Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 3 topics

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 31 05:32AM -0500


> FOS as usual.
 
>>It was a big nothing.
 
> You're a big nothing!
 
The liar lies.
--
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 31 04:01PM

> > a new budget since this agreement was signed.
 
> > -hh
 
> SO WHAT?
 
So it invalidates your assertion and makes you the clown, just like
your misrepresenting hero.
 
> They AGREED to it and MOST don't even COME CLOSE!
 
SO WHAT?
 
Perhaps they don't see the value in spending a million dollars to kill
each "terrorist" when Trumps fat mouth makes a thousand more with every
fat headed racist remark and casual bombing of civilians.
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 31 04:59PM


> > -hh
 
> SO WHAT? They AGREED to it and MOST don't even COME CLOSE! Some would
> only be competitive in a BATTLE OF THE BANDS!
 
"NATO is obsolete"
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 31 12:09PM -0500

> means that they've not defaulted or in violation of anything.
 
> Today's 2017, not 2024: the deadline is still 7 years in the future.
 
> -hh
 
Oh please. They have been under paying for decades.
--
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 31 06:18PM

Dene wrote:
 
> toms...@gmail.com
 
> You're new here
 
Are you sure about that?
 
> wasting your time trying to engage Baker in an honest discussion. He
> only cares about perpetuating the argument into infinity. He's a
> classic troll.
 
He's an ungracious last word junkie but that doesn't mean he hasn't
spanked your arse a good few times and that is why you are so bitter.
 
He has no idea how to close an argument even one he's initially won...
so he ends up losing.
 
Having said that the person you think new knows exactly what he is
about and they seem equally ridiculous in their continuation of a
discussion well beyond sensible comment.
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 31 06:21PM

Moderate wrote:
 
> > future.
 
> > -hh
 
> Oh please. They have been under paying for decades.
 
That is simply an opinon; a ver simple opinion. Many of them have very
different goals to the USA; mutual defense and global domination are
very unequal in terms of costs.
 
--
Donald Trump "NATO is obsolete."
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 01:41PM -0500

BK@Onramp.net: May 31 01:41PM -0500

BK@Onramp.net: May 31 01:42PM -0500

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 31 05:30AM -0700


> > <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nordics-trump-idUSKBN18Q2FU?>
 
> Just like they were laughing when Trump told them point-blank
> to start living up to their NATO 2% of GDP agreement...
 
You do realize that the 2% GDP goal wasn't even agreed to until
2014, right? And that the promise is to hit 2% by 2024, right?
 
After all, developing a new budget with higher spending does
take time. For example, the USA hasn't even written & passed
a new budget since this agreement was signed.
 
 
-hh
tomseim2g@gmail.com: May 31 08:09AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 5:30:51 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
> take time. For example, the USA hasn't even written & passed
> a new budget since this agreement was signed.
 
> -hh
 
SO WHAT? They AGREED to it and MOST don't even COME CLOSE! Some would only be competitive in a BATTLE OF THE BANDS!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 08:12AM -0700

>> a new budget since this agreement was signed.
 
>> -hh
 
> SO WHAT? They AGREED to it and MOST don't even COME CLOSE! Some would only be competitive in a BATTLE OF THE BANDS!
 
Are you having a tantrum?
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 31 09:42AM -0700

> > take time. For example, the USA hasn't even written & passed
> > a new budget since this agreement was signed.
 
> SO WHAT? They AGREED to it and MOST don't even COME CLOSE!...
 
And as per said agreement, they're not required to yet. That
means that they've not defaulted or in violation of anything.
 
Today's 2017, not 2024: the deadline is still 7 years in the future.
 
 
-hh
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 10:43AM -0700

On 2017-05-31 10:09 AM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> -hh
 
> Oh please. They have been under paying for decades.
 
Proof?
 
Support?
 
Do you have ANYTHING?
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 01:36PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 12:09:37 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> Today's 2017, not 2024: the deadline is still 7 years in the future.
 
>> -hh
 
>Oh please. They have been under paying for decades.
 
If there isn't a requirement signed
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 01:36PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 12:09:37 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 01:37PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 12:09:37 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 01:39PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 12:09:37 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> Today's 2017, not 2024: the deadline is still 7 years in the future.
 
>> -hh
 
>Oh please. They have been under paying for decades.
 
Oh please. Not so if they haven't signed the agreement yet. How
stupid can you be? Never mind, we know the answer to that already.
tomseim2g@gmail.com: May 31 08:05AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 11:52:03 PM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > Show me the PROOF that he KNEW this to be untrue.
 
> Before I do.
 
> Tell me that you actually believe that to be true.
 
You're STUMPED AGAIN! Can't provide the PROOF, can you?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 08:06AM -0700


>> Before I do.
 
>> Tell me that you actually believe that to be true.
 
> You're STUMPED AGAIN! Can't provide the PROOF, can you?
 
Why won't you answer?
 
:-)
tomseim2g@gmail.com: May 31 08:33AM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 8:06:09 AM UTC-7, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > You're STUMPED AGAIN! Can't provide the PROOF, can you?
 
> Why won't you answer?
 
> :-)
 
Why won't you? YOU'RE the one making the claim: now BACK IT UP!! Of course you CAN'T!!!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 09:46AM -0700


>> Why won't you answer?
 
>> :-)
 
> Why won't you? YOU'RE the one making the claim: now BACK IT UP!! Of course you CAN'T!!!
 
Why won't you answer?
 
It's because you know its bullshit and you can't bring yourself to say
you believe something so obviously absurd, isn't it?
 
:-)
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 31 09:53AM -0700

> successful. We made and saved the USA many billions of
> dollars and millions of jobs," Trump tweeted.
 
> Show me the PROOF that he KNEW this to be untrue.
 
Has he stopped yet beating his wife?
 
 
-hh
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 10:46AM -0700

toms...@gmail.com
- show quoted text -
Why won't you? YOU'RE the one making the claim: now BACK IT UP!! Of course you CAN'T!!!
 
You're new here so allow me to give you one piece of advice. You are wasting your time trying to engage Baker in an honest discussion. He only cares about perpetuating the argument into infinity. He's a classic troll. I refer to him as the RAT...resident asshole troll.
 
Free country. You are welcome to waste your time with the RAT all you want. Most in here have him on full ignore.
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: May 31 12:54PM -0500

Dene wrote:
> Why won't you? YOU'RE the one making the claim: now BACK IT UP!! Of course you CAN'T!!!
 
> You're new here so allow me to give you one piece of advice. You are wasting your time trying to engage Baker in an honest discussion. He only cares about perpetuating the argument into infinity. He's a classic troll. I refer to him as the RAT...resident asshole troll.
 
> Free country. You are welcome to waste your time with the RAT all you want. Most in here have him on full ignore.
 
The ABC sure has a loyal fan base.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment