Digest for rec.sport.football.college@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 13 topics

Thursday, May 11, 2017

Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 02:01PM -0700

<http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/10/noam-chomsky-republican-party-more-dangerous-than-isis-north-korea/>
 
TONIGHT: The Republican party is the most dangerous organisation
in human history – Noam Chomsky tells
#newsnight pic.twitter.com/RQPiuMCpLu
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) May 10, 2017
 
--
Michael Press
Some dued <theodoreward@gmail.com>: May 11 02:08PM -0700

I thought he died?
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 11 09:24PM

On Thu, 11 May 2017 14:01:32 -0700, Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>
wrote:
 
 
><http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/10/noam-chomsky-republican-party-more-dangerous-than-isis-north-korea/>
 
>TONIGHT: The Republican party is the most dangerous organisation
>in human history
 
I certainly hope so. Protestors love their patty cake.
 
Hugh
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 03:19PM -0700

In article <5914d631.100877437@news.eternal-september.org>,
 
> >TONIGHT: The Republican party is the most dangerous organisation
> >in human history
 
> I certainly hope so. Protestors love their patty cake.
 
Thanks for the riposte.
 
I certainly hope so.
 
--
Michael Press
Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: May 11 06:09PM -0400

Merrick Garland
 
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/11/sen-mike-lee-floats-name-for-new-fbi-director-and-its-not-who-youd-think/
Futbol Phan <sgzphd@gmail.com>: May 11 03:17PM -0700

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 5:09:58 PM UTC-5, Ken Olson wrote:
> Merrick Garland
 
> http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/11/sen-mike-lee-floats-name-for-new-fbi-director-and-its-not-who-youd-think/
 
Nope no hypocrisy to see here, move along...
unclejr <watsona64@gmail.com>: May 11 03:15PM -0700

Submitted without further comment.
 
http://nypost.com/2017/05/09/murder-suspect-tries-big-penis-defense-and-it-might-work/
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 01:51PM -0700

Unrestricted "democracy is two wolves and a sheep
voting on what to eat for dinner ... [but in a] 
constitutional republic, the sheep has an AK-47,"
Singh said. 
 
<http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/10/sikhs-launch-advocacy-group/>
<http://tinyurl.com/lpq58km>
 
--
Michael Press
Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: May 11 06:13PM -0400

On 5/11/2017 4:51 PM, Michael Press wrote:
> Singh said.
 
> <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/10/sikhs-launch-advocacy-group/>
> <http://tinyurl.com/lpq58km>
 
Or equivalent. And more. Whatever. It's all good.
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 03:05PM -0700

The Resistance upgrades President Trump's rating
from Hitler to Nixon.
 
--
Michael Press
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 02:59PM -0700

HOST: But Madam Secretary, if he [Putin] indeed did engage in
these types of tactics in our election, then the very legitimacy
of our election is at issue, isn't it?
 
RICE: No, no. That's where I — first of all, I don't want to
question his motives beyond he's an eye for an eye kind of
person. Secondly, I trust the people who voted in Wisconsin and
Texas and Alabama and California to have voted on the basis of
who they thought was best going to represent their interests. And
so I'm not going to question the legitimacy of their vote because
Vladimir Putin tried to interfere in the elections. That's just a
step that I don't think we should take. Let's trust our fellow
citizens to have been smart enough to have voted for the people
they thought they ought to be voting for.
 
Boom!
 
--
Michael Press
Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: May 11 01:52PM -0400

On 5/11/2017 1:26 PM, xyzzy wrote:
>> Michael Press
 
> For the same reason Bill Clinton never fired Janet Reno.
 
> Ethics.
 
Do you mean lack of them?
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: May 11 11:32AM -0700

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 1:52:56 PM UTC-4, Ken Olson wrote:
 
> > For the same reason Bill Clinton never fired Janet Reno.
 
> > Ethics.
 
> Do you mean lack of them?
 
No, she was a thorn in his side and he would have loved to have gotten rid her but unlike Trump he didn't think it was right to fire her when she was investigating members of his administration.
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 11:57AM -0700

In article <77f713b4-fa4b-4bd4-9b18-b0a090726092@googlegroups.com>,
> > Michael Press
 
> For the same reason Bill Clinton never fired Janet Reno.
 
> Ethics.
 
Lack of?
 
James Comey broke the law and arrogated unto himself
authority reserved for the Deputy Attorney General. These are
absolute firing offenses. He did this in summer 2016.
Why didn't President Obama fire James Comey? James Comey
revealed details of an investigation into an un-indicted person.
 
--
Michael Press
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 01:28PM -0700

In article <26bc3a24-c341-4c17-b718-0064d541ad85@googlegroups.com>,
 
> > --
> > Michael Press
 
> You would have been the first one to praise this, amirite?
 
Would I?
You read what I wrote about James Comey here and elsewhere.
 
--
Michael Press
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 11 09:18PM

On Thu, 11 May 2017 10:07:59 -0700, Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>
wrote:
 
> Some dued <theodoreward@gmail.com> wrote:
 
>> Here we go with the Trump justification, so gross.
 
>Why didn't President Obama fire James Comey?
 
There was no cold pail of water to throw on and separate them.
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 02:08PM -0700

ROSIE
@Rosie
Replying to @pricklyeater @brianefallon
 
- FIRE COMEY
3:26 PM - 20 Dec 2016
 
-----
 
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
 
We finally agree on something Rosie. twitter.com/rosie/status/8…
12:55 PM - 11 May 2017
 
-----
 
<https://mobile.twitter.com/Rosie/status/811352134256037889>
<https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/862758098892619780>
 
--
Michael Press
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 01:33PM -0700

In article <3382a8b7-757b-46da-8324-42e19354f04a@googlegroups.com>,
 
> > So you agree that you are doctrinaire.
 
> I don't need an MD to point out you're still rocking 80 column fixed width.
 
> Cheers.
 
7-bit ascii was good enough for my grandfather
and it is good enough for me.
 
--
Michael Press
dotslashderek@gmail.com: May 11 01:40PM -0700

Dinotrinairian!
 
Cheers.
Some dued <theodoreward@gmail.com>: May 11 02:06PM -0700

What a waste of an 8th bit.
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 01:21PM -0700

<http://tinyurl.com/kbbxyqq>
 
--
Michael Press
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 12:02PM -0700

In article <9ecf9125-a982-45c2-a2cc-3adb25d7bd95@googlegroups.com>,
 
> > I thot that this was going to be a post about renaming this chatrum. I think that it's already been renamed to rec.politics.
 
> rec.politics-for-people-that-like-college-football
 
> It's not nearly as bad as the actual politics groups.
 
I do not think it is bad.
 
--
Michael Press
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 11 12:00PM -0700

In article <299109a6-848d-47e6-ba8f-9bce3dd9f189@googlegroups.com>,
 
> > > Cheers.
 
> > Incorrect.
 
> Well that did it. Your single word response "Incorect" converted me and changed my whole world view. Well done!
 
You act as if I am trying to change you.
I am not. Wouldn't if I could.
 
--
Michael Press
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: May 11 10:52AM -0700

On Thursday, May 11, 2017 at 1:35:06 PM UTC-4, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
> > be going to Europe for business this fall and I always pack light and
> > never check bags.
 
> TSA Pre allowed to bring laptops?
 
I doubt it since the proposed rule applies to flights from Europe, where they don't have TSA Pre.
"Con Reeder, unhyphenated American" <constance@duxmail.com>: May 11 01:06PM -0500


>> TSA Pre allowed to bring laptops?
 
> I doubt it since the proposed rule applies to flights from Europe,
> where they don't have TSA Pre.
 
I thought maybe if you were ticketed on a US flight outgoing, that
status could be saved. I don't pay for it, but am frequently (80%)
granted TSA Pre status when I buy a ticket.
 
It seems to me that if you have traveled extensively within the U.S. since
2001, you should be TSA Pre all the time. Especially when you are over 60
years old....that's my guess as to why I rate most of the time.
 
--
An amateur practices until he gets it right. A pro
practices until he can't get it wrong. -- unknown
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.football.college+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment