Digest for rec.sport.football.college@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: May 16 10:53AM -0700

Individuals who are "extremely careless" with classified information should be denied further access to such info.
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 15 04:29PM -0700

In article <ofda8q$c1o$1@dont-email.me>,
 
> That happened in my home area some years ago. It was like the water
> heater was a Minuteman missile launched out of the basement, through 2
> stories, and landed hundreds of feet away.
 
Surprising, too, how straight up they go.
In open air one landed within 10 water heater lengths
of the launch pad.
 
--
Michael Press
YosemiteSam <YosemiteSam@byteme.com>: May 16 06:15AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 8:29:12 AM UTC-4, unclejr wrote:
> > > Unbefckinglievable.
 
> > I'm still waiting to see any evidence of election rigging.
 
> Rigging? No one's claiming this.
 
Then what is the claim? What happened that warrants all the hysteria?
 
I'm not being anything but totally honest with those questions. I haven't seen or read anything that justifies the ranting and raving over Russia's alleged involvement in the election. What exactly did they do?
 
They hacked Clinton's email, ok. What did that do? Cause thousands upon thousands of Clinton voters to suddenly realize they were going to vote for a crooked politician?
 
Believe me, I get all the anxious and on the edge of your seat jitters over Trump, but nobody has shown the light of day on/over anything he's done thus far.
 
Inuendo, speculation, wishful thinking is all that comes from any and all media reports. Not one piece of clear cut evidence of anything.
 
I wouldn't have voted for HRC with a gun to my head. If there were no 3rd party candidate and Trump was the only alternative it would have taken a gun to my head to vote for Trump.
 
My point is, show me the evidence. Anything. One memo, one recorded conversation. A hand written note...something other than a people filled with a level of hatred so intense no one could succeed.
 
~YS~
unclejr <watsona64@gmail.com>: May 16 06:30AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 8:15:58 AM UTC-5, YosemiteSam wrote:
 
> Inuendo, speculation, wishful thinking is all that comes from any and all media reports. Not one piece of clear cut evidence of anything.
 
> I wouldn't have voted for HRC with a gun to my head. If there were no 3rd party candidate and Trump was the only alternative it would have taken a gun to my head to vote for Trump.
 
> My point is, show me the evidence. Anything. One memo, one recorded conversation. A hand written note...something other than a people filled with a level of hatred so intense no one could succeed.
 
Influenced |= Rigged.
 
There are two congressional investigations on top of an FBI investigation on Trump/Trump's campaign as he/it relates to Russia. The evidence, if it exists, will come out eventually.
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <iamtj4life@gmail.com>: May 16 06:30AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 7:29:12 AM UTC-5, unclejr wrote:
> > > Unbefckinglievable.
 
> > I'm still waiting to see any evidence of election rigging.
 
> Rigging? No one's claiming this.
 
Um.....or are you saying hacking/rigging are different?
unclejr <watsona64@gmail.com>: May 16 06:35AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 8:30:56 AM UTC-5, The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior wrote:
 
> > > I'm still waiting to see any evidence of election rigging.
 
> > Rigging? No one's claiming this.
 
> Um.....or are you saying hacking/rigging are different?
 
Yes.
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <iamtj4life@gmail.com>: May 16 06:53AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 8:35:09 AM UTC-5, unclejr wrote:
 
> > > Rigging? No one's claiming this.
 
> > Um.....or are you saying hacking/rigging are different?
 
> Yes.
 
Looks like you poasted this just as I was asking...
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <iamtj4life@gmail.com>: May 16 07:09AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 7:29:12 AM UTC-5, unclejr wrote:
> > > Unbefckinglievable.
 
> > I'm still waiting to see any evidence of election rigging.
 
> Rigging? No one's claiming this.
 
New DNC chair Perez? does he count?
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/dnc-tom-perez-donald-trump-russia-putin-investigation-chairman-rigged-election-a7601961.html
dotslashderek@gmail.com: May 16 07:23AM -0700

Why does this have to be partisan?
 
Nothing is going to change the outcome of the election. Everyone can agree on that.
 
We don't want Russia hacking US assets to attempt to influence our elections. Everyone can agree on that.
 
We don't want candidates reaching out to Russia to offer them some sort of pay (in hacking assets) to play relationship. We can all agree to that.
 
I don't think the current dust up has anything to do with the above. It's regarding allegations that trump unknowingly discussed classified intelligence with Russian officials. Again, why is this partisan? That's a stupid thing to do and he should correct to make sure it doesn't happen again. Case closed.
 
The fact that we have to make everything partisan and us vs them is what's driving this country to extremism on both sides. And it's made every single rsfc-politics poaster, including myself, a hypocrite at one time or another. They did x, oH my god how could they do that. We did x, no big deal.
 
Cheers.
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <iamtj4life@gmail.com>: May 16 07:30AM -0700

> Why does this have to be partisan?
 
It wasn't deliberate - just happened to be the first google search return
 
OTOH, it certainly is likely always going to be political given the story IS deeply political in nature.

> Nothing is going to change the outcome of the election. Everyone can agree on that.
 
> We don't want Russia hacking US assets to attempt to influence our elections. Everyone can agree on that.
 
Sure - and I'm pretty sure we don't want other countries doing the same either - or their press agents.
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 16 02:38PM

On Tue, 16 May 2017 05:32:01 -0700 (PDT), unclejr
>> > do, the Trumpkins love and defend him. UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE!
 
>> Still better than HRC.
 
>Debatable. One thing for sure is that THANKFULLY we will never know.
 
Edited by Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 16 02:43PM

On Tue, 16 May 2017 06:30:10 -0700 (PDT), unclejr
 
>> My point is, show me the evidence. Anything. One memo, one recorded conversation. A hand written note...something other than a people filled with a level of hatred so intense no one could succeed.
 
>Influenced |= Rigged.
 
>There are two congressional investigations on top of an FBI investigation on Trump/Trump's campaign as he/it relates to Russia. The evidence, if it exists, will come out eventually.
 
Influence is not the new kid on the block. Foreign aid has existed for
a L O N G time.
 
If they find Russian influence, so what?
 
How ironic that Russia would not prefer Obama socialism to Trump
conservatism for Les Etats Unis.
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
"Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger" <damonhynes@gmail.com>: May 16 08:04AM -0700

D00d, we do it to them, and not a peep from the professional pearl-clutchers.
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <iamtj4life@gmail.com>: May 16 08:10AM -0700

On Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 10:04:49 AM UTC-5, Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger wrote:
> D00d, we do it to them, and not a peep from the professional pearl-clutchers.
 
but that's different!!!!11!
 
Actually, the locals almost certainly *hate* it.
Futbol Phan <sgzphd@gmail.com>: May 16 08:24AM -0700

On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 11:29:58 PM UTC-5, RoddyMcCorley wrote:
 
> > You like this shit show after just 116 days?
 
> That is the amazing thing: no matter what the fucktard and his minions
> do, the Trumpkins love and defend him. UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE!
 
Well it can't be a good omen when you've lost lovely Ann Coulter (author, I must remind you, of "in Trump We Trust":
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/coulter-disappointment-donald-trump_us_591a4014e4b07d5f6ba578e4?iq&ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009
 
The money shot: ""Everyone who voted for him knew his personality was grotesque," but it was the issues, the conservative commentator and author told The Daily Caller in an interview Sunday. Now, as far as the issues go, "boy, things don't look good," she said.
Futbol Phan <sgzphd@gmail.com>: May 16 08:25AM -0700

On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 11:43:22 PM UTC-5, Ken Olson wrote:
 
> > That is the amazing thing: no matter what the fucktard and his minions
> > do, the Trumpkins love and defend him. UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE!
 
> Still better than HRC.
 
I've never owned a parrot. But I think I understand what it would be like to have one.
"the_andrew_smith@yahoo.com" <agavinsmith@gmail.com>: May 16 07:37AM -0700

It did. Some folks can't let it go.
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 16 02:46PM

On Tue, 16 May 2017 05:30:41 -0700 (PDT), unclejr
>> Charlie Weis was paid over $60MM for a losing record.
 
>> You have quarterly reviews with an incapable clown to justify your continued employment.
 
>This sidetracked into a Trump thread quickly.
 
Just a continuation from the previous 8 years...
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 16 02:37PM

On Tue, 16 May 2017 05:22:31 -0700 (PDT), "the_andrew_smith@yahoo.com"
 
>I suspect an overwhelming majority of patients were at zero risk of loss of limb or life.
 
>A hospital that couldn't treat someone because their "computer" was down is inept.
 
Au contraire, my wife and I find that doctors associated with the
hospital, even in private practice, spend visit time on the computer.
I suppose they ask about your complaints, set up tests and review
them. That makes it dependent on the patient to diagnose himself.
 
My view is that doctors no longer have any diagnostic ability and we
are being treated by computer engineers and analysists. When the
computer is down he has no guidance. That may be the future but I am
the past.
 
I am told that deviation from past tests is their indicator, not out
of range tests. But I have my lab tests for 30 years on the computer
and doctors don't. I don't have the expertise to create a program to
make a composite of the tests that would allow for change in test name
and range.
 
Hugh
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
plaidmoon@gmail.com: May 16 07:20AM -0700

Go take another look. It wasn't Jeff Sessions. Similar name, different dude.
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: May 16 07:24AM -0700

> Go take another look. It wasn't Jeff Sessions. Similar name, different dude.
 
William != Jeff
"the_andrew_smith@yahoo.com" <agavinsmith@gmail.com>: May 16 07:36AM -0700

Family Circle?
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: May 16 06:45AM -0700

On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 11:39:33 PM UTC-4, Some dued wrote:
> When will it end?
 
> http://ew.com/tv/2017/05/15/last-man-standing-cancelation-abc-boycott/
 
PA1D PR0TESTERS!1!!!
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: May 16 07:28AM -0700

On Monday, May 15, 2017 at 11:39:33 PM UTC-4, Some dued wrote:
> When will it end?
 
> http://ew.com/tv/2017/05/15/last-man-standing-cancelation-abc-boycott/
 
Btw the linked article does give more insight on why the show might have been cancelled, and it's not to screw a Trump supporter.
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 16 12:17PM

On Mon, 15 May 2017 15:45:35 -0700 (PDT), michael anderson
>fender here) are guilty of this- prescribing a 600 dollar/month drug when o=
>ne exists for 5 dollars/month that the evidence shows works roughly as well=
>(or doesn't work that well just as good).
 
Don't prescribers have more of an obligation to serve the patient in
all respects than you do the reps?
 
Medicare doesn't have money - it's taxpayer money. Tax payer? That's
you.
 
Hugh
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.football.college+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment