the knife in. The Dems don't
>> have the votes to do it by themselves.
 
>True. Republicans are generally law and order people.
 
Democrats aren't? BS
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 08:51AM -0500

On Wed, 17 May 2017 21:47:33 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
 
>>>>>> His poll numbers have already impeded his agenda. The White House is
>>>>>> consumed with damage control and very little in the way of policy-
>>>>>> making is going on.
 
Damage control because of Trump's damages.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 07:32AM -0700

> That is absolutely ridiculous. Historians have already placed him
> twelfth in the list of best presidents. Trump is in the bottom three
> already.
 
He'll end up 45th out of 45.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 07:34AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 11:19:01 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting
> Flynn go. He is a good guy." That statement is an impeachable offense.
 
> LOLOLOLOL!
 
It's called obstruction of justice.
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 17 06:27PM -0700

On 2017-05-17 6:25 PM, Dene wrote:
 
>> Lame!
 
> Lame accusations. You have no evidence that he committed an impeachable
> offense. Even Pelosi hasn't jumped on that silly bandwagon.
 
You need to catch up to the orchestra, son.
 
<https://www.google.ca/search?q=republicans+trump+impeachment&oq=republicans+trump+impeachment&aqs=chrome..69i57.7507j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8>
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 17 06:25PM -0700

On 2017-05-17 6:21 PM, Dene wrote:
>> going to stop blaming the press for all his shortcomings?
 
> Hmmmmm...
 
> Healthcare reform
 
Which hasn't happened, nor is it likely to.
 
> Border control
> Jobs
 
Nothing he's done.
 
> Stock market up
 
Wishful thinking.
 
> Tax reform initiation
 
Nothing done. Just talk.
 
> Firing Comey
 
Obstruction of justice.
 
> Re-doing trade agreements
 
That hasn't happened.
 
> Syria attack
 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
 
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 17 06:29PM -0700

On 5/17/2017 4:00 PM, Carbon wrote:
> out.
 
> You can deny it all you want. It's still going to happen, sooner rather
> than later.
 
You cannot conceive of the likelihood that Trump and his campaign are
innocent of collusion, can you? Soon you will turn against Mueller.
 
One thing is certain. Leakers have committed crimes and hopefully that
will lead to prosecutions.
 
Another thing is certain too. Speculation will lead on Cable news and
leftists like the R.A.T. (resident asshole troll) will clog RSG with one
speculative article after another.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 17 06:25PM -0700

On 5/17/2017 4:07 PM, Carbon wrote:
 
> Agree! Trump got caught committing two impeachable offenses just this past
> week and Obama didn't get caught even once in his eight years in office.
 
> Lame!
 
Lame accusations. You have no evidence that he committed an impeachable
offense. Even Pelosi hasn't jumped on that silly bandwagon.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 17 06:21PM -0700

On 5/17/2017 3:33 PM, John B. wrote:
>> making is going on.
 
>> --------
 
>> He's done more in the last hundred days then your empty suit did in
six years. Trump will learn how to deal with the press. I hope he quits
the briefings and just gives the biased bastards a sheet of paper.
 
> He hasn't done a goddamn thing in the last 100 days except make
> a fool of himself every time he opens his mouth. When are you
> going to stop blaming the press for all his shortcomings?
 
Hmmmmm...
 
Healthcare reform
Border control
Jobs
Stock market up
Tax reform initiation
Firing Comey
Re-doing trade agreements
Syria attack
 
There is more but your Trump hate clouds your vision.
BK@Onramp.net: May 17 09:32PM -0500

> > going to stop blaming the press for all his shortcomings?
 
>Hmmmmm...
 
>Healthcare reform
Not yet, if ever.
>Border control
Minimal at best Greg.
>Jobs
To date the large job numbers still belong to the last administration.
>Stock market up
Stock market tanked today.
>Tax reform initiation
Wait and see.
>Firing Comey
Stupid act. He's being nailed for it...and by Republicans.
>Re-doing trade agreements
One with China.
>Syria attack
What else could he do?
 
>There is more but your Trump hate clouds your vision.
 
Why don't you list the fuckups? There is a ton of them.
BK@Onramp.net: May 17 09:35PM -0500


>> Lame!
 
>Lame accusations. You have no evidence that he committed an impeachable
>offense. Even Pelosi hasn't jumped on that silly bandwagon.
 
The silliness is your statement that Trump has done more than Obama.
That is absolutely ridiculous. Historians have already placed him
twelfth in the list of best presidents. Trump is in the bottom three
already.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 17 08:18PM -0700

On 5/17/2017 8:10 PM, Carbon wrote:
> justice. Then he admits to firing Comey because he won't stop the Russia
> investigation. And then he gives top secret information to the Russians,
> yet another impeachable offense. He's an idiot, a walking train wreck.
 
"I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting
Flynn go. He is a good guy." That statement is an impeachable offense.
 
LOLOLOLOL!
 
> Again, it'll be the Republicans who'll slide the knife in. The Dems don't
> have the votes to do it by themselves.
 
True. Republicans are generally law and order people.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 17 09:47PM -0700

On 2017-05-17 8:12 PM, Dene wrote:
 
>>> There is more but your Trump hate clouds your vision.
 
>> Why don't you list the fuckups? There is a ton of them.
 
> I answered John's question.
 
John's question was (and I quote):
 
'When are you going to stop blaming the press for all his shortcomings?'
 
You didn't so much as acknowledge his question.
BK@Onramp.net: May 17 09:13PM -0500

On Wed, 17 May 2017 18:08:42 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
>> they aren't lies. But you have to have an excuse. It would bother me
>> except you're beneath respect.
 
>I bother you plenty. :-)
 
Your lack of intelligence does. That's what all Trump backers have in
common.
Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org>: May 18 03:17AM

What a fucking existence!
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment