Digest for rec.sport.pro-wrestling@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 10 topics

Wednesday, May 31, 2017

fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:46PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 1:45:33 AM UTC-4, The Chad wrote:
> 99d7-84132456aad2@googlegroups.com:
 
> > Nowhere to be found
 
> You should try watching something besides Fox News.
 
 
you should try having a life other than RSPW.
"Jason Todd!!!" <janklowicz24@yahoo.com>: May 31 08:50PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 7:33:48 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> Lol that's awesome
 
So we have a double standard?
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 09:22PM -0700

Dude she held his severed head and laughed about it
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 09:22PM -0700

Just wondering
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 08:45PM -0700

robert stickler wrote:
> hell yeah
 
chad steals from my posts
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 09:21PM -0700

No
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 07:58PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 10:39:57 PM UTC-4, % wrote:
> > i read on average 20 veterans a day commit suicide. how would you
> > stop this?
 
> give them a job
 
umm, that isn't the answer. jobs are not that hard to get.
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:43PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 10:35:57 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> i read on average 20 veterans a day commit suicide. how would you stop this?
 
 
Stalk them online and threaten to tell their employers?
Post through an anonymous server and attempt to insult them?
Create a sock puppet after they die and claim to be them?
 
Or maybe rifle through their underwear drawers looking for vibrators. Chadlee's REALLY good at that...
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:44PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 10:59:00 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> > > stop this?
 
> > give them a job
 
> umm, that isn't the answer. jobs are not that hard to get.
 
 
Yes, but you have already taken all the gullible dimwit ones.
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 08:44PM -0700

robert stickler wrote:
>>> stop this?
 
>> give them a job
 
> umm, that isn't the answer. jobs are not that hard to get.
 
yea they are for most vets they are
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 09:21PM -0700

Chad hasn't answered
Lou Proctor <louproctor@aol.com>: Jun 01 03:11AM

fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com wrote in news:b1a8aee0-9713-4ab1-8395-
>> > Dink is a sock of Lou proctor
 
>> No, he's not. Lou Proctor is someone else's sock, I think. Not sure who.
 
> Yea, because it's not like it's obvious or anything...
 
It's obvious that you're a liar.
You're also unemployed.
 
Lou Proctor
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 08:31PM -0700

Lou proctor is unemployed
Lou Proctor <louproctor@aol.com>: Jun 01 03:32AM

robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com> wrote in news:592d1cae-02e8-4607-8cea-
 
> Lou proctor is unemployed
 
I have a good job.
It isn't one that a trainable retard like you can do.
 
Lou Proctor
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:39PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 11:11:33 PM UTC-4, Lou Proctor wrote:
 
> It's obvious that you're a liar.
> You're also unemployed.
 
> Lou Proctor
 
 
 
Nope on both counts, Chadlee.
Your trolling really sucks right now.
 
Did you get distracted by a donut or something?
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:40PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 11:32:41 PM UTC-4, Lou Proctor wrote:
 
> I have a good job.
> It isn't one that a trainable retard like you can do.
 
> Lou Proctor
 
 
begging for change on the street with a sign that reads "STUPID. PLEASE HELP" isn't exactly considered as a "job"...
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 09:20PM -0700

Lou proctor has no job
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:45PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 9:42:43 PM UTC-4, Janithor wrote:
 
> > you must be bored, Chadlee.
 
> Finally we agree on something. Smacking you down is getting so easy, of
> course he's bored.
 
 
 
Nice of you to admit that Lou Proctor is a Chadlee Bryant sock puppet.
Lou Proctor <louproctor@aol.com>: Jun 01 03:16AM

Does his asshole still gurgle his dead dad's semen?
Or is Lane making him a prison bitch now?
 
Lou Proctor
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:44PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 11:16:10 PM UTC-4, Lou Proctor wrote:
> Does his asshole still gurgle his dead dad's semen?
> Or is Lane making him a prison bitch now?
 
> Lou Proctor
 
 
You really need to stop attempts at stalking, Chadlee.
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 08:44PM -0700

robert stickler wrote:
>>> He died
 
>> who
 
> captain lou
 
lou who
Lou Proctor <louproctor@aol.com>: Jun 01 03:10AM

fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com wrote in
 
> But Chadlee. Surely you have been stalking me enough to know?
 
> I guess when you can't afford intellius you have to just make shit up
> or throw out random guesses.
 
See what I mean about your bullshit claims?
You can never keep your stories straight, puto.
 
Lou Proctor
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:41PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 9:39:37 PM UTC-4, Lou Proctor wrote:
> > the poorly educated virginal milksop who lives with his
> > mommy and step-daddy.
 
> You live with your mommy, Dink.
 
 
Scott Off is not me, Chadlee.
I would not put it past you, however, to create a sock puppet using your favorite quasi-anonymous server, and then respond to it and claim that it is me. You are just that batshit crazy.
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 08:42PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 11:10:56 PM UTC-4, Lou Proctor wrote:
 
> > I guess when you can't afford intellius you have to just make shit up
> > or throw out random guesses.
 
> See what I mean about your bullshit claims?
 
 
Soooooo you didn't use intellius to stalk me, then?
What service DID you use?
 
How are Krusty's wedding photos, by the way?
Still staring at them in a jealous rage?
 
 
> You can never keep your stories straight, puto.
 
 
You can never create your sockpupppets believable, Fatass.
 
 
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 05:33PM -0700

robert stickler wrote:
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.pro-wrestling+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.pro-wrestling@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 9 topics

robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 07:35PM -0700

i read on average 20 veterans a day commit suicide. how would you stop this?
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 07:39PM -0700

robert stickler wrote:
> i read on average 20 veterans a day commit suicide. how would you
> stop this?
 
give them a job
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 07:39PM -0700

hell yeah
Lou Proctor <louproctor@aol.com>: Jun 01 01:14AM

fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com wrote in news:0739dd7c-1881-4bcc-9149-
 
> On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 5:21:50 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
>> Dink stays in his moms' basement
 
> I have a job, you brain-dead protoplasm.
 
Another food service job, I'm sure.
You're just that pathetic.
 
Lou Proctor
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 06:19PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 9:14:28 PM UTC-4, Lou Proctor wrote:
 
> Another food service job, I'm sure.
> You're just that pathetic.
 
> Lou Proctor
 
 
But Chadlee. Surely you have been stalking me enough to know?
 
I guess when you can't afford intellius you have to just make shit up or throw out random guesses.
Lou Proctor <louproctor@aol.com>: Jun 01 01:39AM


> So says
> the poorly educated virginal milksop who lives with his
> mommy and step-daddy.
 
You live with your mommy, Dink.
What are you going to do when she dies and doesn't leave you the house?
 
Lou Proctor
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 07:38PM -0700


> > Lou Proctor
 
> But Chadlee. Surely you have been stalking me enough to know?
 
> I guess when you can't afford intellius you have to just make shit up or throw out random guesses.
 
dink doesn't have a job. chad proved it.
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 05:34PM -0700

.
 
rules
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 05:45PM -0700

He died
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 06:57PM -0700

robert stickler wrote:
> He died
 
who
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 07:37PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 9:57:24 PM UTC-4, % wrote:
> robert stickler wrote:
> > He died
 
> who
 
captain lou
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 05:34PM -0700

robert stickler wrote:
Lou Proctor <louproctor@aol.com>: Jun 01 01:13AM

fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com wrote in
 
> Sure you have, Chadlee.
> You do realize watching the television channel does not classify you
> are "attending", right?
 
Isn't Sundance held in Utah?
Didn't Chad used to live in Utah?
You're failing, mayo moron.
 
Lou Proctor
hobbyfan@yahoo.com: May 31 06:15PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 7:34:19 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> Dink is a sock of Lou proctor
 
No, he's not. Lou Proctor is someone else's sock, I think. Not sure who.
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 06:18PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 9:13:24 PM UTC-4, Chadlee Anvil Bryant posing and posting as sock puppet Lou Proctor wrote:
> > You do realize watching the television channel does not classify you
> > are "attending", right?
 
> Isn't Sundance held in Utah?
 
 
But you don't live in EeeewwwTuh anymore.
 
 
> Didn't Chad used to live in Utah?
 
 
Until he got scared and had to run away.
But cowardice tends to have that sort of effect on people.
 
 
> You're failing, mayo moron.
 
You're pathetic, Crisco Kid.
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 06:18PM -0700

> On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 7:34:19 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> > Dink is a sock of Lou proctor
 
> No, he's not. Lou Proctor is someone else's sock, I think. Not sure who.
 
 
Yea, because it's not like it's obvious or anything...
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 06:59PM -0700

Lou Proctor wrote:
> Didn't Chad used to live in Utah?
> You're failing, mayo moron.
 
> Lou Proctor
 
chad is stealing my posts from another group ,
sundances are held all over north america ,
i've been to 22 of them
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 07:37PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 9:59:57 PM UTC-4, % wrote:
 
> chad is stealing my posts from another group ,
> sundances are held all over north america ,
> i've been to 22 of them
 
chad never stole your posts.
mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>: May 31 10:33PM -0400

On 5/31/2017 1:36 PM, robert stickler wrote:
> What could be worse then pretending to be head the president?
 
Inviting people to shoot or hang the president.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNLmi0_216g
 
--
Grizzly H.
Lou Proctor <louproctor@aol.com>: Jun 01 01:15AM

fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com wrote in news:3bedac5d-15dc-43d9-b3f2-
 
>> She should have gifted you 15 credit hours at IU-South Bend, you
>> poorly educated, mollycoddled, Trumpsucking, low rent rube.
 
> She should have aborted him.
 
Your mom should have swallowed.
Or just taken it up her fat ass.
 
Lou Proctor
fitnessforyou2002@yahoo.com: May 31 06:19PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 9:15:12 PM UTC-4, Lou Proctor wrote:
 
> Your mom should have swallowed.
> Or just taken it up her fat ass.
 
> Lou Proctor
 
 
 
you must be bored, Chadlee.
Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net>: May 31 06:42PM -0700

x-no-archive: yes
 
>> Or just taken it up her fat ass.
 
>> Lou Proctor
 
> you must be bored, Chadlee.
 
Finally we agree on something. Smacking you down is getting so easy, of
course he's bored.
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 05:36PM -0700

.
 
lou albano
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: May 31 05:45PM -0700

Who?
" %" <persent@gmail.com>: May 31 05:34PM -0700

robert stickler wrote:
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.pro-wrestling+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 7 topics

Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 06:30PM -0700

One of our wingnuts has expressed is trust for CBS News (well... ...he
left himself an out: he said he trust the CBS News APP), so...
 
<http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-house-intelligence-committee-issues-seven-subpoenas/>
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 04:19PM -0700

On 05/31/2017 03:27 PM, Dene wrote:
>> surprised. I'm also pretty sure that you didn't finish the article
>> for obvious reasons.
 
> Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
Sean Hannity is still has a primetime show. So not so much.
 
When it comes to extremism, Hannity is milk toast compared to Rachel.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 04:25PM -0700

On Wed, 31 May 2017 14:02:14 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gds...@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
>Show me where they haven't.
 
LOL. Exactly the same answer that Alan uses, and .you have nothing but
disdain for him. I'll give you the reposte that always follows; You
brought it up so show where they have.
 
Here is what I know. When I want straight news, I watch Shepherd Smith or read the CBS news app. If I want balanced, entertaining commentary, I watched the Five.
 
There is nothing like this I've seen on CNN or MSNBC. If I'm wrong, enlighten me.
 
Could care less about the OP link written by a former disgruntled employee of a dead guy. I read it and gave it due consideration. I trust my own experience and judgment above all else....especially in this room.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 04:27PM -0700

On 2017-05-31 4:25 PM, Dene wrote:
 
> Here is what I know. When I want straight news, I watch Shepherd Smith or read the CBS news app. If I want balanced, entertaining commentary, I watched the Five.
 
> There is nothing like this I've seen on CNN or MSNBC. If I'm wrong, enlighten me.
 
> Could care less about the OP link written by a former disgruntled employee of a dead guy. I read it and gave it due consideration. I trust my own experience and judgment above all else....especially in this room.
 
So tell us upon which issues surrounding Trump, CBS has differed
significantly from CNN or MSNBC, Greg...
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 04:28PM -0700

On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:55:55 -0700, Alan Baker <alang...@telus.net>
wrote:
- show quoted text -
Nor I, but I know for sure that this conversation happens quite often,
I just don't remember which side you've been on.
 
You're trying to reason with a RAT, BK.
Good luck with that.
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 06:29PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:02:20 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
>> I just don't remember which side you've been on.
 
>I don't think anyone here can find a single instance of me making a
>claim and then insisting the other person prove it's not true.
 
As I said I'm not sure but there have been times that you've pointed
out that someone had made a statement that they needed to prove, or
said that you weren't obliged to prove their statement for them.
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 06:31PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:19:07 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
 
>> Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
>Sean Hannity is still has a primetime show. So not so much.
 
>When it comes to extremism, Hannity is milk toast compared to Rachel.
 
That has nothing to do with the OP. Goalpost move.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 04:34PM -0700

On 2017-05-31 4:28 PM, Dene wrote:
> I just don't remember which side you've been on.
 
> You're trying to reason with a RAT, BK.
> Good luck with that.
 
And you're trying to have it both ways:
 
Claim you've killfiled me, but then still turn around and try to insult me.
 
Class, Greg: you're all class.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 04:35PM -0700


> As I said I'm not sure but there have been times that you've pointed
> out that someone had made a statement that they needed to prove, or
> said that you weren't obliged to prove their statement for them.
 
I've certainly done both of those...
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 06:38PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:25:42 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>brought it up so show where they have.
 
>Here is what I know. When I want straight news, I watch Shepherd Smith or read the CBS news app. If I want balanced, entertaining commentary, I watched the Five.
 
>There is nothing like this I've seen on CNN or MSNBC. If I'm wrong, enlighten me.
 
That isn't the thrust of this thread.
 
 
>Could care less about the OP link written by a former disgruntled employee of a dead guy.
> I read it and gave it due consideration. I trust my own experience and judgment above all else....especially in this room.
 
That's pretty bold. There are those in this room that have more
experience and judgment than the rest of us in many areas.l
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 06:40PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:28:32 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>I just don't remember which side you've been on.
 
>You're trying to reason with a RAT, BK.
>Good luck with that.
 
My hope was to be able to reason with you on this Greg.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 04:41PM -0700


>> You're trying to reason with a RAT, BK.
>> Good luck with that.
 
> My hope was to be able to reason with you on this Greg.
 
I think you've seen how well that's working...
 
:-)
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 05:06PM -0700


> >Sean Hannity is still has a primetime show. So not so much.
 
> >When it comes to extremism, Hannity is milk toast compared to Rachel.
 
> That has nothing to do with the OP. Goalpost move.
 
Since when, in this room, does a thread not wander?
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 05:07PM -0700

> > I read it and gave it due consideration. I trust my own experience and judgment above all else....especially in this room.
 
> That's pretty bold. There are those in this room that have more
> experience and judgment than the rest of us in many areas.l
 
Then answer my question....where am I wrong with my experience and judgment?
 
-Greg
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 05:07PM -0700


> >You're trying to reason with a RAT, BK.
> >Good luck with that.
 
> My hope was to be able to reason with you on this Greg.
 
I'm listening.
Conversion is a different story.
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 07:58PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 17:07:01 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> experience and judgment than the rest of us in many areas.l
 
>Then answer my question....where am I wrong with my experience and judgment?
 
>-Greg
 
Here.
"I trust my own experience and judgment above all else".
IMO that's too broad in any venue.
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 08:00PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 19:29:41 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>> That's pretty bold. There are those in this room that have more
>> experience and judgment than the rest of us in many areas.l
 
>Thank you BK.
 
I don't know a thing about elevator buttons. That would be it in your
case.
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 31 06:09PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 5:34:47 PM UTC-4, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> > Read the entire thread, blathering idiot. BK was the one who made the claims.
 
> With which you tacitly agreed, Greg, but to which you countered that
> "they've evolved".
 
And here's the cite where Greg made that claim:
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/8EA9-6jfTFg/f97onCnOCAAJ>
 
Oh, and while we're at it, here's Greg's unsubstantiated claim on CNN:
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.golf/8EA9-6jfTFg/ND1d5aLTCAAJ>
 
Kindly now support both, Greg.
 
Oh, and while you're at it, a personal apology to me for your error would also be appreciated.
 
 
-hh
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 31 06:13PM -0700


> Here.
> "I trust my own experience and judgment above all else".
> IMO that's too broad in any venue.
 
Particualrly when one knows that someone else has even MORE
experience and judgement acumen than one's self.
 
To spurn the opportunity to leverage a clearly superior information/
resource base is simply foolish.
 
 
-hh
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com>: Jun 01 02:58AM +0200

Love it.
 
May I add balding asshole.
 
May I add college dropout.
 
May I add no wife, no kids, nothing. Who would want this disgusting animal.
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 31 07:26PM -0500

> can guarantee that the kind of scripting and "hit man" situations
> don't exist there. Fox has a projected raison d'etre laid out by
> Ailes and it stinks.
 
You have never watched CNN obviously.
--
Moderate <nospam@noemail.com>: May 31 07:29PM -0500

> On Wed, 31 May 2017 16:25:42 -0700 .
 
> That's pretty bold. There are those in this room that have more
> experience and judgment than the rest of us in many areas.l
 
Thank you BK.
 
--
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 11:52AM -0700

On 2017-05-31 10:46 AM, Dene wrote:
> Why won't you? YOU'RE the one making the claim: now BACK IT UP!! Of course you CAN'T!!!
 
> You're new here so allow me to give you one piece of advice. You are wasting your time trying to engage Baker in an honest discussion. He only cares about perpetuating the argument into infinity. He's a classic troll. I refer to him as the RAT...resident asshole troll.
 
> Free country. You are welcome to waste your time with the RAT all you want. Most in here have him on full ignore.
 
His initial statement implies he doesn't believe it himself, Greg.
 
So what is the point in arguing that something he already believes is false?
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 10:38AM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 05:32:47 -0500 (CDT), Moderate
 
>>>It was a big nothing.
 
>> You're a big nothing!
 
>The liar lies.
 
We know, but you just can't help yourself. Pity.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: May 31 05:46AM -0400

On 05/30/2017 10:19 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
 
> it, Elizabeth. He just knows Republicans are stupid and they'll buy it."
 
> <https://heisenbergreport.com/2017/05/29/doug-called-elizabeth-spiers-a-loser-and-then-it-all-went-wrong-for-doug/>
 
> <https://twitter.com/espiers/status/868893815490445312/photo/1

Trump is clearly an idiot but like any good grifter he has a good sense for what the suckers want to hear.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.golf@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 4 topics

Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 12:27PM -0700

> outlet you so dearly believe? I'm pretty sure that Mike isn't
> surprised. I'm also pretty sure that you didn't finish the article
> for obvious reasons.
 
Obviously Fox News has evolved.
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: May 31 03:02PM -0500

Dene wrote:
>> surprised. I'm also pretty sure that you didn't finish the article
>> for obvious reasons.
 
> Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
Not to mention Tobin Smith had an axe to grind after getting shitcanned
from Fox after getting caught in SEC stock fraud.
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 03:14PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 12:27:28 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>> surprised. I'm also pretty sure that you didn't finish the article
>> for obvious reasons.
 
>Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 03:28PM -0500


>> Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
>Not to mention Tobin Smith had an axe to grind after getting shitcanned
>from Fox after getting caught in SEC stock fraud.
 
How could he have an axe to grind? He was at odds with the Fox
network's policy on accepting profits from other sources, not because
of getting caught in a penny stock fraud. He wasn't found guilty
until a year after he left Fox.
 
Fox has been shown to be scripted....a fraud in itself.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 01:53PM -0700

On 2017-05-31 1:02 PM, MNMikeW wrote:
 
>> Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
> Not to mention Tobin Smith had an axe to grind after getting shitcanned
> from Fox after getting caught in SEC stock fraud.
 
Then why did he wait so long?
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: May 31 04:01PM -0500

> of getting caught in a penny stock fraud. He wasn't found guilty
> until a year after he left Fox.
 
> Fox has been shown to be scripted....a fraud in itself.
 
You think that shit does not happen all over, you've naive.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 02:02PM -0700

Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
Show me where they haven't.
MNMikeW <mnmiikkew@aol.com>: May 31 04:02PM -0500

>>> for obvious reasons.
 
>> Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
> Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
They aren't NBC.
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 02:07PM -0700

> Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
They aren't NBC.
 
Or CNN...which sadly use to be moderate.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 02:15PM -0700

On 2017-05-31 2:01 PM, MNMikeW wrote:
>> until a year after he left Fox.
 
>> Fox has been shown to be scripted....a fraud in itself.
 
> You think that shit does not happen all over, you've naive.
 
No, Mikey.
 
You and your ilk have been telling us that Fox is the only "fair and
balanced" source...
 
...and this shows how full of it you all are.
 
:-)
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 31 02:16PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 5:02:17 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
> BobbyK wrote:
> > Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
> Show me where they haven't.
 
Role reversal much, Greg?
 
You were the one who made the claim that Fox evolved, so
it is your responsibility to substantiate your claim.
 
And if you can't support it, then withdraw your claim.
 
 
-hh
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 02:16PM -0700

On 2017-05-31 2:02 PM, Dene wrote:
> Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
> Show me where they haven't.
 
You're the one making the claim.
 
You tacitly admit that they were peddling bullshit, and counter that
they've evolved...
 
...but now you punk on actually supporting your claim.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 02:17PM -0700

On 2017-05-31 2:07 PM, Dene wrote:
>> Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
> They aren't NBC.
 
> Or CNN...which sadly use to be moderate.
 
Or still is in a very extreme world.
 
:-)
Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>: May 31 02:20PM -0700

On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 5:02:17 PM UTC-4, Dene wrote:
> BobbyK wrote:
> > Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
> Show me where they haven't.
 
Role reversal much, Greg?
 
You were the one who made the claim that Fox evolved, so
it is your responsibility to substantiate your claim.
 
And if you can't support it, then withdraw your claim.
 
Read the entire thread, blathering idiot. BK was the one who made the claims.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 02:34PM -0700

On 2017-05-31 2:20 PM, Dene wrote:
> it is your responsibility to substantiate your claim.
 
> And if you can't support it, then withdraw your claim.
 
> Read the entire thread, blathering idiot. BK was the one who made the claims.
 
With which you tacitly agreed, Greg, but to which you countered that
"they've evolved".
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 05:48PM -0500

>> until a year after he left Fox.
 
>> Fox has been shown to be scripted....a fraud in itself.
 
>You think that shit does not happen all over, you've naive.
 
I've been around a long time Mike. Have known some of the major
networks' reporters and on-screen anchors for CBS and NBC in LA. I
can guarantee that the kind of scripting and "hit man" situations
don't exist there. Fox has a projected raison d'etre laid out by
Ailes and it stinks.
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 05:53PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 14:02:14 -0700 (PDT), Dene <gdstrue@aol.com>
wrote:
 
>Point one area in which they've evolved to the better.
 
>Show me where they haven't.
 
LOL. Exactly the same answer that Alan uses, and .you have nothing but
disdain for him. I'll give you the reposte that always follows; You
brought it up so show where they have.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 03:55PM -0700


> LOL. Exactly the same answer that Alan uses, and .you have nothing but
> disdain for him. I'll give you the reposte that always follows; You
> brought it up so show where they have.
 
Bobby,
 
I almost never use that answer.
 
I'd remove the almost, but I can't be sure.
 
:-)
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 05:59PM -0500

On Wed, 31 May 2017 15:55:55 -0700, Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>
wrote:
 
 
>I almost never use that answer.
 
>I'd remove the almost, but I can't be sure.
 
>:-)
 
Nor I, but I know for sure that this conversation happens quite often,
I just don't remember which side you've been on.
Carbon <nobrac@nospam.tampabay.rr.com>: May 31 07:00PM -0400

On 05/31/2017 03:27 PM, Dene wrote:
>> surprised. I'm also pretty sure that you didn't finish the article
>> for obvious reasons.
 
> Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
Sean Hannity is still has a primetime show. So not so much.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 04:02PM -0700


>> :-)
 
> Nor I, but I know for sure that this conversation happens quite often,
> I just don't remember which side you've been on.
 
I don't think anyone here can find a single instance of me making a
claim and then insisting the other person prove it's not true.
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 04:03PM -0700

On 2017-05-31 4:00 PM, Carbon wrote:
 
>> Obviously Fox News has evolved.
 
> Sean Hannity is still has a primetime show. So not so much.
 
That would be the same Sean Hannity who is still perpetuating the
utterly fabricated story of Seth Rich and the DNC's emails?
 
:-)
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>: May 31 01:11PM -0700

BobbyK wrote:
 
> >Oh please. They have been under paying for decades.
 
> Oh please. Not so if they haven't signed the agreement yet. How
> stupid can you be? Never mind, we know the answer to that already.
 
If memory serves, the prior agreement dates from 2006, which called
for a budget of 1% of GDP ... which many did achieve.
 
FYI, here's a quick article with a partial chart:
 
<http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/02/daily-chart-11>
 
In any case, even if one wants to point out that the USA spends
more than 2%, the facts of the matter is that the USA's DoD
budget includes allocations for more theaters of operation than
merely EUCOM (the one that's NATO's back yard). All told, the
US has nine (9) different combat commands identified; here's a
quick primer:
 
<http://www.dodlive.mil/2016/08/17/dods-9-combatant-commands-what-they-are-what-they-do/>
 
Now just think about how much smaller the US Navy would be if
we didn't have the Indian or Pacific Oceans as theaters. This
is pretty much why the USA has more carriers (10) than the
rest of the world combined (8), even before we consider that
our nine (9) full-deck amphibious assault ships also do flight
operations and which are bigger than some other countries' carriers.
 
 
-hh
Alan Baker <alangbaker@telus.net>: May 31 12:02PM -0700

<http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-defends-carter-page-whom-he-not-supposed-know>
 
First (March 21, 2016):
 
'RYAN: Thank you… We've heard you're going to be announcing your foreign
policy team shortly… Any you can share with us?
 
TRUMP: Well, I hadn't thought of doing it, but if you want I can give
you some of the names… Walid Phares, who you probably know, PhD, adviser
to the House of Representatives caucus, and counter-terrorism expert;
Carter Page, PhD...'
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/03/21/a-transcript-of-donald-trumps-meeting-with-the-washington-post-editorial-board/>
 
 
Next (January 20, 2017):
 
'The inclusion of Page is of particular interest. Just last week,
incoming White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer told reporters, "Carter
Page is an individual whom the president-elect does not know."'
<http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/new-details-investigation-cast-cloud-over-trump-inauguration>
 
 
And now:
 
'[Trump:] "So now it is reported that the Democrats, who have excoriated
Carter Page about Russia, don't want him to testify. He blows away their
case against him & now wants to clear his name by showing 'the false or
misleading testimony by James Comey, John Brennan…' Witch Hunt!"'
 
So, which is it, wingnuts?
 
How do you reconcile all of that?
BK@Onramp.net: May 31 01:32PM -0500


>On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 7:37:30 PM UTC-7, B...@onramp.net wrote:
<clip>
>> >Just WHEN has Trump lied?
 
>> That nails it. You're a fucking moron.
 
>Thanks: you're as intelligent as a dead slug.
 
LOL. Your question above shows that you have no intelligence at all.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.golf+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.