Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 3 topics

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 12:41PM -0700

> "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting
> Flynn go. He is a good guy." That statement is an impeachable offense.
 
 
It's called obstruction of justice.
 
------
 
Witch-hunt is more accurate.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 12:44PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 12:41 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> It's called obstruction of justice.
 
> ------
 
> Witch-hunt is more accurate.
 
LOL!
 
This is HILARIOUS.
 
We have the Director of the FBI reporting that Trump wanted him to let
someone under investigation get free pass...
 
...and THAT's what you're calling a witch-hunt?
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 03:28PM -0500

On Thu, 18 May 2017 12:41:17 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
>It's called obstruction of justice.
 
>------
 
>Witch-hunt is more accurate.
 
That's what you want it to be, but we don't know what the ruling will
be.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 01:45PM -0700


>> John's question was (and I quote):
 
>> 'When are you going to stop blaming the press for all his shortcomings?'
 
>> You didn't so much as acknowledge his question.
 
I replied to his post.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 01:46PM -0700


>> Witch-hunt is more accurate.
 
> That's what you want it to be, but we don't know what the ruling will
> be.
 
It will be interesting if the Dems accept the ruling, especially if it
proves there was no collusion.
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 18 01:54PM -0700

Dene wrote:
 
>> That's what you want it to be, but we don't know what the ruling will be.
 
> It will be interesting if the Dems accept the ruling, especially if it
> proves there was no collusion.
 
It will be even more revealing to watch who rejects it, especially if the
pronouncement is a bad one for Trump, et al.
 
 
-hh
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 02:55PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 3:41:19 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> It's called obstruction of justice.
 
> ------
 
> Witch-hunt is more accurate.
 
So, it's your opinion that Trump has done nothing wrong and
no investigation of anything is called for?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 04:05PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 1:45 PM, Dene wrote:
 
>>> 'When are you going to stop blaming the press for all his shortcomings?'
 
>>> You didn't so much as acknowledge his question.
 
> I replied to his post.
 
You claimed you answered his question.
 
You lied.
 
:-)
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 12:38PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 12:27 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
> Of course you do. You aren't smart enough to discern truth from
> lies so you repeat the lies.
 
> The article states these contacts happened after the election.
 
Quote that part...
 
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 12:38PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 12:27 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> How do YOU claim to know that, doofus?
 
> I read the article.
 
So quote the text...
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 12:38PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 12:28 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> "But, but, but... ...Obama!"
 
>> Are you saying that such talks were wrong, doofus?
 
> You are.
 
I'm asking you for your stance...
 
 
...are you afraid to take one?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 12:46PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 12:44 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> "But, but, but... ...Obama!"
 
>> Are you saying that such talks were wrong, doofus?
 
> Obviously you think it is only wrong when Trump does it.
 
I'm asking you what YOU think...
 
..and you keep ducking.
 
:-)
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 03:25PM -0500

On Thu, 18 May 2017 14:27:07 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
> lies so you repeat the lies.
 
>The article states these contacts happened after the election.
> You base your opinion on the headlines.
 
Went over your head huh? Crying "wolf", or in your case, "fake news",
is a definite sign that you have nothing, just blathering.
 
As far as intelligence you come in last on RSG.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 12:23PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 11:34 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
> Since the libs are so concerned about contacts with foreign
> governments this will make them livid.
 
> http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/129728
 
"But, but, but... ...Obama!"
 
Are you saying that such talks were wrong, doofus?
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 18 01:59PM -0700


>> Isn't the problem not only wrongdoing or collusion but the call
>> itself? Were they supposed to make any contact at all?
 
>The REAL scandal is the unmasking that took place. Collusion is not a crime.
 
Gosh, it looks like MNMike forgot to look up the definition of "Collusion"
(hint: it is, by formal & literal definition, a specific type of crime).
 
FYI, so too is something called "Obstruction of Justice".
 
But do continue to believe in the miracles promised to you by what's increasingly
becoming the 21st Century IRL version of the Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight.
 
 
 
-hh
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 02:56PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 2:09:21 PM UTC-4, MNMikeW wrote:
 
> > Isn't the problem not only wrongdoing or collusion but the call
> > itself? Were they supposed to make any contact at all?
 
> The REAL scandal is the unmasking that took place. Collusion is not a crime.
 
Collusion is a crime. Unmasking is not.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 02:59PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 3:38:29 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > Of course you do. You aren't smart enough to discern truth from
> > lies so you repeat the lies.
 
> > The article states these contacts happened after the election.
 
If the contacts were criminal in nature, it doesn't matter whether
they happened before or after the election.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 03:59PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 12:49 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
> Really?
 
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/05/susan-rices-alleged-unm
> asking-requests-not-so-routine-ex-officials-say.html
 
Nothing in that refutes what I said, doofus.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 04:03PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 12:51 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> So quote the text...
 
> Bwaahaahaa. Go fuck yourself. Read the cite.
 
I did.
 
First paragraph (emphasis mine)
 
"Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump's campaign were in
contact with Russian officials and others with Kremlin ties in at least
18 calls and emails DURING THE LAST SEVEN MONTHS OF THE 2016
PRESIDENTIAL RACE...
 
And again:
 
'The 18 calls and electronic messages took place between April and
November 2016'
 
The only place it mentions anything after the election is only with
regard to Flynn talking to others, but they are talking about other
people than Flynn in the article.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 04:04PM -0700

On 2017-05-18 3:55 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> they happened before or after the election.
 
> Bwaahaahaa. The imagination of these fucks is amazing. Don't they
> read Congressional testimony?
 
What testimony are you alluding to?
 
I bet you'll produce no text that backs up your implied refutation.
 
:-)
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 18 07:33PM

Moderate wrote:
 
> "John B." <johnb505@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-contacts-idUSKCN18E106?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=Social
 
> More unknown undisclosed sources.
 
> This is as meaningless as the Comey note fiction.
 
> We already know this took place after the election.
 
 
"during the last seven months of the 2016 presidential race"
 
You shouldn't say "we" in an inclusive manner when you mean exclusively
you and some other delusional doofus.
 
--
Most people believe there is truth and there are lies. "Alternative
facts" are lies.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 18 02:44PM -0500


>> http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/129728
 
> "But, but, but... ...Obama!"
 
> Are you saying that such talks were wrong, doofus?
 
Obviously you think it is only wrong when Trump does it.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 18 02:49PM -0500


> And the people doing it literally CANNOT KNOW that they were unmasking
> Trump's people...
 
> ...BECAUSE THE NAMES WERE MASKED!
 
Really?
 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/05/susan-rices-alleged-unm
asking-requests-not-so-routine-ex-officials-say.html
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 18 02:51PM -0500


>> I read the article.
 
> So quote the text...
 
Bwaahaahaa. Go fuck yourself. Read the cite.
--
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 18 09:36PM

Moderate wrote:
 
> lies so you repeat the lies.
 
> The article states these contacts happened after the election.
> You base your opinion on the headlines.
 
The article states
 
"The 18 calls and electronic messages took place between April and
November 2016"
 
I can discern your lie.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment