Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 05:57PM -0700

On 5/18/2017 2:55 PM, John B. wrote:
 
>> Witch-hunt is more accurate.
 
> So, it's your opinion that Trump has done nothing wrong and
> no investigation of anything is called for?
 
Investigation is warranted.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 05:58PM -0700

On 5/18/2017 1:54 PM, -hh wrote:
 
> It will be even more revealing to watch who rejects it, especially if the
> pronouncement is a bad one for Trump, et al.
 
> -hh
 
I will accept the report, regardless of the outcome.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 06:13PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 4:54:10 PM UTC-4, -hh wrote:
 
> It will be even more revealing to watch who rejects it, especially if the
> pronouncement is a bad one for Trump, et al.
 
> -hh
 
At this point, a report charging Trump with criminal behavior won't
lead many congressional Republicans to defend him. Very few of them
like him and his approval rating is in the toilet.
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 08:18PM -0500


>> So, it's your opinion that Trump has done nothing wrong and
>> no investigation of anything is called for?
 
>Investigation is warranted.
 
But you just said (above) that it's a witch-hunt. Can't be both Greg.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 07:18PM -0700

> >> no investigation of anything is called for?
 
> >Investigation is warranted.
 
> But you just said (above) that it's a witch-hunt. Can't be both Greg.
 
It's a witch hunt and it's best resolution is an authentic, bi-partisan investigation.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 07:19PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 5:13:10 PM UTC-8, John B. wrote:
 
> At this point, a report charging Trump with criminal behavior won't
> lead many congressional Republicans to defend him. Very few of them
> like him and his approval rating is in the toilet.
 
Agreed. Then President Pence will sign the Republican agenda. All good.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: May 18 10:35PM -0400

On 05/18/2017 10:19 PM, Dene wrote:
>> lead many congressional Republicans to defend him. Very few of them
>> like him and his approval rating is in the toilet.
 
> Agreed. Then President Pence will sign the Republican agenda. All good.

If the presidency was gained via illegal means then there should be another election.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 07:44PM -0700

> Agreed. Then President Pence will sign the Republican agenda. All good.

If the presidency was gained via illegal means then there should be another election.
 
Wow! Still believe the Russians influenced the election. Helluva stretch.
Seriously doubt if that the succession of powers has a provision for your whacked conspiracy theory.
However, I am certain that the far left will create dirt on Pence and the presstitutes will broadcast it.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 07:46PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 10:18:23 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> > >Investigation is warranted.
 
> > But you just said (above) that it's a witch-hunt. Can't be both Greg.
 
> It's a witch hunt and it's best resolution is an authentic, bi-partisan investigation.
 
If it were a witch hunt, no investigation would be required.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 07:46PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 10:19:34 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
> > lead many congressional Republicans to defend him. Very few of them
> > like him and his approval rating is in the toilet.
 
> Agreed. Then President Pence will sign the Republican agenda. All good.
 
There's more to being president than signing things.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 07:48PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 10:45:02 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> Wow! Still believe the Russians influenced the election. Helluva stretch.
> Seriously doubt if that the succession of powers has a provision for your whacked conspiracy theory.
> However, I am certain that the far left will create dirt on Pence and the presstitutes will broadcast it.
 
I don't believe, I KNOW, that the Russians TRIED to influence the
election.
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 09:54PM -0500

On Thu, 18 May 2017 19:18:21 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> >Investigation is warranted.
 
>> But you just said (above) that it's a witch-hunt. Can't be both Greg.
 
>It's a witch hunt and it's best resolution is an authentic, bi-partisan investigation.
 
LOL.
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 07:52PM -0500

On Thu, 18 May 2017 18:52:01 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>Remember that time when fake news was used to set up a special
> counsel by the people who wanted a special council?
 
No, but it's memorable that you use the term any time you don't have
anything concrete to further your personal agenda.
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 06:08PM -0700

> > counsel by the people who wanted a special council?
 
> No, but it's memorable that you use the term any time you don't have
> anything concrete to further your personal agenda.
 
I don't remember that, either. Fake news consists of things like the
report that Hillary Clinton and others were running a child prostitution
ring out of a pizza restaurant in DC. Or that Obama was born in Kenya.
Or that Michelle Obama is a transsexual. Those were fake news stories.
Some have broadened the term to describe any news report they don't
like.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 07:52PM -0700

I don't remember that, either. Fake news consists of things like the
report that Hillary Clinton and others were running a child prostitution
ring out of a pizza restaurant in DC. Or that Obama was born in Kenya.
Or that Michelle Obama is a transsexual. Those were fake news stories.
Some have broadened the term to describe any news report they don't like.
 
Or that Comey was fired because he requested more resources..
Or that MLK bust was removed from the Oval Office...
Or.... https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/four-fake-news-stories-liberals-gobbled-up-this-week
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 06:30PM -0700

Trump called Comey a few weeks after taking office and asked him
when he would publicly state that Trump wasn't under investigation.
Comey told his that if he wanted to know the status of an
investigation, he should not contact Comey directly, but go through
the proper channels.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/us/politics/james-comey-memo-fbi-trump.html?_r=0
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 07:46PM -0700

Trump called Comey a few weeks after taking office and asked him
when he would publicly state that Trump wasn't under investigation.
Comey told his that if he wanted to know the status of an
investigation, he should not contact Comey directly, but go through
the proper channels.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/us/politics/james-comey-memo-fbi-trump.html?_r=0
 
That inquiry, assuming it's true, is obstruction of justice?
Good grief.
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 06:10PM -0500

On Thu, 18 May 2017 16:03:06 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
 
>The only place it mentions anything after the election is only with
>regard to Flynn talking to others, but they are talking about other
>people than Flynn in the article.
 
Well Mod, I guess when you say that no one here nails your ass this
proves quite the opposite. You always make claims that are bogus,
hoping that no one fact checks you. Tsk, Tsk.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: May 18 09:50PM -0400

On 05/18/2017 02:09 PM, MNMikeW wrote:
 
>> Isn't the problem not only wrongdoing or collusion but the call
>> itself? Were they supposed to make any contact at all?
 
> The REAL scandal is the unmasking that took place. Collusion is not a crime.

OMFG. You serious?
 
1. Unmasking was perfectly legal.
 
2. Collusion is a crime.
 
Not bad for one line.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 04:30PM -0700

...was copied from Obama!
 
'"My initial reaction to the order is, 'this is great,'" former National
Security Council Director for Cybersecurity Policy Ben Flatgard told
Ars. "Trump just endorsed Barack Obama's cybersecurity policy." Flatgard
was one of the principal authors of the Obama administration's Cyber
National Action Plan (CNAP), published in February of 2016.'
 
<https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/05/the-text-and-subtext-of-trumps-cyber-executive-order/>
 
:-)
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 18 06:04PM -0700

On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 7:30:30 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
> National Action Plan (CNAP), published in February of 2016.'
 
> <https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/05/the-text-and-subtext-of-trumps-cyber-executive-order/>
 
> :-)
 
 
Parts of Trump's commencement speech at the Coast Guard Academy
were plagiarized from the speech that Reese Witherspoon gave in
Legally Blonde.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 18 05:55PM -0500


>> > The article states these contacts happened after the election.
 
> If the contacts were criminal in nature, it doesn't matter whether
> they happened before or after the election.
 
Bwaahaahaa. The imagination of these fucks is amazing. Don't they
read Congressional testimony?
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 18 06:52PM -0500

Remember that time when fake news was used to set up a special
counsel by the people who wanted a special council?
--
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 18 04:37PM -0700

'Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) is expected to announce Thursday that he
is resigning before the end of this congressional term, according to
three sources familiar with his plans.
 
Chaffetz did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday evening or
Thursday morning. Multiple sources say he will leave Congress on June 30.'
 
<http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/18/chaffetz-to-announce-early-departure-from-congress-238550>
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 18 08:36AM -0400

You should beg mommie for some hair plugs and chin augmentation, Shit Stain.
 
Won't make a homely looking mutt like you look any better, but, you can fool
yourself into thinking they do.
 
You're great at fooling yourself.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment