Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 5 topics

Friday, May 19, 2017

BK@Onramp.net: May 18 09:59PM -0500

On Thu, 18 May 2017 19:19:33 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> lead many congressional Republicans to defend him. Very few of them
>> like him and his approval rating is in the toilet.
 
>Agreed. Then President Pence will sign the Republican agenda. All good.
 
I think not. Pence just went along with Trump. He never voiced
anything like his agenda before 2016. He might be better, but he has
a lot of baggage of his own.
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 10:03PM -0500

On Thu, 18 May 2017 19:44:59 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
>Wow! Still believe the Russians influenced the election. Helluva stretch.
>Seriously doubt if that the succession of powers has a provision for your whacked conspiracy theory.
>However, I am certain that the far left will create dirt on Pence and the presstitutes will broadcast it.
 
What the hell was that??. Carbs said nothing about the Russians. But
if Trump leaves for any reason his veep would become POTUS.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 08:11PM -0700

- hide quoted text -
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 10:45:02 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
 
> Wow! Still believe the Russians influenced the election. Helluva stretch.
> Seriously doubt if that the succession of powers has a provision for your whacked conspiracy theory.
> However, I am certain that the far left will create dirt on Pence and the presstitutes will broadcast it.
 
I don't believe, I KNOW, that the Russians TRIED to influence the
election.
 
I agree but they did not succeed, hence no basis for Carb's wet dream.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 08:13PM -0700

On Thu, 18 May 2017 19:44:59 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gds...@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
- show quoted text -
What the hell was that??. Carbs said nothing about the Russians. But
if Trump leaves for any reason his veep would become POTUS.
 
Then what election illegality was he referring to?
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 08:15PM -0700

On Thu, 18 May 2017 19:19:33 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gds...@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> lead many congressional Republicans to defend him. Very few of them
>> like him and his approval rating is in the toilet.
 
>Agreed. Then President Pence will sign the Republican agenda. All good.
 
I think not. Pence just went along with Trump. He never voiced
anything like his agenda before 2016. He might be better, but he has
a lot of baggage of his own.
 
And so it begins…
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 19 12:38AM -0700

On 2017-05-18 8:11 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> I don't believe, I KNOW, that the Russians TRIED to influence the
> election.
 
> I agree but they did not succeed, hence no basis for Carb's wet dream.
 
How do you KNOW they didn't succeed, Greg?
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 19 05:56AM

Alan Baker wrote:
 
 
> Chaffetz did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday evening
> or Thursday morning. Multiple sources say he will leave Congress on
> June 30.'
 
<http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/18/chaffetz-to-announce-early-departure-from-congress-238550>
 
Pass the poisoned chalice on the right hand side.
 
--
Most people believe there is truth and there are lies. "Alternative
facts" are lies.
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 19 06:07AM

Dene wrote:
 
> ump.html?_r=0
 
> That inquiry, assuming it's true, is obstruction of justice?
> Good grief.
 
It certainly could been seen as such depending on wording and tone,
together with other such instances.
 
A person in a position of authority directly contacting the person
responsible for investigating "your" conduct urging them to state you
are not under investigation could easily be construed as intimidation.
That's why it is against the rules.
 
Are you forgetting Trump was in the "hire and fire" position?
 
No wonder you have trouble with the concept of sexual harrassment in
the workplace also.
 
--
Most people believe there is truth and there are lies. "Alternative
facts" are lies.
BK@Onramp.net: May 18 10:06PM -0500

On Thu, 18 May 2017 19:46:32 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/us/politics/james-comey-memo-fbi-trump.html?_r=0
 
>That inquiry, assuming it's true, is obstruction of justice?
>Good grief.
 
Good grief is right. The assumption is by you. No one inferred that
this was obstruction of justice. It was pointing out that Comey was
leery of Trump and wanted to keep him at a distance.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 08:14PM -0700

On Thu, 18 May 2017 19:46:32 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gds...@aol.com>
wrote:
- show quoted text -
Good grief is right. The assumption is by you. No one inferred that
this was obstruction of justice. It was pointing out that Comey was
leery of Trump and wanted to keep him at a distance.
 
Care to explain John's choice of words in the subject line???
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 18 08:09PM -0700

Forgot this one....
 
President Trump invited the Pope for lunch on his mega yacht, the Pope accepted and during lunch, a puff of wind blew the Pontiff's hat off, right into the water.
It floated off about 50 feet, then the wind died down and it just floated in place.
The crew and the secret service were scrambling to launch a boat to go get it, when Trump waved them off, saying "Never mind, boys, I'll get it."
The Donald climbed over the side of the yacht, walked on the water to the hat, picked it up, walked back on the water, climbed into the yacht, and handed the Pope his hat.
The crew was speechless. The security team and the Pope's entourage were speechless.
No one knew what to say, not even the Pope.
But that afternoon, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CNN reported:
"TRUMP CAN'T SWIM"
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 18 08:11AM -0400

keep it up, Shit Stain, we are all laughing...
...at you.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment