Digest for rec.sport.football.college@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 12 topics

Monday, May 1, 2017

Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: May 01 06:17PM -0400

On 5/1/2017 7:49 AM, xyzzy wrote:
> It is when you guys cite it apparently
 
I don't know. I don't use it.
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 01 04:58PM -0700

In article <oe68fq$635$1@dont-email.me>, "wolfie" <bgbdwolf@gte.net>
wrote:
 
 
> No, she called someone out on hypocrisy.
> Snarky responses don't change the fact
> she was right.
 
 
Ben Shapiro is right too, and for the exact same reason:
calling a politician a hypocrite.
 
#LightItUpBlue for #AutismAwareness. pic.twitter.com/uaNcgJPgYK
— Paul Ryan (@SpeakerRyan) April 2, 2017
<https://mobile.twitter.com/SpeakerRyan/status/848535842465488898/photo/1>
 
Words without action are … meaningless. Words with inaction are …
just words. Words with opposite action is … hypocrisy.
https://t.co/hLYUiZT5tN
— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) April 2, 2017
 
Glad you tweeted something about it. https://t.co/oYhIMlZcvr
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) April 28, 2017
 
Sarcasm may not translate on Twitter. The Republican healthcare
plan wld let states cut #autism coverage. That cruelty needs no
translation. https://t.co/ttUnbmfNyb
— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) April 28, 2017
 
You weren't being sarcastic. Also, this is called "federalism."
Ask your dad about it sometime. https://t.co/M9U9cvv8tT
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) April 28, 2017
 
--
Michael Press
dotslashderek@gmail.com: May 01 04:57PM -0700

"You remind them there is a United States Senate, and it will change things. What we send over there isn't going over there on stone tablets," said Rep. Tom Cole, R-Oklahoma.
 
They change republicare to pull in the wingers and loss the centrists.
 
So they're telling the centrists to be reasonable: vote for something you don't believe is viable and let the other dudes sort it out.
 
Why not. That's, like, their official party motto, right?
 
Cheers.
Michael Press <rubrum@pacbell.net>: May 01 04:53PM -0700

In article <52c6cc9c-a5c4-401d-95c9-a3ff36df8635@googlegroups.com>,
 
> No he's not.
 
So---you deny it.
 
--
Michael Press
Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: May 01 06:40PM -0400

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-politics-religion-idUSKBN17X17Q
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:42AM -0700

On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 12:24:45 PM UTC-7, JGibson wrote:
> Why is it that people are so bitter against the rich?
 
It's a shame that some people actually think people should be paid for their work.
 
/s
 
Mike
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 01 07:17PM


>It's a shame that some people actually think people should be paid for their work.
 
>/s
 
>Mike
 
How do you feel abput being overpaid for their work or not making an
effort?
 
Hugh
 
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: May 01 05:28PM -0400


> It's a shame that some people actually think people should be paid for their work.
 
> /s
 
> Mike
 
I always thought what is referred to as leftovers is actually profit.
"Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger" <damonhynes@gmail.com>: May 01 03:25PM -0700

> I'm so glad my company is private.
 
> Cheers.
 
My previous company was public, but closely held--most of the shares were owned by the founder and his family, so it was essentially private and it was wonderful.
 
Once they retired and sold their shares, the bank that bought us wasn't happy with making a dollar if they could squeeze out $1.01. In doing so, they rotenoned the pond and salted the earth. I understand that's what relentless capitalism is all about, but it was so sad.
"Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger" <damonhynes@gmail.com>: May 01 03:28PM -0700

On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 2:24:45 PM UTC-5, JGibson wrote:
> Why is it that people are so bitter against the rich?
 
If I may ask, who were you quoting? Both Delta American Airlines just moved 1B USD each to employees and the institutional shareholders are crying bloody murder.
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:35AM -0700

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 2:04:40 PM UTC-7, shiite wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 1:26:36 PM UTC-5, xyzzy wrote:
> > https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/trump-defends-birth-control-requirement-under-obamacare/2017/04/25/afc9d5d2-2935-11e7-b605-33413c691853_story.html
 
> He saved us from Hillary. That buys absolution for all sins past, present, future.
 
No, and that's the problem...
 
As I said, his first 100 was a failure to both Left and Right, because many on the Right want fire opened, NOW.
 
Mike
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:37AM -0700

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 6:25:48 PM UTC-7, Some dued wrote:
> If you say that about every opposition candidate you have to admit that you are okay with anything your side does, unconditionally.
 
As many are -- my friend and I like to call them "Jersey [insert party here]", as they are cheering a sports team, and have no real scruples of their own to speak of, Left or Right.
 
Mike
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:38AM -0700

On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 11:22:50 AM UTC-7, Some dued wrote:
> Then you are an abject dolt.
 
Many on both sides are.
 
Mike
Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: May 01 06:05PM -0400


> No, and that's the problem...
 
> As I said, his first 100 was a failure to both Left and Right, because many on the Right want fire opened, NOW.
 
> Mike
 
If he's failed to the right and the left extremes he's likely done the
best that could be done.
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:27AM -0700


> Doing a good job of correcting our foreign policy.
 
> Doing a good job of minimizing the liberal press (seems unable to ignore a personal attack).
 
> A fairly centrist track thus far.
 
Failure to both Left and Right.
 
Left is obvious, but his base on the Right can't think he's remotely going far enough -- being limited by this nasty little thing called a Constitution.
 
Mike
dotslashderek@gmail.com: May 01 11:47AM -0700

Sure, drew.
 
Here's the full passage:
 
"Had Andrew Jackson been a little later you wouldn't have had the Civil War," Trump said. "He was a very tough person, but he had a big heart. And he was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War, [and] he said, 'There's no reason for this.' People don't realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it—why? People don't ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?"
 
"And he was really angry that he saw what was happening with regard to the Civil War". He saw that and was all "there's no reason for this!"
 
Don't worry. I won't point out the irony around you clearly knowing that "later" refered to being potus, not being alive; that you're obviously familiar enough with this gaff to know a read through the entire passage shows trump thought jackson was alive and then, on the spot, invented an entire narrative where jackson was against the civil war.
 
That - knowing all this - you then decided to pull out a tiny half sentence of the entire remark and apply ContextAway judiciously - all so you could shape reality to meet your needs.
 
No worries. I'm used to it. We're all getting used to it. Sad!
 
Cheers.
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): May 01 07:11PM

On Mon, 1 May 2017 10:56:03 -0700 (PDT), Futbol Phan
 
> A total idot.
 
It takes one to know one. You are almost overqualified.
 
Hugh
 
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
Ken Olson <kolson@freedomnet.org>: May 01 05:38PM -0400

On 5/1/2017 1:56 PM, Futbol Phan wrote:
 
>> Cheers.
 
> It is truly frightening to think that this is the most powerful person on Earth. A total idot.
 
> http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/01/politics/donald-trump-civil-war-comments-sirius-interview/index.html
 
Damb, we just got rid of one!
dotslashderek@gmail.com: May 01 11:50AM -0700

I like how they calculated the rate of leak against maximum in-air time and added enough additional physical memory to support it.
 
Yo, old-tymers - wasn't memory pretty pricey back then?
 
Cheers.
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: May 01 02:01PM -0700

> I like how they calculated the rate of leak against maximum in-air time and added enough additional physical memory to support it.
 
> Yo, old-tymers - wasn't memory pretty pricey back then?
 
> Cheers.
 
Yeah but it was military spending so cheaper than a toilet seat.
xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>: May 01 02:03PM -0700

> Pragmatism or laziness.
 
Since when are those different things?
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:41AM -0700

Ligament damage, you could even have a small fracture somewhere in the equation.
 
Turned my ankle BAD 10 or so years ago and had one of those -- NOT FUN.
 
Mike
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:33AM -0700

On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 9:44:39 AM UTC-7, The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior wrote:
> Apparently there was supposed to be a luxury music fest in the Bahamas this weekend - big names, expensive accommodations - basically Coachella for the trust fund set
 
> Not going well
 
> http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fyre-festival-canceled-after-guests-allege-hoax/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=36999788
 
Somebody got woken up -- hard.
 
I hope some of these trust fund babies actually see this is what the rest of the world (evidenced both by the music industry and the thugs) think of them.
 
Mike
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:31AM -0700

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 7:13:08 AM UTC-7, The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior wrote:
> Cutting a lot of shows and on-air talent
 
> Maybe they'll go back to covering sports now?
 
Not a chance. They'll double-down on sports-debate.
 
Mike
darkstar7646@gmail.com: May 01 11:29AM -0700

ESPN is becoming a political screaming network, using sports as the platform.
 
I guess they see what their master, Herr Goodell, has been doing for the last 16 years and is finally converting over to a full debate format.
 
Mike
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.football.college+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

0 comments:

Post a Comment