Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 21 updates in 7 topics

Sunday, May 14, 2017

"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 13 08:17PM

John B. wrote:
 
> except through a blind trust. So, perhaps you can tell me where
> you got your information about where Obama got all the money
> you say he earned while president.
 
FFS read the flaming link he provided.
 
--
Most people believe there is truth and there are lies. "Alternative
facts" are lies.
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 13 08:11PM


> —
> recusal
> play \-'kyü-z?l\ noun :
 
<sigh>
 
It's boring watching you bozo's play for the minor points, badly, when
there are big scores on the board.
 
One lie does not Trump another.
 
--
Most people believe there is truth and there are lies. "Alternative
facts" are lies.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 13 04:48PM -0500


>>> :-)
 
>>She made the final decision you ass wipe.
 
> Which was to recuse herself, shit-for-brains.
 
You two don't haven't two brain cells between you.
 
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/politics/loretta-lynch-hi
llary-clinton-email-server.html
 
--
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 13 10:43PM

Alan Baker wrote:
 
 
> ...
 
> "The case will be resolved by the team that's been working on it from
> the beginning," [Lynch] said in Aspen'
 
Moderate lies all the time; when you do likewise he thinks he is just
as honest as you.
 
You lose.
 
--
Most people believe there is truth and there are lies. "Alternative
facts" are lies.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 13 09:58PM -0500


> No.
 
> Did he leave the investigation to others in her agency and in the FBI?
 
> Yes.
 
She refused to recuse herself as the NY TIMES reported.
 
You two special needs children can't remember shit or even read.
--
"Welcome to Trumpton" <trumpton@maiIsorter.co.uk>: May 14 06:30AM

Alan Baker wrote:
 
 
> > > > > > She made the final decision you ass wipe.
 
> > > > > Which was to recuse herself, shit-for-brains.
 
> > > > You two don't haven't two brain cells between you.
 
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/politics/loretta-lynch-hi
 
> No.
 
> Did he leave the investigation to others in her agency and in the FBI?
 
> Yes.
 
That's called delegation. That's her job.
 
She distanced herself but she did not officially or unofficially
stepaway from the investigation; she was still ultimately in charge of
what would happen with the data and recommendations that would cross
her desk.
 
You do the research. You know exactly why it is accepted that she did
not recuse herself. She never claims to have recused herself. Others
claimed she recused herself and were publicly slapped down for it.
 
It may sound like recusal to you in the first instance but you know
full well that recusal means having absolutely no involvement in the
outcome.
 
You also know that if the boot were on the other foot you would not
allow moderate to get away with such a liberty. you would be all over
him asking for cites, that you have been unable to provide, and calling
him a liar.
 
What is wrong with you that you couldn't simply moderate your assertion
to "almost as good as recused herself" and continue to make your point,
if you had one. Instead you are too stubborn to take half a step back
onto solid ground preferring getting bogged down in an unwinable fight
where getting the last word is more important than the subject matter
itself.
 
(You are probably typical of most of the Trump supporters that still
claim to strongly approve of their man despite the calamitous way he
goes about the job)
 
You do it every thread. There is so much Trump gold out there and you
spend most of your time mining a spent theme. (seam, get it)
 
You might, for instance, have asked what Jeff Sessions, who did
officially recuse himself
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us/politics/jeff-sessions-russia-trump-investigation-democrats.html
 
was doing getting invovled in the firing of the guy that was in charge
of the investigation he recused himself from.
 
Now that has a bad smell.
 
--
Independent but still waiting for Trump to do something worthy of
approval.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 13 02:08PM -0700

On 2017-05-13 12:11 PM, Moderate wrote:
>> Clinton's emails.
 
>> :-)
 
> She made the final decision you ass wipe.
 
No. She did not.
 
You have nothing.
BK@Onramp.net: May 13 04:35PM -0500

On Sat, 13 May 2017 14:08:55 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
 
>> She made the final decision you ass wipe.
 
>No. She did not.
 
>You have nothing.
 
He's showing a smidge of realization though. He's decided not to
argue with a dictionary. Surprised me!!!
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 13 02:57PM -0700

On 2017-05-13 2:48 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
> You two don't haven't two brain cells between you.
 
> https://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/us/politics/loretta-lynch-hi
> llary-clinton-email-server.html
 
As usual, you provide a cite, but not the text you claim makes your point...
 
But I'll provide the text:
 
'Ms. Lynch said she had decided this spring to defer to the
recommendations of her staff and the F.B.I. because her status as a
political appointee sitting in judgment on a politically charged case
would raise questions of a conflict of interest.
 
...
 
"The case will be resolved by the team that's been working on it from
the beginning," [Lynch] said in Aspen'
BK@Onramp.net: May 13 05:23PM -0500

On Sat, 13 May 2017 14:57:47 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
 
>...
 
>"The case will be resolved by the team that's been working on it from
>the beginning," [Lynch] said in Aspen'
 
What Dumb Fuck is alluding to is that it was said that she couldn't
recuse herself because she was the head of the department and it was
her duty to adjudicate this. Plus, she never used the term recuse. But
it's a stupid person that can't see that she did everything that one
does to recuse themselves from making the final judgment...that was
left to Comey. Mod has very limited comprehension of overt details.
He just can't quite understand some things, like the English language.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 13 03:53PM -0700

On 2017-05-13 3:43 PM, Welcome to Trumpton wrote:
 
> Moderate lies all the time; when you do likewise he thinks he is just
> as honest as you.
 
> You lose.
 
I'm not lying.
 
Did she utter the word, "recusal"?
 
No.
 
Did he leave the investigation to others in her agency and in the FBI?
 
Yes.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 13 06:24PM -0700

On 5/12/2017 2:16 PM, David Laville wrote:
 
>>> Better them than our resident Canadians. ;-)
 
>> Well no, that wouldn't be fair. We didn't buy the election.
 
> Hillary must have bought it since she got 3,000,0000 more votes.
 
Irrelevent votes.
Libs were certain that the Dems were going to take over Congress too.
Why didn't that happen?
Answer...Republicans have a have realistic agenda.
BK@Onramp.net: May 13 08:32PM -0500

>Libs were certain that the Dems were going to take over Congress too.
>Why didn't that happen?
>Answer...Republicans have a have realistic agenda.
 
It certainly hasn't shown, unless you're talking about gerrymandering.
We'll see at the mid-terms if the voters think so.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 13 10:09PM -0700

On 2017-05-13 6:24 PM, Dene wrote:
 
>>> Well no, that wouldn't be fair. We didn't buy the election.
>> Hillary must have bought it since she got 3,000,0000 more votes.
 
> Irrelevent votes.
 
Nope. The fact is that more voters wanted Clinton than wanted Trump.
 
And it would be even more so today.
 
> Libs were certain that the Dems were going to take over Congress too.
 
They did gain ground...
 
> Why didn't that happen?
> Answer...Republicans have a have realistic agenda.
 
And that's why the lost the popular vote for president and lost seats?
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 13 10:10PM -0700

On 2017-05-13 7:58 PM, Moderate wrote:
 
>> Yes.
 
> She refused to recuse herself as the NY TIMES reported.
 
> You two special needs children can't remember shit or even read.
 
She left the decision to the FBI and career prosecutors.
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 13 08:30PM -0400

Someone should take that defect to the pound to be gassed.
"Michael P" <MikePat@aol.com>: May 13 08:27PM -0400

The human POS lives off IT'S mommie and IT'S inheritances.
 
If not for that, the dumb shit would be living in a cardboard box.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 13 03:40PM -0700

...no matter how much you wingnuts wish it were so:
 
On Tuesday, Rosenstein says:
 
'"I cannot defend the director's handling" of the Clinton email
investigation.'
 
On Thursday, Trumps says it was because:
 
'Comey's "a showboat, he's a grandstander, the F.B.I. has been in turmoil."'
 
 
 
On Tuesday, regarding the creation of Rosenstein's memo, Spicer says:
 
'"No one from the White House. That was a D.O.J. decision."'
 
On Wednesday, Huckabee Sanders says:
 
'Trump asked for "their recommendation in writing."'
 
 
 
On Tuesday, Spicer says the decision was made because:
 
'Rosenstein "made a determination" and Trump followed it.'
 
On Thursday, Huckabee Sanders says:
 
'Trump "had already made that decision" before Rosenstein.'
 
 
 
On Tuesday, Conway says:
 
'"This has nothing to do with Russia."'
 
On Thursday, Trump says:
 
'"When I decided to just do it, I said to myself" that "Trump and Russia
is a made-up story."'
 
 
 
On Wednesday, Huckabee Sanders says:
 
'"The rank and file of the F.B.I. had lost confidence."'
 
On Thursday, McCabe says:
 
'Comey has "broad support" and "still does to this day."'
 
 
<https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/12/us/politics/trump-comey-firing-contradictions.html>
 
You know that all of that is true.
 
Deal with it.
 
You're being lied to.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 13 02:22PM -0700

...this time to head the USDA:
 
'The United States Department of Agriculture's research division studies
matters such as nutrition, food distribution, and climate change, and,
according to the 2008 Farm Bill, is meant to be helmed by a "chief
scientist" chosen "from among distinguished scientists."
 
Naturally, President Trump is expected to appoint a man with literally
no science education, much less a career in the discipline, to head the
USDA's research section, a position officially known as the department's
"undersecretary." Instead, Trump's projected pick, Sam Clovis, is a
former tenured business and public policy professor at Morning Side
college who has hardly even published any work in his field, and has
never taken a graduate-level science class, according to a ProPublica
article that came out Friday evening. Obviously Clovis is also very
skeptical about global warming—after all, he studies business, not science.'
 
<http://theslot.jezebel.com/trump-expected-to-pick-former-business-professor-to-ser-1795193297>
 
And for those of you who don't like the source: too bad!
"John B." <johnb505@gmail.com>: May 13 02:38PM -0700

On Saturday, May 13, 2017 at 5:22:14 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
> skeptical about global warming—after all, he studies business, not science.'
 
> <http://theslot.jezebel.com/trump-expected-to-pick-former-business-professor-to-ser-1795193297>
 
> And for those of you who don't like the source: too bad!
 
USDA has already reversed the Obama administration nutrition
standards for school lunch programs. Who cares about children,
right?
Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org>: May 13 09:01PM

The son, well what can we say.
 
We all know, live in denial you repulsive fewl
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment