Digest for rec.sport.football.college@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 7 topics

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Futbol Phan <sgzphd@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:47PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 1:36:27 PM UTC-5, Mercellus Bohren wrote:
 
> I oppose Hugh's solutions because they are self-centered. I oppose them because they are sappy. And I oppose them because they will snooker people of every stripe into believing that matters of racial justice should enter a period of "benign neglect" sometime soon. Hugh does not content himself with fabricating all sorts of unctuous, ad hoc rules and regulations. Rather, Hugh seeks to popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge crude harijans to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy. If he does, that will be the end of the general public knowing that there are some simple truths in this world. First, it's because of his willingness to prevaricate and equivocate that it took no time at all for Hugh to succumb to the demons of greed, power, and wealth. Second, Hugh is undeniably exasperated by the limitations that have thus far denied him the ability to promote tuchungism's traits as normative values to be embraced. And finally, I am not predicting anything specific. I just have a feeling, an intuition, based on several things that are happening now that Hugh will dispense outright misinformation and flashlight-under-the-chin ghost stories faster than you can say "anatomicochirurgical".
 
> It is hardly surprising that Hugh wants to contaminate clear thinking with his neo-malignant theories. After all, this is the same uncongenial phony whose pusillanimous prattle informed us that violence directed at his nemeses is morally justified. Apparently, he claims to be fighting for equality. What Hugh is really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that if Hugh wants to complain, he should have an argument. He shouldn't just throw out the word "saccharogalactorrhea", for example, and expect us to be scared. His apocrisiaries do not concern themselves much with the people around them. This means, in particular, that we've all heard his pontifical pronouncement that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of fetishism. Obviously, that conclusion is based on unconfirmed gossip, questionably-sourced reports, and blatant speculation, but it's also the case that Hugh's dream is to mollycoddle imprudent shirkers. Then, just to twist the knife a little, he'll draw unsuspecting slackers into the orbit of childish, prudish finks.
 
> The drivel emanating freely from Hugh's mouth gives me cause to reach for the nearest vomit pail. Not that I've come to expect any better from Hugh. His comrades are more determined than most scary, foul-mouthed stirrers. Hugh doesn't want to discuss that, of course. He'd rather be out viewing countries and the people that live in them either as economic targets to be exploited or as military targets to be defeated. What this tells us is that the term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of Hugh. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I, not being one of the many mendacious nabobs of opportunism of this world, believe that Hugh obviously believes that he can absorb mana by devouring his critics' brains. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Hugh needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that it has long been obvious to attentive observers that the dominant opinion of the day proclaims that he has let his pathetic nature get the better of him. But did you know that Hugh's insensate, complacent apothegms represent a thinly veiled attempt to fortify a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries? He doesn't want you to know that because he has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then the most homophobic rotters you'll ever see will be free to drive us into a state of apoplexy. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how I cannot compromise with Hugh; he is without principles. I cannot reason with him; he is without reason. But I can warn him and with a warning he must truly take to heart: Hugh's stories about onanism are particularly ridden with errors and distortions, even leaving aside the concept's initial implausibility. In closing, please remember that my ultimate goal is to stand up and fight for our heritage, traditions, and values. If I advance, follow me. If I stop, urge me on. If I retreat, kill me.
 
Funny, I was thinking the same thing.
michael anderson <mianderson79@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:02PM -0700

Puerto Rico I mean of course....
 
I've heard one obstacle to getting them back on track(in terms of attracting business and growing the economy) is the minimum wage....which is 3 times higher than comparable labor in DR. Gee I wonder where capital will set up when that is the case.....
 
I read something that said due to bankruptcy court laws and jurisdictions, all the bond holders can just go straight to the utilities and tax revenues to get what they are owed.(and they should). That's going to make am even bigger mess of the country, and the adults over there now who are employable(a dwindling number....a third by some estimates) will flood New York and central Florida.
 
It's not looking good....
"Con Reeder, unhyphenated American" <constance@duxmail.com>: Jun 30 08:17PM -0500

> number....a third by some estimates) will flood New York and central
> Florida.
 
> It's not looking good....
 
Actually, it is an ongoing laboratory for the increased minimum wage.
Lefties talk like it wouldn't make that much difference to
workers except to improve their lots, but the federal minimum wage is
a significant barrier to employment in Puerto Rico, which suffers from
a 14% unemployment rate (40% for young people). One of the proposed
measures for recovery is suspension of the minimum wage. And the bozos
on the left want to double it...
 
--
We should not be surprised to find the left concentrated in institutions
where ideas do not have to work in order to survive. -- Thomas Sowell
"Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger" <damonhynes@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:24PM -0700

Sell it to Cuba.
"Con Reeder, unhyphenated American" <constance@duxmail.com>: Jun 30 10:44PM -0500

> Sell it to Cuba.
 
I don't think they have enough cigars...
 
--
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in
overalls and looks like work. -- Thomas Edison
andre.ervin@gmail.com: Jun 30 07:56PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 7:36:32 PM UTC-4, YosemiteSam wrote:
 
> > slavery or death doesn't seem like much of a choice to me.
 
> > Doug
 
> Obviously. Nonetheless, the blacks today who make reasonable arguments in stating their support for the confederate flag shouldn't dismissed outright.
 
Oh yes. Let's elevate the internalized racism of a handful of black people over a stupid flag even as we discount the arguments backed by actual historical documents of far *more* black people. Because that's fair. Because that's not utterly *humiliating* to a people already having faced hundreds of years of injustices both small and large.
 
Typical.
jim brown <jimbrowndoc@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 07:12PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 7:31:38 PM UTC-5, The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior wrote:
> and I'm not entirely sure why either - too busy spending my company's money to even read the crop report which moved grains so much.
 
> Record setting day for us in terms of hedging and contracts written - nucking futs.
 
 
 
 
I bailed yesterday on most of what I had left old crop conventional. I see too much good corn for this to have happened....I was WRONG. Cost me $5000 left on the table, because even if I had waited till this morning, I would have sold out when it was up 15 cents.
 
Fortunately, I do a better job of marketing my organic.
 
 
How does your neck of the woods look? We look pretty good....most of iowa, while not perfect, looks pretty good.
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <Iamtj4life@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:32PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:12:38 PM UTC-5, jim brown wrote:
 
> I bailed yesterday on most of what I had left old crop conventional. I see too much good corn for this to have happened....I was WRONG. Cost me $5000 left on the table, because even if I had waited till this morning, I would have sold out when it was up 15 cents.
 
> Fortunately, I do a better job of marketing my organic.
 
> How does your neck of the woods look? We look pretty good....most of iowa, while not perfect, looks pretty good.
 
I hate to say this, but we look fabulous - we're at the top of the crop ratings for good reason - just gorgeous looking crops. Couple of sunny days and it could be silly
"Jim G." <jimgysin@geemail.com.invalid>: Jun 30 02:35PM -0500

J. Hugh Sullivan sent the following on 06/30/2015 at 07:39 AM:
> <jimgysin@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
 
>> Wow. Now I remember why I prefer to mock you indirectly
 
> You thought you wouldn't look as stupid that way.
 
No, I actually gave my reason in the part of my post that you snipped.
Do try to keep up, champ.
 
--
Jim G. | It's baseball season, so all is right with the world
"One man practicing sportsmanship is far better than 50 preaching it."
-- Knute Rockne
"Damon Hynes, Cyclone Ranger" <damonhynes@gmail.com>: Jun 30 09:55AM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 8:32:03 AM UTC-5, Con Reeder, unhyphenated American wrote:
 
> asked Angeliki Psarianou, a 67-year-old retired public servant,
> who stood in the drizzle after arriving too late at one empty
> ATM in the Greek capital."
 
Holy shit. Yeah.
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 30 04:41PM

On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 06:52:06 -0700 (PDT), xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@gmail.com>
wrote:
 
>For a hundred years, GM, and especially Cadillac made the best cars in the world that everyone aspired to.
 
>That's still the case because it was the case in the 1950s, right? Because nothing ever changes.
 
For liberals and other asswipes the only purpose for history is
revision.
 
For many others the reason is to prevent repeated failures which seem
not to bother libs.
 
Hugh
Eagle@bellsouth.net (J. Hugh Sullivan): Jun 30 04:44PM


>Want to see me talk about other stuff? Get certain of your compatriots to stop spouting off about things they have little knowledge on and less interest in having their personal realities challenged.
 
Ah, yes! - the fight started when he hit me back logic.
 
Hugh
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.football.college+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

centralymca@gmail.com: Jun 30 07:08PM -0700

Fednatic
God bless you
Shakes <kvcshake@gmail.com>: Jun 30 09:12PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 3:14:51 AM UTC-7, Fednatic wrote:
 
> >They got mono.
 
> Not mono but the big C. Having chemo and terrible fatigue.
 
> http://www.curetoday.com/articles/adjusted-regimen-of-abraxane-and-gemzar-less-toxic-in-pancreatic-cancer
 
Really sorry to hear that. I think you're being really brave about it.
TennisGuy <Google359@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 10:01PM -0400

On 6/30/2015 7:39 PM, Patrick Kehoe wrote:
>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/wimb/2015/06/30/pete-sampras-roger-federer-wimbledon-record/29505207/
 
> Sorry posted this twice...
 
> P
 
Yeah you're right, nice interview.
 
Just one thing puzzles me though.
It's the posting twice thing.
 
Your second post was made a few minutes after your first.
 
In your second post you mentioned "Sorry posted this twice...".
 
It's almost as if you deliberately posted twice and apologized for doing
it while finishing your second post.
 
I can't think of any other way it could have happened.
 
Please help me! :)
 
(Many people including myself, post twice or even more times.
But when we do, we do so not knowing that we are doing multiple posts.)
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:15PM -0800


> Please help me! :)
 
Huh? He posted it twice, then apologized two minutes later. That or
the US government is bugging your computer over your 9/11 and faked moon
landings evidence.
TennisGuy <Google359@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 10:26PM -0400

On 6/30/2015 7:39 PM, Patrick Kehoe wrote:
>> http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/wimb/2015/06/30/pete-sampras-roger-federer-wimbledon-record/29505207/
 
> Sorry posted this twice...
 
> P
 
OK I think I figured it out now.
 
I noticed now that you started another thread on this close to 7 p.m.
 
Then you must have had a mental lapse where you totally forgot about the
post. ??
 
So you posted about it again around 7:30 starting this thread.
 
Then when you realized you had started two threads, you apologized in
this thread. :)
pltrgyst <nntp@xhost.org>: Jun 30 10:51PM -0400

On 6/30/15 10:26 PM, TennisGuy wrote:
 
> OK I think I figured it out now.
 
Is your last name Gump?
 
-- Larry
TennisGuy <Google359@yahoo.com>: Jul 01 12:01AM -0400

On 6/30/2015 10:15 PM, jdeluise wrote:
 
> Huh? He posted it twice, then apologized two minutes later. That or
> the US government is bugging your computer over your 9/11 and faked moon
> landings evidence.
 
Yes it is rather obvious now.
 
But if you were in my position, where you only read the *second* thread
he started, it wouldn't be nearly as obvious. :)
 
You must be confusing me with someone else re: the faked moon landings
evidence. Never did I write about such things here.
 
But good memory about 9/11 though. :)
TennisGuy <Google359@yahoo.com>: Jul 01 12:09AM -0400

On 6/30/2015 10:15 PM, jdeluise wrote:
 
> Huh? He posted it twice, then apologized two minutes later. That or
> the US government is bugging your computer over your 9/11 and faked moon
> landings evidence.
 
Just to be clear.
 
There is a difference between posting two separate threads about the
same thing..
 
AND
 
posting twice about the same thing in ONE post.
 
I thought he had done the latter.
Comprendez vous?
Shakes <kvcshake@gmail.com>: Jun 30 09:05PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 2:18:50 PM UTC-7, Gracchus wrote:
 
> > > Correct.
> > Wrong, goat is a certainty! Boat is subjective garbage can conjecture, hopium, nonsense!
 
> Hold on there! Didn't you read what Shakes wrote? He didn't merely agree with bob's comment--he certified its truth beyond dispute with "correct." That's when you're supposed to know the matter is settled and cease arguing.
 
Sorry, should've said "Agreed". :)
Shakes <kvcshake@gmail.com>: Jun 30 09:06PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 2:13:39 PM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
> >> they should be same guy.
 
> > Correct.
 
> They probably never were, since you can't quantify BOAT.
 
True. Better way to say would be that BOAE (Best of an Era) should ideally be the same as the Greatest of an Era (GOAE).
Shakes <kvcshake@gmail.com>: Jun 30 09:01PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 5:36:38 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
 
> > P
 
> Nah, I think Agassi and Sampras are ok with each other at this point. Read this article where Sampras writes a letter of advice to his younger self and what he says about Agassi and his career/life. Interesting read:
 
> http://www.theplayerstribune.com/pete-sampras-letter-to-my-younger-self/
 
Yes, I read this the other day. Good one.
Shakes <kvcshake@gmail.com>: Jun 30 09:02PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:01:55 PM UTC-7, Shakes wrote:
 
> > Nah, I think Agassi and Sampras are ok with each other at this point. Read this article where Sampras writes a letter of advice to his younger self and what he says about Agassi and his career/life. Interesting read:
 
> > http://www.theplayerstribune.com/pete-sampras-letter-to-my-younger-self/
 
> Yes, I read this the other day. Good one.
 
Some regrets, post retirement, but it's to be expected I think. Overall, I think he gave some good advice.
Ulysses <ulysses@mscomm.com>: Jun 30 06:54PM -0700

YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!
 
http://www.puntodebreak.com/files/wawrinka_body_issue.jpg
 
https://s.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/etFqnc5HMgHdbgGiUKTjaQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://l.yimg.com/os/publish-images/sports/2015-06-30/4a455360-1f20-11e5-8ba4-013390c2d1c0_Wawrinka-ESPN.jpg
TennisGuy <Google359@yahoo.com>: Jul 01 12:03AM -0400

On 6/30/2015 9:54 PM, Ulysses wrote:
> YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!
 
> http://www.puntodebreak.com/files/wawrinka_body_issue.jpg
 
> https://s.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/etFqnc5HMgHdbgGiUKTjaQ--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://l.yimg.com/os/publish-images/sports/2015-06-30/4a455360-1f20-11e5-8ba4-013390c2d1c0_Wawrinka-ESPN.jpg
 
I refuse to even click on the link!
I'm a homophobe. :(
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:25PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:19:56 PM UTC-4, jdeluise wrote:
> > address.
 
> I had checked it too and my resources didn't say Houston. Of course it
> very well still could be Raja...
 
Just inquiring is the paki, newguy is hoss, hoss and pepper!
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:33PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 6:19:56 PM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
> > address.
 
> I had checked it too and my resources didn't say Houston. Of course it
> very well still could be Raja...
 
Careful...TJT will accuse you of stalking again.
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 06:41PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:19:56 PM UTC-4, jdeluise wrote:
 
> > address.
 
> I had checked it too and my resources didn't say Houston. Of course it
> very well still could be Raja...
 
When I looked up the posting host it said Houston. It's him.
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:11PM -0800


> When I looked up the posting host it said Houston. It's him.
 
Well, I looked at a couple more and I see Atlanta... shouldn't be too
hard to draw him out with some well-timed Lendl insults.
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 08:00PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:11:22 PM UTC-4, jdeluise wrote:
 
> > When I looked up the posting host it said Houston. It's him.
 
> Well, I looked at a couple more and I see Atlanta... shouldn't be too
> hard to draw him out with some well-timed Lendl insults.
 
Or bait him with Sharapova pics. Or say that Graf is unattractive. Or tell him you don't think Ingrid Bergman was so beautiful. He goes nuts, lol
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:21PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 8:00:27 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
 
> > Well, I looked at a couple more and I see Atlanta... shouldn't be too
> > hard to draw him out with some well-timed Lendl insults.
 
> Or bait him with Sharapova pics. Or say that Graf is unattractive. Or tell him you don't think Ingrid Bergman was so beautiful. He goes nuts, lol
 
Or to put him over the edge, a list of "Bands that Suck," topped by Led Zeppelin.
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Jun 30 08:44PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 11:21:27 PM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
> > > hard to draw him out with some well-timed Lendl insults.
 
> > Or bait him with Sharapova pics. Or say that Graf is unattractive. Or tell him you don't think Ingrid Bergman was so beautiful. He goes nuts, lol
 
> Or to put him over the edge, a list of "Bands that Suck," topped by Led Zeppelin.
 
Raja knows about as much about Western music as whimpy does about tennis, not very much, youtube hilite clips! Oh dear!
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 06:50PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:13:38 PM UTC-4, Ulysses wrote:
 
> I agree. Courty, do you think Rafa has a chance against Muzzette?
 
I have no idea. I watched Nadal for about five minutes today which is not enough to get a feel for where his game is at. I think Thomaz Bellucci is cute and have always thought so. He looks like the Karate Kid. If he was more famous he would be super popular.

> I also hate Fed's shirt. No collar makes him look cheap out there!
 
I didn't see any of the Federer match and did not see what Federer was wearing.
Ulysses <ulysses@mscomm.com>: Jun 30 07:00PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 6:50:45 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
 
> I have no idea. I watched Nadal for about five minutes today which is not enough to get a feel for where his game is at. I think Thomaz Bellucci is cute and have always thought so. He looks like the Karate Kid. If he was more famous he would be super popular.
 
> > I also hate Fed's shirt. No collar makes him look cheap out there!
 
> I didn't see any of the Federer match and did not see what Federer was wearing.
 
Yeah, Bellucci has great hair and is cute. Check out the nudie pics of Mr. Pockmark I just posted. I never thought I would even remotely think Stanimal was "attractive."
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 08:10PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:00:14 PM UTC-4, Ulysses wrote:
 
> > > I also hate Fed's shirt. No collar makes him look cheap out there!
 
> > I didn't see any of the Federer match and did not see what Federer was wearing.
 
> Yeah, Bellucci has great hair and is cute. Check out the nudie pics of Mr. Pockmark I just posted. I never thought I would even remotely think Stanimal was "attractive."
 
Negative on Mr. Pockmark. I don't find him physically attractive at all. His tennis when on is another story.
 
Bellucci is a doll IMO. :)
heyguys00@gmail.com: Jun 30 08:00PM -0700

Oh sure Mac would win. But if Serena can ace Djokovic twice in a row she can do the same to Mac.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.pro-wrestling@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 10 topics

"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:07PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:01:02 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
 
> > > I long for the glory years of the 80's, especially when Martha Quinn was SO, SO adorable.
 
> > that does a good a job as me explaing it robby you doofus
 
> she's still a host on xm satellite radio's 80s on 8.
 
it just aint the same
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 07:09PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:07:29 PM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
 
> > > that does a good a job as me explaing it robby you doofus
 
> > she's still a host on xm satellite radio's 80s on 8.
 
> it just aint the same
 
i know that bro.
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:09PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:09:12 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
 
> > > she's still a host on xm satellite radio's 80s on 8.
 
> > it just aint the same
 
> i know that bro.
 
you do not dvde
hobbyfan@yahoo.com: Jun 30 07:26PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:01:02 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
 
> > > I long for the glory years of the 80's, especially when Martha Quinn was SO, SO adorable.
 
> > that does a good a job as me explaing it robby you doofus
 
> she's still a host on xm satellite radio's 80s on 8.
 
Yes, I know. I don't own a satellite radio, though. She and the other surviving original VJ's wrote a book a couple of years back. Haven't seen that one, though.
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:15PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:51:35 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> > > Just go get some sun.
 
> > too mufdch uv exposure
 
> but the sun gives you vitamin d.
 
it also gives you skin cancer and ruins the white complexion
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:29PM -0700

.
 
no
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:10PM -0700

.
 
can you blame him
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:10PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:07:49 PM UTC-4, % wrote:
> .
 
> can you blame him
 
no!
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 07:12PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:07:49 PM UTC-4, % wrote:
> .
 
> can you blame him
 
hell yeah.
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:19PM -0700

.
 
why
Unifarva <unifarva@robby.cabal>: Jun 30 10:19PM -0400

On 6/30/2015 10:19 PM, % wrote:
> .
 
> why
 
not
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:28PM -0700

cause
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:11PM -0700

robert wrote:
 
>>> 9:56 pm
 
>> 7:04
 
> 10:04 pm
 
7:10
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 07:11PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:08:12 PM UTC-4, % wrote:
 
> >> 7:04
 
> > 10:04 pm
 
> 7:10
 
10:11 pm
"%" <persent@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:19PM -0700

robert wrote:
 
>>> 10:04 pm
 
>> 7:10
 
> 10:11 pm
 
7:18
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:08PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:57:39 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 7:26:07 PM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
> > well?
 
> never heard of it.
 
watch tv land
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 07:10PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:08:33 PM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
> > > well?
 
> > never heard of it.
 
> watch tv land
 
i do sometimes.
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:14PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:10:58 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
 
> > > never heard of it.
 
> > watch tv land
 
> i do sometimes.
 
it has too many 80's and 90's shows on
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:13PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:52:38 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> > > Why do these famous actors let themselves get all old?
 
> > its beyong d their control
 
> go swimming in the fountain of youth.
 
theres no such thing
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:12PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:52:56 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
 
> > meh
> > loses its fizz too fast and it makes me queazy
 
> dont take it out of the fridge.
 
but howmy gonna drink it?
robert <rjs2085@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 07:09PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:06:12 PM UTC-4, SPAZZCATAZ. wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:02:47 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
> > yes or no?
 
> snake oil
 
hell yeah?
"SPAZZCATAZ." <unifarva4@gmail.com>: Jun 30 07:11PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 10:09:39 PM UTC-4, robert wrote:
> > > yes or no?
 
> > snake oil
 
> hell yeah?
 
lol you got it
The Brunei Bindlestiff <unifarva@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:05PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 5:34:10 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> I hate Maury!
 
what in fvckhell?
robert stickler <rjs2084@aol.com>: Jun 30 06:51PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:05:22 PM UTC-4, The Brunei Bindlestiff wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 5:34:10 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> > I hate Maury!
 
> what in fvckhell?
 
what in the hell?
The Brunei Bindlestiff <unifarva@gmail.com>: Jun 30 06:06PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 5:33:45 PM UTC-4, robert stickler wrote:
> Why not?
 
you are a habitual liar of great renown
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.pro-wrestling+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Digest for rec.sport.tennis@googlegroups.com - 25 updates in 8 topics

jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jun 30 02:32PM -0800


> Who is this Raja? And why should I be him or her?
 
That's what InsideOut used to answer when asked if he was felangey!
Gracchus <gracchado@gmail.com>: Jun 30 03:41PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 3:32:32 PM UTC-7, jdeluise wrote:
> newguy999444@gmail.com writes:
 
> > Who is this Raja? And why should I be him or her?
 
> That's what InsideOut used to answer when asked if he was felangey!
 
Among other things...including:
 
"Who is trolling, brother?"
 
"This felangey stuff is startin' to piss me off."
 
Neither of these guys are exactly expert shape-shifters. Felangey's biggest mistake was trying to create a persona that came from someplace culturally and physically very far from him, as if that would throw others off the scent. Turned out just the opposite. Raja's approach is a little different, but just as ineffective.
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 05:29PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 6:41:20 PM UTC-4, Gracchus wrote:
 
> "Who is trolling, brother?"
 
> "This felangey stuff is startin' to piss me off."
 
> Neither of these guys are exactly expert shape-shifters. Felangey's biggest mistake was trying to create a persona that came from someplace culturally and physically very far from him, as if that would throw others off the scent. Turned out just the opposite. Raja's approach is a little different, but just as ineffective.
 
It's Raja. He'll crack soon and fess up. ;)
TennisGuy <Google359@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 09:04PM -0400

On 6/30/2015 8:29 PM, Court_1 wrote:
 
>> "This felangey stuff is startin' to piss me off."
 
>> Neither of these guys are exactly expert shape-shifters. Felangey's biggest mistake was trying to create a persona that came from someplace culturally and physically very far from him, as if that would throw others off the scent. Turned out just the opposite. Raja's approach is a little different, but just as ineffective.
 
> It's Raja. He'll crack soon and fess up. ;)
 
Oh no, not the Rock'n Roll / List guy?
Please say no! :(
jdeluise <jdeluise@gmail.com>: Jun 30 05:19PM -0800


> It could be Raja. He is located in Houston according to his IP
> address.
 
I had checked it too and my resources didn't say Houston. Of course it
very well still could be Raja...
grif <griffin_230@hotmail.com>: Jun 30 08:41PM +0100

On 30/06/2015 19:57, Court_1 wrote:
 
>>> Nadal will easily make it the quarters... look at his cupcake draw. Murray will beat him then, but I think Nadal will get a set. McEnroe gave Rafa a grade of B for today's first round. He said his ROS needs to improve and he's still misfiring with his FH. Mac also said Nadal is practicing his serve on the outer courts and he saw him cranking some 125+ MPH serves, though he admitted most of them were missing.
 
>> Did you also hear McEnroe say that he thinks Nadal is not done winning slams?
 
> McEnroe also said the thinks Kyrgios and Zverev will be slam winners out of the current youngsters.
 
I heard his comment about Kyrgios, but not about Zverev. Did he say anything else about Zverev's game ? I've heard people talking him up and know he beat Nole last week, but haven't seen too much of him. He's a bit tall at 6'6".
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 12:45PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 3:41:47 PM UTC-4, grif wrote:

> I heard his comment about Kyrgios, but not about Zverev. Did he say anything else about Zverev's game ? I've heard people talking him up and know he beat Nole last week, but haven't seen too much of him. He's a bit tall at 6'6".
 
All I heard him say was that he thinks Zverev will be a slam winner. I don't know if he said anything more specific after that.
Ulysses <ulysses@mscomm.com>: Jun 30 06:13PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 12:20:12 PM UTC-7, Court_1 wrote:
> > > What a miracle, John Liang and Gracchus told everyone this was absolutely impossible!
 
> > Has he fallen so far that you're ecstatic when he defeats some stooge in the first round of Wimbledon? I'm sure that both Nadal and Federer were glad to get through quickly today, but let's try to keep the event in perspective. R1 is R1.
 
> Nadal and Federer have sickeningly easy draws up until the QF. If they can't get to the QF stage with those draws they both need to retire.
 
I agree. Courty, do you think Rafa has a chance against Muzzette? I thought he was playing solidly today, though his UE's on the FH side are still very noticeable.
 
I also hate Fed's shirt. No collar makes him look cheap out there!
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 30 04:43PM -0700

> How about we take the weight of Serena's boobs and butt and put the equivalent in ankle weights on Sampras or Mac. Seems like a fair equalizer. How would she do then? :-)
 
Trying for the "Ben Wright" award this year, are we Drew?
 
:))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
 
P
Ulysses <ulysses@mscomm.com>: Jun 30 06:09PM -0700

> > and slow."
 
> > ROTFL. Have you seen him play recently? He's in great shape and doesn't NEED to be fast to beat Serena. She's not returning his serve and he would effortlessly return her serve.
 
> You really sure he would *effortlessly* return her serve? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NACXLBczcS0
 
 
Have you seen McEnroe play recently? Either in person or on TV. An effortless refutation to your theory is this: John McEnroe routinely returns the serves of Sampras and Flipper in exo's. Care to compare their deliveries to Serena?
 
What is your projected scoreline in a Serena-Mac match? I don't care what service you choose, it's 1 and 1 for Mac.
Ulysses <ulysses@mscomm.com>: Jun 30 06:10PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 6:09:25 PM UTC-7, Ulysses wrote:
 
> > You really sure he would *effortlessly* return her serve? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NACXLBczcS0
 
> Have you seen McEnroe play recently? Either in person or on TV. An effortless refutation to your theory is this: John McEnroe routinely returns the serves of Sampras and Flipper in exo's. Care to compare their deliveries to Serena?
 
> What is your projected scoreline in a Serena-Mac match? I don't care what service you choose, it's 1 and 1 for Mac.
 
Oops.. meant "surface," not "service."
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 30 03:54PM -0700

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/wimb/2015/06/30/pete-sampras-roger-federer-wimbledon-record/29505207/
Scott <scottl44@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 04:25PM -0700

He usually interviews well. Nice to see he and Agassi can still play exo without killing each other.
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 30 04:38PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 4:25:54 PM UTC-7, Scott wrote:
> He usually interviews well. Nice to see he and Agassi can still play exo without killing each other.
 
Ya... not sure about how they manage all these exo's... because they certainly have a 'strained'/complicated relationship...
 
P
kaennorsing <ljubitsis@hotmail.com>: Jun 30 05:00PM -0700

Op woensdag 1 juli 2015 00:54:34 UTC+2 schreef Patrick Kehoe:
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/wimb/2015/06/30/pete-sampras-roger-federer-wimbledon-record/29505207/
 
Still a hero of mine. Nice read and good to hear he's a fan of his successor. No sour grapes from the man himself... Sounds like a good father as well.
Guypers <gapp111@gmail.com>: Jun 30 05:10PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 8:00:21 PM UTC-4, kaennorsing wrote:
> Op woensdag 1 juli 2015 00:54:34 UTC+2 schreef Patrick Kehoe:
> > http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/wimb/2015/06/30/pete-sampras-roger-federer-wimbledon-record/29505207/
 
> Still a hero of mine. Nice read and good to hear he's a fan of his successor. No sour grapes from the man himself... Sounds like a good father as well.
 
Pete was always real! What you saw was what he was! Lot more real than Agassian, surely?
Court_1 <olympia0000@yahoo.com>: Jun 30 05:36PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 7:38:16 PM UTC-4, Patrick Kehoe wrote:
> > He usually interviews well. Nice to see he and Agassi can still play exo without killing each other.
 
> Ya... not sure about how they manage all these exo's... because they certainly have a 'strained'/complicated relationship...
 
> P
 
Nah, I think Agassi and Sampras are ok with each other at this point. Read this article where Sampras writes a letter of advice to his younger self and what he says about Agassi and his career/life. Interesting read:
 
http://www.theplayerstribune.com/pete-sampras-letter-to-my-younger-self/
Ulysses <ulysses@mscomm.com>: Jun 30 06:06PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 5:10:19 PM UTC-7, Guypers wrote:
> > > http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/wimb/2015/06/30/pete-sampras-roger-federer-wimbledon-record/29505207/
 
> > Still a hero of mine. Nice read and good to hear he's a fan of his successor. No sour grapes from the man himself... Sounds like a good father as well.
 
> Pete was always real! What you saw was what he was! Lot more real than Agassian, surely?
 
Patrick, thanks for posting that, great read.
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 30 04:06PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 12:55:33 PM UTC-7, Tom Undelay wrote:
> But not for long. He's playing Raonic tomorrow.
 
IFFFFFFFFF, Haas can bunt back those returns and make Milos actually 'hit' the ball a few times per rally, he could take Milos out... big ask on getting enough returns in though... Milos certainly seems to be trying to push Rafa out from under that radar cover... :))
 
P
acebharath@gmail.com: Jun 30 04:25PM -0700

That's a big IF Patrick.
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 30 04:41PM -0700

> That's a big IF Patrick.
 
INDEED... :)))))))))))
 
Haas can really play some smooth grass court tennis though... amazing he never did better at Wimbledon... man that guy had one of the worst runs of injury I can think of... he couldn't get though a 6 month period without something MAJOR happening to him...
 
P
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 30 04:36PM -0700

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/wimb/2015/06/30/pete-sampras-roger-federer-wimbledon-record/29505207/
Patrick Kehoe <pkehoe@telus.net>: Jun 30 04:39PM -0700

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 4:36:29 PM UTC-7, Patrick Kehoe wrote:
> http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/tennis/wimb/2015/06/30/pete-sampras-roger-federer-wimbledon-record/29505207/
 
Sorry posted this twice...
 
P
arahim <arahim_arahim@hotmail.com>: Jun 30 04:07PM -0700

Kukushkin sort of gave it away in the last few gams of set one. He played tight. Then they switched to th Duan-Bouchard match and both tried their hardest to lose the first set throwing in double faults, shanks, ugly positioning...finally Bouchard won that battle. Then they switched back to Murray-Kukushkin. Kukushkin played well to get the break back and then go a break up and then as in the first set fell apart when he had the chance. Bouchard continued to grab the initiative to lose.
PeteWasLucky <Waleed.Khedr@gmail.com>: Jun 30 12:29PM -0700

It's more about her opponents wishing her good luck.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to rec.sport.tennis+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.